Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:25:52 PM |
|
first off all! to everybody! DO NOT accept the procedure according the HF email! Confirmation that you understand USD order totals that were originally paid with BTC can be refunded in BTC at the USD to BTC market exchange rate on the date of refund.
it is a agreement and if you sign it HF is on the save side! the only goal of HF ist to get as many customers as they can to sign this. request a full refund in BTC with market exchange rate on the date of order if you paid in BTC! do this immeditaly after 31 Dec if they fail to deliver. accept NO OTHER agreement and let them know this fact! this is very important, if you sign a contract agreeing to the new terms, you are screwed. That is why this is worded this way. PLEASE DON'T EVER DO THIS! IF THEY SAY YOU WON'T GET A REFUND UNLESS YOU SIGN THEY ARE LYING. If you paid in BTC, only accept that exact amount of BTC in refund. We have seen proof that the policy was in place when orders were made. do we have a full list of all email addresses fo HF batch 1 customers? this information above is very important! no one should sign or agree to this new HF extension of the original TOS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
defcon23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:27:36 PM |
|
I operate Eligius. Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast. -wk Thanx for clarification , all the best wizkid057 ! Cheers !
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:27:42 PM |
|
I operate Eligius. Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast. -wk thx!
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:28:31 PM |
|
when they will say that will ship batch 1?
|
|
|
|
ineededausername
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:28:53 PM |
|
Website down. edit: they were "tinkering around" momentarily...
|
(BFL)^2 < 0
|
|
|
fenwick
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:29:42 PM Last edit: January 06, 2014, 02:04:07 AM by fenwick |
|
first off all! to everybody! DO NOT accept the procedure according the HF email!
Exactly. Confirmation that you understand USD order totals that were originally paid with BTC can be refunded in BTC at the USD to BTC market exchange rate on the date of refund.
it is a agreement and if you sign it HF is on the save side! Exactly. Let me rephrase this letter: Hey you suckers, those of you who are willing to forfeit 85% of their investment without a fight, would you please step forward? By signing this, you are waiving your rights for a full refund. We appreciate your business.
This is what this mail sounds like to my ears. the only goal of HF is to get as many customers as they can to sign this.
request a full refund in BTC with market exchange rate on the date of order if you paid in BTC! do this immeditaly after 31 Dec if they fail to deliver. accept NO OTHER agreement and let them know this fact!
I don't fully agree with this second point. In fact, I think HF has (at least) two goals here: 1. Chips away some of our crucial rights, by entering in to new a understanding with them. 2. Collect info about the "whiners"; those problematic clients who are so arrogant that they actually want to fight for their rights. This second point is important too, because if they know who are the ones who actually know that they are entitled full BTC refunds, they know where to focus their energies! For example, they might want to try to shit their very limited supply of actually working BJs to them, to avoid having to give them BTC refunds. This is why I say that we should withhold this information from them! Information is power, and we are in a war with them. (They started it, but we need to finish it.) So I think we should not respond do this mail at all. There is no reason to. We can demand our refund later, as spelled out in the TOS. Saying "OK" will take our rights away. Saying "F.U." will place us in their attention. I think in this case, silence is golden.
|
|
|
|
edgie13
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:31:05 PM |
|
I did not receive the latest email, but I am not a batch 1 customer. The email seems like their usual psychological tactics. They want you to think that you can't have your BTC back so that you will just give up and accept their terms. They have been running mind games on us from the beginning. They call it marketing.
|
BTC Scotch fund: 1GFZos2WGknCeVgDtjpHwo3jeJ4tSLVrXS
|
|
|
1l1l11ll1l
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:31:29 PM |
|
I operate Eligius. Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast. -wk Thanks for not doxing me wiz!
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:33:53 PM |
|
is impossible somenone return the refund at btc no one company can do that
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:36:44 PM |
|
is impossible somenone return the refund at btc no one company can do that
They were not suppose to use the bitcoins. Our company will auth a credit card, but will not withdraw the funds until we actually ship. They have the coins. if they dont, they need to go to the open market and get them.
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
ninjarobot
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:37:59 PM |
|
is impossible somenone return the refund at btc no one company can do that
According to Cypherdoc (who was being paid by HF at the time) HF has been holding the customer pre-order BTC until the end of year (as they should since they are not allowed to use it to fund development anyway since we are not investors or backers). they want only those committed to leaving their BTC with HashFast until the end of the year. if they fail to deliver, they have said they will give full refunds in BTC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270363.msg2894478#msg2894478
|
|
|
|
perezoso
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:42:19 PM |
|
So I guess the BTC payers generally want to exercise option A?
