Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 02:55:12 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - Lightweight Bitcoin Client  (Read 243015 times)
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 04:18:09 AM
 #1521

Found this on google : http://download.electrum.org/

Scam ?

Have lunch the last portable nighlty build in a VM and nothing happen  Huh

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3e8892ca0c1464e2ecf0ac8427f1ba7e91d4fbd9775fd32df3b167730a7a40c7/analysis/
1480949712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480949712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480949712
Reply with quote  #2

1480949712
Report to moderator
1480949712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480949712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480949712
Reply with quote  #2

1480949712
Report to moderator
1480949712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480949712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480949712
Reply with quote  #2

1480949712
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480949712
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480949712

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480949712
Reply with quote  #2

1480949712
Report to moderator
Tachikoma
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile WWW
June 22, 2013, 08:04:07 AM
 #1522

Found this on google : http://download.electrum.org/

Scam ?

Have lunch the last portable nighlty build in a VM and nothing happen  Huh

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3e8892ca0c1464e2ecf0ac8427f1ba7e91d4fbd9775fd32df3b167730a7a40c7/analysis/

I would call 1 out of 47 a false positive. Slush hosts the binaries since Github stopped offering binary downloads.   

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks | Bytesized Seedboxes BTC/LTC supported
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 09:09:45 AM
 #1523

Found this on google : http://download.electrum.org/

Scam ?

Have lunch the last portable nighlty build in a VM and nothing happen  Huh

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3e8892ca0c1464e2ecf0ac8427f1ba7e91d4fbd9775fd32df3b167730a7a40c7/analysis/

I would call 1 out of 47 a false positive. Slush hosts the binaries since Github stopped offering binary downloads.  

What is the difference between slush fork and official ?

I don't find the slush repo on Github
01BTC10
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 09:33:05 AM
 #1524

All my balance has 20+ confirm but I get this when trying to send a transaction:



Any idea what is happening?

Using Electrum 1.8

EDIT: Realised those are newly generated coins... Maybe I need more than 20+ confirm.
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 09:39:48 AM
 #1525

All my balance has 20+ confirm but I get this when trying to send a transaction:



Any idea what is happening?

Using Electrum 1.8

EDIT: Realised those are newly generated coins... Maybe I need more than 20+ confirm.

"Coins generated aren't considered confirmed by the Bitcoin protocol for 100 blocks. It is advisable to wait some additional time for a better chance that the transaction will be propogated by all nodes. The classic bitcoin client won't show generated coins as confirmed until the 120th block."

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation
01BTC10
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 06:55:56 PM
 #1526

All my balance has 20+ confirm but I get this when trying to send a transaction:



Any idea what is happening?

Using Electrum 1.8

EDIT: Realised those are newly generated coins... Maybe I need more than 20+ confirm.

"Coins generated aren't considered confirmed by the Bitcoin protocol for 100 blocks. It is advisable to wait some additional time for a better chance that the transaction will be propogated by all nodes. The classic bitcoin client won't show generated coins as confirmed until the 120th block."

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation
Ok now I sent 20BTC to my wallet but can't spend 18BTC (same error code). I have 1.36 newly generated coins with less than 100 confirm in the same wallet but on another address. Is it possible to chose wich input I spend?
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 07:07:57 PM
 #1527

All my balance has 20+ confirm but I get this when trying to send a transaction:



Any idea what is happening?

Using Electrum 1.8

EDIT: Realised those are newly generated coins... Maybe I need more than 20+ confirm.

"Coins generated aren't considered confirmed by the Bitcoin protocol for 100 blocks. It is advisable to wait some additional time for a better chance that the transaction will be propogated by all nodes. The classic bitcoin client won't show generated coins as confirmed until the 120th block."

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Confirmation
Ok now I sent 20BTC to my wallet but can't spend 18BTC (same error code). I have 1.36 newly generated coins with less than 100 confirm in the same wallet but on another address. Is it possible to chose wich input I spend?

edit: nvm
01BTC10
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 02:41:39 AM
 #1528

The transaction worked when the newly generated input got fully confirmed. When the wallet has unconfirmed newly generated input and you deposit bitcoin on top then you can't send any transaction since the client will try to send the first unconfirmed newly generated input first. Even if using separate deposit address.
btcven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 717


Bitcoin Venezuela


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2013, 10:23:39 AM
 #1529

The transaction worked when the newly generated input got fully confirmed. When the wallet has unconfirmed newly generated input and you deposit bitcoin on top then you can't send any transaction since the client will try to send the first unconfirmed newly generated input first. Even if using separate deposit address.

Try freezing the addresses you don't want the client to het funds from.

Admin: rdymac (PGP) | contacto@bitcoinvenezuela.com | @cafebitcoin | Electrum, lightweight bitcoin client
If I've been helpful tip me a coffee! Cheesy1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k Bitrated user: rdymac.
Chaoskampf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


order in numbers


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 05:35:12 PM
 #1530

Is there a more thorough console documentation anywhere? Or is the existing documentation as thorough as it gets?
sdp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 401



View Profile WWW
June 23, 2013, 11:40:22 PM
 #1531

I am running Electrum 1.8 (Python sources) on Windows Vista.  It initially took a long time to connect and then to synchronize but nothing compared to how long a full node would.  I restarted the client several times, finally it is displaying my balance.

