Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2024, 12:22:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 [250] 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 880465 times)
jermwerty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 472
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 11:49:45 AM
 #4981

A slightly OT example: For those following along at home who don't get why HF batch 1 customers are so unhappy about their "october" batch 1 units,  compare: Instead of paying 55 BTC months ago for a 400GH HF batch 1 unit with uncertain delivery they could have sat comfortably on their coin and today ordered 3.1 TH/s of antminer for immediate delivery for the same price (or just got 360GH/s for 6.3 BTC).  Even figuring it in terms of USD, the little antminer devices are lower cost per GH/s than hashfast batch 1 devices which are still not shipping.

*sigh....

Yes I wish I had an early KnC order and a Batch1 Avalon.  But I didn't.  I had a batch 2/3 and same thing happened to that Batch 3.  Still pissed.  At least I didn't have BFL.

In bitcoin mining one in the hand beats two in the bush any day...  Pre-orders are simply fail, even KnC would have been fail if BTC hadn't appreciated....

starsoccer9
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1630
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 11:53:23 AM
 #4982


95% increase month over month over month? Bullshit. Not gonna happen.

As i stated, right now our average is 94%. Also it has gone up in past months as much as 140%
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 04:57:33 PM
Last edit: December 25, 2013, 05:13:47 PM by Entropy-uc
 #4983

A slightly OT example: For those following along at home who don't get why HF batch 1 customers are so unhappy about their "october" batch 1 units,  compare: Instead of paying 55 BTC months ago for a 400GH HF batch 1 unit with uncertain delivery they could have sat comfortably on their coin and today ordered 3.1 TH/s of antminer for immediate delivery for the same price (or just got 360GH/s for 6.3 BTC).  Even figuring it in terms of USD, the little antminer devices are lower cost per GH/s than hashfast batch 1 devices which are still not shipping.

*sigh....

Yes I wish I had an early KnC order and a Batch1 Avalon.  But I didn't.  I had a batch 2/3 and same thing happened to that Batch 3.  Still pissed.  At least I didn't have BFL.

In bitcoin mining one in the hand beats two in the bush any day...  Pre-orders are simply fail, even KnC would have been fail if BTC hadn't appreciated....




Don't make the mistake of making equivalence between Avalon and any other supplier.  What Yifu and Ngzhang did was far worse than what any one else has done in this space by a very long distance.

Yifu and Ngzhang stole the batch 2 machines to mine for themselves.  Eventually they delivered the batch 3 machines (months late) to batch 2 and 3 customers.

Hashfast simply followed the BFL model of promising something that couldn't be delivered.  After the BFL example, it was trivial for anyone to know that they were overpromising based on semiconductor fabrication timelines.  Those who bought the first batch without proof of a tapeout knew they were buying into hot air, but greed overwhelmed any rational consideration of doing business on reasonable terms.

Like BFL before them, increases in the exchange rate will bail out Hashfast's early investors.  And BFL and Hashfast will continue to have customers because greed overwhelms all common sense in Bitcoin.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808



View Profile WWW
December 25, 2013, 05:18:44 PM
 #4984

Those who bought the first batch without proof of a tapeout knew they were buying into hot air, but greed overwhelmed any rational consideration of doing business on reasonable terms.
Nah, run the numbers on what return was expected even if everything had gone according to plan. No one who can multiply bought in here because of an abundance of greed, it was never _that_ attractive an offer. The deal needed sweeteners like MPP, refund in BTC, in person meetings, and a partnership with an experienced design house before it sounded attractive.
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 05:32:17 PM
 #4985

Those who bought the first batch without proof of a tapeout knew they were buying into hot air, but greed overwhelmed any rational consideration of doing business on reasonable terms.
Nah, run the numbers on what return was expected even if everything had gone according to plan. No one who can multiply bought in here because of an abundance of greed, it was never _that_ attractive an offer. The deal needed sweeteners like MPP, refund in BTC, in person meetings, and a partnership with an experienced design house before it sounded attractive.


Sorry, but greed is the only thing that can rationalize buying hardware in advance of a working prototype for terms that are 100% down payment and no equity position in the company.

