Hi, I took a glance at your gambling profile and accounts history on the other thread and would think you are a high roller. I can understand that you're frustrated and angry for the delay as high rollers are usually benefited certain privileges in one form or another. I am PMing duelbits' representative to notify them about this thread so they can attend to it. I'd like to ask you to give a little bit more patience as duelbits is currently not online and it might took time for them to notice my PM.

Meanwhile, as you have raised a scam accusation, I'd like to think that it'll be best to lock your other thread on gambling section as it will make things harder to track if someone create simultaneous threads. The lock topic button is at the bottom left of the page.



On a lighter note to brighten the... mood, 40kk is better known as 40m

I might be wrongly remember, but I think I've read some people indirectly --as in they know people who know people, and the likes-- have a "successful" result of resolution through the license provider. You never heard any of it is probably because the lack of follow-ups by the parties involved for the case, as the disputes are solved and intermediated privately, unlike ADR like CG or AG who open the discussion for public.

Thank you for accepting my application. Sig and avatar updated.
Current post count (including this one): 3078

First of all, Coinzino Casino, I appreciate your prompt action by returning to this forum to clarify the issue. Risking to sound repetitive, I am agree with two posts above me and asking if you can provide us with a tx id or at the very least, a screenshot of the proof of successful payment. OP, we can work this part from your side too. Can you clarify that you've receive what's stated by the representative?

Second, agreeing with Agbe, can you please at the very least inform us what clause has the OP breached? I think informing us the point of the ToS being breached wont compromise your security and fraud detection algorithm.

As there's no other means of contact to inform the representative of the platform about the current situation other than email, as per the information from their live support, I've made a temp-email and send them info about this. Let's wait and see if they'll come back online and address this issue.

If I may suggest, I'd propose you to stop posting here or any other thread and start working on that ban appeal, otherwise --judging from how frequent you posted on any other board and topic instead of making an appeal on meta-- this account will begin to be considered as a ban evasion attempt.

Given your history with gambling platforms and your track records, I am asking this with a bucket of salt next to me: did they said you passed the video KYC verification or give any conclusion regarding it?


Rollbit is not on askgamblers, and depends on what kind of gambling or betting he did on rollbit, casinoguru might or might not be able to mediate the case; CG did not intermediating sportsbet-related issues.

---

Edit: realized there's one auto-suggestion, removed

The list needs to be tweaked a bit to straighten things up. What currently happen/happened with those cases are as follow:

1. Rollbit - scam 5k - GDPR PROBLEM
I have not read the whole case, only quoting the OP for image visibility, as I had to attend to personal matter the past week and now catching things up that I put on pause during that personal matter. Will give a thorough read when I have time available at hand.

2. Rollbit disables account and seizes funds (10.2k)!
This is an "active" case where Razer has stated that OP abused their sportsbetting rules but refuses to inform what abuse it was, only that the abuse were found and raised by their 3rd party, Betby.

3. Community Warning - Rollbit ⚠️
This is a unique and special case of... amusing user who tried to "warn" the community through scam accusation because their withdrawal got delayed for two hours. No ban, no KYC, no other burdening task other than having to wait for two hours. So, yeah, I don't think this can be considered as an open scam accusation

4. Rollbit hold funds and ignore in chat
This one, where I used to left a tag for Razer and Rollbit to catch their attention in hope for them to re-assess the issue because there were no follow ups for quite a while, finally were concluded as below:


So, I think it's safe to assume the OP of that thread is indeed trying to cheat and abuse Rollbit.

5. scam warning rollbit.com banned my account
This one accuses everybody who said anything with the slightest sliver tone that questioned him to be "rollbit staff". Can't imagine why he had the need or felt it's important to mention he's a korean youtuber other than to subtly threatening the customer support. The case is... was, he used rollbit to trade, utilizing their 1,000x leverage bonus to trade on a gambling platform and earned 670x-ish of his initial deposit.

Though I have to say Rollbit shares the blame here, because if they're not ready for their bonus and promo without countermeasures, they shouldn't offer it at all, the OP is also clearly not without malicious intent. I personally think there's no need to consider this case as active. Rollbit make [present tense, as they're still doing it and seemed will not rectify it in any near future] mistakes, but what happened is arguably conclusive.

