soulmann
|
|
July 11, 2014, 08:15:24 PM |
|
I have the same with 2 7970. Dev fee version. GPU load = 0. Calatyst 14.3. Mining time stays 0 forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Anonz
|
|
July 11, 2014, 10:53:57 PM |
|
Primecoin doesn't have the same profitability factor as it did before. Has this miner even released yet?
|
|
|
|
tujh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:13:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
July 15, 2014, 10:35:58 AM |
|
Any thoughts on how to get this working with normal AMD drivers ? 13.12 will not work even with amd_ocl dll's in the folder. 14.6 does not allow to change clock speeds which makes it unacceptable and anything else is completely useless for mining....
|
|
|
|
taaku
|
|
July 27, 2014, 11:23:31 AM |
|
does this work on 14.6? its crashing for me
|
BTC: 1DgUj6s1yRwauEb89mGn92ZfNqK8xwcZPP
|
|
|
kev7112001
|
|
July 27, 2014, 04:40:48 PM |
|
does this work on 14.6? its crashing for me
yes it works the gpu harder so your volts might not be high enough for the clocks u have set
|
MCXNOW MODERATOR
|
|
|
taaku
|
|
July 28, 2014, 04:09:24 PM |
|
does restarting the mine..resets its block yield and or its fine if restart ....my only concern is that in xpm mining you only get proper reward after mining for around 12 hour..so lets say my miner gets restarted..does that mean i have to start the yield from beginning or its just that pool that determine for how much time i am connected.
|
BTC: 1DgUj6s1yRwauEb89mGn92ZfNqK8xwcZPP
|
|
|
taaku
|
|
July 28, 2014, 04:36:27 PM |
|
my system config: 2 - r9 280x 14.6 driver pool- ypool.net the speed remains at around 16 cpd after 30 min the speed starts decreasing slowly ,gpu load is down any idea?? what may be the problem .
|
BTC: 1DgUj6s1yRwauEb89mGn92ZfNqK8xwcZPP
|
|
|
primeGPU (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:35:40 PM |
|
my system config: 2 - r9 280x 14.6 driver pool- ypool.net the speed remains at around 16 cpd after 30 min the speed starts decreasing slowly ,gpu load is down any idea?? what may be the problem . Does GPU load jumps from 99% to 50%? If this is the case, it needs more power, you can adjust it in MSI Afterburner.
|
|
|
|
primeGPU (OP)
|
|
July 29, 2014, 09:37:09 PM |
|
does restarting the mine..resets its block yield and or its fine if restart ....my only concern is that in xpm mining you only get proper reward after mining for around 12 hour..so lets say my miner gets restarted..does that mean i have to start the yield from beginning or its just that pool that determine for how much time i am connected. It's completely fine to restart it - you don't loose anything.
|
|
|
|
deadworldisee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
August 18, 2014, 02:55:33 PM |
|
Will you make a version also for old video cards 6970,5970,6990...? I have lots of them also others.
|
|
|
|
gross
|
|
August 22, 2014, 11:51:49 AM |
|
who will tell it normally? 5 x 280x if not how i can fix it how to fix it, i change core clock to 1000 ,GPU still down 100% to 0%,then up to 100%
|
|
|
|
romantic1
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
August 24, 2014, 06:54:08 AM |
|
http://anty.info/primecoin-calculator/ doesn't work any more. How can I calculate my profit ? Example, I have 4 cards 280x with 35 chains per day, how many xpm coins I going to mine a day ? Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
Anonz
|
|
September 15, 2014, 08:06:27 AM |
|
http://anty.info/primecoin-calculator/ doesn't work any more. How can I calculate my profit ? Example, I have 4 cards 280x with 35 chains per day, how many xpm coins I going to mine a day ? Thank you very much. The owner of that site was a dickhead anyways. I'm sure there is other calculators out there
|
|
|
|
svedex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 11:04:29 PM |
|
hey guys,
quick question....is solo mining still profitable or is it better to go with a pool? my rig is 2x 280x OC hitting 18.46 CPD
|
|
|
|
kludzins
|
|
September 21, 2014, 09:08:49 AM |
|
my system config: 2 - r9 280x 14.6 driver pool- ypool.net the speed remains at around 16 cpd after 30 min the speed starts decreasing slowly ,gpu load is down any idea?? what may be the problem . Does GPU load jumps from 99% to 50%? If this is the case, it needs more power, you can adjust it in MSI Afterburner. Same problem to me now.. Added more power with afterburner (+20), GPU load stays in 88-94 range but after 30min load falls.. Core clock 1070 and memory clock 1500.. Maybe I need to change these? (I have 3x R9 280x)
|
|
|
|
kev7112001
|
|
November 19, 2014, 07:46:16 PM |
|
well its been months and no updates are u going to release the source
|
MCXNOW MODERATOR
|
|
|
splat44
|
|
December 24, 2014, 08:22:32 PM |
|
I have the same with 2 7970. Dev fee version. GPU load = 0. Calatyst 14.3. Mining time stays 0 forever.
+1 I even have AMD radeon R7 240 and this miner doesn't work with catalyst 14.9 as miner timer stays at zero. Also the latest catalyst omega file revision doesn't with any GPU Miners as it crash GPU! I've used similar miner as shown in entire but for CPU and function better! Until creator fix primecoin GPU miner then it best using the following miner: claymore gpu minerhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693680.0That miner is slower and work!
|
|
|
|
splat44
|
|
December 27, 2014, 04:39:18 PM Last edit: December 27, 2014, 04:53:40 PM by splat44 |
|
well its been months and no updates are u going to release the source
What on earth would they do that for? Even though the open source miner is now faster, it would be stupid to open source theirs and allow any optimizations missing from the open source miner to be added. Ok, Let's see: Version 4 was posted on March 29, 2014 and primeGPU last post was July 29, 2014 and no promises being done to improve his miner! The fact and my point is: I don't think your question is related as the open source (version 1) is available and none for current version: http://primegpu.com/After three months miner's owner not being active, it makes sense for members asking updates. Importantly even if source is fast enough and since not all members know about compiling via linus or win32-64, it seems to suggest you know something! At this point Wolf0, why don't you take a look at source and try to compile it accordingly and test it?
|
|
|
|
|