The best case happens right now is mintpal and cryptsy open altcoin/DRK market. You can image what happens  To be honest I would prefer 1 darkoshi > 1 satoshi > 1 latoshi. It will be heaven then |
|
|
|
Maybe you won't believe or listen to me. But I never trust coinwarz or some calculation websites. Only trust my calculation. Oh, never mind. Happy mining then. |
|
|
|
Just wondering how many of you guys run mixed rigs (nVidia and AMD)?
Have you found it better to split your rigs to different coins?
Examples: X11, Quark hash rates
AMD 280x: 3069, 2131 (better at X11)
T75ti: 2120, 3180 (better at Quark)
(real results from my rigs)
Plugging these sets of numbers into coinwarz.com for profit.
Of course there are always exceptions. Example recently SYNC was most profitable regardless of platform.
For example right now the AMDs produce better return on X11 (DRK) while nVidia produces better return on Quark (SRC).
As an example lets say you had 3 of each card:
All pointed to DRK: $3.50(amd) + $1.85 (nvidia)= $5.35 per day x 365 days=$1,952.75
All pointed to SRC: $2.08 (amd) + $3.10 (nvidia)=$5.18 per day x 365 days=$1,890.70
Split to each coin: $3.50 (amd) + $3.10 (nvidia)=$6.60 per day x 365 days=$2,409.00
So as you can see it can make a big difference in profit to track hash rates on the different platforms and pointing each platform to the most appropriate coin!
Carlo
There is something wrong in your calculation. Quark can't be more profitable than X11 ATM. Did you include the current price and diff in your calculation? AMD was beaten in almost every hashing algos right now by nVidia, except scrypt-base coin. I rather mine my AMD cards some scrypt-jane coins or fold for Curecoin than mining X11 or Quark. One tip for you, mine JPC, it is at least 2 times more profitable than Quark.  |
|
|
|
111 BTC sell wall @ 0.02. LTC whale try to keep DRK exploding to hold their position? Futile, IMHO. |
|
|
|
As you probably can understand, I'm not a naitive English speaker, and my English isn't too good, but I'm willing to pay for a server (or vps) and for a domain name for a wiki page for us. If anybody wants to manage and update it constantly, we can do it. Besides the Christians there's few other notable users here that contribute to this community, maybe any if you would like to help setting this wiki page.
Honestly i would never have guessed you weren't a native English speaker. I am English and the way most people spell is considerably worse then yourself. As for paying for a server (vps), i wouldn't too much bother with it. I will host the wiki if needs be, ive got to get some use out of my server, but i wouldnt expect 100% uptime from a freely hosted server especially when i break it or have to reboot for updates Don't praise him, bigjme . Let's him practise more. Even the worst English speaker/writer as myself was getting praise from bigjme as well. This guy is really generous. But don't believe him, non-naive English speakers. Train your English more |
|
|
|
I would kindly ask people to report Spoetnik's post to moderators.
This crosses the line.
Spoetnik is well ignored all over the forum, Christian. Don't ever mind him and read his post. I just ignored all of his post forever. But I did report his post as you wish. |
|
|
|
I would kindly ask people to report Spoetnik's post to moderators.
This crosses the line.
Hi, Christian! small bug with JSON config file found: root@kopiemtu:/opt/miners/ccminer# cat /etc/kopiemtu/miner.conf
{
"url" : "stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3341",
"user" : "jk_14.d1",
"pass" : "p1",
"algo" : "x11"
}
root@kopiemtu:/opt/miners/ccminer# ./ccminer -c /etc/kopiemtu/miner.conf
*** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. ***
This is version 1.0 (beta)
based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler
based on pooler-cpuminer extension for HVC from
https://github.com/heavycoin/cpuminer-heavycoin
and
http://hvc.1gh.com/
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
LTC donation address: LKS1WDKGED647msBQfLBHV3Ls8sveGncnm
BTC donation address: 16hJF5mceSojnTD3ZTUDqdRhDyPJzoRakM
YAC donation address: Y87sptDEcpLkLeAuex6qZioDbvy1qXZEj4
./ccminer: Heavycoin hash requires block reward vote parameter (see --vote)
Try `minerd --help' for more information.