6. rollbit scam (255 USDT)
The last one was replied and explained by Razer as below,


Razer accuses the OP of that thread, hugarden2, of account limitation abuse, and though initially hugarden2 denied this and insisted that his account on rollbit was the first one,


his last activity on this forum was on the 12th of April, as per when this post was made, around when his charade of being the one wronged here didn't seems to gain enough traction as people overseeing that case didn't seems to take his side --nor Rollbit's side-- I am more than welcoming an idea that he's busy somewhere with his personal matter and didn't have time to defend 255 USD [not sure how much will it worth converted to Ruble], but the absence of defense could arguably be translated that he tried his luck by playing the victim card, and giving up when he saw the forum keeps its neutrality. Thus, this case is also closed.

I am not defending Rollbit and their representative at any degree by this post. In fact, I deeply think that rollbit need to stop throwing blanket statement of "prolific abuser" and give something more specific and concrete the best they can without jeopardizing their security algorithm for each cases served to their plate.

The wall of text above merely serve to point out that from the six --that I know of-- scam accusations raised against them on the dedicated board, only two still inconclusive, and became the basis of me agreeing with the later part of Solosanz post, that every case against rollbit or any well established platform, who has little to no record of wronging their customer, should be taken with grain of salt.

Posting to make OP's image visible after re-uploading through imgbb, resizing it so anyone reading this thread will not get hit in the face with barrage of images [I think it's zoom-able. Not sure if it will get pixelated on PC, I can zoom it through my phone just fine, though.]


source: https://imgur.com/a/mEeamhK





source: https://imgur.com/a/HmrWQ0P


source: https://imgur.com/a/JLDJGUv


source: http://imgur.com/a/285OW8a


source: https://imgur.com/a/rBTI0nU

---

I am somewhat sure the IMG and the BB code works just fine, you're just unable to show it due to the rank restriction. it'll be very helpful for the members of this forum if you still upload the bbcode version for your next images, someone with higher rank will make it visible by quoting your post.

---

OP, please stop making double post. You've raised a thread here against them, I'd ask you to stop making the exact same post on their ANN as it'll make things and development of the case harder to follow.

Chiming in with what several people has pointed out here, that is not a robbery, that is a rule agreed on ToS being enforced.

I am not trying to give you a false hope, but have you checked your initial account, a.k.a. the spam-acocunt? Try to look there. If your balance wasn't there, refer to the text below from their ToS I marked in blue. If some is there, then congratulation and refer to the text I marked in green. Pay attention to the underlined words, they don't have any obligation to take that action, it's in their full discretion to take which of the two options available.
 

Silence, you peasant! How dare you raise your voice to the king of snowflake?

---

Thank you for your generosity, message is well received. If it wouldn't burden you so much, it'll be very much appreciated if you could lock this thread as there's no case from your side against rollbit, you achieved what you generously tried to do, and message received. This thread no longer serve any purpose

Hi, moving here while the other campaign is on pause [I guess I just enjoyed working with you way too much]

Current number of post (Including this one): 3069
Rank: Legendary
bech32 address: bc1qcmwf7ckusenz7vjsvp8pwhjqn9gyulrtejeq74
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 192

I didn't follow the case from the beginning, obviously, so I didn't have an immersive knowledge of the case, nor I am interested on reading every single chat on their group since 15th to today to get acquainted with every complaint and "anyone participants ask about reward they blocked from group not giving any clear answer", but perhaps you missed their pinned post?

I am not sure I understand you correctly, because I am sure I read your situation wrongly, I read it as follows:

You signed up and played on rollbit for three days, made multiple deposits and withdrawal within that relatively short time span, all successful, and at one point on that third day, your supposed-to-be instant withdrawal because it's in SOL got delayed for two hours, two, with a message telling you to contact support, of which they replied that it is normal and asked you to wait, and they delivered exactly that, namely after two hours, it went through.

Despite the multiple withdrawal in short time span etc., they didn't ask you for KYC or anything, they only asked you to wait, and not for days or even 24 hours. Two hours, as in one, two. And when it went through, you decided that you want to create an account on this forum to warn people to not playing on that platform? Who delivered their words?

I am sure I understand all or at least some of those points wrongly, as your thread is the antithesis of a scam accusation.

They promised you that everything is alright, asked you to wait, and it happened exactly like that. If you've been playing for years, you'll came to an understanding that two hours delay is a simple issue, if not a non-issue. I can't see why you feel the urge to create an account and warn people just because they made you wait for two hours.

If I may be an ass --which already on my personal text, by the way, so I spare you from the need to point it out at me-- I can only think of two possibilities. One, you're an alt of someone who currently have an issue with rollbit and tried to stir the pot even further with an non-existent issue. Two, and I pray to anything divine that it is wrong, you're a special kind of... human who happens to be on Astaroth's speed dial because you two are BFF.

