Bitcoin Forum
December 18, 2017, 03:22:26 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Primecoin GPU miner: 9.1 CPD on a 280x / pool / 2% dev.fee  (Read 99941 times)
LongAndShort
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:35:16 PM
 #421

Quote
I'm just use to putting the wallet address as rpcuser from prior solo mining experiences.

So, part of the software is the server/miner portion and the other is kind of a wallet/block viewer. I could open the qt, it said it couldn't lock in the data.

My cpu usage is 20% or less, is that normal for one 7970 running on a quad core cpu setup?

This happens when the client is still running and can mostly happen if a miner is still mining on it even if you close the client.
Its still locked onto the data so if you see that, usually its best to go to task manager and close the process
1513610546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513610546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513610546
Reply with quote  #2

1513610546
Report to moderator
1513610546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513610546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513610546
Reply with quote  #2

1513610546
Report to moderator
1513610546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513610546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513610546
Reply with quote  #2

1513610546
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513610546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513610546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513610546
Reply with quote  #2

1513610546
Report to moderator
1513610546
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513610546

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513610546
Reply with quote  #2

1513610546
Report to moderator
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:36:42 PM
 #422

Claymore's seems to be better for the 290/290X.
This is not correct:
- Claymore is yet to provide stats for 290
- Claymore claims to have 0.9 cpd on 290x, ours >= 1.1 cpd (various reports)
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:37:20 PM
 #423

Quote
I'm just use to putting the wallet address as rpcuser from prior solo mining experiences.

So, part of the software is the server/miner portion and the other is kind of a wallet/block viewer. I could open the qt, it said it couldn't lock in the data.

My cpu usage is 20% or less, is that normal for one 7970 running on a quad core cpu setup?

This happens when the client is still running and can mostly happen if a miner is still mining on it even if you close the client.
Its still locked onto the data so if you see that, usually its best to go to task manager and close the process


i can vouch for that what up long

MCXNOW MODERATOR
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:37:48 PM
 #424

that was for yours as the other miner is for ypool not solo
Sorry, my bad.
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120

Miners developer


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:38:20 PM
 #425

The primegpu miner is faster than the Claymore one for 7970/280X. I get time=238 on primegpu and time=770 on Claymore.


On prime GPU miner i am at 240-250 time for each 290x.  Hoping for improvement on these cards soon.

Do you know what exactly means "240-250" time? Or "770" time? I know only how I measure "770" time, but I have no clue what primegpu measures in his miner. Miners are different and they show different numbers since they measure absolutely different things. Again, these numbers have different meanings. So don't compare these values. It's like compare apple and orange Smiley The only way to compare different miners is to run them and check earnings.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:40:39 PM
 #426

The primegpu miner is faster than the Claymore one for 7970/280X. I get time=238 on primegpu and time=770 on Claymore.


On prime GPU miner i am at 240-250 time for each 290x.  Hoping for improvement on these cards soon.

Do you know what exactly means "240-250" time? Or "770" time? I know only how I measure "770" time, but I have no clue what primegpu measures in his miner. Miners are different and they show different numbers since they measure absolutely different things. Again, these numbers have different meanings. So don't compare these values. It's like compare apple and orange Smiley The only way to compare different miners is to run them and check earnings.

so far with 2 290x's i have made .09 xpm in 2hrs

MCXNOW MODERATOR
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 08:41:45 PM
 #427

The primegpu miner is faster than the Claymore one for 7970/280X. I get time=238 on primegpu and time=770 on Claymore.


On prime GPU miner i am at 240-250 time for each 290x.  Hoping for improvement on these cards soon.

Do you know what exactly means "240-250" time? Or "770" time? I know only how I measure "770" time, but I have no clue what primegpu measures in his miner. Miners are different and they show different numbers since they measure absolutely different things. Again, these numbers have different meanings. So don't compare these values. It's like compare apple and orange Smiley The only way to compare different miners is to run them and check earnings.

Your miner show is the total time round. I'm just assuming that primegpu is doing the same, but I can be wrong, I'm human you know. But these number I'm getting is from a 7970, I don't currently own a 290/290x.