Perhaps you were aware of the math that made the offer appear not compelling.  I am willing to bet that most buyers considered 1 Ph/s by this time as very unlikely.  And the 10 Ph/s we actually have would have been considered laughable.

A review of mining bond prices, or cloud hashing prices should make it obvious that the market is still dominated by math challenged fools.

Hopefully this latest debacle will teach people to insist on doing business on reasonable terms.  It has been an intensely frustrating 18 months being driven out of the market by irrational "TAKE MY MONEY NOW!" speculators.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 05:40:45 PM
 #4986

I'm sorry entropy, but you are wrong. At least in my case and in many others. It wasn't greed that made me buy from HF, it was stupidity. I knew that a full ROI was improbable to say it at last, but i wanted to mine anyway.

However, accusing us doesn't help HF. Btw, if HF delivered as promised in October, and delivered the MPP as promised, we would be in a good position.

So the problem isn't the stupid customer, the problem is the company of scammers.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
ninjarobot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 761
Merit: 500


Mine Silent, Mine Deep


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 05:43:51 PM
 #4987

There is enough blame to pass around for everybody. Merry Xmas!
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 05:46:09 PM
 #4988

I'm sorry entropy, but you are wrong. At least in my case and in many others. It wasn't greed that made me buy from HF, it was stupidity. I knew that a full ROI was improbable to say it at last, but i wanted to mine anyway.

However, accusing us doesn't help HF. Btw, if HF delivered as promised in October, and delivered the MPP as promised, we would be in a good position.

So the problem isn't the stupid customer, the problem is the company of scammers.

Personally, I hope you sue, and get a ruling for a refund in Bitcoin.  It would be a good precedent, and force some sobriety on the supplier side of the table.

But I expect you will take delivery of your machines and shut up, like everyone else in your shoes.

Greed or stupidity; both have the same result.  A market where rational investors are on the sidelines.  (or taking money from the greedy fools - it's a shame I don't have the lack of ethics required for that)
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 05:53:23 PM
 #4989

But I expect you will take delivery of your machines and shut up, like everyone else in your shoes.
This is the only thing that i can assure you won't happen. Unless they overdeliver and create a new standard for how to compensate the customers that you scammed, but i don't think that it will be the case.
However many told me that what you said will happen - people will just shut up once they have they useless machines. I can just hope this to be wrong.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
dopamine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 486
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 06:00:06 PM
 #4990

How long will it take for HashFast gets the Scam Tag?

Bitcoinica still has not given me 50% of my claim of 600 BTC
INTERSANGO can go down with bitcoinica for abandoning customers
Alberto Armandi is a SCAMMER
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 06:05:08 PM
 #4991

How long will it take for HashFast gets the Scam Tag?

Two weeks after BFL does.

Buy & Hold
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 06:09:47 PM
 #4992

A judgement of bitcoins against hashfast would most likely kill the company at this point (my guess is they sold the bulk at ~$150).

I find it unlikely that it will drive sobriety into the ASIC producers.

If I had to guess, it will instead foster the development of private self-mines a la 100TH and Asic Miner, and companies selling hardware to the public will be a thing of the past.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 06:15:29 PM
 #4993

LOL? Don't sue HF because poor company scamming the public will be things of the past in the future if you do so? Really? And they sold at 150 when everyone else was sure that the price was skyrocketing? Yes, sure.
I sold at the top and doubled my BTC stake myself, do you think that HF wouldn't have been able to do so? I don't believe it.

Marry Christmas everyone.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Bogart
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 06:42:51 PM
 #4994

A judgement of bitcoins against hashfast would most likely kill the company at this point (my guess is they sold the bulk at ~$150).

I find it unlikely that it will drive sobriety into the ASIC producers.

If I had to guess, it will instead foster the development of private self-mines a la 100TH and Asic Miner, and companies selling hardware to the public will be a thing of the past.

A deserved death then.  One they brought upon themselves.

I think that such a judgement would indeed serve as a warning to other would-be vendors not to repeat HF's mistakes.  Had this occurred with BFL, HF customers might not be in this position now.

