Bitcoin Forum
September 22, 2018, 11:43:28 PM *
News: ♦♦ New info! Bitcoin Core users absolutely must upgrade to previously-announced 0.16.3 [Torrent]. All Bitcoin users should temporarily trust confirmations slightly less. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.5  (Read 39372 times)
Miner2525
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 12:33:44 AM
 #181

It's all a bunch of garbage that preys on the notion that us GPU owners will ignore the reality that ASICs are better than GPUs in almost every way and that we'll be emotionally linked to our investments and want to "protect them from the evil Bitmain" (who is actually only 1 of 4 ASIC manufacturers).

That's true to a certain extent, but the other side of the coin is promoting decentralization which is easier to do with GPU's that the "common man" still can barely afford compared to FCFS ASIC's that only "rich capitalist farmers" can buy.

No one should be under the illusion that the parameter change for higher memory requirements will equate to ASIC prevention.  Resistance is not prevention.  Only delay.  The French Resistance certainly did not defeat the Nazi's.

ECOMI
⇐ ● ECOMI - PAY, PROTECT, COLLECT. Licensed Crypto-Collectables, Wireless Hardware Wallet, and more ICO NOW LIVE ● ⇒
○ ○ ○ ➀ WEBSITE ➀ ○ ○ ○
1537659808
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1537659808

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1537659808
Reply with quote  #2

1537659808
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 544


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 01:16:51 AM
 #182

...the other side of the coin is promoting decentralization which is easier to do with GPU's that the "common man" still can barely afford compared to FCFS ASIC's that only "rich capitalist farmers" can buy...
Misinformation upon misinformation upon misinformation.

  • The security of a blockchain should never be whittled down to something based on what some random burger flipper making minimum wage can afford to mine with.

  • If the above does happen, the lie that an $871 ASIC is "too expensive" for entry should be pointed out

  • If you see $871 ("ASIC's that only 'rich capitalist farmers' can buy") for the same hashrate as a $12,000 GPU setup ("that the 'common man' still can barely afford") as how it is, then you can't math.

  • The decentralization of 3 ASIC chip manufactures is greater than the "decentralization" of 2 GPU chip manufactures (one of which hasn't made any chips in 6 months and the other which is widely not supported by these new changes); because, math!

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
abyss26
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 05:03:45 AM
 #183

Quick little story my buddy wanted to mine BTC last year around sept. Looking at spending around 7-800 usd to get started. choice between bitmain s7s s9s vs cards on nicehash in an apartment setting.

reason's asic didn't get picked, dropping price of used gear with rising difficulty dropping returns, no fast repair, products being received by others were used/not new oh, and the HEAT NOISE!

Was able to put him together a 4 card rig on one i5 PC 1 1050ti $150, 3 970s $160ea all from a local store with warranties and plenty of spares if needed as time = $ cuz maths.

all 4 plus the CPU have been mining ever since. Was able to get in early on some coins and now has a diverse portfolio with a very solid base in BTCZ.

others include BTC through NH, Musicoin, Zencash, Vert, Sumo, CMM, 0xBTC, Raven, Masari, Wavi ect ect ect same gear which has been nice and quiet is worth more today than paid for it prolly.

When local stores carry several brands of asic's with spares NIB and all are 300-600 watts then we can talk, otherwise only thing i keep hearing from bitmain is "Dear customers,

There has been another wave of phishing emails sent by fraudsters. If you do receive such emails offering Antminer models that are not available"

edit: for case and point. had he chose to buy an s7 or even an s9 today it would be about worthless.

from NH prof calc

BITMAIN AntMiner S7 makes currently 0.00775354 BTC $51.20 and costs $93.00 in electric

BITMAIN AntMiner S9 0.02295104 BTC $151.00 and costs 98.00 in electric $52.00 profit

this 4 card miner consistently makes $100 plus per month and the electric is only 35.00 40.00
LesiA
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 06:12:16 AM
 #184

...the other side of the coin is promoting decentralization which is easier to do with GPU's that the "common man" still can barely afford compared to FCFS ASIC's that only "rich capitalist farmers" can buy...
Misinformation upon misinformation upon misinformation.

