|
150 BTC including shipping to USA/Canada - All 4 Cards....
|
|
|
|
how are you guys keeping track?
Excel-->copy-->paste--->add.worker.totals--->compare.payments....LOL |
|
|
|
|
It seems reasonable to assume that Pirate's 'counters' never reset on the 10th after payments went out, as that additional amount seems to be close to what I was overpaid.
|
|
|
|
|
Pirate, check payments from the 11th. There may be a slight discrepancy. Not to complain, but I was overpaid.
My totals still do not add up and by my calculations, I still owe you mining shares.
|
|
|
|
What will happen if your system gets compromised and funds will be solen?
I am sure pirate would be smart enough to have multiple wallets, tripple password encryption, storing wallet offline, backups, etc etc I thought he used insta-wallet?  No. Pirate seems like a Linode VPS kinda guy  |
|
|
|
What will happen if your system gets compromised and funds will be solen?
I am sure pirate would be smart enough to have multiple wallets, tripple password encryption, storing wallet offline, backups, etc etc I`m talking about current funds stolen,not all of them, who will take responsibility,users\owner of system? Judging by your 13 post history, you clearly have no idea just how much of our BTC that Pirate currently 'manages' not to mention, no one else posting any concern in the last 3 months...lol Welcome to Bitcointalk.org |
|
|
|
|
As I am not a #Bitcoin-OTC User, I have decided that this thread will serve as my BitcoinTalk.org community Credit & Community History.
Latest transactions will be added to the top of the list, with the oldest transaction at the bottom.
Repaid/Concluded Transactions Notes shown in Green - Current/Outstanding Transactions Notes shown in Red
All times listed are MST (GMT -7) using the TimeStamps from my BTC Wallet (Bitcoin-qt V.0.6.2 beta).
---------------------------------------------------------------
alexmat - (private address)
----------------------------------------------------------
June 15, 2012 - 13:56 - (600 BTC Loan Received)
July 16, 2012 - xx:xx - First Payment Due (10% Principal + 100% Interest = 108 BTC)
Dec 16, 2012 - 00:00 - Loan Due
(Loan Term - 6 Months @ 8% MPR)
PatrickHarnett - 1JRhBxBZu8VzPZnKhfjUuDn3X9tAoRZEPc
----------------------------------------------------------
June 1, 2012 - 21:29 - (120 BTC) Loan Received.
June 15, 2012 - 02:42 - (69.4 BTC Total paid to date)
June 15, 2012 - 14:05 - (65 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full
(Loan due July 1, 2012 @ 12%)
Jeremy-Spendbitcoins.com
----------------------------------------------------------
May 09, 2012 - 00:49 - (1650 BTC) Purchase Made.
znort987 - (private address)
----------------------------------------------------------
Apr 21, 2012 - 20:48 - (230 BTC) Loan Received.
May 03, 2012 - 19:44 - (34.5 BTC) Sent to date.
May 07, 2012 - 14:00 - (204 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full
(Loan due June 20, 2012- 0.5% Daily)
BurtWagner - 1BzrwBPqmBNirgj9RS115ofNS5kLLkBBJi
----------------------------------------------------------
Mar 30, 2012 - 10:19 - (90 BTC) Loan Received.
Apr 21, 2012 - 08:59 - (100 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full
(Loan due April 29, 2012 - No Schedule = 100 BTC)
hashking - 1JjtEbZM7acwTBgceDv1DE2VavbdFYL3vH
----------------------------------------------------------
Mar 07, 2012 - 20:48 - (40 BTC) Loan Received.
Mar 30, 2012 - 11:44 - (45 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full.
(Loan due April 07, 2012 - No Schedule = 45 BTC)
DollarTrader - 1EwowGJJTYCUuaT2ARZqZanAWXUnymQ8wb
----------------------------------------------------------
Feb 12, 2012 - 20:00 - (25 BTC) Loan Received.