Purely curious if you have ever bought something online. Seeing that the goods' status is being delivered but you need two days for it to arrive in your hand must be... tormenting.

It's literally up there on the first post of this page made by me, in reply to razer's reply on the last page. Did you not try to read every posts on your own thread which aim is to solve a problem you had? I requoted razer's reply below, for your re-re-reference

Looking for truth, obviously. The roasting part was done several posts ago. Try to keep up.


Me? Why me? I am just an amateur with zero experience in scam busting. Why don't you? You're the professional here. I thought you like to see yourself as the last force protecting the cryptocommunity?


I most certainly don't know about that partnership, solely for the reason I am not even aware I have friends on bitcointalk. Care to tell me who my friends are whom partnered with you? I am sure they don't mind you mentioning them by name and inviting them here to vouch for you and informing me that I am their friend. You might made my day by letting me know that some people here on the forum, who happen to be your partner, consider me as their friend.


[gasp]
The highest level of moral principles and honesty is accepting payment to remove negative facts from a review site and hiring and considering people who spent 48 hours on an app, platform, or the likes as someone with real user experience?


Hmm.. this is interesting. Can you ask her for me, if she's not in any way involved, at any degree with BKS, then why'd she retweeted their tweet about her being their advisor? I am aware I can ask her myself, but certainly we can agree that two people poking her tg with questions will rather put her on an inconvenient situation.

And for the last time, CryptoViking and BKS are not my friend, just like --I am sure-- they're also not friends with the DT who left you feedback. The feedback and "defense" --though I prefer to use the word "inquiries-- happens here is not because we know CV and friend with him. I have not even heard of his name before this thread. So it'll be very much appreciated if you can stop throwing the "you're friend with xxx" or "your friend xxx" or "the admins bla-bla-bla" like its a Black Friday.


I am sure you're well aware that your answer is not covering what I asked. Allow me to make it simpler: does the 1,000-3,000 USD and the 5-10% you charge to your "client" is outside the fee charged by the law firms?

Sadly, that will only slowed the BM a little. As OP said, the bounty was managed by a notorious BM. Leclerc2019 was part of, if not he himself, the already flagged and tagged Formula Bounty. He'll re-emerge with another alt-account.

Currently there were no information about an ADR that hosted Rollbit that also intermediating sportbetting related issues. Several members have asked about it and no answer so far, which could means they probably not on any. As you seems to be on a deadend and would take any leads, only one that I can offer is perhaps asking their licensor to handle your dispute. Rollbit is with GamingCuracao. Mind that their findings will be considered as a final says and it could take weeks for them to clear the issue.

Yes, I got the answer, as well as, I believe, everybody who read this thread. Though a bit implicitly explained, the nature of your site and the ethic you followed, your definition of honesty, can be summed up in that sentence. When people did not pay you, i.e.: using your free service, you'll tell all positive and negative facts. You'll have a lengthy dialog with the potential buyer like CryptoViking, inquiring about so many things --borderline grasping at straws, if I may add my personal amateur opinion-- while actually collecting more and more materials for your article and offering the paid service. When they pay, they can rest assured. When they opt to use your free service, though, they'll have a potential to [check note], ahh... deserved to be "shut down"

I think the tag is well proven and justified now.

Moving on to next topic. Though, at this point, I don't see why its necessary anymore, given the dark side of your service is already well-founded. Nonetheless...

Ms. Valge.
I can see that you're quite well versed on crafting sentences to drive certain opinion. "consultant", "work with them", "working on". The announcement made by BKS was that she's one of the advisors, as she acknowledged and confirmed on the last part of her chat with you.

Flying overseas to help solve problems... and whatnot.
Your explanation on the earlier part here, just in case I was wrongly understand it, I'd like to confirm, so you're pretty much brokering a lawyer? You're reviewing a case, if it can be solved by yourself, virtually, much like what we did here, it's free. But if it require a lawyer, you'll look for a lawyer in that area, charge the customer an extra 1,000-3,000 USD outside the lawyer's fee, non-refundable, and when they win the case, you'll charge another 5-10% of the amount won. All that for finding a lawyer for the customer? Or do I understand that scheme of yours wrongly?

I am sorry if I sound rude, that's a bit intentional, but I think you have a trouble on addressing all the matters being discussed. This will the third time it being asked, so I'll just snip everything and focus solely on this matter below, to help with your short attention span, until it's cleared.