|
1501
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
|
on: June 03, 2015, 04:23:16 PM
|
Stumbled upon this site, scrypt.ccthe question is, is it legit? and if it is legit, is it worthy? It's a ponzi, a scam and a virus. They will steal everything you send them. Well, maybe not everything, but the bigger part. I would think they are in the final stages of collapsing. Definitely not worth the risk now. Even if somebody had roi, you are very late to the ponzi. Uh, what the hell are you talking about? Do you even know what a virus is...? Please do not make any baseless statements based on your own limited knowledge, just to earn more for your signature campaign. scrypt.cc is one of the oldest cloud mining sites.... I don't think I should answer to an ignorant shill like you (unless you're trolling that you think it's legit), but yeah, of course I know what a virus is. I was just making a joke referencing to a well known Staff member -ck comment about eobot cloudming where he told smth like that  Please do not make any baseless statements based on your own limited understanding on the comments of other members And stop shilling for scrypt.cc, because it is almost a definition how a ponzi and a scam looks like. It will soon collapse, nobody invest there unless you want to lose money! I really am amazed. Where have I stated that scrypt.cc is not a ponzi or a scam? If you bothered to read my statement properly, you would realize that all I stated is that it is one of the oldest cloud mining sites. You cannot say that something is a scam unless its proven. All you can say is that it is likely to be a scam. The one who is making a baseless statement is you. Accusing me of shilling is a very severe accusation, and I'd suggest that you should keep your mouth shut unless you know what you are talking about. If what you said was "It's very likely to be a ponzi", then I would have not answered you in any way, shape or form. However, making things up so that people stay away from something when you aren't sure of the facts is ridiculous. - It is very wrong statement, friend! This statement is equal to saying "this is not a ponzi". |
|
|
|
|
1502
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing
|
on: June 03, 2015, 04:19:03 PM
|
Quoting for future reference. Investment Packages are now available for purchase on the CloudThink.IO official website so everyone can register in our affiliate program and earn 5% as commission which can even be 1.2BTC for a single sale! (Our Expert Package is $5.000 which means $250 as commission). We keep sessions for 90 days so you have an increased chance to register a commission from your referrals. Payouts are issued automatically after sale is confirmed, the dashboard offers professional reports, statistics, sales and many other data which is highly transparent and functional. Payouts are issued to the bitcoin address you provide in your profile settings immediately after 3 confirmations are confirmed for every sale your referral makes. Register here: https://cloudthink.io/idevaffiliate/Email your questions to: affiliate@cloudthink.ioEarn more by using our signature: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1074144.0Please note that this is a self-moderated thread. I will delete and report any post which contains: off-topic, accusations, questions which don't have anything to do with our affiliate program, questions about escrow and any post I deem irrelevant to this thread. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
1503
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin is not decentralised. Proof right now.
|
on: June 03, 2015, 04:15:55 PM
|
-snip-
Don't get me wrong, I think the 20MB idea is useless and only a small patch, {...}
Why? Because he is just spamming fud nonsense. Feel free to ignore him, he clearly has no idea what the fork is or why it is being done. His account along with some others here appears to have been created for the sole purpose of spreading fud.
I don't like to ignore. |
|
|
|
|
1504
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing
|
on: June 03, 2015, 04:03:28 PM
|
I received same PM btw..guy also want to stay anon.
anyway, they deleted by posts from their sg. thread:(
Reason: Off-topic, false accusations. Please feel free to apply only with the specified format, READ THE RULES! Thank you! Will you make an non-self moderated ANN thread, so we can have a discussion? Are you joking?  @Xialla: Thanks! The thing is that mirjangka is a n00b scammer. He doesn't know how to cover his track. |
|
|
|
|
1506
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Probable Alts Of Mirjangka, Owner Of CloudThink.IO Scam (5 Alts Found Till Now)
|
on: June 03, 2015, 03:32:49 PM
|
I will talk with theymos to remove this thread. Thank you!
Forget about it, admin especially theymos dont deal with this kind of stuff or remove a likely scam. If you want this thread to be remove, you have to proof that they are not your account but the seller of the account has confirmed that you are the owner of that accounts I refuse to this, I am sick of you idiotic kids. I won't do anything else to fuel your witch-hunt. Your threads are doing harm to our company and the campaigns we run here. We have done only good to the community and they finally see how you do only harm to it. Most users who claimed bad things about us have have removed their posts and more will do so in the future. Good luck! No one is doing anything to your company. The only thing people done here is exposing your alt account, nothing is wrong with that. The only thing that you have to do is present a proof but you refused it . Actually most people that exposed your lies or alt are not a kid He even accepted this accusation. He posted that these are his accounts. There is no "refuting" anymore. I refuse to this, I am sick of you idiotic kids. I won't do anything else to fuel your witch-hunt. Your threads are doing harm to our company and the campaigns we run here. We have done only good to the community and they finally see how you do only harm to it. Most users who claimed bad things about us have have removed their posts and more will do so in the future.