root@kopiemtu:/opt/miners/ccminer#
(I have some workaroud, but a bit comfortless...) I did suggest a quick fix a month ago but I don't have permission to commit in the base code. You only need to comment out those lines in parse_cmdline function: if (opt_algo == ALGO_HEAVY && opt_vote == 9999) {
fprintf(stderr, "%s: Heavycoin hash requires block reward vote parameter (see --vote)\n",
argv[0]);
show_usage_and_exit(1);
}
we found the issue a while back, it just needs i think its 3 lines removing? just the heavycoin algo check which shouldn't be there anyway
The fix is not beautiful, bigjme. The 3 parse_xx functions have some duplicated code which could be remove/optimize. But I think Christian doesn't have time for this, and it isn't really necessary either. |
|
|
|
I can't believe more people aren't raising a ruckus about the fact that this dude is transparently and has even admitted to breaching the terms of the GPL! What the hell happened to this scene that this is seen as acceptable behaviour!? Shame on you all. Greed over anything else.
LOL me too. Read my comment here and everyone ignores it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=616786.msg6832200#msg6832200But I heard that the dev promises to release it open source in next 2 weeks. Lets wait and see. Right now I'm still mining with the old trust friend sph-sgminer, LOL. |
|
|
|
|
I'm so sad to say what happens with this coin is exactly what happens with RPC or small scrypt coin in general. In the RPC thread I've warned the creator a few months ago and they called me troller, FUD spreader, even deleted my post. Ok the creator is not a dev himself so he couldn't understand some technical stuffs.
I posted here as well about a month ago about changing the hashing algo in order to avoid ASICs. The dev listens to the community and tested to change to X11. I don't know why he/they postpone it, or even cancelled??
Look at what happening now with 2 biggest scrypt coins out there LTC and DOGE. A handful of ASICs miners scare off the whole community. What do you think what will happen to us?
Accept the fact now, guys. Scrypt is dead. But I don't want to see this coin has the same fate. If you want to have a real science coin, look at Curecoin. I think it is an amazing idea.
|
|
|
|
Please mr rawtroll! You'r making a fool out of your self.
Stop cluttering this nice thread with your anger. It gives me a major pain in my frontal lobe.
I have no problem with you Stenull, you were very nice to me in IRC, and I appreciate that very much! You I have respect for. So thank you for your warm greeting and I am sorry you are caught up in this. Agreed. ANN thread is not the place for discussion like that. Please move to IRC if you wish to do so. Btw, what interesting is after the big warning of our millionaire friend, CACHe diff still goes up and the price won't go down. Even a few BTC more of buy walls are created. It looks like somebody is waiting for cheap CACHe and was disappointed. |
|
|
|
Haha , You guys have a different point of view from life, why wasting time from each others? Anyway, I've read all the logs and was having fun myself for a while . Thanks. It is the liveliest conversation I've seen in crypto so far. |
|
|
|
I am a small miner (~16MH), and I know how to read the pool stats, thanks. Using my amazing power of reading (yes it was hard to leverage such skills, I need a lie down now) I was able to determine I earned the pool 6,775,400JPC vs 2,304,203JPC that was paid out to me….now I know I am just a stupid small miner who finds it even harder to count numbers over 10 than it is to read them, but that seems to be a bigger difference than 10% to me. Also, see the thread over the last two pages, the guy complaining had over 400MH, does that not count as a whale? Maybe I'm not the one that has trouble reading.  Of course all us small miners are idiots, so I'll quit complaining now and scurry off back to my hole.  Sorry I didn't mean to offend anyone. Maybe I lost some JPCs over mininghubpools too but IMHO it is too soon to call him scammer or something similar. And I don't think the whale miner complains about his pool because he's still mining there. If your lost coin calculation is true (over 60%), I don't think anyone with such farm still willing to stay. You could contact mininghubpool and tell him to send you your transactions log so you can compare and check what is wrong. He's active enough to listen to you. Regards, |
|
|
|
I'm running other coins also, didn't get any complain like this before.
Jackpotcoin is not my first coin pool. I had run many coins with providing trust and fast feedback.
I like jackpotcoin, but why do I scam with only jackpotcoin?
I tried my best to offer good service.
I tried to listen to many miners saying and changed jackpot distribution rule to satisfy miners. I even opened poll since I heard many complains about the rule.
What do I have to do then?
Complaints about jackpot rule and blaming as I'm a thief..
