rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;)

[FUR11]

Is there actually an updated version on the famous "Risto's long-term logarithmic BTC price extrapolation chart", is the old one from last year's bubble still accurate or what's the most recent version? His predictions have often be shockingly spot-on!

[giveBTCpls]

My husband and I were careful not to invest either because of the relationship with drugs, money laundering back in 2012.  We waited until we heard that some money laundering rules were at least being put into place before making our first purchase in 2013 right before the April bubble.  Unfortunately we did not go "all in" at that point and just put our feet in the water so to speak.   I feel like fear of the government cost us a few thousand, if not hundred thousand, at this point.  At least we are involved now and it is still early!

You are most likely incapable of understanding exactly how too late it is at this time, but it is too early to say for sure how late it actually is lately, and when the time comes you will be surprised at how early some of us (me in particular) were able to determine how late it actually is.  Lately I have been giving this topic some thought, especially early in the morning when I awake, which in your part of the world would be very late at night, but I actually experience day earlier than you ever could because of the rotational bias of the spherical solar satellite on which we reside being more attuned to my early waking than yours.  It is simply too late for you.

But I am done trying to elucidate the likes of you, and will leave now, never to return to this thread.

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

[Miz4r]

My husband and I were careful not to invest either because of the relationship with drugs, money laundering back in 2012.  We waited until we heard that some money laundering rules were at least being put into place before making our first purchase in 2013 right before the April bubble.  Unfortunately we did not go "all in" at that point and just put our feet in the water so to speak.   I feel like fear of the government cost us a few thousand, if not hundred thousand, at this point.  At least we are involved now and it is still early!

You are most likely incapable of understanding exactly how too late it is at this time, but it is too early to say for sure how late it actually is lately, and when the time comes you will be surprised at how early some of us (me in particular) were able to determine how late it actually is.  Lately I have been giving this topic some thought, especially early in the morning when I awake, which in your part of the world would be very late at night, but I actually experience day earlier than you ever could because of the rotational bias of the spherical solar satellite on which we reside being more attuned to my early waking than yours.  It is simply too late for you.

But I am done trying to elucidate the likes of you, and will leave now, never to return to this thread.

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

You really don't know how late it is, do you?

[AnnoyMint]

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

Of course you do not get it.  Only inferior minds resort to blatant ad hominem.  And a see you have added the incorrect qualifier "somewhat" to the word hilarious.  And I see no reason for this short shrifting and understatement.

In the early 90s I developed a comedy algorithm  and had extensive conversations with notable comedians about it's use and sought their help to tune it as far as I could before more important projects eventually had to take center stage, if you will forgive the pun.

I must stop to point out that puns, as a form of humor, are almost always the playground of the overtly and astutely intelligent, so I do not expect you to actually see the humor in that flawless comedy execution immediately uppost.  Appropriately this is reminiscent of a conversation I had with Pauly Shore concerning my own development of the comedy algorithm.

From:AnnoyChuckle
To:Paul SHore
Dear Mr. Shore,

As we discussed in our 3rd, 4rth, and 6th emails my comedy algorithm is nearing a perfect balance but I am having to work out some finer details on certain equations and feel you exemplify certain flaws I have discovered, and I offer this information to you at no charge, Indded, it is respect for your work in spite of your serious limitations which drives me to tell you these things.  The problem is I have charted the progress of your comedy and see there is no way for it NOT to fall under the weight of it's own juvinillity by early August 1997 at the latest.

Foremost you must begin to employ greater numbers of *PUNS* in your repertoire or you will lose the brightest of your fans.  Your reliance on:

• Awkward situational gaffes
• Roles like  'Nicky' in "The Wedding Band"
• The ginger afro wig
• The affectation "buuuuuudy"
• Stoner humor

Is revealing your ignorance of "appealing to the lesser half of the apple" fallacy and is, as I mention up-email, unsustainable.

-AnnoyChuckle

To: AnnoyChuckle
From: Paul Shore

Dude.

How the hell did you get my NEW email address??  Jesus Christ, man, you have a problem. I'm only addressing ONE thing. I don't have red hair, and Carrot Top, who I GUESS you are confusing me with, is NOT wearing a wig.

Go Away.  The next email will be from my lawyer.

As I predicted his relevance faded markedly after his Chuck Betts role in "The Curse of Inferno". I must now point out this was, exactly as I predicted, in 1997.

But I do not currently have time to talk to you about this as I have important tweaks to make to my bullet point list theorum.  This will be my last post for the foreseeable future.

[BitChick]

My husband and I were careful not to invest either because of the relationship with drugs, money laundering back in 2012.  We waited until we heard that some money laundering rules were at least being put into place before making our first purchase in 2013 right before the April bubble.  Unfortunately we did not go "all in" at that point and just put our feet in the water so to speak.  I feel like fear of the government cost us a few thousand, if not hundred thousand, at this point.  At least we are involved now and it is still early!