██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████           ▄█▄        ▄█▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀████████████▀           █████
█████           ████▀    ▀████           █████
█████           ████▄    ▄████           █████
█████           ▄████████████▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀█▀        ▀█▀           █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██             ▄█▀███████████
██              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
████████████████████████████
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                 ▄███▀  ██
██             ▄▄██▀▀  ▄█ ██
██     ▄    ▄███▀▀  ▄███  ██
██    ██▄▄██▀▀   ▄█████   ██
██   ████▀▀  ▄▄██▀▀ ▀█    ██
██  █▀▀   ▄▄██▀           ██
██    ▄▄███▀              ██
██▄▄▄████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██  ████▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ██
██     ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██    ██
██      ██         ██     ██
██       ███████████      ██
██        ▄▄     ▄▄       ██
██       ▀██▀   ▀██▀      ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                       ▄██
██                     █████
██         ▄         ███▀ ██
██       ▄███     ▄███▀   ██
██   ▄▄███▀▀███▄████▀     ██
██▄▄███▀     ▀███▀        ██
████▀                     ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄███████████▄  ██████████████
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
██████▀██████  ██████▀███████
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 11:51:59 PM
 #1532

I am running Electrum 1.8 (Python sources) on Windows Vista.  It initially took a long time to connect and then to synchronize but nothing compared to how long a full node would.  I restarted the client several times, finally it is displaying my balance.

use electrum.coinwallet.me server, fast and great uptime

btcven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 717


Bitcoin Venezuela


View Profile WWW
June 24, 2013, 02:16:06 PM
 #1533

I am running Electrum 1.8 (Python sources) on Windows Vista.  It initially took a long time to connect and then to synchronize but nothing compared to how long a full node would.  I restarted the client several times, finally it is displaying my balance.

When this happen, switch servers or restart the client.

Admin: rdymac (PGP) | contacto@bitcoinvenezuela.com | @cafebitcoin | Electrum, lightweight bitcoin client
If I've been helpful tip me a coffee! Cheesy1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k Bitrated user: rdymac.
jim618
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708



View Profile WWW
June 24, 2013, 08:33:13 PM
 #1534

Now that the QT client recommends a 0.0001 fee, could electrum go back to do the same? The sooner we all switch to the lower fee, the sooner miners will include it in new blocks as frequently as they did with the previous 0.0005 fee.

yes, I will do that.

(I know MultiBit is off topic in this thread but bear with me).

In the latest MultiBit release (0.5.12) I have changed the fee from a flat 0.0005 BTC to match the bitcoin-QT fees (basically 0.0001 BTC per 1000 bytes as Tacticat mentions).

There is an odd phenomenom that if all the clients drop their fees our users are all better off, but if only one does their users' transactions will get 'bumped down the list' and probably end up in later blocks. (This happens especially when there is a long gap between blocks and the unconfirmed tx start piling up).

I suggest we seize the day and ALL decrease our default fees and save our users some cash. The miners get that lovely 25 BTC coinbase so I don't think they will notice.

I think I will cross post in the Armory and Bitcoin wallet threads whilst I am feeling rebellious !

:-)

Jim

edit:
Bitcoin Wallet cross post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=242257.0
Armory cross post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=242255.0

MultiBit HD   Lightweight desktop client.                    Bitcoin Solutions Ltd   Bespoke software. Consultancy.
Binford 6100
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


PGP OTC WOT: EB7FCE3D


View Profile
June 25, 2013, 04:50:47 AM
 #1535

In the latest MultiBit release (0.5.12) I have changed the fee from a flat 0.0005 BTC to match the bitcoin-QT fees (basically 0.0001 BTC per 1000 bytes as Tacticat mentions).
...
:-)
Jim

fees in electrum seem to be modifiable by user. at least I managed to change the fees proposed by client app and it was still accepted in the blockchain. I mean if it is a sensitive topic (0.0005 vs 0.0002 vs 0.0001) just make fees variable/editable by users

You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
btcven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 717


Bitcoin Venezuela


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2013, 06:58:01 AM
 #1536

In the latest MultiBit release (0.5.12) I have changed the fee from a flat 0.0005 BTC to match the bitcoin-QT fees (basically 0.0001 BTC per 1000 bytes as Tacticat mentions).
...
:-)
Jim

fees in electrum seem to be modifiable by user. at least I managed to change the fees proposed by client app and it was still accepted in the blockchain. I mean if it is a sensitive topic (0.0005 vs 0.0002 vs 0.0001) just make fees variable/editable by users

You can set the fee you see enough for the TX, non sufficient will be rejected before broadcasting, but the 0.0005 is a editable recommended fee.

Admin: rdymac (PGP) | contacto@bitcoinvenezuela.com | @cafebitcoin | Electrum, lightweight bitcoin client
If I've been helpful tip me a coffee! Cheesy1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k Bitrated user: rdymac.
dermo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 11:37:29 AM
 #1537

Scam ?

https://bitcoinstarter.com/projects/104
ThomasV
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722



View Profile WWW
June 25, 2013, 03:06:19 PM
 #1538


I think that project is legit. I forwarded 2 btc from the old Electrum donation address.

Electrum: the convenience of a web wallet, without the risks
btcven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 717


Bitcoin Venezuela


View Profile WWW
June 25, 2013, 05:47:23 PM
 #1539



Check the announcement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=242767.0

Admin: rdymac (PGP) | contacto@bitcoinvenezuela.com | @cafebitcoin | Electrum, lightweight bitcoin client
If I've been helpful tip me a coffee! Cheesy1rdymachKZpA9pTYHYHMYZjfjnoBW6B3k Bitrated user: rdymac.
harningt
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92



View Profile WWW
June 25, 2013, 05:58:11 PM
 #1540

The BitcoinStarter is Not-A-Scam. Working towards a 'more native' Android client - and as mentioned, there is an announcement thread here.

If you find any of my contributions valuable, don't hesitate to tip Wink
1q8GSvUDaEHhVLqAec8qxWDtKeJGKX69m

Blog: Electroid - Electrum for Android - Native Edition
Pages: « 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!