Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:52:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 248 »
1101  Other / Politics & Society / BREAKING - Bernie Sanders has DROPPED OUT on: April 08, 2020, 03:31:14 PM
Just reported on the NY Times first, Bernie Sanders is dropping out of the Democratic primary for President. That leaves Joe Biden to be the presumptive nominee and to begin to unify the party around him. Crazy to think that we've seen Biden become the front runner, then Bernie, and now back to Biden ending up as the nominee. Could've made some good money betting on Biden when he was beginning his downfall!

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/08/politics/bernie-sanders-drops-out/index.html sorry about fake news CNN
1102  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Coronavirus Outbreak on: April 08, 2020, 03:22:15 PM
After seeing things unfold a bit more, and seeing the increasingly totalitarian steps enforced by state mandate, I am starting to get a very clear picture that this event is being used to strip people of their freedoms. They are training us all to be disgusted with and fear one another. They are training us to report our neighbors if we leave our homes like we live in East Germany. They are training us to be told when we can leave your homes, where we can go, and what we can do when you get there. They are training you to accept being told where you can shop, what you can buy, and who can work. They are training us to accept universal basic income with the emergency payouts. They are even training us to accept the 5G control grid by using the bandwidth demand as an excuse to throttle connections to make us beg for 5G bandwidth.

I was supportive of this lock down at first because it was voluntary and optional. Now it is rapidly becoming totalitarian and based on force. We can't tolerate this being sustained much longer or else those freedoms will go away and will never be returned without a high price paid in blood. This event is being used to cripple the American economy (and others) and train us to be in a wartime mindset, and wartime is exactly what we are going to get if we don't start resisting these unconstitutional restrictions.

Or maybe there's a global pandemic and they're trying to stop the spread of a virus.

Yeah maybe. LOL

But I do think that there is going to be a lot of things that government do to take power during this time that they wouldn't have had before. I know Rahm Emanuel -- Obama first Chief of Staff said "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." So the federal, state, and local governments aren't going to waste time here in abosbing powers that they didn't have before. Even the Presidency (the Executive branch as a whole) is going to absorb powers from the other branches because we're in a crisis.

This event wasn't created to take more power for government, but they sure as shit are going to use it to grow more powerful and to try to stop the spread of this virus.

I've seen reports that dictatorships across the world are becoming stronger and stronger in a time like this. s
1103  Other / Politics & Society / Re: what have we earned from handling epidemics on: April 08, 2020, 02:36:22 PM
The biggest thing is that we were neglecting having the proper infrastructure setup for an event like this. Everyone in power thought -- well it probably won't happen again (after Ebola) and they disregarded that this was a nagging risk. Public health experts on the otherhand have been talking about how government and private industry should be devoting resources to proper research.

We knew this was a problem after Ebola happened. We got lucky because Ebola wasn't as infectious and we were able to control the few people that we knew had it.

As Bill Gates said, we need to begin fighting pandemics like we fight wars. Prepare for it in advance and be more then ready next time. All the money that the US spent on the military this year -- 800B or so -- couldn't help much in the fight against the coronavirus.

Watch this video - https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_the_next_outbreak_we_re_not_ready?language=en
1104  Economy / Economics / Re: History Reveals There Is No Going Back for the Economy on: April 08, 2020, 02:08:03 PM
There's a big chance that China will try to become the world leader in exports post this pandemic. China will try to flood the international markets with their cheap and sub-standard quality goods. When the deep-pocket companies will see this happening, they will rush to China to open their factories so that they can continue with their business and take benefit from cheap labor force of China. We have already seen this happening in Mobile industry. All global mobile brands are manufacturing their phones in China only!

This will have a ripple effect on all markets and there's a good chance that China will become the next superpower of the world. That can in turn bring financial doomsday to many countries solely dependent on the global exports.

So becoming a nationalist is not a preferred choice you can make post this pandemic. Becoming aggressive in capturing the global business - must be the survival strategy post this time so maintain the finances.  

I don't really fear this scenario.  It takes a lot more than what China has to become the global superpower, and the US and its allies will make sure China doesn't achieve it.

When you can print the main global reserve currency, and other countries' economies are addicted to you buying from them with that currency, you have a lot of power.  Not to mention that you still have more soft power than China (even in the era of Trump!)

As I mentioned, the main reason the West will keep China out of world leadership is that China will not be friendly enough to help ease the West into its decline, in the same way the US helped Britain, and Britain helped the Netherlands in their respective periods of decline from superpower status.

