[Tycho]
|
|
March 05, 2013, 01:31:42 PM |
|
A bug was found and fixed today. This bug possibly caused mining problems for some users since 22-23.03.2013, so now things may get better if you were affected. Today is 05.03.2013 only. It was a typo, should read 02 (feb) instead of 03.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks ! ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures ( NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
|
|
|
gochk
|
|
March 06, 2013, 09:24:33 PM Last edit: March 06, 2013, 09:36:41 PM by gochk |
|
Is deepbit.net having problems? I am freaking out right now ... I cannot withdraw. I click on Instant Payout and it came back with Page Temporarily Unavailable OR Please_wait_2_minutes!
Can anyone help please?
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
March 06, 2013, 11:04:14 PM |
|
It's posted some posts above: Sorry for this. Recent USD/BTC rate rise caused the pool's hot wallet to be drained MUCH faster than usual and I had to manually refill it. Delays up to a few hours were experienced, but I think that it never happened for a 24h in a row. As you may know, the rate is now all-time-high, so lots of users are cashing out. Report to moderator
|
Chaos could be a form of intelligence we cannot yet understand its complexity.
|
|
|
Vannicke
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
That guy, you know, with the face
|
|
March 07, 2013, 01:20:33 PM Last edit: March 07, 2013, 01:38:12 PM by Vannicke |
|
Something is definitely wrong ... I am running my usual 900MH/s, but getting paid for about for about 80MH/s while the sidebar has 600 in the calculate daily pay button. It has been this way over the past few hours, and I recalculated and recalculated my numbers and I've averaged 895MH/s over the past 8 hours. What's going on here? http://puu.sh/2dyik <-- shows over the past seven hours my sidebar shows around 80MH for payouts, yet my history shows about 500MH/s. This is not cool, even if I was doing average 500MH/s my payout should reflect that, but my miners have both been running full steam, and I don't have a load of rejected shares, about 40 on one and 15 on the other. Why isn't it reflecting this in my payouts? Edit: also noticed my miners [tails 2 and 3 in the pic] are showing minutes since last share ... I post 2-4 shares per minute on one, and about 10 shares per minute on the other, atm its showing 3 minutes ago on miner 2, yet I have posted about 25 shares accepted in phoenix in the past 3 minutes.
|
The Satoshi Jar: 16t2BLGZyaMpGm3vzYWxucGz8g4bVotr1h
|
|
|
Vannicke
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
That guy, you know, with the face
|
|
March 07, 2013, 01:53:06 PM |
|
A half hour later still showing 600 while my miners are running 640MH and 280MH as usual, it seems I'm registering 2/3 my speed in this screen, http://puu.sh/2dyMt ... but in team it shows much less. http://puu.sh/2dyTp
|
The Satoshi Jar: 16t2BLGZyaMpGm3vzYWxucGz8g4bVotr1h
|
|
|
Mike Hearn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1134
|
|
March 08, 2013, 01:54:19 PM |
|
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
March 08, 2013, 02:39:48 PM |
|
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
Your notifying the community of a pools apparent block size is completely appropriate and probably a good thing. But please keep your opinions of where a person should be mining and why to yourself and let miners exercise their freedom of choice. Whether you, or others, agree with that choice, or not, is immaterial. Thanks for the info though. Take Care, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
NEO2012
|
|
March 08, 2013, 03:17:59 PM Last edit: March 08, 2013, 05:53:40 PM by NEO2012 |
|
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
Your notifying the community of a pools apparent block size is completely appropriate and probably a good thing. But please keep your opinions of where a person should be mining and why to yourself and let miners exercise their freedom of choice. Whether you, or others, agree with that choice, or not, is immaterial. Thanks for the info though. Take Care, Sam sam seems to be a deepbit fan boy taking this agresive stance whats left of deepbit is gpu miners who run on autopilot when asics start to arive in few weeks deepbit is finished peace sam deepbit and tycho:) so long was nice ride while it lasted oh and my miners are returning failed shares? si deep bit down?
|
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 08, 2013, 06:45:36 PM |
|
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
Mike Hearn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1134
|
|
March 08, 2013, 07:01:51 PM |
|
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
Yeah, what I have heard is that there are multiple nodes configured differently. If you look at the sizes of blocks being created by DeepBit it's clear there's a 50kb hard cap somewhere, the sizes are too perfectly close to that boundary to be anything else. Of course other pools also have a variety of nodes configured differently, but 50kb is pretty low. People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining.
|
|
|
|
sosad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2013, 07:26:38 PM |
|
A bug was found and fixed today. This bug possibly caused mining problems for some users since 22-23.02.2013, so now things may get better if you were affected.