There is nothing inherently wrong with the preorder model.  What's wrong is intentionally misrepresenting the timetable and the risks involved, lying about the progress made, and trying to change the terms of the sale after money has been paid.

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1077


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 07:05:44 PM
 #4995

Don't make the mistake of making equivalence between Avalon and any other supplier.  What Yifu and Ngzhang did was far worse than what any one else has done in this space by a very long distance.

Orly? What Yifu did is by order of magnitude more honest than what ScamFast did, and this comes from a both Avalon and HF victim. Eventually we all got full BTC amount back from Yifu, his greatest sin is destroying the dream of small miners to ever get in the fair mining game with the big boys. ScamFast deliberately lied with the intention to keep most of the BTC and never refund them in full to customers. Avalon is greed and incompetence, HF is pure scam, how can Avalon be worse?
thepostman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 07:06:37 PM
 #4996

...
There is nothing inherently wrong with the preorder model...

As far as miners are concerned, almost everything is wrong with the pre-order model.
It encourages operations like HashFast, players who enter the manufacturing field risking none of their own money.  If their gamble pays off, they become rich.  If it doesn't and the company fails, the actors have lost nothing, while profiting from the money they have paid themselves and their friends in salaries.
jspielberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 255



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 07:10:19 PM
Last edit: December 25, 2013, 08:14:04 PM by jspielberg
 #4997

The sell at 150 is my speculation... Not fact.  I seem to recall in this thread someone saying that they had a successful sales one weekend... But I would have to go searching.

I seem to recall cypherdoc stating it, though I maybe misremembering.  

Some official information sure would be helpful.

Edit:
I think this was the comment that lead me to believe that they sold a bunch in late August.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=262052.msg3036903#msg3036903
mgio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 08:44:42 PM
 #4998

Don't make the mistake of making equivalence between Avalon and any other supplier.  What Yifu and Ngzhang did was far worse than what any one else has done in this space by a very long distance.

Orly? What Yifu did is by order of magnitude more honest than what ScamFast did, and this comes from a both Avalon and HF victim. Eventually we all got full BTC amount back from Yifu, his greatest sin is destroying the dream of small miners to ever get in the fair mining game with the big boys. ScamFast deliberately lied with the intention to keep most of the BTC and never refund them in full to customers. Avalon is greed and incompetence, HF is pure scam, how can Avalon be worse?

Actually wait Avalon does was waaaay worse. They held onto batch 2 orders for 2-3 months while THEY MINED WITH THEM. So not only did they delay shipment if their miners, they actually STOLE money from their customers. I personally lost 60 bitcoins on my batch 2 order because of them. So yeah, Yifu is scum of the earth, almost as bad at the retards from BFL.

Hashfast are angels compared to them.
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
December 25, 2013, 08:46:33 PM
 #4999

Don't make the mistake of making equivalence between Avalon and any other supplier.  What Yifu and Ngzhang did was far worse than what any one else has done in this space by a very long distance.

Orly? What Yifu did is by order of magnitude more honest than what ScamFast did, and this comes from a both Avalon and HF victim. Eventually we all got full BTC amount back from Yifu, his greatest sin is destroying the dream of small miners to ever get in the fair mining game with the big boys. ScamFast deliberately lied with the intention to keep most of the BTC and never refund them in full to customers. Avalon is greed and incompetence, HF is pure scam, how can Avalon be worse?

You obviously haven't been around long enough to have any perspective on the subject beyond your own losses.

BFL promised false shipping dates every day for over a year to keep their pre order cash flow running.  There was no batches, no attempt to give any realistic perspective of time to delivery if you ordered.  Just lies from Josh and abuse against anyone who asked for refunds or actual facts. Hashfast has about 10 months to go before they come close to matching this.

As for Avalon, I calculate Yifu stole on the order of 250 000 bitcoins fron his customers by keeping batch 2 for himself.  Simon has done a terrific job of promising things he can't deliver.  He hasn't stolen what he promised to deliver as of yet.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 25, 2013, 08:47:21 PM
 #5000

Hashfast are angels compared to them.
Losing 85% of your BTC investment is being an angel? Who lost 85% or even 50%+ with Avalon?

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Pages: « 1 ... 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 [250] 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!