silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:15:23 PM |
|
I don't see Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v7.0 for Windows
me too I don't see any uploaded file for windows
|
|
|
|
goofy73
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:25:24 PM |
|
I do not understand.
|
|
|
|
CrashOD
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:42:55 PM |
|
Your screenshot shows a Primecoin (XPM) miner and CPD is "Coins per Day " which is the hashrate equivalent for XPM. This thread is for the CryptoNote miner which is completely different from the XPM miner you are talking about. I believe you are looking for this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693680.0
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:52:35 PM |
|
I don't see Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v7.0 for Windows
me too I don't see any uploaded file for windows I uploaded v7.0 for Windows.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 18, 2014, 02:59:48 PM |
|
Here is the full log, when I start the miner: ----------- The other thing that is bugging me, that in the both archives uploaded, have identical sizes, and both give me the warning "Catalyst 13.12 is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility", although the files in the archives are different.
I use driver 14.4, set swap to 20GB, system memory is 2GB, 6 x 7950 cards. Operating system is Ubunty Server 14.04 LTS. Tried both versions, 13.12 and 14.6, both are giving me the error above.
1. The actual error is "Internal error: Input OpenCL binary is not for the target!". Something is wrong with Catalyst. I tested on 14.6, perhaps there is some compatibility problem for 14.4 on Linux. 2. Both versions show "Catalyst 13.12 required" because I did not build EXE twice for Linux. Probably I must remove this message in Linux version. The only difference in versions is "data.bin" file.
|
|
|
|
Rabinovitch
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1076
BTCLife.global participant
|
|
September 18, 2014, 04:59:46 PM |
|
I uploaded v7.0 for Windows.
Looks like -tt really works. Thanx!
|
|
|
|
moroz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 05:24:52 PM |
|
Thanks for Linux miner!
OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6 Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes. I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine. Are hashrates normal for these cards? The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 18, 2014, 05:30:55 PM |
|
Thanks for Linux miner!
OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6 Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes. I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine. Are hashrates normal for these cards? The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?
The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix. I use Windows.
|
|
|
|
goofy73
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:41:25 PM |
|
I do not understand.
Your screenshot shows a Primecoin (XPM) miner and CPD is "Coins per Day " which is the hashrate equivalent for XPM. This thread is for the CryptoNote miner which is completely different from the XPM miner you are talking about. I believe you are looking for this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693680.0Sorry guys, you are right! Im little confused.. By the way, nice to hear that cryptonote miner have speed potential, thanks Claymore fo your work. Maybe you look at xpm miner and 7950 cards?!
|
|
|
|
infofront
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
|
September 19, 2014, 01:40:42 AM |
|
Thanks for Linux miner!
OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6 Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes. I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine. Are hashrates normal for these cards? The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?
The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix. I use Windows. My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory.
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 19, 2014, 06:25:02 AM |
|
Thanks for Linux miner!
OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6 Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes. I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine. Are hashrates normal for these cards? The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?
The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix. I use Windows. My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory. Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 19, 2014, 06:40:01 AM |
|
Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.
Uh... yes it is. If you mean, worth more than power costs, it is. I use btc-mike's AMD miner. The hash rate is the same for 750 or 1250MHz memory frequency.
|
|
|
|
moroz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2014, 09:52:27 AM |
|
Thanks for Linux miner!
OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6 Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes. I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine. Are hashrates normal for these cards? The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?
The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix. I use Windows. Yeah, you are right, Elpida memory... I found other 7970 cards with Hynix, they do much better
|
|
|
|
Black_Adder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
September 19, 2014, 09:57:25 AM Last edit: September 19, 2014, 10:09:40 AM by Black_Adder |
|
I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower
is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?
|
|
|
|
OrientA
|
|
September 19, 2014, 10:28:56 AM |
|
I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower
is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?
Claymore said it was just the fan control in the 7.0. So I did not upgrade.
|
|
|
|
DemocraticRepublicOfDave
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 01:52:27 PM |
|
Hi all,
Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers. AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).
Cheers
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
|
DemocraticRepublicOfDave
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 03:30:28 PM |
|
Ah cool. Up and running and hashing away. Cheers Dave
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 19, 2014, 06:59:15 PM Last edit: September 19, 2014, 10:37:16 PM by anatolikostis |
|
PowerColor hd7950-dhv5 with Elpida GDDR5 @1080/1500 non optimized bios - 376h/s optimized bios - 426h/s (hd7950-dhv2 with Hynix GDDR5 @1080/1500 pulls over 456h/s) the speed diference between v6.1 & v7.0 is apsent
|
|
|
|
|