Bitcoin Forum
July 21, 2018, 12:45:38 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3235 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 415 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 371 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 4019

Pages: « 1 ... 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 [427] 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 ... 1144 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4328514 times)
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 05:10:36 PM
 #8521

I'm doing maintenance on database, so website is down. mining is working.

1532133938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532133938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532133938
Reply with quote  #2

1532133938
Report to moderator
1532133938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532133938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532133938
Reply with quote  #2

1532133938
Report to moderator
1532133938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532133938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532133938
Reply with quote  #2

1532133938
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1532133938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532133938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532133938
Reply with quote  #2

1532133938
Report to moderator
1532133938
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1532133938

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1532133938
Reply with quote  #2

1532133938
Report to moderator
Psyrick
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 05:20:08 PM
 #8522

That's a relief. What a crying shame it would be to waste all that hash.

BORG 1TA3CQfApBtHafdCRkXAUj2XiaHipPgVA
stephengillon
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 05:24:28 PM
 #8523

I know a canadian store that only accepts bitcoins in canada that has some blade

I bought a 7970 from them already wish i had enough for a blade pm me if you want there going for about 55 bitcoins

Accepting donations for help: 1GxiMYdPd4snJyNhwamwhx1Q2PGhNkhAFQ
tiktoc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 21, 2013, 05:28:47 PM
 #8524

I just started mining here a couple days ago with my first ASIC (blade).  Took me a while to get it hashing right because I had some wifi issues interfering but so far so good!

But where are you buying blade?  Am having 300.000,00 rubles for gear, but not finding available.

This is the sales thread for them not sure on the supply though.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204030.0
kgbgk
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 05:43:40 PM
 #8525

Slush,

Glad to hear you're still there, even if lurking. Hope everything works out in all aspects for ya.

Thanks again for the great playground.

k.
felente
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 05:50:18 PM
 #8526

Hi all, I've been quiet here on forum because of work and family problems in recent days, but I was monitoring the pool closely. I'm just telling you that I'm actively solving the problem of high invalids and I'll inform you later about the progress.
I'm doing maintenance on database, so website is down. mining is working.
glad to see you again here Slush.
have worried about a little because of long absence of good pool-operator Smiley
hope anything is right now, or eventually anything will be right (for sure). meaning private life on the first place.
sgbullion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:10:52 PM
 #8527

The namecoin miner just sits there looking like it is doing nothing but as soon as you start running it whenever a block is found you will post the reward for it. Problem is that the frequency of payout's is a lot lower so it just looks like nothing is happening.

http://www.sgbullion.com "bullion for the little guy and we take bitcoin" To donate to my favorite cause 1MXbEx3JpHSfrFmnjfaom9JdsPFuy8PD4g
slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:18:53 PM
 #8528

I've detected problems in bitcoind 0.8.1 where high number of transactions in memory pool caused 100% CPU load on the pool server. Because of this, submitting of new blocks were delayed for tens of seconds and caused high invalid rate.

Sipa (the bitcoin developer) implemented fix for this problem (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2677) which I just tested and implemented to the pool server. I'm watching the pool closely, but the CPU load dropped from 100% back to 2-3%, so everything looks fine so far...

scouzi
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:25:59 PM
 #8529

Seems that ASICMiner is now mining SOLO.
valladex
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:27:20 PM
 #8530

cheers slush.

must have got more of those positive vibes.   Cool
madkind
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:27:37 PM
 #8531

Thank you Slush!

♠♠♠ Bit777.com ♠♠♠ THE PRIME BITCOIN CASINO FEATURING 50+ GAMES. ♠♠♠ PLAY TO WIN BTC NOW! ♠♠♠ (http://www.bit777.com/)
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:28:12 PM
 #8532

I just started mining here a couple days ago with my first ASIC (blade).  Took me a while to get it hashing right because I had some wifi issues interfering but so far so good!

But where are you buying blade?  Am having 300.000,00 rubles for gear, but not finding available.
Look at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204030.0

But if you ask me this price is to hi.
sgbullion
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:46:09 PM
 #8533

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I start at the beginning of every round because I leave my miner running 24/7 and my score goes up and up and up and my reward goes down not sure why there is an inverted relationship between the two. I know I have a slow hash rate but I've got new mining equipment coming so I figured start slow to learn the process.  Huh

Stupid question vs 2.0 I take it that the lack of response to my question is a sign of the complete stupidity of the question or I'm being ignored so could someone please let me know were to find the answer thanks

http://www.sgbullion.com "bullion for the little guy and we take bitcoin" To donate to my favorite cause 1MXbEx3JpHSfrFmnjfaom9JdsPFuy8PD4g
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:50:08 PM
 #8534

Hi Slush nice to see you back. I was really worried that something happened to you.

I've detected problems in bitcoind 0.8.1 where high number of transactions in memory pool caused 100% CPU load on the pool server. Because of this, submitting of new blocks were delayed for tens of seconds and caused high invalid rate.

