Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 02:18:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 266 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER Speculation Thread  (Read 808659 times)
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 04:06:49 PM
 #2941

div: 0.01355608

very decent div, considering the circumstances
velacreations (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 07:44:53 PM
 #2942

div: 0.01355608

very decent div, considering the circumstances

I agree.  I think we'll see the share price inch back up near 2.4-2.5 with this.  There's still a lot of hardware revenue that wasn't included in this div, and they are still holding back, so actual div was likely closer to .02.

mechs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 11, 2013, 08:51:11 PM
 #2943

div: 0.01355608

very decent div, considering the circumstances

I agree.  I think we'll see the share price inch back up near 2.4-2.5 with this.  There's still a lot of hardware revenue that wasn't included in this div, and they are still holding back, so actual div was likely closer to .02.
The dividend irrelevan right now.  All that matters is the network hash percentage and when they can get their gen 2 hardware out.  They need to beat the competition.
Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 10:52:07 PM
 #2944


Either a large scale BTC buyer owns that address,  or FC hasn't started using his Gen 2 funds. As far as I know, no 55nm-capable foundry accepts bitcoin.

Not to mention he's playing with fire by keeping future fiat liabilities in Bitcoin in the first place. That's like a gold mining company hoarding gold bars to save up for a new mine that they had promised to investors.

Bitcoin -> IC -> Bitcoin
Thats what friedcat does.
The arrows are mysterious, but I doubt you could do better.

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 10:53:22 PM
 #2945


Either a large scale BTC buyer owns that address,  or FC hasn't started using his Gen 2 funds. As far as I know, no 55nm-capable foundry accepts bitcoin.

Not to mention he's playing with fire by keeping future fiat liabilities in Bitcoin in the first place. That's like a gold mining company hoarding gold bars to save up for a new mine that they had promised to investors.

Bitcoin -> IC -> Bitcoin
Thats what friedcat does.
The arrows are mysterious, but I doubt you could do better.
What's IC?

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 10:55:20 PM
 #2946

Integrated Circuit

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 11:00:55 PM
 #2947

Ah, ok!
I see it even like that then  Smiley

Bitcoin -> IC -> Bitcoin

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
velacreations (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 11:03:11 PM
 #2948

The dividend irrelevan right now.  All that matters is the network hash percentage and when they can get their gen 2 hardware out.  They need to beat the competition.

for the mid term, I agree, but for the next few weeks, dividends certainly matter.  And when FC has enough for reinvestment, divs will likely see a boost.

And I bet we'll see a slight increase in share price, too.

Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 11:22:00 PM
 #2949


Either a large scale BTC buyer owns that address,  or FC hasn't started using his Gen 2 funds. As far as I know, no 55nm-capable foundry accepts bitcoin.

Not to mention he's playing with fire by keeping future fiat liabilities in Bitcoin in the first place. That's like a gold mining company hoarding gold bars to save up for a new mine that they had promised to investors.

Bitcoin -> IC -> Bitcoin
Thats what friedcat does.
The arrows are mysterious, but I doubt you could do better.

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.

velacreations (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2013, 11:38:45 PM
 #2950

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.

we don't know that those are what he intends to spend.

he might be saving up for more.  how much does 10 PT/s cost?

chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2013, 11:41:06 PM
 #2951

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.

we don't know that those are what he intends to spend.

he might be saving up for more.  how much does 10 PT/s cost?


It could be collateral. If you are bullish on bitcoin (which I am sure Friedcat is), you would probably want to borrow in RMB and hold bitcoin if you can.
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 12:08:28 AM
 #2952

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.

we don't know that those are what he intends to spend.

he might be saving up for more.  how much does 10 PT/s cost?


It could be collateral. If you are bullish on bitcoin (which I am sure Friedcat is), you would probably want to borrow in RMB and hold bitcoin if you can.

No bank would accept bitcoin as collateral on the equivalent of a $1M+ loan, especially when the revenue for repayment ALSO depends on the stability of BTC/USD.

Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 12:22:03 AM
 #2953

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.
You think you could improve friedcat's business? You are delusional.

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 12:42:43 AM
 #2954

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.
You think you could improve friedcat's business? You are delusional.

Either you are consistently and intentionally misinterpreting very clear statements,  or you have the reading comprehension of a first-grader.

Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 12:48:04 AM
 #2955

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.
You think you could improve friedcat's business? You are delusional.

Either you are consistently and intentionally misinterpreting very clear statements,  or you have the reading comprehension of a first-grader.
What are you going to spend them on genius? You have next to no knowledge of the development and manufacturing plans.
So by trying to do better you would not be attempting to improve the business?

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 12:58:31 AM
 #2956

Well, if I was going to try and do better,  I'd probably start by spending the bitcoins I collected with the intention of spending.
You think you could improve friedcat's business? You are delusional.

Either you are consistently and intentionally misinterpreting very clear statements,  or you have the reading comprehension of a first-grader.
What are you going to spend them on genius? You have next to no knowledge of the development and manufacturing plans.
So by trying to do better you would not be attempting to improve the business?

I actually happen to be a semiconductor process engineer, so watch your claims here.

Foundries usually expect up-front payment from low volume, one-off customers like Friedcat. Assuming he's taped out his design and verified e-beam samples, he needs to open his checkbook for photomask sets, at the very least. He probably needs to pay for the chip batches also.

If he hasn't verified his e-beam samples, I suspect he needs to do so within the next couple of weeks to meet a December deployment deadline. If he's skipping e-beam testing, all the more reason he should be ordering the masks already.

Then there's the matter of assembly.  Maybe he's got some buddies doing his assembly, but if so I'm a little surprised regarding his hubris about price advantage ("invincible"), since anyone could get the same price simply by being a businessman in China.

If he is doing it in-house, then he needs pick and place machines and reflow ovens and so on, because he needs to vastly increase production. That kind of equipment costs money.

Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 01:10:23 AM
 #2957


I actually happen to be a semiconductor process engineer, so watch your claims here.

Foundries usually expect up-front payment from low volume, one-off customers like Friedcat. Assuming he's taped out his design and verified e-beam samples, he needs to open his checkbook for photomask sets, at the very least. He probably needs to pay for the chip batches also.

If he hasn't verified his e-beam samples, I suspect he needs to do so within the next couple of weeks to meet a December deployment deadline. If he's skipping e-beam testing, all the more reason he should be ordering the maska already.

Then there's the matter of assembly. Maybe he's got some buddies doing his assembly, but if so I'm a little surprised regarding his hubris about price advantage ("invincible"), since anyone could get the same price simply by being a businessman in China.

If he is doing it in-house, then he needs pick and place machines and reflow ovens and so on, because he needs to vastly increase production. That kind of equipment costs money.

So by trying to do better you would not be attempting to improve the business?
Can you explain whats wrong with my comprehension here?

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
Vycid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


♫ the AM bear who cares ♫


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 01:13:39 AM
 #2958


I actually happen to be a semiconductor process engineer, so watch your claims here.

Foundries usually expect up-front payment from low volume, one-off customers like Friedcat. Assuming he's taped out his design and verified e-beam samples, he needs to open his checkbook for photomask sets, at the very least. He probably needs to pay for the chip batches also.

If he hasn't verified his e-beam samples, I suspect he needs to do so within the next couple of weeks to meet a December deployment deadline. If he's skipping e-beam testing, all the more reason he should be ordering the maska already.

Then there's the matter of assembly. Maybe he's got some buddies doing his assembly, but if so I'm a little surprised regarding his hubris about price advantage ("invincible"), since anyone could get the same price simply by being a businessman in China.

If he is doing it in-house, then he needs pick and place machines and reflow ovens and so on, because he needs to vastly increase production. That kind of equipment costs money.

So by trying to do better you would not be attempting to improve the business?
Can you explain whats wrong with my comprehansion here?

Sure thing.

IF those things are not happening, there will be no full-scale Gen 2 by December. That would fit the fact he doesn't seem to be spending money.

Are we understanding any better?

Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 01:18:18 AM
 #2959

You misunderstand the clarification I'm looing for. Why was I wrong to assume by trying to do better, that meant improving the business?

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
Vexual
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 12, 2013, 01:22:35 AM
 #2960

To reiterate, you have no knowlegde of what ASICMINER has paid for, and where they are at with development, so why suggest they need to start trading coins to pay invoices? I think friedcat knows his business better than you, despite whatever semiconductor work you have done in the past.

1VEX7x76pJdreV1nJW8bXpotbCNggDxG5
Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 266 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!