The other day, I stumbled upon a thread that was about gamers earning BTCitcoins, and two of the comments that mentioned "BitSkins" caught my attention ^{[#3 and #5]}. I did some digging and it looks like it requires users to go through some sort of KYC process, so I looked around for alternative options and the closest that I could find was CS.Deals but the main issue with it is their userbase; In other words, I have to price my skins lower than other marketplaces and even then, it takes a while before I could sell those.

Note: I already checked all of the mentioned alternatives ^{[CS.Deals, Skinport, SkinBaron, and LootBear]} from the following two threads ^{[thread #1 and thread #2]} and none of them seem to tick all the boxes...

I'm after the following things:

• Non-KYC marketplace
• Support for BTCitcoin payments
• A similar amount of traffic ^{[or userbase]} to BitSkins
• Reasonable fee
• Legit

Does anyone know a better BitSkins alternative than CS.Deals?

I think it's safe to say that's much more complicated than that ^{[unfortunately]}.

I don't think realistically that's achievable by BTCitcoin, especially for those altcoins that survived that state, upon being introduced for the first time to the crypto-currency world.
^{- From thousands of existing or upcoming altcoins, there will always be some that'll have real use cases where BTCitcoin might not be a solution.}

Taproot ^{[to an extent]}.

You're very welcome... I just finished checking the above-archived links and it looks like there's an issue if we click the "View the archive here" button...
^{- Perhaps it doesn't have the ability to save PDF files like other similar websites.}

• This is the error that I'm getting:
  
  Quote
  }Err@Er{
  This archive is experiencing an existential crisis
  It has been deleted, moved, or never existed.

---

Thanks to the "Bumping changes on some boards", all of those bumps mean little to nothing but have you tried reporting it ^{[might get trashed]}?

I strongly believe that this whole thing is nothing but a way to obtain personal information ^{[e.g. IDs]} from users, so you could use those things to your advantage, on other platforms.

---

I'd suggest staying away from this user.

May nakakaalam ba kung anu ba ang ngyari sa payment gateway/solution ng Coins.ph?

• Akala ko nung una ^{[since 25th of May]} baka temporary lang ito pero hanggang ngayon sira parin yung page nila para sa mga merchants ^{[e.g. Accept Payments - 404 error]}.
  ^{- Chineck ko din yung mga announcement nila pero wala akong nakitang announcement tungkol dun.}

Nandoon yung option kabayan, kailangan iclick mo yung "CoinPayments" option sa listahan.
^{- Check mo yung "post [screenshot]" ni bL4nkcode.}

---

Matagal na nakalagay sa FAQ page nila:

You pasted an incorrect link; Here's the "archived" version.

---

This one is closer than it looks... I checked Whois results for both of the above platforms and they were both created on the exact same day and despite SafeMoon Inu's creation time being 19 hrs after MoonPortal, they seem to be more polished ^{[I do know looks can be deceiving]} in comparison to the latter one ^[MP].
^{- What do you think? Could it be the other way around instead?}

Indeed but I'm looking at it from a different perspective than what you and most other users are discussing here...
^{- What I'm about to mention might not be 100% accurate, since I'm not going to refer to any of the charts but whenever we experience one of these ATH moments, it also results in huge spikes in fees [understandably] and when crashes of that extent happen, we're mostly left with true bitcoiners and that also leads to fees going down drastically.}

Interesting concept but if I understood everything correctly, players could end up losing more than what they've wagered ^{[based on their skills and final scores]} and I believe that is one of its downsides ^{[apart from Jawhead999's comment]}.

Here you go: MintGox Podcast 10 - Ken Kruger from Pay with Moon

For the most part, there's no merchant fee, but it looks like they do charge 0.0005BTC for each of the transactions involving external BTCitcoin addresses.
^{- IMO, that should be dynamic as opposed to a fixed fee.}

---

I don't think a lot of merchants would choose a processor that requires their customers to either have an account with Paxful or force them to create one and go through a KYC process ^{[I know it's just a phone number and an email verification, but still...]} just so they could purchase something.
^{- Paxful Pay - Step By Step Guide For New Users}

I looked around and found one on "RealCrypto" and also a few on Alibaba.
^{Note: I prefer to no vouch for both of the above platforms [DYOR].}

---

You'll probably get better answers if you move this thread to the "Collectibles" board instead.
^{- Move button is in the bottom left corner of the page.}

I don't think it's fair to compare such applications with a forum ^{[they belong to a different category]}.
^{- Check other forums and you'll see the difference isn't that much.}

It's not; I can't really see a need for adding more of those.

Pretty sure I'm not visiting the website from a cached version, but still can't see that update on your website...
^{- Am I missing something or you were just referring to the comment section at the bottom of the main page?}

You might want to consider adding a thumbs-down icon as well.

---

It doesn't seem to have a report button for each of the listings, so I'd suggest adding one as well.

Sorry Ronak, but I won't spend a single minute contacting an exchange that everyone knows it's a platform meant for scamming their users ^{[you should've done more research prior to offering such services]}...

<sup>- Just check their "ann thread" and also the "trust summary" of their representative in this forum.
- Forget about offering such services for them [will probably get tagged if you continue] and I'd suggest locking this thread as well.</sup>

I just created an account for testing purposes on one of the forums ^{[Coinbistro.com - Epochtalk testing grounds]} that's using Epochtalk and I was able to upload an animated avatar.
^{- Having said that, I don't think we'll have that feature when it launches [it annoyed a lot of users back then].}

You might want to mention in which one of the cryptocurrency exchanges you can help with listings?

---

Btw, care to provide a list of coins that you've successfully helped with their listings in the past, so we could do a background check with some of the developers?

That's going to be one loud car while being in a parked state
^{- It's not going to be a significant earning but it's at least something new and hopefully, this isn't just a marketing strategy.}

I think this one should be the appropriate source instead: Link
^{- You can also find a bit more information from "this" link.}

A large company with no reputation means nothing to this community.

In other words, scam newcomers to make a quick buck.

If you've already used them for mining, then why even mention not having enough time to fully test it?

So suddenly you changed your mind and became generous, huh

Yeah, right!

---

Due to multiple red flags, I'm temporarily tagging your account until you can prove us wrong ^{[previous users have already mentioned what you should do]}.

Unfortunately, I don't think the previous submission form ^{[regardless of the mentioned expiry date]} is going to have any effect; They've now completely removed the "crypto-themed physical tokens" from the "All Non U.S. Mint Coins" section of their services and have also mentioned the following on their website:

I don't know why some of the users always compare BTCitcoin with something that clearly belongs to another category or field; It's like you're trying to compare water with a fruit, vegetable, and meat ^{[you can't place all of them in a single contest]}.
^{- Each one of them comes with its unique feature as a store of value and we're going to see/use them side by side for a very long time.}