anybody knows who is doing 128MHash/s on jackpotcoin cloudminer ?
Its about 270Mhs already. Who knows, its definitively some medium whale with a farm, probably AMD because I haven't seen anyone with nVidia farm at that size. But who knows  , maybe some big guys who recognizes the potential of nVidia in mining race and he has built a farm already. 270Mhs is around 100x750Tis, the whole farm is merely < 20k Euro if you compare to some whale who invested > 100k in mining equipment. But anyway we are welcome this because that means the coin got some attention. would you put 20k investment on this coin ? This coin sound like a lot of gambling for such high investment. Hopefully, he won't stay long on this coin meanwhile, my 130euro investment just arrived Will be the occasion to remove all the dust which has accumulated in the case since two months... According to normal logic it is risky, but in crypto everything is already risky as well. Maybe the whale sees a potential for this coin or he's trying to mine one day and dump all of his coin for 0.5BTC and runs for the next coin. With every coin sucking right now this coin is ATM the most profitable coin so I don't see why don't give it a try. |
|
|
|
Thanks for your miner. It seems AMD CPU has more advantage than Intel this time (depend on clock rate)? My old friend Phenom X6 gets 0.9Mhs while my shiny new Core I7-4770k gets only 1Mhs. Thanks anyway. It maybe a good start for new miner but I will stay out this time  |
|
|
|
Why so many miners mining out of pool? they really can get jackpot?
Maybe it is a farm/big farm . No it's not so many. The stats about total nethash is wrong. It should be 6 times lower because it was calculated with the wrong PoW block time. So total nethash is now around 1Ghs. cloudminers has 700Mhs is already over >70% of total nethash. Who is the whale miners in cloudminers ? You should point your rigs to hashminer pool to avoid FUD of destroying the coin. |
|
|
|
We have a whale with 270Mhs at cloudminers Congrats. This coin gets more attention. |
|
|
|
anybody knows who is doing 128MHash/s on jackpotcoin cloudminer ?
Its about 270Mhs already. Who knows, its definitively some medium whale with a farm, probably AMD because I haven't seen anyone with nVidia farm at that size. But who knows , maybe some big guys who recognizes the potential of nVidia in mining race and he has built a farm already. 270Mhs is around 100x750Tis, the whole farm is merely < 20k Euro if you compare to some whale who invested > 100k in mining equipment. But anyway we are welcome this because that means the coin got some attention. |
|
|
|
as an alternative to myriad-coin you can also take a look at saffron-coin. same algorithm -> minable with ccminer
saffroncoin looks very shady to me. And still no exchange right? Anyway I must report about the performance of ccminer0.7 about myr-gr. My GTX580 flies with 12Mhs right now. Absolutely magic, Christian + Christian GTX 580 (compute 2.0) 12 Mhash/s GTX 660Ti (compute 3.0) 9,7 Mhash/s (overclocked) GTX 750Ti (compute 5.0) 6,4 Mhash/s (overclocked) i'm disappoint... EDIT: seems i have found dependence GTX 580 -> Memory Interface Width 384-bit; Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 192.4 -> 12 Mhash/s GTX 660ti -> Memory Interface Width 192-bit; Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 144,2 -> 9,7 Mhash/s (overclocked) GTX 750ti -> Memory Interface Width 128-bit; Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec) 86.4 -> 6,4 Mhash/s (overclocked) or number of ROPs? GTX 580 -> 48 ROPs GTX 660ti -> 24 ROPs GTX 750ti -> 16 ROPs You are disappointed? Why? LOL Because the AMD R9 290 gets the same hashrate with the 3 years old GTX580? No way. |
|
|
|
as an alternative to myriad-coin you can also take a look at saffron-coin. same algorithm -> minable with ccminer
saffroncoin looks very shady to me. And still no exchange right? Anyway I must report about the performance of ccminer0.7 about myr-gr. My GTX580 flies with 12Mhs right now. Absolutely magic, Christian + Christian |
|
|
|
I think the pools are showing a too high network hash rate
PoW: 120 sec block target
PoS: 20 sec block target
the difficulty to hash rate mapping formula that I know goes like this
DIFFICULTY * (2 ^ 32) / BLOCKTIME
so with current difficulty of 25 we get
2 * 4294967296 / 120 = 894 MHash/s.
