|
1681
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing
|
on: May 30, 2015, 03:50:56 PM
|
I can't even post the reason for denying his request.  Note that this deleted post was my second post because first one was deleted by mirjangka from that thread. Scammy! Okay, then. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. I declined to act as an escrow for this signature campaign because of following reasons: - mirjangka couldn't provide me mining details. - mirjangka only provided me a 3 drafts(1 of them was an agreement which was useless) which fully describes about positions in the company and agreements. Only detail I found which is what was worth reading is company number. - mirjangka has promoted ponzis earlier. - The details in the site is very fishy. TL;DR -- I don't want to promote a ponzi. @mirjangka I couldn't find an announcement thread on the forum for Cloudthink. When was the company launched in the beginning ? Maybe you should also start an ANN thread.
mirjangka said that mirjangka or another user will make an ANN thread soon. I request all users not to join this campaign and stay away from this site. *Note: I posted this earlier but mirjangka deleted my post. Therefore, re-posting. |
|
|
|
|
1683
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Authy App
|
on: May 30, 2015, 12:55:48 PM
|
-snip- You can associate an email address to your account which will help you or you can use 'inherited trust' feature. Have you tried 'master recovery codes' to change number? I think it works. http://blog.authy.com/multi-deviceDoesn't this kind of defeat the purpose of the app if you can just bypass it with email? That makes your email address a hot target for hackers and a way they can easily bypass 2-factor. "You can" doesn't mean "you should". In other words, only do it if you know what you are doing. |
|
|
|
|
1684
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Offline navigation , Is it possible ?
|
on: May 30, 2015, 12:53:51 PM
|
Your country? An OSM using navigation app may do the work.
I am Indian. Hey, by OSM navigation you mean open street map using navigation right ? Websites which specify features of a phone gave me info that my phone has "A-GPS". I have no idea about it. Thanks to all of you, I downloaded Be On Road, and it downloaded map for india which had a size of 237 MB . Now I can browse offline. Yes. Glad to know you sorted it out. Please lock this thread now by clicking 'lock topic'(lower left). |
|
|
|
|
1686
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Cloud Mining - Please help a newbie
|
on: May 30, 2015, 12:47:50 PM
|
Pretty much all of these cloud services should be taken as gambles, some are less so than others.
Not just the cloud miners...all miners are a gamble that an individual could ROI and maybe make profit before the new wave comes out. Even if new new generation old gen runs a while. It does not instantly stop old gear (assuming decent electricity price). I ran with a dragon 1T for a LONG time. Eventually though it was to small of amount to run and I sold it off. Mining is a lot harder than it was when 3 month roi was almost guaranteed. But it still can be done.We still enjoy four months ROI at www.CloudMining.website. That's not too bad over three month's guaranteed ROI.  That is quite the promise. One that many would think sounds to good to be true. I suggest others compare cloud mining sites that are considered more trusted. To make a promise of 4 months and no fees and no matter what the difficulty jump is? I mean no one can guarantee a return espically set it in period like 4 months. Can you please point out where exactly you got that promise of 4 months ? AFAIK CMW never made any promise about ROI ever. I merely pointed out to the fact that it took around 4 months to ROI for some of us. This is your second attempt to confuse people after your tried to show more than 100% ROI as more than 100% legitimacy. I could be wrong. Can you tell us more what brand of equipment are you using? Where is your data center located to be able to do what most cannot? Any proof it is not just a ponzi? I mean it's hard to find hardware that ROI's at 4 months in my opinion, and then include electricity and cooling. No matter what difficulty jump you still profit in 4 months?