  • The security of a blockchain should never be whittled down to something based on what some random burger flipper making minimum wage can afford to mine with.

  • If the above does happen, the lie that an $871 ASIC is "too expensive" for entry should be pointed out

  • If you see $871 ("ASIC's that only 'rich capitalist farmers' can buy") for the same hashrate as a $12,000 GPU setup ("that the 'common man' still can barely afford") as how it is, then you can't math.

  • The decentralization of 3 ASIC chip manufactures is greater than the "decentralization" of 2 GPU chip manufactures (one of which hasn't made any chips in 6 months and the other which is widely not supported by these new changes); because, math!

Leveling a playing field from time to time is a good thing Smiley
evren320
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 06:35:57 AM
 #185

does it mine aion coin equihash variant?
dushan76
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 07:58:55 AM
 #186

does it mine aion coin equihash variant?

Not yet. It is equihash 210_9. I thing that EWBF working on it.
Yarik47
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 08:42:28 AM
 #187

Hello everybody
is there any kind of detailed customization guide? commands for bat file? how to specify the intensity?
Sirwan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 09:08:54 AM
 #188

Hello to all
I have good news about SMOS (simplemining.net)
I talked with the SMOS Admin about EWBF 0.2 and they added the EWBF 0.2 to the SMOS site.
But the current version of the SMOS operating system is not compatible with EWBF 0.2 and brings the error "ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version."

Finally, They introduced to me a new version of the operating system that did not make this mistake
reflash http://download.simplemining.net/SimpleMiningOS-NV-RX-v1165-4.16.0-amd18.10.img.zip

Please notify this topic and post in the first post
enjoy  Wink  Wink
Grumo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 206
Merit: 15


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 09:30:15 AM
 #189

Tested it

On a rig with 6 x 1070 ti  8gb ram i7 7600
algo for btcz it crashes one gpu . disabled one gpu and it continued to mine for a day at 150-170 sol. getting some random error messages of memory exausted

on the same rig i tried zer , doest go at all. not enough memory.

On a rig of 4 1080 and one 1080 ti 16 gb ram ryzen 1600
algo for btcz it goes 170 sol and continue to mine without errors

with zer i get 100 sols and no errors at starting , im currently testing it

good work EWBF!
CitricAcid
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 01:32:08 PM
 #190

Short answer, impossible, 144.5 requires a larger amount of ram that the ASIC machines do not have

Hello EWBF!

A question for you, how difficult is it for Bitmain and Inno_Miner to just do an Over the Air update to their miners to include the code you have in here for 144.5 algo?
[/quote]
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 544


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 02:00:55 PM
 #191

Short answer, impossible, 144.5 requires a larger amount of ram that the ASIC machines do not have
And how much RAM do they have?

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
Vispilio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 292



View Profile
June 20, 2018, 02:37:04 PM
 #192

Wow great to hear from EWBF again after a few years I guess ? Smiley

I still use 0.3.4 version for mining ZCASH, how much does this version improve on the performance compared to it ?..