I made a separate thread to discuss your miner to reduce any confusion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=557604.0

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:41:53 PM
 #428

the claymore miner is pool optimized likely at the cost of ch/day to compare the 2 solo vs pool makes little sense, i hope primegpu has some performance enhancement for us soon or we all wasted our xpm on license Sad which btw are painfully restrictive unless u had a card in its own rig for this...
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:46:53 PM
 #429

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320

MCXNOW MODERATOR
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:46:59 PM
 #430

the claymore miner is pool optimized likely at the cost of ch/day to compare the 2 solo vs pool makes little sense, i hope primegpu has some performance enhancement for us soon or we all wasted our xpm on license Sad which btw are painfully restrictive unless u had a card in its own rig for this...
For 7970/280x ours is at least 2x faster than Claymore's.
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:48:13 PM
 #431

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320
What was the value on 13.9?
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:49:03 PM
 #432

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320
What was the value on 13.9?

dont know i never downgraded but i see other with 2.19

MCXNOW MODERATOR
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 08:50:04 PM
 #433

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320

Mine's is showing "Estimated CPD= 1.39" on 14.3 beta drivers on a single 7970 with a AMD Phenom II x4 820 (Unlock cache makes it equal to a 920).

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:51:31 PM
 #434

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320

Mine's is showing "Estimated CPD= 1.39" on 14.3 beta drivers on a single 7970 with a AMD Phenom II x4 820 (Unlock cache makes it equal to a 920).

i do have it overclocked to 4ghz though

MCXNOW MODERATOR
urubu
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:52:14 PM
 #435

The primegpu miner is faster than the Claymore one for 7970/280X. I get time=238 on primegpu and time=770 on Claymore.


On prime GPU miner i am at 240-250 time for each 290x.  Hoping for improvement on these cards soon.

Do you know what exactly means "240-250" time? Or "770" time? I know only how I measure "770" time, but I have no clue what primegpu measures in his miner. Miners are different and they show different numbers since they measure absolutely different things. Again, these numbers have different meanings. So don't compare these values. It's like compare apple and orange Smiley The only way to compare different miners is to run them and check earnings.

You are likely correct.  I am at 2.2 cpd with 2x290x.  Is that easier to compare?
I gather that the claymore miner mines a pool instead of solo, is that correct?
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 799


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:53:09 PM
 #436

the claymore miner is pool optimized likely at the cost of ch/day to compare the 2 solo vs pool makes little sense, i hope primegpu has some performance enhancement for us soon or we all wasted our xpm on license Sad which btw are painfully restrictive unless u had a card in its own rig for this...
For 7970/280x ours is at least 2x faster than Claymore's.

Release a miner for ypool then u can compare till then ur just pulling numbers from ur arse...
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 08:56:01 PM
 #437

i have noticed that im running at 2.57 cpd with 14.3 drivers on 2 7970's and a 8320

Mine's is showing "Estimated CPD= 1.39" on 14.3 beta drivers on a single 7970 with a AMD Phenom II x4 820 (Unlock cache makes it equal to a 920).

i do have it overclocked to 4ghz though

I'm just running 2.8ghz on my old AMD Phenom II x4. I was planning to run it on my Core i5 build, but the AMD meets the requirement to run the miner properly.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429


View Profile
April 04, 2014, 08:58:36 PM
 #438

also the computer that has 2 7970's in it is my htpc which runs tv most of the day and it found a block in 8 hrs

MCXNOW MODERATOR
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
April 04, 2014, 09:00:10 PM
 #439

Release a miner for ypool then u can compare till then ur just pulling numbers from ur arse...
Thank you, I prefer pulling numbers from my arse... let's just wait and see.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
April 04, 2014, 09:09:27 PM
 #440

also the computer that has 2 7970's in it is my htpc which runs tv most of the day and it found a block in 8 hrs

That's balls, running your htpc as a miner...LOL....Cool....

Is is a big htpc case? Lucky the miner runs the gpu cool.

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!