Good luck!
We all know you tried to start a ponzi under the name "cloud mining" and now telling we accusers are idiots? Oh, come on...! I thought you are lot better than this TBH. |
|
|
|
|
1509
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Bitcoin vs Dogecoin vs Litecoin vs Peercoin
|
on: June 03, 2015, 01:51:47 PM
|
What is the difference between bitcoin, dogecoin, litecoin and peercoin?
bitcoin is main cryptocurrency and the most reliable of all cryptos if you want to buy. besides it has more usage than others. the rest are just altcoins that don't really have a good future. i only like Dogecoin because of its community, and the rest are just for trading and gaining profit... There is nothing called "main cryptocurrency". |
|
|
|
|
1510
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin is not decentralised. Proof right now.
|
on: June 03, 2015, 01:45:06 PM
|
It's not decentralised or even democratic. And it will even less be so if people switch to Gavins' fork.
-snip-
Gavin also does not care about node count so the network itself will become a lot less decentralised on his Gavinfork.
-snip-
Why? Why you keep saying Bitcoin will be more centralized if we accept that fork? |
|
|
|
|
1511
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Looking for evidence to support theory of Gavin successor to Satoshi
|
on: June 03, 2015, 01:36:07 PM
|
Everyone repeats over and over again Gavin would be the successor of Satoshi but is there actually any evidence for that?
It's a ridiculous concept. There is nobody in charge of Bitcoin. There is no King of Bitcoin. There is no successor. It is sad that so many people need someone to tell them what to do and what to think. If anything kills Bitcoin, it will be that. Yeah it's pretty sad that people need a leader. People is free to run Core or run XT based on their prefered views on the software, not on who is proposing the changes on the software. ...but on what is proposed software does. According to the block size growth, we need to increase maximum block size and no, it won't lead to centralization. But I still don't know whether 20MB maximum block size is needed ATM or is it better to have a lower maximum block size and increase it later if needed. I am still thinking on it. Anybody? Why not start with 2MB size limit and when a certain threshhold is exceeded (2.8 for example) go up to 4 MB etc.? I think the reason Gavin has decided on 20MB is to avoid repeating the adversity of again forking the client. Bear in mind 20mb is a LIMIT. We are not anywhere near having enough transaction demand to fill 20mb blocks anytime soon.
But even if we hit 20mb tomorrow (won't happen), anyone can run a full node in pruning node, in which case old data is deleted and all you need is the UTXO set + a bit. So that's one or two gigabytes, hardly a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
1512
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Anti-fork guys: What is YOUR proposal?
|
on: June 03, 2015, 01:35:35 PM
|
Why do you guys go aginst this fork? Bear in mind 20mb is a LIMIT. We are not anywhere near having enough transaction demand to fill 20mb blocks anytime soon.
But even if we hit 20mb tomorrow (won't happen), anyone can run a full node in pruning node, in which case old data is deleted and all you need is the UTXO set + a bit. So that's one or two gigabytes, hardly a big deal.
|
|
|
|
|
1513
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to create/send a Tx from Brainwallet.org
|
on: June 03, 2015, 11:47:09 AM
|
Nothing is wrong with the unspent outputs, to check that I just pushed the Transaction from electrum to another address and it went through instantly and I'll try again with one more address/private key, again containing few mBTCs (more than the previous one) and see if I am able to push it from that one.
Edit: I think I found the problem, I was trying to push the Tx to a multisig address and as soon as I entered a normal address, the Tx got signed and is now ready to be pushed. So I guess brainwallet cannot push transactions to multisig addresses.