You are most likely incapable of understanding exactly how too late it is at this time, but it is too early to say for sure how late it actually is lately, and when the time comes you will be surprised at how early some of us (me in particular) were able to determine how late it actually is.  Lately I have been giving this topic some thought, especially early in the morning when I awake, which in your part of the world would be very late at night, but I actually experience day earlier than you ever could because of the rotational bias of the spherical solar satellite on which we reside being more attuned to my early waking than yours.  It is simply too late for you.

But I am done trying to elucidate the likes of you, and will leave now, never to return to this thread.

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

You really don't know how late it is, do you?

I am now fully shamed at the realization of how very late I am.  I realize how futile it even is to try to even try to wake up in the morning.  By the time I wake up I am so late up compared to where the important and smarter people in the world reside that I might as well just put my head back on my pillow and cry.    

[Peter R]

Already my favorite satircal troll of all time. This guy puts Proudhon to shame.

Sorry Proudhon.

I don't think we should understate Proudhon's contribution to the field of satirical trolling.  His career reached its apex in January 2014 when he successfully trolled the International Business Times (20 million unique monthly readers): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=412280.msg4862368#msg4862368

[chriswilmer]

Already my favorite satircal troll of all time. This guy puts Proudhon to shame.

Sorry Proudhon.

I don't think we should understate Proudhon's contribution to the field of satirical trolling.  His career reached its apex in January 2014 when he successfully trolled the International Business Times (20 million unique monthly readers): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=412280.msg4862368#msg4862368

There's even a song about/dedicated-to Proudhon on Youtube. How many trolls can claim that?

[Bitcopia]

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

Of course you do not get it.  Only inferior minds resort to blatant ad hominem.  And a see you have added the incorrect qualifier "somewhat" to the word hilarious.  And I see no reason for this short shrifting and understatement.

In the early 90s I developed a comedy algorithm  and had extensive conversations with notable comedians about it's use and sought their help to tune it as far as I could before more important projects eventually had to take center stage, if you will forgive the pun.

I must stop to point out that puns, as a form of humor, are almost always the playground of the overtly and astutely intelligent, so I do not expect you to actually see the humor in that flawless comedy execution immediately uppost.  Appropriately this is reminiscent of a conversation I had with Pauly Shore concerning my own development of the comedy algorithm.

From:AnnoyChuckle
To:Paul SHore
Dear Mr. Shore,

As we discussed in our 3rd, 4rth, and 6th emails my comedy algorithm is nearing a perfect balance but I am having to work out some finer details on certain equations and feel you exemplify certain flaws I have discovered, and I offer this information to you at no charge, Indded, it is respect for your work in spite of your serious limitations which drives me to tell you these things.  The problem is I have charted the progress of your comedy and see there is no way for it NOT to fall under the weight of it's own juvinillity by early August 1997 at the latest.

Foremost you must begin to employ greater numbers of *PUNS* in your repertoire or you will lose the brightest of your fans.  Your reliance on:

• Awkward situational gaffes
• Roles like  'Nicky' in "The Wedding Band"
• The ginger afro wig
• The affectation "buuuuuudy"
• Stoner humor

Is revealing your ignorance of "appealing to the lesser half of the apple" fallacy and is, as I mention up-email, unsustainable.

-AnnoyChuckle

To: AnnoyChuckle
From: Paul Shore

Dude.

How the hell did you get my NEW email address??  Jesus Christ, man, you have a problem. I'm only addressing ONE thing. I don't have red hair, and Carrot Top, who I GUESS you are confusing me with, is NOT wearing a wig.

Go Away.  The next email will be from my lawyer.

As I predicted his relevance faded markedly after his Chuck Betts role in "The Curse of Inferno". I must now point out this was, exactly as I predicted, in 1997.

But I do not currently have time to talk to you about this as I have important tweaks to make to my bullet point list theorum.  This will be my last post for the foreseeable future.

Already my favorite satircal troll of all time. This guy puts Proudhon to shame.

Sorry Proudhon.

+1

Although Proudhon was my first troll. He'll always have a place in my heart and he's stood the test of time.

[av123]

This guy is a legitimate troll. You can read his introduccion post, well I did 2 times and I still don't fully get it, just as this post. At least the guy is somewhat hilarious.

Of course you do not get it.  Only inferior minds resort to blatant ad hominem.  And a see you have added the incorrect qualifier "somewhat" to the word hilarious.  And I see no reason for this short shrifting and understatement.

In the early 90s I developed a comedy algorithm  and had extensive conversations with notable comedians about it's use and sought their help to tune it as far as I could before more important projects eventually had to take center stage, if you will forgive the pun.

I must stop to point out that puns, as a form of humor, are almost always the playground of the overtly and astutely intelligent, so I do not expect you to actually see the humor in that flawless comedy execution immediately uppost.  Appropriately this is reminiscent of a conversation I had with Pauly Shore concerning my own development of the comedy algorithm.