How am I supposed to tell you ? Am I their official representative ? In fact, I encourage many CMW competitors in their own thread. But, most the Qs you have asked are either in their FAQ or they have responded in their Forum. Do a little bit of research and you'll find all the answers. And again, there is NO guarantee of 4 months ROI. Difficulty is doing up-down for some time, so we are enjoying it. If it steeply goes up again, it is expected to take more time naturally. Moreover, it also depends on at which rate you are buying contracts. You said you that people there enjoyed 4 month ROI I assumed you were guaranteeing it. You said "We still enjoy four months ROI at www.CloudMining.website. " This does come out sounding a little like advertising a 4 month ROI, but I could be reading wrong. Anways it is not the bigger part of question. As Official Representative please anwser the following: Can you tell us more what brand of equipment are you using? Where is your data center located? Any proof it is not just a ponzi? Yes, there is a big proof. " They are paying and payment details are public!" |
|
|
|
|
1688
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ndnhc is an extortionist
|
on: May 30, 2015, 11:50:51 AM
|
Forum search is disabled. So I am lazy to find that post.
You can use "site:bitcointalk.org" before any Google queries you make in order to make it function as if you were using the forum search function built into SMF (the forum software). It might not work as well but you can usually find what you're looking for using the site modifier. Just a little tip. I use it but it is not useful as forum search, at least to me. Back on-topic: Sigh, I just want to see ndnhc's response. The entire ordeal is quite confusing and now we have a bunch of theories popping up.
Does anybody have his contact? If so, please contact him and tell to reply. It will only take a few minutes for him to reply. |
|
|
|
|
1691
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: blockchain.info API - callback IP
|
on: May 30, 2015, 09:25:28 AM
|
Hello guys, I'm facing a problem with blockchain.info API. I'm actually receiving payments on random generated addresses by blockchain.info which forward the bitcoins to my wallet address, but you already know how it works  However, payments are properly forwarded but there is no saved requests from blockchain.info server (callback) because the DDoS protection offered by my company filters and blocks the incoming connections from blockchain.info May I know the correct IP addresses used for callback requests so that I can add them in whitelist? Apparently I can not find them over the web  You should contact Blockchain.info support. https://blockchain.info/support-desk |
|
|
|
|
1692
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ndnhc is an extortionist
|
on: May 30, 2015, 09:19:48 AM
|
Woow , nice catch Quickseller. Well done, I have randomly noticed the ndnhc's trust when I have opened the dadice signature campaign's thread.... I never thought he was an extortionist so dishonest person. Now everything it is clear, and I remember his initial topics in the gambling section ... really suspicious.
I have also seen he never replied to this thread, and I cannot verify if he was banned (but I do not think he was banned). Can someone through a PM, give me more information? Thanks.
Forum search is disabled. So I am lazy to find that post. You should check on carra's post. Ndnhc has informed carra that he will be back soon, perhaps he is doing something at the moment or is busy to handle the forum. He was away for atleast 3 weeks before due to some matter in the real world. It is not yet proven that he tried to extort, we will need to listen from his part
|
|
|
|
|
1693
|
Other / Meta / Re: Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list
|
on: May 30, 2015, 04:45:37 AM
|
devthedev absolutely 100% but I haven't really spoken to or know any of the other ones in the poll.
I could probably put a few other users forward though, in my honest opinion you could trust the following -
Carra23
inca
macsga
shorena
I'll edit & add some more in if I remember any names lol.
Shorena is in default trust list depth 2. |
|
|
|
|
1694
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 29, 2015, 05:40:07 PM
|
You asking *Bitcointalk* lenders to fulfill your loan request.
No I am not, and if you look through the origional thread I even just saw this: Lastly you can see my details are verified on BTCjam so I am who I say I am at least there.
And along with other exchanges.
I am not asking for a direct loan here, but through BTCjam.
According to your view, you are asking an indirect loan here. That is enough for a negative feedback as you don't have any trust here. Once again you said: "I haven't seen him leaving a negative feedback for just advertising BTCJam link here." But apparently you say I "you are asking an indirect loan here", which clearly in my original thread I clarify that I was not looking for a loan here but on BTCjam. So where do I stand with your biased view? I am fine under your terms of advertising my BTCjam link, and also NOT fine under your same terms of posting a BTCjam link here. Do the math I mean he doesn't leave negative feedback only because you advertised your loan listing here. He left you negative feedback because you didn't have any trust to ask for 7.5 BTC loan. Its still one and the same... 'Trust' is the main problem. If you have good trust, he will not leave you a negative feedback but you didn't have to ask 7.5 BTC loan. |
|
|
|
|
1696
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 29, 2015, 05:32:30 PM
|
You asking *Bitcointalk* lenders to fulfill your loan request.