Decline is unfortunately inevitable under this system, where, over the decades of unearned wealth and power, your cost structure has become too high, and your 'spoiled' people are too used to their money enjoying an artificially high value.  There's just no way for a country like this to maintain its comfortable status quo.  The only question is hard vs soft landing.

China is a superpower, maybe not as powerful as the US, but they're still a global superpower with  MASSIVE amount of influence in the world. China won't be friendly to the west, and that is true. But China has FORCED its way into the global stage by leveraging their cheap manufacturing to take over the global stage.

Further, China is investing HEAVILY in other countries that are developing and are forcing their influence on these other countries later on. Here's a list I found online of Chinese investments - https://chinapower.csis.org/china-foreign-direct-investment/
1105  Economy / Economics / Re: returning to normal on: April 08, 2020, 01:48:04 PM
Life will return to normal, it always does, it's just going to be a long few months of recovery period where people MUST follow the social distancing guidelines or life is going to take longer to return to normal.

Maybe this normal will be a bit different. Maybe people will want to stockpile food in their homes for longer, grocery stores will probably develop better online ordering options, government SHOULD prepare for the next pandemic in a better way -- like Bill Gates said -- having resources prepared to research stuff like this, fighting against pandemics like we fight against war.

Our world is always altered by the things that happen, and typically our responses to these events will always make us stronger as we're able to deal with the NEXT time better. But people that thrive on people being scared are going to say things are never going to be the same -- that's just not true, we're all going to be okay at some point.
1106  Economy / Economics / Re: The US Congress, and later the Senate, approved a $2 Trillion stimulus bill. on: April 08, 2020, 01:39:27 PM
Digital dollar was a part of the House version of the bill that wasn't passed, the Senate version of the bill which was a compromise b/w Dems and Republicans was the bill that was actually passed and made into law, was a version that didn't include a digital dollar. Absurd claims about this being good for Crypto are very stupid.

I see a lot of optimism that the stimulus package will boost crypto, assuming that people are going to put their money on bitcoin. However, there traditional global market like stocks could also be a good leverage for them. So we can't really conclude that this is good for crypto, and with crypto's volatility, I doubt that people are going to invest on them, specially no-coiners, they would rather go to stocks which is somewhat stable, in my opinion.

When you've lost your job, your retirement account is down like 20-30 percent from the peak, and you don't know when you're going to find a new job -- do you truly think that you're going to want to throw money at a speculative investment like Crypto? No. The answer for most is no. This is a speculative investment that people SHOULDN'T put money into unless they have money that they're willing to invest and lost and have already handled investing in traditional asset classes.

1107  Economy / Economics / Re: History Reveals There Is No Going Back for the Economy on: April 08, 2020, 01:33:52 PM
This cycle is just the boom and bust business cycle that we've seen for hundreds of years now. Some years we're doing great, and other years there are financial problems. But you're calling these the weak years of the economy (your claim regarding 2000-2020) -- disregarding the fact that the stock market has been up 106 percent since 2000.  Unemployment (before the coronavirus) was the lowest it's been in awhile, businesses were thriving, pay was rising, etc.

Inflation hasn't been too bad during this period, I'd say the average for the last two decades is around 2-3 percent. Yes, debt had risen VERY largely and that is something countries must start to control. But I don't think we're in a weak phase right now (obviously disregarding corona)

Boom and bust is all this is.
1108  Economy / Economics / Re: Cutting of Salaries in Indian Companies - Failed Future? on: April 08, 2020, 01:27:42 PM
I mean what do you want to happen in a time of economic crisis? Not everyone can be paid every single dollar of what they received before, as there is no money being circulated in the economy to support that. Businesses shouldn't be required to pay their employees when they need to lay them off. That's going to be left to unemployment insurance to handle.

Every country in the world is doing this right now. Not surprising.
1109  Other / Politics & Society / Re: UK prime minister Boris has been hospitalised! on: April 08, 2020, 06:42:15 AM
Update to this whole thing: Boris Johnson is 'stable' in ICU (CNN)

Seems as if Boris Johnson is stabilizing in ICU, breathing without assistance now and is in good spirits. While this could still take a turn for the worse, as Boris is an old person with conditions that put him at risk for this, I do think this is great news for all. You could hate the guys politics, but I would never wish death upon another because he has different views then me.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/07/uk/boris-johnson-coronavirus-uk-gbr-intl/index.html

I hope everyone is staying safe!
1110  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Don't buy facemasks for the coronavirus! on: April 08, 2020, 06:33:52 AM
I'm assuming this has been discussed on here by now, but the CDC has changed their directive regarding facemasks and is now recommending that all people wear facemasks when they're out of the house. It's NOT to protect you from getting the coronavirus, because JackG has correctly pointed out that these masks won't help, but it will stop you from spreading the virus to others.

