|
oup59
|
 |
June 24, 2018, 08:26:35 AM |
|
Is this miner for the equihash coins those already forked only? What are the algo codes such as 144_5, 200_9 and etc? Is there a place that I can check which coin has which algo code? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CarlOrff
|
|
June 24, 2018, 08:36:41 AM |
|
Is this miner for the equihash coins those already forked only? What are the algo codes such as 144_5, 200_9 and etc? Is there a place that I can check which coin has which algo code? Thanks.
Yes. You can use the pair BTCz coin and SuprNova pool (or an other pool, see my signature and the first post of the BTCz ANN thread). |
Bitcoin + privacy respect = BitcoinZ ( topic BitcoinZ) The only decentralized crypto that complements Bitcoin on privacy. You missed Bitcoin in 2009 ? Do not miss BitcoinZ in 2018 !
|
|
|
Xianantung
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2018, 09:49:22 AM |
|
Short answer, impossible, 144.5 requires a larger amount of ram that the ASIC machines do not have
And how much RAM do they have? Nondestructive analysis show that it is less than 128MB of SRAM. Unless there was a chip breakthrough, you can't fit more than 128MB of SRAM on a chip. EH 144_5 would require a minimum of 600MB SRAM to be competitive with GPUs. Darn, it took the Crypto community 8 years to figure this out? By the way, Renuzit, this miner realy FKs up my RIG, it gives a ton of rejected shares and then crashes and 4 out of 7 GPUs disappear. I typically have to reboot about 4 times to get the system to bring up all 7 GPUs. The resolution keeps bouncing around to 640x480 and On the ZM miner where I used to mine BTCz up until the algo change, I had no issues whatsoever, my RIG would run a month without crashing even once, steady mining. I just tried again and now my RIG is not responding. Even screws up teamviewer, turns into black screen. This usually happens after WIN 10 update. Does it work with Windows 8.1? |
|
|
|
|
|
swisstrader
|
|
June 24, 2018, 10:03:45 AM |
|
EWBF, Please could you do something with the CPU core efficiency. My rig has 12 x GTX 1070 Ti with PL=126 W and OC=200/1200. Terminal with Htop running ooks like your miner uses for mining process only core 4 of the CPU (i5 2800 MHz, Kaby Lake). Many thanks for adaptions.  |
|
|
|
|
|
oup59
|
|
June 24, 2018, 10:17:32 AM |
|
Is this miner for the equihash coins those already forked only? What are the algo codes such as 144_5, 200_9 and etc? Is there a place that I can check which coin has which algo code? Thanks.
Yes. You can use the pair BTCz coin and SuprNova pool (or an other pool, see my signature and the first post of the BTCz ANN thread). Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
EPEMA
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 4
|
 |
June 24, 2018, 04:07:28 PM |
|
Tell me what the problem is:
"24.06.2018 21:35:11 INFO: Detected new work: 135912420056607
24.06.2018 21:35:20 Temp: GPU0 62C GPU1 62C GPU2 62C GPU3 60C GPU4 59C GPU5 61C
24.06.2018 21:35:20 GPU0: 31 Sol/s GPU1: 29 Sol/s GPU2: 32 Sol/s GPU3: 30 Sol/s GPU4: 32 Sol/s GPU5: 31 Sol/s
24.06.2018 21:35:20 Total speed: 185 Sol/s
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU0 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU0 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU1 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU1 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU2 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU2 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU3 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU3 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:31 WARNING: Looks like GPU4 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:31 INFO: GPU4 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:31 WARNING: Looks like GPU5 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:31 INFO: GPU5 are restarted."