Uh! BitcoinJ doesn't support sending to P2SH address. I don't get it - brainwallet.org is written in Java (doesn't look like it from the repo)? BitcoinJ is written in Java. You can send *from* P2SH address but not *to* P2SH address AFAIK. Multisig implementation of Brainwallet.org is http://ms-brainwallet.org/ but not from same developer. Aha! I see now about P2SH addresses using BitcoinJ, thanks! I thought it was completed. Still I am confused as to what BitcoinJ has to do with brainwallet.org ... but it's no big deal. BitcoinJ is an implementation of Bitcoin protocol in Java and Brainwallet.org uses BitcoinJ. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250531.0I know about BitcoinJ - and if you say so, I don't doubt you - but I really thought from looking at the GitHub repo that Brainwallet.org is written in JavaScript. Not Java. (Anyway, no need to go on about this.) You are right. I missed it. Brainwallet is using BitcoinJS not BitcoinJ. http://bitcoinjs.org |
|
|
|
|
1514
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: cloudminr.io no payout
|
on: June 03, 2015, 11:32:43 AM
|
I think all website similarly to this in some days will became scam
What is the min and max deposit?
The FAQ is not completed
So the support is sucks, I send an email 2 days ago
No reply
I don't think there is a maximum deposit 30,000 GHs is the maximum you can buy at a time but you can buy that contract as many times as you like. Current total price will be 24 BTC. Minimum deposit is price * 100 GHs IIRC and that will 0.12 BTC at current price. * Edited. |
|
|
|
|
1516
|
Other / New forum software / Re: Account delete button
|
on: June 03, 2015, 11:26:44 AM
|
Why do people want to delete their accounts exactly? I have seen many asking for it after the server got hacked but i dont see how that would help them in any way?? Just change your pass and thats it or delete pms you dont want to be seen other than that, whats the deal with that?
Wipe their history. Some wipe because of privacy issue, some for starting fresh after a bad incident or something etc... If you do it manually, you will have to delete each and every posts which is time consuming. A simple button will be easier. |
|
|
|
|
1517
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to create/send a Tx from Brainwallet.org
|
on: June 03, 2015, 11:23:56 AM
|
Nothing is wrong with the unspent outputs, to check that I just pushed the Transaction from electrum to another address and it went through instantly and I'll try again with one more address/private key, again containing few mBTCs (more than the previous one) and see if I am able to push it from that one.
Edit: I think I found the problem, I was trying to push the Tx to a multisig address and as soon as I entered a normal address, the Tx got signed and is now ready to be pushed. So I guess brainwallet cannot push transactions to multisig addresses.
Uh! BitcoinJ doesn't support sending to P2SH address. I don't get it - brainwallet.org is written in Java (doesn't look like it from the repo)? BitcoinJ is written in Java. You can send *from* P2SH address but not *to* P2SH address AFAIK. Multisig implementation of Brainwallet.org is http://ms-brainwallet.org/ but not from same developer. Aha! I see now about P2SH addresses using BitcoinJ, thanks! I thought it was completed. Still I am confused as to what BitcoinJ has to do with brainwallet.org ... but it's no big deal. BitcoinJ is an implementation of Bitcoin protocol in Java and Brainwallet.org uses BitcoinJ. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250531.0 |
|
|
|
|
1519
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: CloudThink.IO removed management pictures after being caught with stealing
|
on: June 03, 2015, 10:58:35 AM
|
A PM I got. 1st of all, I have chosen to PM this information in an effort to stay anonymous from any potential attacks from the forum.
I'm about 95% sure Cloudthink.IO is a scam.... Have you guys tried calling their phone numbers? 1-855-261-2270 - you get an automated recording that doesn't even pronouce the company name properly  310-846-9028- same automated message. By the way, why does a UK/Thai based company have a US phone number? Besides the obvious fake Twitter followers, take a look at the 41 people he is following: https://twitter.com/CloudThinkIO/followingJustin Bieber Lauren Conrad Maybelline New York BabyCenter Then the interesting ones:Justice Department Department of State Speaker John Boehner I think the guy is a cop trying to "bust" people involved in Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
1520
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Looking for evidence to support theory of Gavin successor to Satoshi
|
on: June 02, 2015, 05:47:31 PM
|
Everyone repeats over and over again Gavin would be the successor of Satoshi but is there actually any evidence for that?
It's a ridiculous concept. There is nobody in charge of Bitcoin. There is no King of Bitcoin. There is no successor. It is sad that so many people need someone to tell them what to do and what to think. If anything kills Bitcoin, it will be that. Yeah it's pretty sad that people need a leader. People is free to run Core or run XT based on their prefered views on the software, not on who is proposing the changes on the software. ...but on what is proposed software does. According to the block size growth, we need to increase maximum block size and no, it won't lead to centralization. But I still don't know whether 20MB maximum block size is needed ATM or is it better to have a lower maximum block size and increase it later if needed. I am still thinking on it. Anybody? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
