Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[silencesilence]

I don't see Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v7.0 for Windows

me too
 I don't see any uploaded file for windows

[1715164231]

1715164231

[1715164231]

1715164231

[1715164231]

1715164231

[goofy73]

I do not understand.

[CrashOD]

I do not understand.

http://i68.fastpic.ru/big/2014/0918/66/fccd79719f91879aa9ebffd2f70fda66.jpg

Your screenshot shows a Primecoin (XPM) miner and CPD is "Coins per Day " which is the hashrate equivalent for XPM. This thread is for the CryptoNote miner which is completely different from the XPM miner you are talking about. I believe you are looking for this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693680.0

[Claymore]

I don't see Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner v7.0 for Windows

me too
 I don't see any uploaded file for windows

I uploaded v7.0 for Windows.

[Claymore]

Here is the full log, when I start the miner:
-----------
The other thing that is bugging me, that in the both archives uploaded, have identical sizes, and both give me the warning "Catalyst 13.12 is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility", although the files in the archives are different.

I use driver 14.4, set swap to 20GB, system memory is 2GB, 6 x 7950 cards. Operating system is Ubunty Server 14.04 LTS. Tried both versions, 13.12 and 14.6, both are giving me the error above.

1. The actual error is "Internal error: Input OpenCL binary is not for the target!". Something is wrong with Catalyst. I tested on 14.6, perhaps there is some compatibility problem for 14.4 on Linux.
2. Both versions show "Catalyst 13.12 required" because I did not build EXE twice for Linux. Probably I must remove this message in Linux version. The only difference in versions is "data.bin" file.

[Rabinovitch]

I uploaded v7.0 for Windows.

Looks like -tt really works. Thanx! 

[moroz]

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

[OrientA]

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

[goofy73]

I do not understand.

Your screenshot shows a Primecoin (XPM) miner and CPD is "Coins per Day " which is the hashrate equivalent for XPM. This thread is for the CryptoNote miner which is completely different from the XPM miner you are talking about. I believe you are looking for this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693680.0

Sorry guys, you are right! Im little confused.. By the way, nice to hear that cryptonote miner have speed potential, thanks Claymore fo your work. Maybe you look at xpm miner and 7950 cards?!

[infofront]

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory.

[OrientA]

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

My 7950s get awful rates as well. I'm thinking they probably have Elpida memory.

Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.

[OrientA]

Boolberry's miner is not sensitive to memory speed. But it is not profitable to mine either.

Uh... yes it is. If you mean, worth more than power costs, it is.

I  use btc-mike's AMD miner. The hash rate is the same for 750 or 1250MHz memory frequency.

[moroz]

Thanks for Linux miner!

OS Ubuntu 14.04, catalyst 14.4, GPU Miner v7.0 Beta catalyst 14.6
Host 1: Sempron 140 2GB RAM, dual R9 290 @ 947MHz 1280h/s
Host 2: Xeon E5-2665 4GB RAM, dual R 290 @ 1040MHz, 1390h/s
Host 3: Celeron G1820 4GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s
Host 4: Dual Xeon E5-2665 16GB RAM, quad 7970 @ 925 MHz, 1420h/s

Flying good for the last 24 hours, no crashes.
I don't have any issues regarding virtual memory. Actually i don't have any virtual mem since Ubuntu is PXE booted into RAM (squashfs image) and uses approx 1.1 gigs, which leaves 900 megs free for the first machine.
Are hashrates normal for these cards?
The only thing that stops me from booting the entire farm with this miner is no way to monitor it. With c(s)gminer it's easy using the API and anubis. Any way to monitor Claymore's miner?

The 7970 speed is quite low. for 925MHz, should be around 460h/s. Yours is about 355h/s. Maybe your memory speed is lower than 1250MHz or they are not Hynix.

I use Windows.

Yeah, you are right, Elpida memory... I found other 7970 cards with Hynix, they do much better

[Black_Adder]

I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower

is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?

[OrientA]

I cannot see any different in speed between 7.0 and 6.1 for windows in fact the new one is slower

is there's any reason for this or does the new one has different settings?

Claymore said it was just the fan control in the 7.0. So I did not upgrade.

[DemocraticRepublicOfDave]

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers.  AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

[bonosurgut]

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers.  AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous/detail?os=Linux%20x86_64&rev=13.12

[DemocraticRepublicOfDave]

Hi all,

Any idea where I can download the catalyst 13.12 linux 64 bit drivers.  AMD website keeps throwing me to the latest 14.x version (grrr).

Cheers

Dave

http://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/previous/detail?os=Linux%20x86_64&rev=13.12

Many thanks.

Dave

[DemocraticRepublicOfDave]

Ah cool.

Up and running and hashing away. 

Cheers

Dave

[anatolikostis]

PowerColor hd7950-dhv5 with Elpida GDDR5 @1080/1500
non optimized bios - 376h/s
optimized bios - 426h/s   (hd7950-dhv2 with Hynix GDDR5 @1080/1500 pulls over 456h/s)
the speed diference between v6.1 & v7.0 is apsent