Are the pools wrongly using 20 seconds block time in the formula, overreporting network hash rate a 4 Gigahash/s?
Or are they basing their estimates on block founds per hour or per day, which includes PoS blocks every 20 seconds?
Christian you are right but I think it was a bug from the coin daemon. getmininginfo show "networkhashps" : 5287006833 currently so I think the pools get the stats from the coin daemon. Btw what kind of logic is this when users can't register at official pool? New coin launches with interesting new hashing algorithm and concept, distance itself in the clone ocean out there, but many little details like this could keep new users away. |
|
|
|
Is jackpotcoin profitable at all? I've switched off my miner,because only YAC was barely making back any RoI,and mining anything else had become unprofitable. With them switching back to their commit,how does the v0.7 perform? Is it still giving the same hashrate or more/less? I have a Kepler card,btw.
Chris84 just told me that with this 35 MHash/s he's expecting a 0.15 BTC income per day. lolwhut I told everyone yesterday but no one believes me. This coin remains for us nVidier. Hopefully it won't end up like Fuguecoin. I'm still in the rich list of Fuguecoin with a little distance to Christian  well, right now it is only exchanged on one crappy exchange and we are asked to vote to get to a second crappy one... This doesn't sound good to me 0.15BTC is may-be achievable however at the moment the total buy volume is 0.56BTC so it won't last At the moment there is an order at 3sat this explains my lolwhut statement... And nothing lasts forever in Cryptoland. Even the all mighty BTC has his hard time too. Why don't enjoy it while it still lasts? |
|
|
|
Thanks for your fast update again. It works great with Kepler & Maxwell cards, but unfortunately not with Fermi cards. (I mean jackpot algo).
I got
780 - 6Mhs
680 - 3.7Mhs
750ti - 2.9Mhs
our stream compaction code currently makes use of the __shfl intrinsics (warp shuffle) and that has a minimum requirement of Compute 3.0, sorry. I might try to add some emulation code later. It will be a bit slower though. Ok Christian, no need to sorry. You have provided us enough. I just want to report. My 580 can go back to mine groestl. Still have the best performance with ccminer5 for Fermi cards. Btw, I have tried to fix the bugs with config file in ccminer and the thing I came up with is by deleting these two if clause in parse_config and parse_cmdline function. Ugly quick fix but it works: if (opt_algo == ALGO_HEAVY && opt_vote == 9999) { fprintf(stderr, "%s: Heavycoin hash requires block reward vote parameter (see --vote)\n", argv[0]); show_usage_and_exit(1); } With this the config file could be read but a few options are unavailable e.g. --quiet. I will try to read the code and find the bugs too when I have time. Luckily your code are readable and I understand German too. Regards, |
|
|
|
Is jackpotcoin profitable at all? I've switched off my miner,because only YAC was barely making back any RoI,and mining anything else had become unprofitable. With them switching back to their commit,how does the v0.7 perform? Is it still giving the same hashrate or more/less? I have a Kepler card,btw.
Chris84 just told me that with this 35 MHash/s he's expecting a 0.15 BTC income per day. lolwhut I told everyone yesterday but no one believes me. This coin remains for us nVidier. Hopefully it won't end up like Fuguecoin. I'm still in the rich list of Fuguecoin with a little distance to Christian |
|
|
|
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your fast update again. It works great with Kepler & Maxwell cards, but unfortunately not with Fermi cards. (I mean jackpot algo).