on the old algorithm, everything was fine, and now at 194.5 several times a day this failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
GaryH
|
|
June 24, 2018, 05:59:30 PM |
|
Tell me what the problem is:
"24.06.2018 21:35:11 INFO: Detected new work: 135912420056607
24.06.2018 21:35:20 Temp: GPU0 62C GPU1 62C GPU2 62C GPU3 60C GPU4 59C GPU5 61C
24.06.2018 21:35:20 GPU0: 31 Sol/s GPU1: 29 Sol/s GPU2: 32 Sol/s GPU3: 30 Sol/s GPU4: 32 Sol/s GPU5: 31 Sol/s
24.06.2018 21:35:20 Total speed: 185 Sol/s
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:29 CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with message: "unspecified launch failure"
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU0 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU0 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU1 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU1 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU2 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU2 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:30 WARNING: Looks like GPU3 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:30 INFO: GPU3 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:31 WARNING: Looks like GPU4 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:31 INFO: GPU4 are restarted.
24.06.2018 21:35:31 WARNING: Looks like GPU5 are stopped. Restarting...
24.06.2018 21:35:31 INFO: GPU5 are restarted."
on the old algorithm, everything was fine, and now at 194.5 several times a day this failure
Could be OC, could be PL. Do Windows logs show any failures like nvidia drivers? Do you have the latest nvidia drivers? |
|
|
|
|
DUK
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2018, 07:52:21 PM |
|
Great miner! Thank you!
ASUS 1070TI 41Sol/s core+210 mem +1100 HIVE OS
|
|
|
|
|
mexicantarget
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1043
Cypherpunk (& cyberpunk)
|
|
June 24, 2018, 10:25:30 PM |
|
My 1080TI's are loving the update. tyvm, kudos!
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 8519
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
June 24, 2018, 10:41:42 PM |
|
Nice work.
Giving you some merit.
I have 13x 1080tis left
And I have 2 1050tis
I will shift some to this newer algo
Quick question
What is a 1080ti earning with this algo
|
|
|
|
|
BitPorium
|
|
June 25, 2018, 01:52:26 AM |
|
+-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.2 |
+-------------------------------------------------+
21:43:05 INFO: Used config file: miner.cfg
21:43:05 INFO: Current pool: zer-eu.forgetop.com:2052
21:43:05 INFO: Selected pools: 1
21:43:05 INFO: Algorithm: 192_7 "ZERO_PoW"
21:43:05 INFO: Devices: All.
21:43:05 INFO: Temperature limit: 82
21:43:05 INFO: Api: Listen on 127.0.0.1:42000
---------------------------------------------------
21:43:05 INFO: Target: 0320000000000000...
21:43:05 INFO: Detected new work: d22b
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:07 CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:07 CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:09 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:10 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:11 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:13 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:13 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 223ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:14 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:18 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:20 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:24 INFO: Detected new work: d22c
21:43:25 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:26 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:27 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:33 INFO: GPU1 Accepted share 112ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:34 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:35 Temp: GPU0: 64C GPU1: 65C GPU2: 64C GPU3: 64C GPU4: 64C GPU5: 57C
21:43:35 GPU0: 10 Sol/s GPU1: 11 Sol/s GPU2: 9 Sol/s GPU3: 11 Sol/s GPU4: 10 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
21:43:35 Total speed: 51 Sol/s
21:43:35 -----------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 64W | 0.16 Sol/W |
| 1 | 66W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 2 | 73W | 0.12 Sol/W |
| 3 | 63W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 4 | 70W | 0.14 Sol/W |
| 5 | 31W | 0.00 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
21:43:36 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 171ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:38 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:39 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:6, R:0]
21:43:40 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:6, R:0]
21:43:43 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:7, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:7, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 182ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:49 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:8, R:0]
21:43:50 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:8, R:0]
21:43:50 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:9, R:0]
21:43:51 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:9, R:0]
21:43:52 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:10, R:0]
21:43:54 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:11, R:0]
21:43:56 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:12, R:0]
21:44:01 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:44:04 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:10, R:0]
21:44:04 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:44:05 Temp: GPU0: 65C GPU1: 66C GPU2: 65C GPU3: 64C GPU4: 64C GPU5: 61C
21:44:05 GPU0: 10 Sol/s GPU1: 12 Sol/s GPU2: 10 Sol/s GPU3: 10 Sol/s GPU4: 11 Sol/s GPU5: 11 Sol/s
21:44:05 Total speed: 64 Sol/s
21:44:05 -----------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 65W | 0.15 Sol/W |
| 1 | 71W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 2 | 69W | 0.14 Sol/W |
| 3 | 63W | 0.16 Sol/W |
| 4 | 74W | 0.15 Sol/W |
| 5 | 62W | 0.18 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
confirmed working with gtx 1060 3gb cards. this is with PL 75w +150 core and +1000 memory in Hive OS. Lucky, I thought my 1060 3gb cards were gonna not work with this!