Mar 07, 2012 - 21:55 - (28 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full.
(Loan due March 12, 2012 - No Schedule = 28 BTC)
BurtWagner - 1BzrwBPqmBNirgj9RS115ofNS5kLLkBBJi
----------------------------------------------------------
Feb 11, 2012 - 15:40 - (25 BTC) Loan Received.
Mar 05, 2012 - 01:49 - (21 BTC) Loan Payment.
Mar 06, 2012 - 18:19 - (7 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full.
(Loan due March 12, 2012 - No Schedule = 28 BTC)
PatrickHarnett - 1JRhBxBZu8VzPZnKhfjUuDn3X9tAoRZEPc
----------------------------------------------------------
Feb 11, 2012 - 14:05 - (50 BTC) Loan Received.
Feb 18, 2012 - 10:34 - (13.5 BTC) First Payment, as agreed.
Feb 24, 2012 - 11:39 - (13.5 BTC) Second Payment.
Feb 26, 2012 - 15:59 - (13.5 BTC) Third Payment.
Feb 29, 2012 - 12:23 - (13.5 BTC) Final Payment, Repaid in Full
(Loan due March 12, 2012 - 4x Weekly Payments = 54 BTC)
---------------------------------------------------------------
**LENDERS - If you would like either your name or payback address removed, please let me know. I have had some that care, some that don't and a select few that don't even want to be listed on this page.... for privacy concerns.
Just let me know.
bitlane.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, what does everyone think of the Internet ?
I think it might be a SCAM or simply a fad and will pass.
If you don't know what the Internet is, just Google "Internet"
|
|
|
|
when mining at a regular pool what is the current rate, when not using gpumax?
(1 / Current Difficulty) * 50 = Payout per Share <EDIT> imsaguy was too quick....LOL |
|
|
|
http://blockexplorer.com/address/1HB5XMLmzFVj8ALj6mfBsbifRoD4miY36vI have no idea how to, so perhaps someone with some actual knowledge might be able to look into this and see if or how many of the recently 'tainted' BTC have made their way into the Wikileaks donations wallet. Just a thought, as I was checking out Wikileaks as I usually do once a week or so and the BTC Donation option reminded me of the recent thefts...lol
|
|
|
|
P2pool: you need also bitcoin and p2pool running and hope none of them crash  (and bitcoin QT client is prone to crash with p2pool... but not bitcoind as far as i know) I had the same problem when I tried P2Pool (QT crashing), so I just ran cmd line BitcoinD rather than the wallet GUI, then used Safebit (html RPC app) for wallet functions when mining. Problem solved. |
|
|
|
Weird, one of my cards chokes with HW errors when using gpumax, but not when on slush. All other settings stock/same.
I had the same problem with 1 of my 5830's last month with an older version of CGMiner and GPUMAX. The card reported errors, but still performed just the same as the other (4) 5830's in the same 5 card rig....it made no sense. New version of CGMiner fixed it up and I haven't had any problems since upgrading to CGMiner 2.3.1 (or whatever the latest is). |
|
|
|
Yup, english is my second language. Maybe i shouls start write in my language and use google translator, who know... Maybe i should translate it like 4-5 times between other languages for increased randomness...
My comment wasn't meant to be an insult Your point is that the "big guys" stay on other pools instead of moving to p2pool, and thus you try to imply that it's somehow p2pool fault. Problem is this is not true. It's a fact that they are NOT on p2pool. But it's also a fact that p2pool is better than a pool with fees. P2pool works, there aren't "game-breaking" bugs, payouts are received and mining work without problems.
P2pool is small but isn't so new, it has been around since a lot of time, and no one report "my btc vanished, help me" things.
I just think that the 'big guys' will move away from pools once P2Pool has MORE of a track record, that's all. I should have said it more simply, but that was the point I was trying to make. Let the 'smaller guys' with less equipment 'test' P2Pool, because moving a big mining farm and having to watch over it to ensure everything is working properly can be alot of work |
|
|
|
nonsense
Why the world don't use bitcoin? Why it's so small? Maybe paypal and dollar is better after all. But then why we are here?