CDC Directive: https://theconversation.com/the-cdc-now-recommends-wearing-a-mask-in-some-cases-a-physician-explains-why-and-when-to-wear-one-135590

So yeah, just wear one. You can make them from home with an old shirt and some rubber bands.
1111  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump stunned the Indian PM, but it’ll definitely pay off in the long run!!! on: April 08, 2020, 04:34:07 AM
Not surprised. The US needs this sort of stuff to see if it can work for further testing on people, and India isn't exporting this potential lifesaving medicine that people need. It isn't a miracle drug, yet, but we'll see if it is in the coming days and weeks. I know thousands of New Yorkers (1500) are receiving it now who are suffering. If you're most likely going to die anyway, why not try some experimental treatments that may help someone.

Worth a shot, eh?
1112  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats on: April 07, 2020, 01:39:36 AM
It's funny how a lot of Democrats are feeling buyer's remorse with Biden now, and are longing for someone else. On PredictIt's "Who will be President?" right now, the odds are:
 - Trump 50%
 - Biden 40%
 - Cuomo 6%
 - Sanders 4%
 - Pence 3%

That 40% Biden number is pretty shocking, since he's the presumptive Democratic nominee. I wonder if the DNC will actually change the rules at this point in order to pick someone else. It's a wild idea, though they can do it.

<>

Keep in mind those numbers are from a market, not a sports book.  A lot of trades are based on what you think other people will predict rather than what you think will actually happen.
A sportsbook tries to price their odds such that approximately equal bets are placed on each side of a bet. A betting market is exactly that, except the spread is much smaller for a market.
When you place a bet with a sports bet, you're betting on the outcome of an event.

On predict it, you could do that.  But you could also bet on where you think the market will be tomorrow, or next week, or next month.  It can be +EV to buy shares of a candidate that you believe has basically no chance of winning, if you know an article or interview or press conference is about to happen that will make other people want to buy shares.  My only point was that I think that's what's happening with Cuomo.

(You could always hedge your sports book bet, which is the same idea, but you would have to bet on every other outcome rather than simply sell your share - it could get very expensive over a presidential campaign)

This is true, I'd be betting on Cuomo to NOT be the nominee right now -- which really could only be done on PredictIT. While I'd have to agree that Cuomo is probably doing a good job -- and an AMAZING job in presenting himself on TV, I can't beleive FOR A SECOND that he'd be able to get the Democrat party behind him. Come on folks.

Edit:

Just looked on the PredictIT site, seems like right now you could bet on Cuomo NOT being the nominee for a return of about 7 percent if he isn't the nominee when the dems official select their nominee during their convention.
You'd be able to make 10 percent on buying shares that say Trump will be the 2020 nominee. Pence comes in a FAR second for this. Guess this is just the risk of death at this age, same thing for Biden with the added portion of Cuomo doing well in press conferences recentley.

Edit 2: PredictIT charges a 5 percent fee for withdrawals. I see where they stop people from just betting no on longshot candidates now.
1113  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [SERIOUS] What do people think of direct cash payments (US stimulus package)? on: April 06, 2020, 11:54:59 PM
In a perfect world you'd be rewarded for being ready for a black swan, not being rewarded for doing the opposite.

The problem with being ready, particularly from a business perspective, is that you would be at a disadvantage vs competition for 99 years out of 100 when a black swan event doesn't happen if you e.g. keep massive cash reserves, don't borrow, insure up the wazoo etc. In other words such a business probably wouldn't survive to reap the benefits. Should the government mandate extreme preparedness so that no one is at a disadvantage? Or just bail them out when it happens, i.e. act as a last resort insurer/lender.

You're without a doubt right, I did forget to mention that I think providing loans to these companies as very low interest rates is alright, though I don't agree with massive cash infusions.

I don't think the government should mandate this sort of thing, though I don't think you should be able to run to the government for xb when you've spend somewhere close to that on share buybacks in the recent years. Just using American Airlines as an example here, look at what they've spent on buybacks - https://ycharts.com/companies/AAL/stock_buyback

Loan guarantees and loans at low interest rates are fine IMO. With some strings attached relating to how they're spending this money and oversight. I'd rather not see these companies push this cash into buybacks.
1114  Other / Politics & Society / Re: [SERIOUS] What do people think of direct cash payments (US stimulus package)? on: April 06, 2020, 11:07:37 PM
long theymos post

I agree with a good amount of what is here. Always happy to see a long Theymos post as well. Starting with the money printing side of things, I've read a good amount of articles and such talking about how this isn't going to cause inflation beyond typical levels due to the fact that spending is HEAVILY depleted here. One of the things that would typically happen in a time like this, without any government intervention, would be deflation. But we don't live in a world anymore where government intervention is foreign -- the only REAL data point we can use in the Modern Era is the Obama Stimulus package and the Great Recession, which saw inflation peak around 3.5 percent even with an 800b+ stimulus package.