Sipa (the bitcoin developer) implemented fix for this problem (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2677) which I just tested and implemented to the pool server. I'm watching the pool closely, but the CPU load dropped from 100% back to 2-3%, so everything looks fine so far...
Who told me that I'm an idiot when I say that this might be a problem? Will he apologise?

Also when you are sure that this is fixed can you then please look at the stratums. I think there is also something wrong with them. It looks like they are not recording all the shares. CGminer log was showing much more shares that they were reported on statistic page for some blocks.

This might help:

Stumbled on to where my missing shares may have gone...
Using Windows and GUIMiner to do the mining.

I'm keeping this as brief as possible and ask if you want to converse with me, send me a message from in the system ( click name, compose a message to me and not start some flame war in the thread please )

I've had weird issues with GUIMiner and connecting to Slush's pool using the ' default ' dropdown to connect ( screen blank, system freezes, java suddenly needing to be wiped/re-installed ) so decided to use Slush's mining proxy to ensure some kind of buffer between me and a known Slush's server... Think i may have stumbled on the missing share issue..

first connection to stratum.bitcoin.cz ( the following is pulled lines from the DOS window and yes, full lines )


2013-05-18 08:18:14,015 WARNING proxy mining_proxy.main # Trying to connect to S
tratum pool at stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333

2013-05-18 08:19:23,453 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job f80 for
 prevhash 936c2a37, clean_jobs=True

2013-05-18 08:22:17,125 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job f85 for
 prevhash 043ec4ad, clean_jobs=True

2013-05-18 08:36:07,500 INFO proxy client_service.handle_event # New job f94 for
 prevhash ea0a27c2, clean_jobs=True


all the false, etc, were removed to be easier to read.  The first ' True ' i can't tell if it loaded the work or if it accepted the share as GUIMiner only showed as 2 ' shares ' and nothing for my account page.  However when connecting with the next stratum the edited shows the following.


2013-05-18 08:57:37,296 WARNING proxy mining_proxy.main # Trying to connect to S
tratum pool at stratum2.bitcoin.cz:3333

2013-05-18 09:06:32,437 INFO proxy stratum_listener.submit # [78ms] Share from '
nybbler905.slowworker' accepted, diff 1

and GUIMiner shows 1 block, 2 shares, https://mining.bitcoin.cz/accounts/profile/ shows 1 share...

not using stratum.bitcoin.cz any more.

I also noticed that from time to time some of my miners were jumping over all stratums and getwork to backup pool. Completely same line and configuration. Load balancers?
KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 501


View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:50:15 PM
 #8535

I've detected problems in bitcoind 0.8.1 where high number of transactions in memory pool caused 100% CPU load on the pool server. Because of this, submitting of new blocks were delayed for tens of seconds and caused high invalid rate.

Is it related (or has a chance to be) to the high memory footprint i have observed with 8.1 lately - it goes to 1.8GB almost immedeately (in few minutes) and in less than a week i need to restart it because i get OOM errors on a 4G RAM machine?

P.S. there is a similar (huge delay on block submission) problem to the terracoind i am running, which is 8.0 based i think.

Mega Crypto Polis - www.MegaCryptoPolis.com
BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 21, 2013, 06:52:53 PM
 #8536

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I start at the beginning of every round because I leave my miner running 24/7 and my score goes up and up and up and my reward goes down not sure why there is an inverted relationship between the two. I know I have a slow hash rate but I've got new mining equipment coming so I figured start slow to learn the process.  Huh

Stupid question vs 2.0 I take it that the lack of response to my question is a sign of the complete stupidity of the question or I'm being ignored so could someone please let me know were to find the answer thanks
I would answered you if I noticed you. Can you tell me your hashrate?
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:54:58 PM
 #8537

Round 18133 (block 237220) seems is also invalid ... hopefully that's the last one and Slush's fix will take care of that.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:55:10 PM
 #8538

Also when you are sure that this is fixed can you then please look at the stratums. I think there is also something wrong with them.

I'm experiencing performance problems with some EC2 instances and I'm solving this as well. Sometimes I need to restart pool software on EC2, which causes miners hoping to another IP from DNS roundrobin.

slush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1019



View Profile WWW
May 21, 2013, 06:55:57 PM
 #8539

Round 18133 (block 237220) seems is also invalid ... hopefully that's the last one and Slush's fix will take care of that.

Unfortunately the pool generated this invalid just few minutes before I applied the patch. Hopefully it will be fine now, bitcoind is in a good mood now :-).

KNK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 682
Merit: 501


View Profile
May 21, 2013, 07:01:02 PM
 #8540

Who told me that I'm an idiot when I say that this might be a problem? Will he apologise?

It wasn't me and i don't remember such post from you, but it doesn't matter too much in this case:
All pools are using the same version 8.1 right now as there is just no other choice, so all of them get the same (similar) delay and all of them had increased chance for invalid blocks (reason for the global bad luck lately?), so it was not a problem for the Slush's pool only.

Mega Crypto Polis - www.MegaCryptoPolis.com
BTC tips: 1KNK1akhpethhtcyhKTF2d3PWTQDUWUzHE
Pages: « 1 ... 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 [427] 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 ... 1144 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!