That is, bitch and moan about getting BTC back, and then probably 95% of you will never file suit. This means Hashfast learned well from BFL. History repeats itself. Eduardo and Fisting Porn dude chuckle and pat themselves on the back, send a thank you note to Inaba.
With option C, however, we have a chance at negotiating better deal. So, better deal for all, or possibly BTC refund for a few people, less lawyer's fees, who have the balls to sue?
Cedivad, I understand your points, but I don't think your suit is responsive to the situation of people who paid in USD. People who paid in USD cannot sue to "get their bitcoins back". So, we can't 'work together' with a lawsuit with your approach. Also, saying that each and every person should sue is a bit silly, as you yourself have noted that the lawsuit route, even if successful, is unlikely to be cost effective for smaller customers.
I don't disrepect your position Cedivad - I think it's a perfectly reasonable response for you - but let's not pretend it really will solve anyone else's problems.
|
|
|
|
miter_myles
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:44:31 PM |
|
is impossible somenone return the refund at btc no one company can do that
According to Cypherdoc (who was being paid by HF at the time) HF has been holding the customer pre-order BTC until the end of year (as they should since they are not allowed to use it to fund development anyway since we are not investors or backers). they want only those committed to leaving their BTC with HashFast until the end of the year. if they fail to deliver, they have said they will give full refunds in BTC. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270363.msg2894478#msg2894478lol - cypherdoc.. the pawn that was paid to keep threads on the main page and blow smoke up peoples asses...
|
BTC - 1D7g5395bs7idApTx1KTXrfDW7JUgzx6Z5 LTC - LVFukQnCWUimBxZuXKqTVKy1L2Jb8kZasL
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:46:38 PM |
|
I don't disrepect your position Cedivad - I think it's a perfectly reasonable response for you - but let's not pretend it really will solve anyone else's problems. I understand and agree completely. You have my complete support in any "white flag" action against HashFast. If there is anything i can help with just ask. On an unrelated note, how many ordered with USD? I guess that it's a minority, i'm i wrong?
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:48:45 PM |
|
The real problem here is that the initial BTC purchase price was too high for the actual delivery date (based on impossible delivery claims).
If the price had gone up 1000x but the units were able to achieve break-even with their purchase price (in BTC), only a few would give a rat's ass that they were "late".
If they want to just cancel and refund... well... that is a very expensive proposition.
My proposal is that they deliver hardware AND refund the difference between the hardware's statistical profitability (after 90 days of receipt of hardware) and the actual purchase price. If they want to provide more hash power at an accelerated rate to reduce the refund difference amount and get to break-even faster, that is fine.
I think that is a somewhat "win-win" proposal.
|
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:57:31 PM |
|
They've been using gmail servers to send their @hashfast.com email.
For the recent emails, yes. The headers of this one, tough... Received: by 10.194.138.199 (10.x is a reserved block, can't be the correct ip) with SMTP id qs7csp90853wjb; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.45.102 (same here) with SMTP id o66mr196684yhb.13.1376696316262; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:58:35 PM |
|
They've been using gmail servers to send their @hashfast.com email.
For the recent emails, yes. The headers of this one, tough... Received: by 10.194.138.199 (10.x is a reserved block, can't be the correct ip) with SMTP id qs7csp90853wjb; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.236.45.102 (same here) with SMTP id o66mr196684yhb.13.1376696316262; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:38:36 -0700 (PDT) 10.x is a local block, and probably is the correct IP...
|
|
|
|
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4172
Merit: 8419
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:59:45 PM Last edit: January 03, 2014, 12:32:15 AM by gmaxwell |
|
The forum trust stuff has largely replaced the scammer tag.
I've gone ahead and and put in a negative rating for Simon Barber, and Hashfast itself.
Am I missing any other parties which acted as agents for hashfast and concretely promoted the belief that if hashfast failed to deliver they would refund the full amount paid?
[Edit: I've removed Cypherdoc because he claims to be a victim too. If I were going to down-rate everyone who in honest ignorance promoted something that turned out badly, I'd need to be down-rating a lot of people. If the trust system had a softer way of making notes on traders I'd still whine, perhaps, but the full distrust is quite forceful]
|
|
|
|
perezoso
|
|
December 29, 2013, 10:01:40 PM |
|
My proposal is that they deliver hardware AND refund the difference between the hardware's statistical profitability (after 90 days of receipt of hardware) and the actual purchase price. If they want to provide more hash power at an accelerated rate to reduce the refund difference amount and get to break-even faster, that is fine.
If you mean that if a BJ earns 2 BTC in 90 days, but I paid 60 BTC for it, then HF should give me 58 BTC, I think that's not one that the company is likely to agree to.
|
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 29, 2013, 10:02:16 PM |
|
You are correct, it's received by, not received from. Sorry. So the information about the sending server should be on the missing headers.
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
|