These two circumstances obviously aren't exactly the same as I do think there were some tax decreases in the Obama stimuls packages. See here for info on what exactly those were - https://www.thebalance.com/what-was-obama-s-stimulus-package-3305625

Couldn't agree more when you talk about businesses getting bailouts and expecting bailouts. That's something that was talked about after the bank bailouts, that banks were taking on increased risk b/c of the fact that they knew the government would bail them out. If you know you have a free pass, is it really your fault if you use it? I'm not going to talk about the fact that the government actually did profit from the bailouts, because they could've used this money more effectively -- lowering taxes for the middle class.

Very interesting tracker for the bailouts is going to be here, by ProPublica - https://projects.propublica.org/bailout/

Businesses that are in industries that are VERY susceptible to this sort of thing should be ready for this to happen. Plus the fact that these companies have been highly profitable for decades and have been taking this cash and rewarding shareholders with it. Money that they COULD'VE set aside to ensure that they were ready for a black swan event.

Even though we're having this great discussion here, politicians are still only going to care about the short term job losses b/c the voters care about the short term. When most Americans can't afford a $400 expense, politicians are going to focus on ensuring that they have a stable income, even if it's not the best choice. In a perfect world you'd be rewarded for being ready for a black swan, not being rewarded for doing the opposite. But we're not in that world I guess.

Smiley
1115  Other / Politics & Society / Re: UK prime minister Boris has been hospitalised! on: April 06, 2020, 10:31:45 PM
Been hospitalized for a days now I'm pretty sure, as he'd been showing corona symptoms for 11 days now. Guy was just transferred over to intensive care, I'm assuming he has some sort of existing condition -- and he's also in the category of people where this hits the hardest, the older people.

Hopefully he gets well soon even if you hate him or his politics, this is a serious situation and you don't want to see anyone sick. Guy has a family and all of that.

he went to hospital on sunday at 8pm uk time.  normal ward
monday 8pm uk time transfered to ICU

Welp. Honestly having a hard time keeping track of time in quarantine, just feels like a permanent Saturday where the only thing I can do is work but I can do it whenever. Thanks for the correction though, I appreciate it!

My point still stands regarding the fact that I'd hope people can rise above politics and support him during this very tough time.
1116  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump refuses to wear a mask, but is open to take medicine? on: April 06, 2020, 10:26:47 PM
A mask will likely not prevent you from getting the Chinese coronavirus, what a mask will do is reduce the chances you will spread the Chinese Coronavirus to someone else.

There is evidence that taking the lupus drug will help you recover from the Chinese Coronavirus quickly, and will result in less severe symptoms while you remain infected. If everyone who has more than mild symptoms is prescribed these drugs, the virus would not be as serious of a problem.

+1 to all of this.

The CDC is recommending that people wear it ensure that they're not spreading the virus to others, not to stop the spread to themselves. This is because 25 percent of people with the coronavirus are showing no symptom and are going to spread the virus at a much higher rate then those that can assume that they have it.

CDC - https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html
1117  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: US Presidential Election 2020 on: April 06, 2020, 10:18:56 PM
Disregarding the getting-sick factor, for which I don't hope, I am asking myself this: I am 77 years old and would like to be the next US President. My chances are more or less 50/50. A guy from my party, 15 years younger and with whom I have a friendly relationship, has way better chances to beat Trump and make my Democrats enter the WH again. What do I do ? Am I putting my own goals above the goals from my party and the future of my nation ?

Biden having once in a lifetime chance to become the most powerful person on the globe. Do you really think that he would sacrifice that and select one of his colleagues for the Democrat nomination? And that too someone who doesn't even figured in the primaries? Forget about his age. Biden would still be the candidate, even if he is 87 years old.

As you said, Biden needs to put his own goals above the goals from his party and the future of the United States. Agreed. But what if Biden thinks that by running for the president (as a moderate Democrat, he has one of the best chances against Trump), he is perfectly in line with the goals from his party? I am sure that Biden thinks that he is doing a favor for the US, by running against Trump.

