gsambolin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 12:03:08 PM |
|
Is getting 29.5 sol/s on a 1070 card doing 144.5 ZHash. Is that about right?
you can some more Uptime: 0d 02:54:32 Server: btcz.suprnova.cc:6586 Connected Statistics of the GPUs GPU Temp Power Speed Efficiency Accepted Rejected GeForce GTX 1070 59 C 154 W 33 Sol/s 0.21 Sol/W 225 0 GeForce GTX 1070 52 C 148 W 35 Sol/s 0.24 Sol/W 211 0 GeForce GTX 1070 58 C 145 W 32 Sol/s 0.22 Sol/W 237 0 GeForce GTX 1070 56 C 148 W 34 Sol/s 0.23 Sol/W 213 1 GeForce GTX 1070 63 C 155 W 33 Sol/s 0.21 Sol/W 226 0 GeForce GTX 1070 54 C 151 W 34 Sol/s 0.23 Sol/W 214 0 Total - 901 W 201 Sol/s 0.22 Sol/W 1326 1 EWBF v0.2 Would you please share your MSI burner settings? I barely get 30 ubuntu, no MSI  GPU ~2000, MEM 8900, PL 160 Would you please share your SuprNova config settings? Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
nUm81
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 12:18:56 PM |
|
Memory speed on the 1070's doesn't seem to matter much.   Power is expensive here, so the less power the better.
|
|
|
|
nUm81
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 12:23:04 PM |
|
i tried with one 1060 3gb it works but the shares are not showing on the pool it stays at zero is this beacause it's just too low 19 sols? my 8 card rigs shows up just fine....  Try using a port that is very low difficulty. The pool may be sending you shares that are too big for the card to solve before the next share is received and it has to start again.
|
|
|
|
abstractHaze
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 12:50:18 PM |
|
can anyone confirm 144_5 with 1060 3gb on windows.. also was main display an issue?
- thank you.
|
|
|
|
Coin++
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 01:32:20 PM |
|
I've tested the Funakoshi miner in 3.2 version (last one). It is not a final release : just a beta one. It's working, but make very very few shares. Back to EWBF, very stable in Cuda8 version (some issues with Cuda9 version : Windows 10-64).
|
|
|
|
Jonpete
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 04:07:29 PM |
|
Any chance dev could make it work with maxwell architecture my 980ti on old algo was pulling 480 to 500 sol on new algo 9 to 11 would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
umadns
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 08:04:29 PM |
|
mining rig 9x 1070ti and one 1070. Keeps crashing half of the gpus thread exited with message:''out of memory''
works fine in old ewbf,tried to remove overclock settings same,tried to run 2 instances of ewbf same...
any help would be much appreciated...
Yes, this is virtual memory, try to increase the paging file to 30 - 50 Gb Thanks a lot, it worked 325avg sols.<3 https://imgur.com/a/DG16YnSStill couldn't make it work with 12 cards and was forced to separate the rig into 2 instances. The 2x1070's were shown as stuck and miner was trying non stop to restart them. https://imgur.com/a/eJxHk3J
|
|
|
|
inudemon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 29, 2018, 11:56:43 PM |
|
Any chance dev could make it work with maxwell architecture my 980ti on old algo was pulling 480 to 500 sol on new algo 9 to 11 would be much appreciated.
I suppose it's the same case as Maxwell on DaggerHashimoto. I remember that every DAG file (every 2 weeks) my GF970s made less and less comparing to 1060s (12 MH to 25 MH for example) while the power consumptiong was 160W to 100 Watts. Finally I stoped to mine DaggerHashimoto and soon sold my 970s to gamers.
|
|
|
|
juville
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 03:36:43 AM |
|
Hi EWBF,
Can we use this new miner to mine the coins that use 200, 9 like zencash?
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 04:09:08 AM |
|
Hi EWBF,
Can we use this new miner to mine the coins that use 200, 9 like zencash?
... * Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted. ...
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
duyvu1311
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 08:07:41 AM |
|
How many GPUs does this miner support?
|
|
|
|
crypper
Member

Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 12
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 11:37:09 AM |
|
Hi guys, Here is my (and possibly many others') problem: I'm on equihash autoswitch (zen, zec, btg, zcl; port 17203) at MininPoolHub; happily mining with older EWBF cuda miner. BTG is however about to fork (~ July 1st) and switch to 144,5 algo. Since new EWBF miner doesn't support 200,9 and older miner doesn't support 144,5, it will not be possible to mine at MPH with either of the miners. What would be a solution here?
EWBF, Any chance you can restore 200,9 in the current version of the miner??
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 12:26:59 PM |
|
...I'm on equihash autoswitch (zen, zec, btg, zcl; port 17203) at MininPoolHub; happily mining with older EWBF cuda miner. BTG is however about to fork (~ July 1st) and switch to 144,5 algo. Since new EWBF miner doesn't support 200,9 and older miner doesn't support 144,5, it will not be possible to mine at MPH with either of the miners. What would be a solution here?...
Because the K & N change makes for what is essentially a new algo, it's not possible to have one port that supports "different equihashs" at the same time (unless the pool has special software to change from a to b). One miner that autochanged algos based on a given pool's switch would have to coordinate with that given pool. That's just not how miners work, unless they, or some overlay app, are proprietary to that pool (like nicehash).
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
crypper
Member

Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 12
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 02:33:52 PM |
|
...I'm on equihash autoswitch (zen, zec, btg, zcl; port 17203) at MininPoolHub; happily mining with older EWBF cuda miner. BTG is however about to fork (~ July 1st) and switch to 144,5 algo. Since new EWBF miner doesn't support 200,9 and older miner doesn't support 144,5, it will not be possible to mine at MPH with either of the miners. What would be a solution here?...
Because the K & N change makes for what is essentially a new algo, it's not possible to have one port that supports "different equihashs" at the same time (unless the pool has special software to change from a to b). One miner that autochanged algos based on a given pool's switch would have to coordinate with that given pool. That's just not how miners work, unless they, or some overlay app, are proprietary to that pool (like nicehash). You are probably right, BTG will have to be dropped from the port. MPH is however silent on that matter. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
MentalNomad
Member

Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 07:24:28 PM |
|
...I'm on equihash autoswitch (zen, zec, btg, zcl; port 17203) at MininPoolHub; happily mining with older EWBF cuda miner. BTG is however about to fork (~ July 1st) and switch to 144,5 algo. Since new EWBF miner doesn't support 200,9 and older miner doesn't support 144,5, it will not be possible to mine at MPH with either of the miners. What would be a solution here?...
Because the K & N change makes for what is essentially a new algo, it's not possible to have one port that supports "different equihashs" at the same time (unless the pool has special software to change from a to b). One miner that autochanged algos based on a given pool's switch would have to coordinate with that given pool. That's just not how miners work, unless they, or some overlay app, are proprietary to that pool (like nicehash). You are probably right, BTG will have to be dropped from the port. MPH is however silent on that matter. We'll see. The MPH banner shows they're supporting BTG after the fork, but yeah, BTG will have to come out of the auto-switching Equihash pool. Their BTG page offers specs - they're keeping the same port number post-fork, so they must plan to take out the old pool and connect a new pool to that same port number at the time of the fork (or have otherwise automated the switch on their end - in which case, good job, MPH.) https://bitcoin-gold.miningpoolhub.com/
|
|
|
|
MentalNomad
Member

Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 07:41:13 PM |
|
FYI to all, at the BTG fork on block 536,200, about 3 days from now (countdown timer here: https://bitcoingold.org/bitcoin-gold-network-upgrade), the Difficulty will drop to 1/100th the prior difficulty. Dropping 1/15 is to account for the hard algo (15x harder), but the rest is just to compensate in case a lot of miners/pool don't immediately migrate. This means the early post-block forks will be hyper-profitable.  I'm just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
crypper
Member

Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 12
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 08:38:16 PM |
|
the early post-block forks .
Or the block-fork post?  In theory you are right...But I'll tell you what: Last year (October or November, can't remember) when BTG was launched I was sitting and waiting for the blockchain to come live hoping on a big profit during the first few days/weeks of mining. You know what...I didn't get rich. It appeared there were plenty of other smarty-pants doing the same thing.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1896
Merit: 1024
|
 |
June 30, 2018, 08:47:37 PM |
|
3-4 big farms can switch in 2min, like they did with lux fork, profit 0.30cent per GPU....... just with 2 big farms moving big farms don`t care and they can do basic math as most are run by retards
|
|
|
|
gsambolin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 01, 2018, 03:57:47 AM Last edit: July 01, 2018, 02:37:28 PM by gsambolin |
|
Just an observation and not sure how this is happening, these are the parameters - Using EWBF V 0.2 - W10 - 3 * 1070 TI and 1 1050 TI - Mining testnet net for Btg http://btg-testnet.miningspot.net/miner/2N4cHD1gzU35ZJG1MsyXuSgj4AUPWbd164hThe issue becomes, when I mine with the miner in the bat file and all the parameters that go with it. The number of sols reported on the test net page are correct and SHOW UP. BUTWhen I use all the miner command with just the config file and the config file has all the exact parameters the number of sols are not reported on the test net page. Works when I run it like thisminer --algo 144_5 --pers BgoldPoW --server btg-testnet.miningspot.net --port 3857 --user 2N4cHD1gzU35ZJG1MsyXuSgj4AUPWxxxxxx --pass x --cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 --intensity 64 64 64 64 64 64 --templimit 80 --api 127.0.0.1:42000 --pec 1 --boff 0 --eexit 3 --tempunits C --log 3 --logfile BTG_miner_V2.log DOES NOT WORK when I run it like thisminer --config miner.cfg These are the parameters on in the miner.cfg file. I am not sure if it is just a test net thing or not - Any suggestions ?# Common parameters # All the parameters here are similar to the command line arguments [common] cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 intensity 64 64 64 64 64 64 templimit 75 pec 1 boff 0 eexit 3 tempunits c log 3 logfile BTG_miner_V2.log api 127.0.0.1:42000 algo 144_5 pers BgoldPOW # The miner start work from this server # When the server is fail, the miner will try to reconnect 3 times # After three unsuccessful attempts, the miner will switch to the next server # You can add up to 8 servers # main server [server] server btg-testnet.miningspot.net port 3857 user 2N4cHD1gzU35ZJG1MsyXuSgj4AUPWxxxxxx pass x # additional server 1 [server] server btg-testnet.miningspot.net port 3857 user 2N4cHD1gzU35ZJG1MsyXuSgj4AUPWxxxxxx pass x
|
|
|
|
kockas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
July 01, 2018, 07:31:15 AM |
|
Hi,
0.2 version on Ubuntu detects only 7 cards for me.
Anyone else? When is planned new release?
Thanks for the miner.
|
|
|
|
|