Well for one. I have good experience in this, advertisements draws in more people, good products make them stay. But in an industry like gambling where you don't really expect patrons, I can see what you're pointing at. That being said, advertisement is still a good way to gather people into your product. If you can allocate something for a let's say, signature campaign which is a surefire way of earning new people, you can invite more gamblers into your site.

you can't take someone's word over the internet especially when it comes to money, I can say that I hate bitcoin but still have a bunch of it in my wallet lol internet is deceiving in many ways. And did Rotschild really said that they hate bitcoin? when in fact it can double their trillions of dollars? they can even play the market alone.



They do, only us that see it that way coz it feels like so huge amount to us when it is so small to them  

Mutiny is always at hand in a setup like this. And besides, humans are always there to find a loophole. Not like bitcoin is an limitless source to begin with. This is if the the supplier of energy was able to keep up with this. Plus thid would happen fast because companies ars etoher gonna ride the wave that is bitcoin and would cause for the supply of bitcoin to deplete even faster.

I guess the only way for us to find whales cadhing out through exchanges is by keeping close look to addresses. These whales are prone to cashing out in bite-sized chunks tp avoid their cover being blown. That being said, that's the only way for us to discover these whales. Pr subscribe to bots on telegram that gives detailed information on whales selling and how much they have sold.

I don't seeit inducing a huge impact to the gambling indjstry really. Except of course if a foulplay is discovered which will direclty affect the winnings of the people who have already placed their bets. Especially for those who have already enjoyed their winnings and would have a hard time, if not an imppssible time retrieving these money.

We still have a long way to go to create a robot with sufficient technology and capability to combat that of a human's. It's quite controversial to say but most of these machines know only a thing or two, and that is why they excel at it. Have their processors do another task and they will start having problems with one or both of it. It may take us a few more hundred years to happen, and I fear the day it comes.

Insurance is something you have in case of a mishap. By the way you are putting bitcoin into the picture, it's like you're telling us that bitcoin is a good insurance plan, which is clearly isn't. One big reason, it's not stable. For your insurance to be effective, it has to test the weather of time, bitcoin may indeed be able to do this, but imagine you in your 70s learning that the bitcoins you invested in are now 30% less valuable than when you started with them, I can only visualize the emotions you will have by then.

I mean, they still would include that into the market cap since the supply of bitcoin is locked and limited. Though the manner of finding these lost coins might be too substandard. Because they just make a rough estimate from it and from there will remove the 10% which easily becomes the lost coins.

A vaccine will only render a person immune to the virus, it is not a cure for the virus. Now with your question whether this will be the last of COVID-19, that will heavily depend on the public itself, do they still have fear and respect for the damages the virus can inflict? Or are they making fun of it thinking it wouldn't hit them?

You might wanna include YOBIT in here too, a lot of prople are complaining ever since about their games being rigged and faking provably fair to take advantage of their patron players. Though it's great that you have this special list so we can be vigilant even more when betting. Gambling is already an unfair game, so it's best to seize every opportunity to tip the scales in our favor.

Did you mean this because of it's cheap entry point or because a lot of normal people, unlike in Wall St. with their own stock brokers, can get into the project without qny fuss? Because I don't see any fault in either of it. Honestly speaking, we can even see cryptocurrency turning the tides of investingvto its favor because as of the moment, it's the most expensive and most promising investment asset to take into

Cryptocurrency is showing signs and promise of it living forever, and it just might be the case, given the fact that it is intangible, it will not corrode, or lose it's intrinsic value, because there is no intrinsic value to base cryptocurrency's worth in the first place. The only way for it to lose it's significance is if it is caused by its own investors by the constand pump and dump, or if it somehow becomes inaccessible in the internet.

Why make all the fuss just to reveal someone's private life? Can't we all just respect him for not being greey and showing u when bitciin is at its peak now eventhough he has all the right to since he *coughs* created it? Besides, what effects will his name be doing to the current bul run, to the market pf the future? Will there be a huge uptrend just because people have someone organic to trust? No is the answer to all that questions. Does it make sense to look for Satoshi then? No.

Bitcoin is still used as a currency anyway, so I do not see the problem about it being used as an investment asset nowadays, if anything, this is what Satoshi would be wanting, to be able to help more people in all means necessary. Besides, he has not been here to "rectify" the situation if there's anything to be rectified.

It's actualy saddening to see how a huge number of people still voted for trump, it was like these guys had never learned a lesson. All of that aside, this was the first time I enountered this big of a bitcoin bet on a presidential election, not to mention the fact that I was oblivious about its legality. Whatever it is, I hope those who deserve the win got what's going for them and vice versa.

As long as internet is still accesible somewhere across the globe, bitcoin and otber cryptocurrencies will still be there. They are really valuable and the only thing that cpuld deplete their wprth is their own dpwnfall or if the coins can no longer be accessed by amyone anywhere. Now that being said it would look like the first option aould be more plausible.

Kinda sad that both these casinos and the people who woek for them struggle to make ends meet. And what's even bad about this is the fact that most skills you obtain working for a casino cannot be transferred to their new jobs. So it's going to be a hard time for them getting good at and used to the new work they will be in.

Nothing too big. Bitcoin is decentralized for a reason. Now some may say it could cause a decline in the volume of users which it definitely will, however. You have to understsnd that bitcoin is used worldwide, and as more and more countries use it, the lesser impact the US will inflict on it. Even to this day, US can only affect the price of bitcoin so little.

Big downside of bitcoin's sucess? Yes truly. But a reason why bitcoin will die? Not so much. Everyone who took the time to research about bitcoin is well aware that it is not meant to make cheap and lightning fast transactions, it is mainly meant to be a boundless gateway for people to send money back and forth, for a price of course. Now that shoukd clear things up.

It's been governed by the CPC (Communist Party of China) for the past 70+ years and had since opened some capitalist concepts like private business ownerships and others which effectively boomed their economy. I do not think they will incorporate a much stricter approach than the ones they are operating under right now as it's not working. And besides, the current system works in their favor. Don't fix what is not broken.