ComputerGenie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 10, 2018, 02:36:57 PM |
|
You cannot mine zcash with this miner, it will only work with coins that have forked to 192,7, 144,5 and 96,5. If you want to mine zcash you will need to use the original miner as it still uses 200,9.
Thank's Where can find what coins are at 96_5 ? Answered 4 posts above this one ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) and at least twice before that ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 8451
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 10, 2018, 11:48:19 PM |
|
I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols for the 2 combined.
I am mining at miningpoolhub is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?
|
|
|
|
trillobeat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 12:02:33 AM |
|
I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols for the 2 combined.
I am mining at miningpoolhub is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?
getting 50-54 with evga 1080ti sc2 hybrids, power set to 68-72%, small cc and mem overclocks 50-50 or 100-50
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 8451
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 12:04:59 AM |
|
I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols for the 2 combined.
I am mining at miningpoolhub is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?
getting 50-54 with evga 1080ti sc2 hybrids, power set to 68-72%, small cc and mem overclocks 50-50 or 100-50 okay about the same 90 core 200 ram power 66% using smos
|
|
|
|
dfish987
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 04:18:00 AM |
|
so i have a 1070 and two 1060 3 gbs trying to mine snow gem my shares never show up whats up with that pool is showing 0 sols but my other 8 card rig shows up on the pool i can't wait till dstm makes a miner for 144,5 no hard feelings but your miners have never been the fastest out
|
|
|
|
twente-mining
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 08:51:36 AM |
|
Some benching i did on 144,5, hope it helps....
--------------------------------------------------
1080ti OC Gaming Strix 11GB
Power 65 Core 100 Mem 450
Powerdraw total 4x = 879 watt
Doing stable 51~56 Sols
----------------------------------------------------
1080ti Aorus 11 GB
Power 65 Core 100 Mem 500
Powerdraw total 6x = 1090 watt
Doing stable 50~53 Sols -----------------------------------------------------
1080ti Founders 11 GB
Power 65 Core 100 Mem 450
Powerdraw total 3x = 534 watt
Doing stable 50~52 Sols
------------------------------------------------------
1080ti Asus Turbo 11 GB
Power 65 Core 100 Mem 400
Powerdraw total 5x = 904 watt
Doing stable 49~52 Sols
-------------------------------------------------------
1070 Armor 8GB ( non TI )
Power 65 Core 50 Mem 400
Powerdraw total 10x = 1390 watt
Doing stable 29~35 Sols
--------------------------------------------------------
1070-TI Armor 8GB
Power 65 Core 120 Mem 450
Powerdraw total 4x = 518 watt
Doing stable 36~40 Sols
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 11:01:55 AM |
|
Hello @EWBF_
hardware:
motherboard: asrock h110 pro btc (13gpu) memory : 4gb cpu Celeron 3930 UNIX - Fedora
Version 0.3.4b working super to ZEC
video cards: 13 gtx EVGA SC2 1080Ti
issue:
gpu 9 gpu 10 gpu 11 and gpu 12 always gets stuck and stops working during gpu detection. May be build the miner to detect all gpus at the very start?
I tested to start 2 miner
cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 8 9 10 11 12
and is very very very slow process detected card :-( and crashed EWBF
Please help me ASAP i have +- 3000 card
13x1070 card working normal
Hello! check this out: https://mega.nz/#F!uhQR0IRa!jZ_tdULPoUf3ib4O6-1BoQ this is a special version, basically the same v0.3, but with a modified device launch system. Please note that if you do not have a problem with starting up devices, do not use this version! This version not working :-( I use CUDA 8 06.07.2018 00:19:09 ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version Added cuda 8 version. Hello, EWBF_ Any news about stability version for 12+ card? Now very big load average :-( thx± In the next version. I will try to publish it asap.
|
|
|
|
twente-mining
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 01:33:58 PM |
|
Hello @EWBF_
hardware:
motherboard: asrock h110 pro btc (13gpu) memory : 4gb cpu Celeron 3930 UNIX - Fedora
Version 0.3.4b working super to ZEC
video cards: 13 gtx EVGA SC2 1080Ti
issue:
gpu 9 gpu 10 gpu 11 and gpu 12 always gets stuck and stops working during gpu detection. May be build the miner to detect all gpus at the very start?