on 144_5 I get 110-115 sol/s with the same settings.
Full disclosure. The rig I got this from is odd. I have some gigabyte g1 cards in it that have an 80w limit on how low I can set the power limit. The card can pull up to 200w for some reason. I have overclocked this thing to 2.1 ghz and have only seen a maximum of 120w so basically these cards are gigantic for nothing. And they are micron and cant OC for crap on memory. Mining eth with them going for + 500 to + 1000 on memory gets me an extra 0.25 mh/s. RIP
But this works great! and seems to run a little cooler
|
|
|
|
|
kuplukota
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 25, 2018, 05:18:43 AM |
|
Is this miner for the equihash coins those already forked only? What are the algo codes such as 144_5, 200_9 and etc? Is there a place that I can check which coin has which algo code? Thanks.
Yes. You can use the pair BTCz coin and SuprNova pool (or an other pool, see my signature and the first post of the BTCz ANN thread). |
|
|
|
|
|
muchoman
|
|
June 25, 2018, 11:09:45 AM |
|
+-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Eqihash CUDA miner. v0.2 |
+-------------------------------------------------+
21:43:05 INFO: Used config file: miner.cfg
21:43:05 INFO: Current pool: zer-eu.forgetop.com:2052
21:43:05 INFO: Selected pools: 1
21:43:05 INFO: Algorithm: 192_7 "ZERO_PoW"
21:43:05 INFO: Devices: All.
21:43:05 INFO: Temperature limit: 82
21:43:05 INFO: Api: Listen on 127.0.0.1:42000
---------------------------------------------------
21:43:05 INFO: Target: 0320000000000000...
21:43:05 INFO: Detected new work: d22b
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:06 CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:07 CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:07 CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3019 MB i:64
21:43:09 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:10 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:11 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:13 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:13 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 223ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:14 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:18 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:20 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:24 INFO: Detected new work: d22c
21:43:25 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:2, R:0]
21:43:26 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:27 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:33 INFO: GPU1 Accepted share 112ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:34 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:35 Temp: GPU0: 64C GPU1: 65C GPU2: 64C GPU3: 64C GPU4: 64C GPU5: 57C
21:43:35 GPU0: 10 Sol/s GPU1: 11 Sol/s GPU2: 9 Sol/s GPU3: 11 Sol/s GPU4: 10 Sol/s GPU5: 0 Sol/s
21:43:35 Total speed: 51 Sol/s
21:43:35 -----------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 64W | 0.16 Sol/W |
| 1 | 66W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 2 | 73W | 0.12 Sol/W |
| 3 | 63W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 4 | 70W | 0.14 Sol/W |
| 5 | 31W | 0.00 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
21:43:36 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:36 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 171ms [A:4, R:0]
21:43:38 INFO: GPU2 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:43:39 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:6, R:0]
21:43:40 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:6, R:0]
21:43:43 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 112ms [A:7, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:7, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU0 Accepted share 111ms [A:5, R:0]
21:43:48 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 182ms [A:1, R:0]
21:43:49 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:8, R:0]
21:43:50 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:8, R:0]