Optimization and lowering network latency needs more work to do but don't blame me as I stole coins. I didn't. Really.
mininghubpools is legitimate and trustful. This guy runs most of his pool without fee and only rely on donation, folks. I still don't understand small miners immediately complains why they get their payouts 5 minutes later than it should be or their earnings are 10% lower than expected without the skill to read the pool stats. Did you ever see a whale miner comes in and complains? |
|
|
|
You are hereby notified that you are infringing on my copyright in this distribution. Under the license terms granted to you, you have 30 days to cure your non-compliance. You may review the license here: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.htmlIf you do not follow the terms of the license within 30 days, I will need to take legal action against you. Thank you for your compliance, Luke P.S. Please note that I have no objection to your fee. You are free to make a profit, provided you abide by the license terms. Please read the comment of the creator of gpuminer here, folks. I don't say it is a scam but I don't trust someone who forks a program from a reputation dev and publishes it closed source and add fee. Look at another reputation devs in the community like phm, dga, cbuchner, nobody does like it. And he ignored the warning of the original creator too. Another sign of incompetence. Folks don't let greed blind your eyes. Just my 2 satoshis. Regards, |
|
|
|
Hi kqpahv,
I have a question for you: just how do you manage your 18 rigs for folding? If I understand right you have all AMD cards and thus you have to use Windows. I can't still image how difficult it was to maintain more than 3 rigs with Windows. Btw could you share what kind of CPU and how many cards do you use for your rigs?
One word: Teamviewerhttp://www.teamviewer.com/en/index.aspxThanks for that question. Everyone knows about this already  . Still a nightmare for me in comparison to ssh. |
|
|
|
I think it is odd but I have the same thing on 3 rigs out of 18. Also tried everything and nothing helped. Then I checked the log for WU's and it showed 1 WU per card in about 4.5h and ~23 000 points for each of those. This gives me a actual PPD of 122K per card despite the software showing 55K.
Hi kqpahv, I have a question for you: just how do you manage your 18 rigs for folding? If I understand right you have all AMD cards and thus you have to use Windows. I can't still image how difficult it was to maintain more than 3 rigs with Windows. Btw could you share what kind of CPU and how many cards do you use for your rigs? Thanks in advance, Regards,
Both of these machines were down for roughly the same amount of time as I swapped GPU's between them. So their payout was slightly lower than usual but still proportional to each other.
Regardless of what the client says it appears that both machines are earning roughly the same points. I'll watch it close over the next couple of days and see if this remains the same.
Again thanks for the information! It appears to be a very strange client glitch. Not sure what is triggering it but it is consistently misrepresenting the PPD even though the actual work appears to be correct. Maddening but very interesting!
Yeah, my experiences taught me don't trust the estimated points which the client gives me. The client and the core have been developed for over 14 years and still very buggy because they won't open source it and only a few handful people are working on this very big project. |
|
|
|
Anyone has problem with mininghubpools.com ?
I never had any problem with them since the beginning, but last few days I noticed a slowdown in payout and my payout + bonus won't execute even if I did do manual payout.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
What do you mean? You didn't get payout? Did you check it in Transactions page? Thanks it solves now. I did fill the manual payout 2 days ago, and i just get it now. I don't worry anyway, because your pool is very legitimate and I always support it. Just curious why this time it takes so long. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone has problem with mininghubpools.com ?
I never had any problem with them since the beginning, but last few days I noticed a slowdown in payout and my payout + bonus won't execute even if I did do manual payout.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have the correct settings for ccminer? I run a bunch of EVGA 750 ti's. I was solo mining with no problem. But now that the diff is so high I need a pool. I tried Danbi's but get all rejects. Same with NOMP.
-Thanks
Get your modified ccminer to work with Diamondcoin pool here. https://github.com/KBomba/ccminer-KBombaOr you can modify the source code yourself. Only 5 lines |
|
|
|
The miner would have to shut off its miners and have to start a new algo. Its too difficult to set up and would require a custom stratum server
Can be done client side, like the guys at myriad coin did for their amd miners...algo switcher, based on profitability. They are working on a pool implementation too. As for folding, nvidia can fold using linux and is faster than AMD...fermi cards are awesome at this (strong compute). Kepler sucks, except for the gk110 derivatives, and maxwell is ok but not wow. I would like to know where did you get the information about fermi cards are awesome at folding? Fermi cards get according to my information maximal 50k PPD while Kepler get 120k PPD and Titan could get as high as 300k PPD. The only maxwell card right now is 750ti get maximal 35k PPD with very serious overclock. Charts here: http://www.overclock.net/t/475163/gpu-projects-ppd-database-revived Thanks if you could enlighten me. Regards, Aizen |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