I got
780 - 6Mhs
680 - 3.7Mhs
750ti - 2.9Mhs
Regards,
PS: FYI, for example my 580GTX get unrealistic hash if I try to solomine
[2014-05-01 13:27:48] thread 0: 79691777 hashes, 79731 khash/s
and with pool it said:
GPU #0: result for nonce $03EDFEBB does not validate on CPU (3 rounds)!
What clocks for your 750ti? I'm only getting 2.55-2.65 with my EVGA SC.  Maybe you are on risers? My rigs with 1x16 riser only get 2.6 per card too. Without risers some card gets 3Mhs. I can't overclock because I use Linux. |
|
|
|
thanks for the heads-up. I fixed the Jackpotcoin algo this morning. here's what 3 ASUS MARS cards are getting (equivalent of 6 GTX 760) [2014-05-01 08:24:26] accepted: 1/2 (50.00%), 20851 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-05-01 08:26:06] accepted: 2/3 (66.67%), 19553 khash/s (yay!!!) I keep seeing some boo's from the wallet, so I wonder what's up with that. Christian Hi Christian, Thanks for your fast update again. It works great with Kepler & Maxwell cards, but unfortunately not with Fermi cards. (I mean jackpot algo). I got 780 - 6Mhs 680 - 3.7Mhs 750ti - 2.9Mhs Regards, PS: FYI, for example my 580GTX get unrealistic hash if I try to solomine [2014-05-01 13:27:48] thread 0: 79691777 hashes, 79731 khash/s and with pool it said: GPU #0: result for nonce $03EDFEBB does not validate on CPU (3 rounds)! |
|
|
|
Hi fellow Fuguees, This coin has so much potential. SCRYPT is in it's death throes (for non-ASIC miners) as ASICs are slowly starting to make it into the wild. The Fugue256 algo is an interesting alternative to X11 and Groestl and difficulty is still relatively low - it should definitely be doing better. I for one would support a new developer who would actually do some work on this. I think the first thing that needs to be done is removal of the atrocious 1980s arcade game pretending to be a website. Next we need to get on some exchanges and create some buzz which is much harder. Hopefully the coin can be brought back from the dead. I will tweet some info on it to try to help but then I don't have many followers so the reach won't be massive (@Soul_Eater_43) - please do the same or retweet if you care about this coin. (Here's the first post : https://twitter.com/Soul_Eater_43/status/461567652415426560) The more of us that can raise awareness of the coin the better but we do also need a proper developer. Does anyone in the community know somebody who might be willing to take the job on? Perhaps we could create some sort of fund to help support further development. I think this coin can succeed in spite of the lack of action from the developer but only if it has a community behind it. Arif. (Soul_Eater/Cryptofiend) Also if anyone wants to get rid of their Fuguecoins I will happily take them off peoples hand's - the coin maybe worthless but at least I could get my number on the top 50 list for something : FQpxJf2a9wxU6Hp6T886fryXRF8HcbKwFv . Here's some additional incentive: 10,000 FC to whomever assumes the dev mantle and gets an updated release of the wallet or website out, whichever comes first. This offer is good for a week. If someone picks up as the dev, I'll hold the coins longer in the hope they'll get that task done. -Dave 10k Fuguecoin from me as well. Prof. Andersen could you inform me if someone want to take this bounty? |
|
|
|
LOL should we say RIP to the coin like Fugue? It's sooner than expected.  I have found blocks and I have 31mh/s I also got one block that was odd which I guess was orphaned or something.