I tested to start 2 miner
cuda_devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 7 8 9 10 11 12
and is very very very slow process detected card :-( and crashed EWBF
Please help me ASAP i have +- 3000 card
13x1070 card working normal
Hello! check this out: https://mega.nz/#F!uhQR0IRa!jZ_tdULPoUf3ib4O6-1BoQ this is a special version, basically the same v0.3, but with a modified device launch system. Please note that if you do not have a problem with starting up devices, do not use this version! This version not working :-( I use CUDA 8 06.07.2018 00:19:09 ERROR: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime version Added cuda 8 version. Hello, EWBF_ Any news about stability version for 12+ card? Now very big load average :-( thx± In the next version. I will try to publish it asap. Used this for my asrock h110 pro btc with 10x armor's and no problems since.... standard version gpu crashes .....
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 8451
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 11, 2018, 05:30:39 PM |
|
I am running 4 two card machines total of 8 1080ti's
earning .4 coins a day or 11 dollars
about 1.40 usd a card running smos
|
|
|
|
CarlOrff
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 03:05:24 AM |
|
I finally got a pair of 1080ti's pointed here I am doing about 105 - 107 sols for the 2 combined.
I am mining at miningpoolhub is anyone running 1080tis on algo 144_5 and getting around 52-54 sols a card?
Yes : 51 sol/s @ 170 W max setting in the driver (135 W in real). OC : 175 core / 350 mem : stable during weelks.
|
Bitcoin + privacy respect = BitcoinZ ( topic BitcoinZ) The only decentralized crypto that complements Bitcoin on privacy. You missed Bitcoin in 2009 ? Do not miss BitcoinZ in 2018 !
|
|
|
siekeheros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 07:06:59 AM |
|
Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version?
|
|
|
|
valaki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 11:26:38 AM |
|
Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version? I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) .
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 11:36:57 AM |
|
Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version? I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) . everyone or just hobby miners that need to slow mining down so they can Farcebook better? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
siekeheros
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 01:32:27 PM |
|
Is the intensity functionality brought back yet? Did not see it in the changelog, but remember i was not the only one asking about it. Is it something that is planned for the next version? I support the proposal, EWBF_ everyone is looking for intensity fix ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) . everyone or just hobby miners that need to slow mining down so they can Farcebook better? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Doesn't matter, but with the old algo without adjusting the intensity i could use my computer for different stuff. Don't use farcebook or any other book that matter, but for programming work and so on. With the new algo's it's impossible to literally do anything on my system. Changing windows is a pain in the ass!. On my part just a suggestion, especially since this new code is based on old code that had this functionality baked in. If it's an easy fix, me and several others i guess will start mining and paying "fee" to devs. Win win in my book, no?
|
|
|
|
tiomnoch
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 02:59:48 PM |
|
I am use 96_5 algo. I have 8 Ks - 1050ti, 13 Ks - 1060, 19Ks - 1070, 24 kS - 1080 and 28 kS on 1080ti (Ewbf 3.0. Windows 10, last gpu drivers). Why the 1080ti is so slow?
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 12, 2018, 07:37:54 PM |
|
Is this miner stable at mix rig (gtx 1060 + 1070 + 1080 ti)?
|
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
beefs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 03:10:37 AM |
|
Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!" If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.
i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof? fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year. so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 10:35:55 AM |
|
Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!" If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.
i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof? fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year. so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Long ago, I predicted your point of view, so I decided to add the "fee" option, which allows you to disable fee. Therefore, if you want it, you can turn it off or use another miner. I see no reason for anger. So, relax and be happy!
|
|
|
|
boo50
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 472
Merit: 250
lux8.net
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 10:42:58 AM |
|
fee option is really a wise decision and it gives a choice to everyone - to thanks devs and share or develop their greed. my respect, EWBF
|
|
|
|
crypper
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 239
Merit: 12
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 13, 2018, 12:59:09 PM |
|
Not everyone; most of us ascribe to the camp of "why are you mad because he didn't break what was already working?" and/or "if it ain't broke, don't 'fix' it!" If you can't mine with a stable setup and 0.3.4b, then you shouldn't be mining.
i gather you don't understand the concept of perpetual vs. subscription software licenses and the development implications thereof? fortunately there were better alternatives brought to market in the time since ol' ewbf ghosted and counted his terraman cheese for a solid year. so you go ahead and fuck with ewbf again if that's what floats your boat...just don't expect to see anything beyond a (possible) r2 of current gen equihash miner. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) What do you smoke, beef? Enlighten us: what license is EWBF on? subscription or perpetual one ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) And btw there is no better alternative to EWBF on the "market". DSTM does give slightly higher hash rate for some cards at the expense of stability, but again disabling fee in EWBF will results in the same revenue as DSTM while being a more stable miner. As of now DSTM failed to introduce new equihash algos. So I'm guessing you are just trolling here while silently using EWBF (no other options).
|
|
|
|
|