I will be nice here , it seems the problem is still around .. I switch pools on the same settings for over 24 hours and not one problem .. here ever few minutes my miners loses connection means i earn less . So please put more time in or the pool is a lost cause " going going gone " as you have seen it's going down hill for a bit now .
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
March 09, 2013, 03:53:09 PM |
|
People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining.
Sure, I understand that and appreciate the info. If your analyzing "apparent" pool block size's maybe it would be productive to create a thread with a chart? Then we all could compare and contrast. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
March 09, 2013, 04:24:02 PM |
|
Please note that DeepBit still appears to be creating 50kb blocks at times - most pools are now upgrading to blocks 10x or 15x larger. Small blocks mean that transactions take longer to confirm.
If you're still mining on DeepBit, please consider moving to a pool that a more reasonable block size policy (basically - any other pool). Most of them seem to have lower fees too.
Your notifying the community of a pools apparent block size is completely appropriate and probably a good thing. But please keep your opinions of where a person should be mining and why to yourself and let miners exercise their freedom of choice. Whether you, or others, agree with that choice, or not, is immaterial. Thanks for the info though. Take Care, Sam sam seems to be a deepbit fan boy taking this agresive stance whats left of deepbit is gpu miners who run on autopilot when asics start to arive in few weeks deepbit is finished peace sam deepbit and tycho:) so long was nice ride while it lasted oh and my miners are returning failed shares? si deep bit down? I'm no Deepbit "fan boy". But I'm not an enemy of Deepbit either. I don't like it when people try to influence the free market. Let people who use a service decide. I very much appreciate the information Mr. Hearn supplied and if my words were a bit harsh I apologize for that. But I stand by the basic point I was attempting to make and that is let the free market work. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
NEO2012
|
|
March 09, 2013, 05:48:53 PM |
|
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
Yeah, what I have heard is that there are multiple nodes configured differently. If you look at the sizes of blocks being created by DeepBit it's clear there's a 50kb hard cap somewhere, the sizes are too perfectly close to that boundary to be anything else. Of course other pools also have a variety of nodes configured differently, but 50kb is pretty low. People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining. i tghought the pint o fmining is making that coin? lol loooks i was mistaken;)
|
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
March 09, 2013, 06:13:36 PM |
|
Deepbit still pushes out the occasional 200+ KB block. All pools create small blocks at times. The way bitcoind handles putting a block together means right after a previous block is found you will likely not be including a significant number of transactions, especially if the previous block was a large one that included most of the transactions your node had record of.
Yeah, what I have heard is that there are multiple nodes configured differently. If you look at the sizes of blocks being created by DeepBit it's clear there's a 50kb hard cap somewhere, the sizes are too perfectly close to that boundary to be anything else. Of course other pools also have a variety of nodes configured differently, but 50kb is pretty low. People can mine wherever they like, of course. I'm just pointing out that 50kb isn't really helping confirm transactions, which is the point of mining. i tghought the pint o fmining is making that coin? lol loooks i was mistaken;) Coin generation is only a portion of point of mining. As reward halves it is a smaller portion of the point of mining. Without transaction confirmations there is no Bitcoin system. So transactions are a much more important part of mining in the long term. Which is why I question the wisdom of modifying block sizes to keep the transaction fees low. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
|
|
March 10, 2013, 09:03:30 PM |
|
Tycho, Could you post your block size and configuration over at organofcorti's new thread? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=151387.msg1606559#msg1606559It may help alleviate some of the paranoia about your pool. Or it may not. Thanks, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
2GOOD
|
|
March 12, 2013, 06:56:59 PM |
|
Please_wait_for_autopayment!I get this, hope it is temporary
|
|
|
|
[Tycho]
|
|
March 12, 2013, 09:10:19 PM |
|
At this moment our pool created a wrong branch of the blockchain, but not because of being 0.8+. I'm working on the fix now.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks ! ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures ( NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
March 12, 2013, 09:17:10 PM |
|
At this moment our pool created a wrong branch of the blockchain, but not because of being 0.8+. I'm working on the fix now.
Tycho, this should be really easy to fix. Ping me on IRC if you need any help.
|
|
|
|
|
|