You have 75% of total net hash. Amazing. What rigs do you have? |
|
|
|
no there is a spelling mistake, in the #if query further down
search for this "#if MAXWELL_OR_FERMI"
you will get no results, then search for "#if MAXWELL_OR_FEMRI" and you will get a result, notice the spelling mistake? :
Also can someone check some hashrate numbers for me for my calcs? i dont mine some so hashrates are ripped off the net, and are for 3x750Ti's
they dont all have a "Worth" because its only linked to mintpal right now. if its right, microcoin could be a very good mining venture
Thanks bigjme I found it. My hashrate is back to 3.2Mhs which is not improved over version 5. Btw you are wrong with MRC block reward because it is still dropping. You should estimate block reward around ~ 16k only. IMHO groestlcoin is more stable to mine now. Or YAC. My i7-4770k pulls whoopy 2.5Mhs right now so our 750ti won't get any advantage anymore. I think we still have to wait for Christian to give us his magic again. today is testing day i guess: after jackpotcoin fails for me, I tried CACHEcoin. And this is the strangest thing ever. I had it running for a while solomining just to test the speeds. Then I tried to mine on a pool. However, mining does not start, instead my GPU's do REALLY strange noises (like birds Oo). Can anyone give me a correct command line for that algo which is known to work? I tried cudaminer -a scrypt-jane:CACH -q -o stratum+tcp://cach.catcoin.cz:3333 -u USER -p PASSWORD but that results in those strange noises... It depends on your card but I will give you my config as example. GTX780 non-ti: --launch-config T11x12 -L 2 -b 8192 -C 0 --single-memory 1 -H 2 --interactive 0 -a scrypt-jane:1388949883,4,30 And cudaminer version is important as well. 28-02 version is the best working right now. |
|
|
|
wow what a drop of diff and hashrate
12:05:51

{
"blocks" : 6056,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 62.14287302,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 4125218041,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
14:30:50

{
"blocks" : 6242,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 15.59424563,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 1415999471,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
Yeah because miner for nVidia folks won't work anymore so all nVidia miners leave. |
|
|
|
I didn't test sgminer with nvidia kernel but IMHO it never matches ccminer performance. Someone corrects me maybe?
Btw, FYI, it seems strange but ccminerv5 works best for me with groestl. Constant 3.2Mhs, no overclock, 750ti. I have tried v5.5, v6, compiled from source, tried Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI 1, all of this but my hashrate still drops to 2.6Mhs, no matter what I do.
did you change the spelling errors? search the 2 groestl files for "MAXWELL_OR_FEMRI" and fix the spelling to "MAXWELL_OR_FERMI" It was correct #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI in two .cu files from the start. I pull the source code from git a few hours ago to test so I assume Christian did fix it yesterday. My hash still drops, strange but true! |
|
|
|
I know sg-miner is for ADM's, but in my frustration I downloaded it and ran it "as is". I only moved the files in the kernal folder into the one with the executable. I was getting registered shares and decent speed too  Anyways now I'm back with ccminer  I didn't test sgminer with nvidia kernel but IMHO it never matches ccminer performance. Someone corrects me maybe? Btw, FYI, it seems strange but ccminerv5 works best for me with groestl. Constant 3.2Mhs, no overclock, 750ti. I have tried v5.5, v6, compiled from source, tried Compute 3.5 with #define MAXWELL_OR_FERMI 1, all of this but my hashrate still drops to 2.6Mhs, no matter what I do. |
|
|
|
Could anyone link to or post best settings for Groestl on 750Ti?
Thanks
+1 I can't figure out my problem, which must trival as it has worked before - but now I just get some weird time-out errors; must have messed up my .bat file. When I run debug, I get this: [2014-04-30 13:09:31] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3345
[2014-04-30 13:09:31] 3 miner threads started, using 'groestl' algorithm.
[2014-04-30 13:09:31] Failed to get Stratum session id
[2014-04-30 13:09:31] Stratum difficulty set to 16
[2014-04-30 13:09:31] DEBUG: job_id='688' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=5360d9cb
[2014-04-30 13:09:59] DEBUG: job_id='689' extranonce2=00000000 ntime=5360da00 As of now I am stuck running sg-miner on the 750 ti's... Thanks! You tried to run sgminer with nvidia-kernel for nVidia card or you just downloaded sgminer and let it run? sgminer won't work without modifying with nVidia, this is for AMD folks. I suggest to use ccminer if you want to mine groestl with your card. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