All the Best

       ▄▄
      ██   ▄▄███▀▀▀▄
   ▄█▄▄▀▀     ▀▀▄
  ▄▄██
██  █               ██
   █                ▐▌▀▄
 ██                  █  ██
  ▀▄                 ▐▌
   ▀▄               ▄
██
  ▄▄ ▀▄           ▄▀ ▐▌
  ▀▀▀▄██▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▀  ██
           ▄▄▀▀▀██▀▄
           ▀▀
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
WHITEPAPER
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.
Unifying Knowledge For Faster Insight.
▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ █████████████▀    ▐██ █
█ ████████████      ▐██ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
█ ████████          ███ █
█ ████████         ▐███ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
█ ███████████▌   ▐██████ █
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ ████▀██████▀   ▀▀▀▄███ █
█ ███▌  ▀▀██▌      ▄███ █
█ ███▀             ████ █
█ ███▄            █████ █
█ ████▄          ██████ █
█ █████▄▄      ▄███████ █
█ ████▄     ▄██████████ █
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ ██████████████████████ █
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
▄█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█▄
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ ██    ████████████████ █
█ ██    ████████████████ █
█ ██████████████████████ █
█ ██    ██   ▀    ▀███ █
█ ██    ██    ▄▄▄   ██ █
█ ██    ██   ████   ██ █
█ ██    ██   ████   ██ █
█ ██    ██   ████   ██ █
█ ██    ██   ████   ██ █
█ ██████████████████████ █
▀█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀
██████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████
.
██████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████
Trololino
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 03:19:47 PM
 #193

Short answer, impossible, 144.5 requires a larger amount of ram that the ASIC machines do not have
And how much RAM do they have?


We get it man, you are pro ASICS. This topic does not concern you, you just spam here to do what exactly?

ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 544


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 03:25:43 PM
 #194

We get it man, you are pro ASICS. This topic does not concern you, you just spam here to do what exactly?
I'm pro-mining, anti-misinformation, and my GPU investment dwarfs my ASIC investment.

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 544


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 03:28:04 PM
 #195

...I still use 0.3.4 version for mining ZCASH, how much does this version improve on the performance compared to it ?...
This miner doesn't currently support the same K & N values that version does ("*  Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted.").

If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
vanthoi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
June 20, 2018, 03:44:42 PM
 #196

How to config miner on pool: https://aikapool.com/btcz/index.php
I use
algo         144_5
#pers         BitcoinZ

But not work!

Help me?
mitsakos156
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 1


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 03:50:16 PM
 #197

Hello to all
I have good news about SMOS (simplemining.net)
I talked with the SMOS Admin about EWBF 0.2 and they added the EWBF 0.2 to the SMOS site.
But the current version of the SMOS operating system is not compatible with EWBF 0.2 and brings the error "ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version."

Finally, They introduced to me a new version of the operating system that did not make this mistake
reflash http://download.simplemining.net/SimpleMiningOS-NV-RX-v1165-4.16.0-amd18.10.img.zip

Please notify this topic and post in the first post
enjoy  Wink  Wink


thanks for this. i still have troubles keeping up all the 11x1060 6GB on simple os. some cards say stuck/restart etc..
humphries365
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 04:51:53 PM
 #198

Anyone help? I keep getting "out of memory" error on GPU5  Huh
Sirwan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 04:58:49 PM
 #199

Thanks ewbf, this was added to SMOS today but I am having a problem

ERROR: CUDA DRIVER VERSION IS INSUFFICIENT FOR CUDA RUNTIME VERSION

any ideas?

What is your Cuda version installed ?
Try the Cuda 8 version of EWBF.
If you haven't Cuda 8.x or Cuda 9.x, EWBF will don't work.

I talked with the SMOS Admin about EWBF 0.2 and they added the EWBF 0.2 to the SMOS site.
But the current version of the SMOS operating system is not compatible with EWBF 0.2 and brings the error "ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version."

Finally, They introduced to me a new version of the operating system that did not make this mistake
reflash http://download.simplemining.net/SimpleMiningOS-NV-RX-v1165-4.16.0-amd18.10.img.zip
abyss26
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 20, 2018, 05:48:07 PM
 #200

We get it man, you are pro ASICS. This topic does not concern you, you just spam here to do what exactly?
I'm pro-mining, anti-misinformation, and my GPU investment dwarfs my ASIC investment.

How about we put up the the numbers on your asic investment so we can calc your work and possibly forecast.

We can just take one you bought as an example if you prefer.

Make model, purchase date, total price, delivery date, and your USD/kWh costs should be good to start.

Let's keep the info as accurate as possible for our research as I don't like misinformation as well.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!