Yeah I don't think any of us, anyone in the media, anyone writing articles, and so on and so forth understand that when you're this close to the presidency -- you're not going to just drop out to be a team player. Maybe if you were a younger democrat and you thought it would be benifitical down the line (think of someone like Mayor Pete) but if you're an older person and you can't wait another 4 years for another shot, you're gonna stick in this and hope and pray.

I can't even imagine what that would be like. Imagine being this close to being the leader of the free world and then losing the election? Whew. Thank god none of us on here will be close to that, hehe.
1118  Other / Politics & Society / Re: UK prime minister Boris has been hospitalised! on: April 06, 2020, 10:05:59 PM
Been hospitalized for a days now I'm pretty sure, as he'd been showing corona symptoms for 11 days now. Guy was just transferred over to intensive care, I'm assuming he has some sort of existing condition -- and he's also in the category of people where this hits the hardest, the older people.

Hopefully he gets well soon even if you hate him or his politics, this is a serious situation and you don't want to see anyone sick. Guy has a family and all of that.
1119  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] PlayBetr Signature Campaign | Hero/Legendary | $50/Week in BTC on: April 06, 2020, 10:03:06 PM
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=938833
Current amount of posts (including this one): 1661
How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 521
SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: 3B4b1EUTohk7yTajgkRzG7bpPRhxELe11T

Accepted! Welcome to the Campaign Smiley


We are once again FULL & CFNP. Thank you everyone for your applications!

Grats on this man, you're entering a campaign that truly is run by one of the best campaign managers! Congrats to Cabalism for moving on up to FJ.

Merits all around folks. Stay safe during these troubling times.
1120  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump: US to deploy anti-drug Navy ships near Venezuela on: April 03, 2020, 12:36:41 AM
That's literally what this is and they said this is what they're doing. The guy literally just got charged with distributing drugs throughout the US, pretty much running a cartel, and so on and so forth. For the US this is the best time for them to leverage their military, and their money, to be able to get someone to flip and to join team US.

They've just gotta pray that the sanctions have been working, and that they've forced Maduro to have to skimp out on paying certain members of his military. Which may sway them towards taking the big money bags from the US. It'd be stupid if Maduro does this, but greed and intelligence don't go hand in hand.

Doubt much will come out of this now though, Trump wants to ride off the approval bounce that comes with being the president during some sort of disaster (in this case, corona pandemic) not being a wartime president when people hate boots on the ground, and really any war.

No the sanctions are doing nothing of the sort. If anything, only the masses suffer. In any case this could also explain why Maduro created a mining company for the military, so he could keep them happy from the spoils underground (gold and diamonds, they said).

Maduro allows the military to conduct bribes usually (but not always) at the border, this is a decades old institution that only strengthened even more under his regime. The military knows that this "operation" could be endangered if another (not accomplice) government comes.

You see, the foot guard at the border will accept the bribe to let you pass, say, food or medicine (because you are supposed to have a permit, yadda, yadda). Part of the bribe goes to his superior, and part of that goes to his superior's superior, all the way to the top. This is kinda like an MLM with the (compulsory) bribes being the main fuel.

Of course traditionally most of the money came from smuggling out (not in) gasoline, because of the absolutely ridiculous subsidy its nearly free, so what takes you 100 USD to fill a cistern tank truck, in Colombia easily becomes 40 thousand or more USD. That's enough money for everyone, including the smugglers and all the irregular groups operating on both sides of the border. Note that while Colombia has traditionally been a "drug" cartel, Venezuela instead has been a gasoline traffic cartel (sure they could have probably also expanded into drugs, or that's what the DEA says anyway).

This has been going at least since the 90ies, which is when they got the fear of adjusting gasoline prices following Caracazo, sowing this much worse future (this is what happens when you deny the market and attempt to peg the price of things).

Yes what I'm saying is that this corrupt military caste was produced by decades of absurd gasoline subsidy, and from those habits came the rest. Incidentally while they can bully and extort civilians or even rival irregular groups, for actual military operations they suck. Of course Venezuela has not faced a REAL military confrontation in centuries.

But that's the point, the point is for the masses to suffer so they begin to rebel against their government. Sanctions typically aren't going to cripple to people at the top, as they have MANY other means to gain $$$ -- they can avoid traditional markets (Stocks,Bonds, etc) and just go ahead and sell drugs (Maduro)

By the way you're explaining things, it seems like this is just a system of corruption that has only been further expanded by the Maduro regime b/c of the hurt that come from US sanctions. The US thinks that at a certain point the people aren't going to allow the government to continue to exploit them, and they're going to rebel and instill a democratic government. Eh?

Maybe I'm wrong here, just spitballing with ya.
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ... 248 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!