Also, p2pool is open source, nothing is hidden. Performance? It's the same of a normal pool. No need to trust anything.
So since they are big they must be right? Then we are better uninstall bitcoin, we are small.
Is it safe to assume, judging by your ' English as a second language' reply, you may have missed the simple point I was trying to get across in my post above and only picked up on certain points, but completely out of context ? |
|
|
|
I've read a bunch of threas from here and around the web, best seems to be the 100 mhz below unless you do a bios flash and then run them on linux?
any development for windows 7 32 or 64 bit?
Windows: MSI Afterburner. Is Afterburner capable of breaking the 125Mhz memory/gpu clock difference on a 6xxx card to lower the memory further ? I haven't tried it for quite some time now (ever since switching from GUIminer to CGMiner 4+ months ago) but I have some 6xxx cards that I would love to get the memory lower on if it's possible and are all Windows7 x64 machines. Could you share a bit of info ? does it require 'unofficial overclocking' to be enabled ? |
|
|
|
|
I made this request in your other 6990 thread, but thought I would post here as well....
Since you seem to have 2 of these 6990's (one in a system and one for sale by itself) is there any way you could post a NEW PIC showing the system with the card installed and the second card sitting in front of it out of the box with your name in the pic ?
I just noticed that the same pic was used in 2 different threads.....
Excuse me while I go put on my tinfoil hat now...LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Since you seem to have 2 of these 6990's (one in a system and one for sale by itself) is there any way you could post a NEW PIC showing the system with the card installed and the second card sitting in front of it out of the box with your name in the pic ?
I just noticed that the same pic was used in 2 different threads.....
Excuse me while I go put on my tinfoil hat now...LOL
|
|
|
|
|
This is easily $1200 worth of Cards on Ebay....... something doesn't smell right.
Do you have a pic of all 6 cards together out of the box with your name somewhere in the pic ?
|
|
|
|
Yes but P2Pool is better in anything you said.
And is really free. Because YOU host p2pool. No need to waste money on servers
I'm not about to sit here and argue the merits of P2P mining vs. Pool Mining because we all know that decentralization is best. NOW, in saying that, it's a wonder why more of the BIG miners (25 GH/s and larger) have not switched over to P2Pool yet. I mean, it's not due to the fact that they don't know what they are doing, because ANYONE who is able to maintain a mining farm larger than 10 GH/s obviously knows what they are doing. What could the deciding factor be then ?....that keeps miners such as these still tied to the large pools ? Well, in short ? PROVEN PERFORMANCE. Perhaps once P2Pool gets a rock solid 6+months under it's belt as a top 10 pool, more miners will find their way there, but for now, with an investment that is as sizeable as some have (again, the LARGE miners) it makes more sense for them to keep a solid income stream coming in from a proven side of the technology and let the smaller miners with alot less to loose, be the 'Beta Testers' for new technologies such as P2Pool.....Sound reasonable ? As an example, the current top 10 miners at BTCGuild could easily/effectively DOUBLE the current P2Pool hashrate, but they still choose to mine at a pool to protect their investments and seem to have no problem PAYING for the privilege to do so....... I only have 6 GH/s under my belt, as I sold off a bunch of equipment after the crash a few months ago and am now replacing with more efficient hardware, so I am a perfect candidate for P2Pool, yet I still choose to pay to have someone else ensure that my BTC income stream is guarded and remains coming in as usual. Unless you have as much to loose, it's easy for a sub-10 GH/s miner to call the bigger miners with tens-of-thousands invested into hardware, IDIOTS for giving up profits for the opportunity to mine at a fee based pool.....but put yourself in THEIR shoes and see how your views might change. |
|
|
|
I'll just leave this here  Could you also leave the make/model of that particular PSU ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