21:43:50 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:9, R:0]
21:43:51 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:9, R:0]
21:43:52 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:10, R:0]
21:43:54 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 112ms [A:11, R:0]
21:43:56 INFO: GPU4 Accepted share 111ms [A:12, R:0]
21:44:01 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 111ms [A:2, R:0]
21:44:04 INFO: GPU3 Accepted share 111ms [A:10, R:0]
21:44:04 INFO: GPU5 Accepted share 112ms [A:3, R:0]
21:44:05 Temp: GPU0: 65C GPU1: 66C GPU2: 65C GPU3: 64C GPU4: 64C GPU5: 61C
21:44:05 GPU0: 10 Sol/s GPU1: 12 Sol/s GPU2: 10 Sol/s GPU3: 10 Sol/s GPU4: 11 Sol/s GPU5: 11 Sol/s
21:44:05 Total speed: 64 Sol/s
21:44:05 -----------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 65W | 0.15 Sol/W |
| 1 | 71W | 0.17 Sol/W |
| 2 | 69W | 0.14 Sol/W |
| 3 | 63W | 0.16 Sol/W |
| 4 | 74W | 0.15 Sol/W |
| 5 | 62W | 0.18 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
confirmed working with gtx 1060 3gb cards. this is with PL 75w +150 core and +1000 memory in Hive OS. Lucky, I thought my 1060 3gb cards were gonna not work with this!
on 144_5 I get 110-115 sol/s with the same settings.
Full disclosure. The rig I got this from is odd. I have some gigabyte g1 cards in it that have an 80w limit on how low I can set the power limit. The card can pull up to 200w for some reason. I have overclocked this thing to 2.1 ghz and have only seen a maximum of 120w so basically these cards are gigantic for nothing. And they are micron and cant OC for crap on memory. Mining eth with them going for + 500 to + 1000 on memory gets me an extra 0.25 mh/s. RIP
But this works great! and seems to run a little cooler
Well... At least your room is warm! |
|
|
|
|
dug03
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
June 25, 2018, 03:17:44 PM |
|
Nice to see ya back!
Played with v0.2 today with 1060x6 ssc. I only mine btg/zec/zcl for equihash so mined on the run,bat as is for ~200shares. Most nvidia OC cards already start above base so w/stock clocks it mined 12-13S/s @ 97-104w with less than 110ms latency. All accepted with only 2 rejects. Was on the 192_7 algo of course. Nvidia driver 391.24 cuda 9.1. Any cc overclock reduced efficiency as well as mem oc had 0 effect. As soon as I backed off the OC's it moved to ~14S/s. As usual EWBF will work well when the other equihash move to newer algos imho...
|
|
|
|
|
Hustler777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 26, 2018, 12:39:45 AM |
|
Hello, started this miner with 6 1070 cards and its showing 8 sol hashrate per card. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem? WIN10, driver Nvidia driver 391.24 cuda 9.1, cards settings are in stock. I will be greatful for any help
|
|
|
|
|
recoal
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
June 26, 2018, 01:04:33 AM |
|
no point
even the best 1080 ti card has break even of one year currently
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
June 26, 2018, 02:28:37 AM |
|
no point
even the best 1080 ti card has break even of one year currently
There may not be much sense in buying new hardware now, but there's plenty of reason to keep mining with hardware that you have already bought and has paid for itself. |
|
|
|
|
inudemon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2018, 12:21:21 AM |
|
Hello, started this miner with 6 1070 cards and its showing 8 sol hashrate per card. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem? WIN10, driver Nvidia driver 391.24 cuda 9.1, cards settings are in stock. I will be greatful for any help
Win10 x32 ? Troyans? Small pagefile? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultrasound
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
June 27, 2018, 02:47:00 AM |
|
no point
even the best 1080 ti card has break even of one year currently
There may not be much sense in buying new hardware now, but there's plenty of reason to keep mining with hardware that you have already bought and has paid for itself. That is only if the electricity price is low. |
|
|
|
|
|
