krnlx
|
|
January 17, 2017, 07:58:30 PM |
|
BUG: Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart But in auto mode works well ./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1 +---------------------------------+ | EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b | +---------------------------------+ INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7... CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0] INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0] INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0] ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797 INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0] ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:03:28 PM |
|
BUG: Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart But in auto mode works well ./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1 +---------------------------------+ | EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b | +---------------------------------+ INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7... CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0] INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0] INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0] ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797 INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0] ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart... CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0 CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1 CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without Thanks for information.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:04:43 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please can you tell us what solver is which, and also what was the solver used in previous EWBF ? Well seems a reboot helped, solver 0 now work. weird...
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:07:30 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please Ok i will add custom file name
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:11:02 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please Ok i will add custom file name Nice thanks This version still struggle with threads, have to start 3 instances of the miner to maximize output as before. Performance of solver 0 and 1 are really close, but i see more stability, and a bit more sol on solver 1, also seems to get a bit of rejected shares on solver 0 when i don't have any in solver 1
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:13:22 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please can you tell us what solver is which, and also what was the solver used in previous EWBF ? Well seems a reboot helped, solver 0 now work. weird... All solvers is a variations of my old solver for example solver 3 is solver from version 0.6.0b for old cards. 0 is solver from version 0.1.0b but with optimizations in code. Solver 2 is most stable and 1 is a hybrid between 0 and 2.
|
|
|
|
spoon_net
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:18:18 PM |
|
the release not good. whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150 whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:25:09 PM |
|
the release not good. whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150 whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
Try another solvers. Because on my rig i get 450 per one 1070 with new version and 440 with 0.1.0b
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:26:50 PM Last edit: January 17, 2017, 08:38:46 PM by m1n1ngP4d4w4n |
|
the release not good. whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150 whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
Try another solvers. Because on my rig i get 450 per one 1070 with new version and 440 with 0.1.0b Seems the optimization bring for me the same symptoms i got on nicehash 0.5c, unstability at higher overclock, i'm playing with settings right now. Thanks for the infos about solvers. Trying to find again the sweet spot. EDIT : got the same speed 2590s/sols (6x1070 rig) i was getting before with 0.0.1b, but with lower overclock (120/500 down from 150/600) and one instance, room to improve this result for sure
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:34:56 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1] INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1] GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s Total speed: 531 Sol/s INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0] INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0] INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0] INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1] INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0] INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0] INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1] INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0] INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0] GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s Total speed: 534 Sol/s INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1] INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0] INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0] INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1] INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0] INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:43:18 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1] INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1] GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s Total speed: 531 Sol/s INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0] INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0] INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0] INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1] INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0] INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0] INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1] INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0] INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0] GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s Total speed: 534 Sol/s INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1] INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0] INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0] INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1] INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0] INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
This actually not a problem. It happened by many reasons: first low precise of timers, load of pool, and this is not a ping it a time in milliseconds from finding a solution to receive a pool answer.
|
|
|
|
skaf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:50:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
wll1rah
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:50:25 PM |
|
Does anyone know how to use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:52:21 PM |
|
Does anyone know how to use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?
Like this @echo off timeout 30 SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0 SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
LOG=%~n0.log
:RESTART miner --server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --user xxxx --pass x --port 2142 --eexit 3 --log 2 --solver 0 goto :RESTART each time miner exit, it will restart itself. Cheers
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:02:16 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1] INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1] GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s Total speed: 531 Sol/s INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0] INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0] INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0] INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0] INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0] INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1] INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0] INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0] INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1] INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0] INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0] GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s Total speed: 534 Sol/s INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0] INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1] INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0] INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0] INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1] INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0] INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
This actually not a problem. It happened by many reasons: first low precise of timers, load of pool, and this is not a ping it a time in milliseconds from finding a solution to receive a pool answer. 0.1.0b dont have this behaviour. it just happens with the new.
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:02:56 PM |
|
good job With what solver u get those numbers? can u post an example of ur bat file
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:05:07 PM |
|
It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird? I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal and thanks for the miner! Yes it is normal for modern gpu, solvers 0 and 1 fastest and difference between this solvers very small. But i know about cases when solver 1 will be much faster. It depends on hardware and software os, drivers etc. Yes, but each time i restart the miner it chooses different solver for the same card even , also i seem to be getting always better results on solver 0.
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:09:50 PM |
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:12:07 PM |
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance.
I am glad that we can confirm the same results. Solver 0 forced is giving the best results and also two instances do not bring more sols
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:17:58 PM |
|
Tested 6*1070 Palit SJS rig , ver. 010 giving me more hash than 020. I've tried all the solvers , only 1 is working to my cards...
|
|
|
|
|