EWBF's Cuda Equihash Miner 0.6

[ComputerGenie]

You cannot mine zcash with this miner, it will only work with coins that have forked to 192,7, 144,5 and 96,5.  If you want to mine zcash you will need to use the original miner as it still uses 200,9.

Thank's
Where can find what coins are at 96_5 ?

Answered 4 posts above this one 

and at least twice before that 

[1685959900]

1685959900

[1685959900]

1685959900

[1685959900]

1685959900

[1685959900]

1685959900

[philipma1957]

I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols  for the 2 combined.

I am mining at miningpoolhub   is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?

[trillobeat]

I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols  for the 2 combined.

I am mining at miningpoolhub   is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?

getting 50-54 with evga 1080ti sc2 hybrids, power set to 68-72%, small cc and mem overclocks  50-50 or 100-50

[philipma1957]

I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols  for the 2 combined.

I am mining at miningpoolhub   is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?

getting 50-54 with evga 1080ti sc2 hybrids, power set to 68-72%, small cc and mem overclocks  50-50 or 100-50

okay about the same

90 core
200 ram
power 66%

using smos

[dfish987]

so i have a 1070 and two 1060 3 gbs trying to mine snow gem my shares never show up whats up with that pool is showing 0 sols but my other 8 card rig shows up on the pool i can't wait till dstm makes a miner for 144,5 no hard feelings but your miners have never been the fastest out

[twente-mining]

Some benching i did on 144,5, hope it helps....

--------------------------------------------------

1080ti OC Gaming Strix 11GB

Power 65
Core 100
Mem 450

Powerdraw total 4x = 879 watt

Doing stable 51~56 Sols

----------------------------------------------------

1080ti Aorus 11 GB

Power 65
Core 100
Mem 500

Powerdraw total 6x = 1090 watt

Doing stable 50~53 Sols
-----------------------------------------------------

1080ti Founders 11 GB

Power 65
Core 100
Mem 450

Powerdraw total 3x = 534 watt

Doing stable 50~52 Sols

------------------------------------------------------

1080ti Asus Turbo 11 GB

Power 65
Core 100
Mem 400

Powerdraw total 5x = 904 watt

Doing stable 49~52 Sols

-------------------------------------------------------

1070 Armor 8GB ( non TI )

Power 65
Core 50
Mem 400

Powerdraw total 10x = 1390 watt

Doing stable 29~35 Sols

--------------------------------------------------------

1070-TI Armor 8GB

Power 65
Core 120
Mem 450

Powerdraw total 4x = 518 watt

Doing stable 36~40 Sols

[EWBF_]

Hello @EWBF_

hardware:

motherboard: asrock h110 pro btc (13gpu)
memory : 4gb
cpu Celeron 3930
UNIX - Fedora

Version 0.3.4b working super to ZEC

video cards: 13 gtx EVGA SC2 1080Ti

issue:

gpu 9 gpu 10 gpu 11 and gpu 12 always gets stuck and stops working during gpu detection.
May be build the miner to detect all gpus at the very start?

I tested to start 2 miner

cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 8 9 10 11 12

and is very very very slow process detected card :-( and crashed EWBF

Please help me ASAP i have +- 3000 card

13x1070 card working normal

Hello! check this out: https://mega.nz/#F!uhQR0IRa!jZ_tdULPoUf3ib4O6-1BoQ this is a special version, basically the same v0.3, but with a modified device launch system. Please note that if you do not have a problem with starting up devices, do not use this version!

This version not working :-(

I use CUDA 8

06.07.2018 00:19:09 ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version 

Added cuda 8 version.

Hello, EWBF_

Any news about stability version for 12+ card? Now very big load average :-(

thx±

In the next version. I will try to publish it asap.

[twente-mining]

Hello @EWBF_

hardware:

motherboard: asrock h110 pro btc (13gpu)
memory : 4gb
cpu Celeron 3930
UNIX - Fedora

Version 0.3.4b working super to ZEC

video cards: 13 gtx EVGA SC2 1080Ti

issue:

gpu 9 gpu 10 gpu 11 and gpu 12 always gets stuck and stops working during gpu detection.
May be build the miner to detect all gpus at the very start?

I tested to start 2 miner

cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 8 9 10 11 12

and is very very very slow process detected card :-( and crashed EWBF

Please help me ASAP i have +- 3000 card

13x1070 card working normal

Hello! check this out: https://mega.nz/#F!uhQR0IRa!jZ_tdULPoUf3ib4O6-1BoQ this is a special version, basically the same v0.3, but with a modified device launch system. Please note that if you do not have a problem with starting up devices, do not use this version!

This version not working :-(

I use CUDA 8

06.07.2018 00:19:09 ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version 

Added cuda 8 version.

Hello, EWBF_

Any news about stability version for 12+ card? Now very big load average :-(

thx±

In the next version. I will try to publish it asap.

Used this for my asrock h110 pro btc with 10x armor's and no problems since....

standard version gpu crashes .....

[philipma1957]

I am running 4 two card machines   total of 8 1080ti's

earning .4 coins a day or 11 dollars

about 1.40 usd a card  running smos

[CarlOrff]

I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols  for the 2 combined.

I am mining at miningpoolhub   is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?

Yes : 51 sol/s @ 170 W max setting in the driver (135 W in real).
OC : 175 core / 350 mem : stable during weelks.

[siekeheros]

Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version?

[valaki]

Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version?

I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix .

[ComputerGenie]

Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version?

I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix .

everyone or just hobby miners that need to slow mining down so they can Farcebook better? 

[siekeheros]

Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version?

I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix .

everyone or just hobby miners that need to slow mining down so they can Farcebook better? 

Doesn't matter, but with the old algo without adjusting the intensity i could use my computer for different stuff. Don't use farcebook or any other book that matter, but for programming work and so on. With the new algo's it's impossible to literally do anything on my system. Changing windows is a pain in the ass!. On my part just a suggestion, especially since this new code is based on old code that had this functionality baked in. If it's an easy fix, me and several others i guess will start mining and paying "fee" to devs. Win win in my book, no?

[tiomnoch]

I am use 96_5 algo. I have 8 Ks - 1050ti, 13 Ks - 1060, 19Ks - 1070, 24 kS - 1080 and 28 kS on 1080ti (Ewbf 3.0. Windows 10, last gpu drivers). Why the 1080ti is so slow?

[Dr_Victor]

Is this miner stable at mix rig (gtx 1060 + 1070 + 1080 ti)?

[beefs]

Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!"
If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.

i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof?  fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year.  so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. 

[EWBF_]

Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!"
If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.

i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof?  fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year.  so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. 

Long ago, I predicted your point of view, so I decided to add the "fee" option, which allows you to disable fee. Therefore, if you want it, you can turn it off or use another miner. I see no reason for anger.
So, relax and be happy!

[boo50]

fee option is really a wise decision and it gives a choice to everyone - to thanks devs and share or develop their greed.
my respect, EWBF

[crypper]

Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!"
If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.

i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof?  fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year.  so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. 

What do you smoke, beef? Enlighten us: what license is EWBF on? subscription or perpetual one
And btw there is no better alternative to EWBF on the "market". DSTM does give slightly higher hash rate for some cards at the expense of stability, but again disabling fee in EWBF will results in the same revenue  as DSTM while being a more stable miner.
As of now DSTM failed to introduce new equihash algos. So I'm guessing you are just trolling here while silently using EWBF (no other options).