From:AnnoyChuckle
To:Paul SHore
Dear Mr. Shore,

As we discussed in our 3rd, 4rth, and 6th emails my comedy algorithm is nearing a perfect balance but I am having to work out some finer details on certain equations and feel you exemplify certain flaws I have discovered, and I offer this information to you at no charge, Indded, it is respect for your work in spite of your serious limitations which drives me to tell you these things.  The problem is I have charted the progress of your comedy and see there is no way for it NOT to fall under the weight of it's own juvinillity by early August 1997 at the latest.

Foremost you must begin to employ greater numbers of *PUNS* in your repertoire or you will lose the brightest of your fans.  Your reliance on:

• Awkward situational gaffes
• Roles like  'Nicky' in "The Wedding Band"
• The ginger afro wig
• The affectation "buuuuuudy"
• Stoner humor

Is revealing your ignorance of "appealing to the lesser half of the apple" fallacy and is, as I mention up-email, unsustainable.

-AnnoyChuckle

To: AnnoyChuckle
From: Paul Shore

Dude.

How the hell did you get my NEW email address??  Jesus Christ, man, you have a problem. I'm only addressing ONE thing. I don't have red hair, and Carrot Top, who I GUESS you are confusing me with, is NOT wearing a wig.

Go Away.  The next email will be from my lawyer.

As I predicted his relevance faded markedly after his Chuck Betts role in "The Curse of Inferno". I must now point out this was, exactly as I predicted, in 1997.

But I do not currently have time to talk to you about this as I have important tweaks to make to my bullet point list theorum.  This will be my last post for the foreseeable future.

Please post more. Thank you.

[ErisDiscordia]

Already my favorite satircal troll of all time. This guy puts Proudhon to shame.

Sorry Proudhon.

but what if this IS PROUDHONS SOCKPUPPET??     

[wachtwoord]

I can define a unit called the wachtwoord which is 160 BTC. Right now 1 wachtwoord is already trading @ $100k USD (625*160). Capiche?

In this case one wachtwoord should come to the next Malla party, since the unit's worth is higher than the threshold BTC100!

Haha 

Just so everyone's clear, I merely defined the wachtwoord to make a point to a guy that found it impossible to conceive any single unit could be worth 100k USD (and 160*625=100k). I didn't disclose anything about my holdings

[giveBTCpls]

Lol at the comedy algorithm.
Well going back on top a bit, for these that do agree with that Microsoft chart and are making analogy to it saying we are about 5 years in on that graph... but really, how do you know? Like  the blockchain is compromised and everyone abandons BTC, or it gets superseded by a superior coin with better anonymous features... stuff like that. How are you guys so sure and calm sleeping millions of dollars (for these that do have a lot of BTC, not me... I can wait) while these could happen?

[kehtolo]

Lol at the comedy algorithm.
Well going back on top a bit, for these that do agree with that Microsoft chart and are making analogy to it saying we are about 5 years in on that graph... but really, how do you know? Like  the blockchain is compromised and everyone abandons BTC, or it gets superseded by a superior coin with better anonymous features... stuff like that. How are you guys so sure and calm sleeping millions of dollars (for these that do have a lot of BTC, not me... I can wait) while these could happen?

I'll try to answer. The blockchain is pretty much unhackable. It's been tried many times and on more than a few occasions all sorts of bo0th white hat and black hat hackers have tried. Nobody has so far succeeded. If quantum computers become a reality.. which is looking ever further away - this MAY change.

2nd. Because bitcoin is 'programmable' it can adopt a new feature if the Devs write it into the code.. and people adopt the new wallet.
Oh, and something called network effect.

[AlexGR]

Price prediction based on a dream: 18.000$ in 2016. Posted for future reference

[luigi1111]

Price prediction based on a dream: 18.000$ in 2016. Posted for future reference

$18,000? This fits with my goal of $6,900 in 2015.

[DieJohnny]

Price prediction based on a dream: 18.000$ in 2016. Posted for future reference

Maybe Dec 2016

[Biodom]

Price prediction based on a dream: 18.000$ in 2016. Posted for future reference

What model is this based on?
I would sell 10% at that point  

All you need to hit a right prediction is to make many of them at random. Then, once one hit, you point to it and say-aha!
This is the method that many economists are using or so it seems...

[dnaleor]

we will see 5000 this year
next year ATH at least 10000, probably higher (20000 - 50000)

[Biodom]

we will see 5000 this year
next year ATH at least 10000, probably higher (20000 - 50000)

I don't see how $5000 is possible, but I am not a betting man.

[molecular]

we will see 5000 this year
next year ATH at least 10000, probably higher (20000 - 50000)

I don't see how $5000 is possible, but I am not a betting man.

I don't think 5000 USD/BTC is likely to occur in 2014. I'd be willing to bet €1000 against that.