You can bet on the nominee at nitrogensports.

It appears you can also bet at betonline, but I don't see any futures for individual primaries. Ditto with bovada. 

@squatz1 you can wager at Freebitco I have left the link below for your reference, and they have more political events too so you can choose specifically which one’s you wish to target, or wager small bets across all the events relating to US politics. Further I haven’t checked which other site is allowing to wager in crypto for US political events, so you’ll have to compare the odds and then decide for yourself and good luck in advance for winning your bet.

Link:

https://freebitco.in (then click on betting - select category and lastly select politics)

What you trying to place a bet on?

You're right. 'Stopping terrorism' is just an excuse, as is this latest angle. Indeed, 'stopping terrorism' has been the excuse for the dramatic ramping up of surveillance activities since 9/11, starting in the immediate aftermath with the Patriot Act which basically destroyed privacy overnight. https://cyber.harvard.edu/privacy/Introduction%20to%20Module%20V.htm

And yet we - or at least many of us - routinely sign it away by clicking our consent to website terms and conditions or else just by using tools such as Facebook and Google.

In the past, even the recent past, surveillance by the government was largely so that they could control us and see what we were doing. That's all changed now with the monetisation of surveillance - indeed surveillance capitalism is Facebook's entire business model. But they are all at it, Google, Amazon, and everyone else.

As crypto moves towards the mainstream, there will be increasing pressure to remove e2e encryption and to mould crypto into something that governments deem acceptable. So is the emasculation of crypto inevitable? I would say no. I think our best chance of avoiding this outcome is the sheer money involved, and the global nature of bitcoin and the huge commerical advantage that things like smart contracts such as Ethereum can provide. Whilst individual governments can 'ban' bitcoin and other cryptos, to do so would put them at a huge disadvantage against anyone who does adopt it. Basically the choice for governments and corporations is to adopt crypto or get left behind by your competitors. So for this simple reason I think that government attempts to wrest control of the direction of crypto will ultimately fail.

I don't think he cares about the Jewish vote nearly as much as he does his relationship with Israel.  I think its pretty common for American Jews to consider themselves American, with little or no loyalty to Israel.  Also, there are only ~7 million Jews in America and half of them live in NY or CA and those that live in other states are mostly Democrats due to Republican anti-immigration stances.  (at least that's been my perception after some reading over the years and personal experiences, i'm not going to cite a bunch of sources right now though)

The relationship between Trump, the Kushners and Netanyahu goes back a long time though.

Netanyahu lived in NYC during the 80s when he was the Israel ambassador and became friends with Trumps father, Trump, and Jareds Father.  Both the Trump and Kushner companies have decades of history involving real estate, loans, and other other business stuff with Israel.

Sorry mate, i have just realised my misunderstanding. It was because of the plenty of topics claiming to be scammed or deceived by localbitcoin, so i just thought this is another accusation.
Even in this case, LBC is the main responsible as the escrow function was set by it. Due to lack of professionalism of the LBC platform, a user can scam other user(s).

Another topic about LBC scamming its users. This becomes regular in almost all forums. Am not surprised reading more topics about it, as the flags have been rised long time ago, since what op calls 'the golden age', and the same apply to Paxful .
Sadly, there was no alternatives to LBC and Pax and users are/were forced to use one of them to make peer to peer trades due to lack of exchangers in their locals. After a long time since their lunch, and after the appearance of more solutions, old platform users are still forced to use one of the platforms or both after already building a long trade reputation and to keep promoting it as well. Those factors help the two platforms not to take so much care about their reputation and have no issue to deceive some users from time to time .
Users of both platforms should stop using them emmidiatly and rise awarness about how much risky to use them.
And for those who built their reputation there, they fortunetly can now use localcrypto as the best actual alternative then export their reputation from LBC and Pax .

I think that Bernie has a very good chance of winning vs Trump if he's the nominee. Current polling shows him beating Trump in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. You definitely can't rely on polls at this stage, since many people polled are replacing "Biden" or "Bernie" with just "not Trump" in their minds right now, and once the election actually gets under way, they'll be faced with actually voting for a particular candidate. But I think that Sanders has a good chance of speaking to working-class voters in these areas. These voters are not all that ideologically opposed to socialism, and they'd find many of Sanders' economic policies attractive. Effective attacks against Sanders for these voters would focus more on immigration, gun rights, and general social issues (ie. if they feel like Sanders projects an "it's not OK to be a straight white male" vibe, that won't go down well). I'm not sure that Trump will be able to attack Sanders well enough to overcome the appeal of some of the economic issues, especially if the economy starts to falter before then (which IMO is not unlikely). And while there are a lot of moderate Democrats who despise Sanders (ie. people who love Bloomberg and who now think of Bush's presidency longingly), are they actually going to swing any states? They probably won't even vote for Trump: they'll just stay home.

This map starts with the Cook Political Report ratings, and then I assigned three of the toss-ups (NC, AZ, FL) to Trump, and the remaining two toss-ups of WI and PA I assigned to Sanders, which is where he polls the best vs Trump currently and where I think he has the best chance of making his message resonate. That puts him over the top.

The Cook ratings probably assume a more moderate Democrat, but will inserting Bernie actually change anything? Is that really going to help Trump win Nevada or Michigan, for example? I doubt it. If anything it might allow Sanders to pick off some of the states which Cook rates as Republican, like maybe OH.

With Biden, I think that Trump wins all 5 Cook toss-ups and therefore the election.

---

All that being said, Democratic establishment is going to try every trick in the book to stop Bernie from being the nominee. It'll be sort of like Trump's nomination, but the Democratic party's establishment is more powerful than the Republican party's establishment, Bernie himself seems less able to push back against this establishment, and of course there are also many other differing factors, so Bernie could definitely be defeated. At this point I'd say that there's less than a 50% chance of Bernie being the nominee.

I do not think that these methods are ideal for this year since many things have happened recently, for example:

 - Localbitcoin has placed restrictions on many countries, so I do not think it is the right place for many citizens, especially since such restrictions may be imposed on more countries.
 - The same applies to Paxful.
 - Bitcoin ATMs: These machines are not available all over the world, so it is your location that determines the benefit in addition to the high fees.
 - Bisq: There are not enough trading volumes.

-Urban legend said you treat women nice they would reward you handsomely in the end. Debunked!

Politicians should stick to politics, and leave trade deals to businesses. All politicians seem to be able to do is to impose taxes and tariffs.

It looks so weird on the world map seeing how Gibraltar belongs to the UK but not Spain.

Then I actually read the story about it and saw that it was Spain that left the soil to the British in 1713...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_Gibraltar

After reading about it, I don't think the UK gonna give it back just because Spain asked it nicely.  It has been three hundred years

@OP

I searched for quite a while this summer and found none, expect the suggestions in the link posted by @LTU_btc. I even started to check the networks listed on youtube one by one. I didn't check all of them, I had given up page #10. If you finally find any it will be welcome.


@OP is not looking for an alternative to Youtube, he's looking for an MCN that pay in BTC. It's totally different than what you're suggesting, not even related.




He didn't talk about a fee in BTC taken by a network, he talked about Western Union fees

I wish that had emailed me when they decided to shut the miners down, I emailed them daily for about a week and didn’t get a reply from them until now.