No I am not, and if you look through the origional thread I even just saw this: Lastly you can see my details are verified on BTCjam so I am who I say I am at least there.
And along with other exchanges.
I am not asking for a direct loan here, but through BTCjam.
According to your view, you are asking an indirect loan here. That is enough for a negative feedback as you don't have any trust here. Once again you said: "I haven't seen him leaving a negative feedback for just advertising BTCJam link here." But apparently you say I "you are asking an indirect loan here", which clearly in my original thread I clarify that I was not looking for a loan here but on BTCjam. So where do I stand with your biased view? I am fine under your terms of advertising my BTCjam link, and also NOT fine under your same terms of posting a BTCjam link here. Do the math I mean he doesn't leave negative feedback only because you advertised your loan listing here. He left you negative feedback because you didn't have any trust to ask for 7.5 BTC loan. |
|
|
|
|
1697
|
Other / Meta / Re: VOD should be removed from default trust for systematic abuse of his position
|
on: May 29, 2015, 04:52:24 PM
|
You asking *Bitcointalk* lenders to fulfill your loan request.
No I am not, and if you look through the origional thread I even just saw this: Lastly you can see my details are verified on BTCjam so I am who I say I am at least there.
And along with other exchanges.
I am not asking for a direct loan here, but through BTCjam.
According to your view, you are asking an indirect loan here. That is enough for a negative feedback as you don't have any trust here. |
|
|
|
|
1699
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Favorite Quotes
|
on: May 29, 2015, 04:33:30 PM
|
Man is not the creature of circumstances. Circumstances are the creatures of man.
This is not true IMHO. |
|
|
|
|
1700
|
Economy / Services / Re: [CloudThink.IO] ★ Signature Campaign ★ | Record Weekly Pay / Post ! | [OPEN]
|
on: May 29, 2015, 04:28:33 PM
|
Escrow?
Muhammed Zakir, would you be available to act as escrow for our campaign? You are very trusted and we see that you offer good and fast escrow services. If someone does not agree with our proposal or has a better idea, please state it here. I will be happy to escrow your campaign *only if* you can send me proofs of your mining. Of course, please PM me with details regarding the information you need to validate our business and I will certainly provide you with anything you may need. Why would you provide mining proof only to escrow ? Escrow is supposed to hold your funds for sig payment. He wont reimburse everyone if you run away like lot of cloud miners have done before. Simply provide your mining address and sold hash power in real time. You dont need to tell us mining firm details, mining manufacturer details or anything. That two parameter will prove beyond doubt that you are mining. For everything else, you are same as other fake cloud miners. I hope Muhammed Zakir will not be upset with us but here is the information I sent him regarding this subject: Please note that we do not offer cloud mining contracts. This is no longer profitable for us, we prefer to use the funds in more locations which we deem to be profitable for our business as a whole. We do not allocate a fixed mining hashing power to each user. Mining is done separately and is only connected to funds received by investors in the sense that we are always trying our best to develop the best mining hardware in the world. We proud ourselves that our recent mining hardware is the most efficient in the world in comparison to other miners available for purchase. We offer clear fixed investment packages which will earn interest proportional to our profits. I can explain more but please ask me about anything regarding CloudThink. This may change in the future if the partners from CloudThink decide it but I know that information regarding the pool we use for mining or other clear information about this is strictly private. Our main mining farm is located in another country with which we have a contract, they have their own rules and they have been private from the beginning. There was no need to make the company/mining farm public or offer cloud mining contracts. The mining farm has always been and will also be (we're pretty sure) profitable without selling any equipment or cloud mining contracts. You were asked for proof of mining. This is no proof, only your word. @MZ and other escrows - don't escrow this campaign unless there is some proof that they are legitimate. I can't speak for other escrows but I will escrow this only if their service looks legit to me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
