|
krnlx
|
 |
January 17, 2017, 07:58:30 PM |
|
BUG: Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart But in auto mode works well ./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1
+---------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b |
+---------------------------------+
INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7...
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797
INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:03:28 PM |
|
BUG: Linux , 6x1070 rig. When I select solvers manual, miner hangs and there are endless retries to restart But in auto mode works well ./eqm --server eu1-zcash.flypool.org --user XXXX.`hostname` --pass x --port 3333 --solver 1
+---------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.2.0b |
+---------------------------------+
INFO: Target: 0020c49ba5e353f7...
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
INFO: Detected new work: a717ea1d90077263db6d
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO 22:54:37: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 51ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:37: GPU4 Accepted share 101ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:39: GPU2 Accepted share 56ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 22:54:40: GPU1 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 22:54:41: GPU4 Accepted share 54ms [A:3, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
INFO: Detected new work: d366aaf19174cd5af797
INFO 22:54:48: GPU0 Accepted share 55ms [A:1, R:0]
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1
ERROR: Some workers are stopped. Attempt to restart...
CUDA: Device: 0 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 2 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 3 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 4 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Thread exited with code: 0
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1070, 8145 MB
CUDA: Device: 0 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 1 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 2 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 3 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 4 User selected solver: 1
CUDA: Device: 5 User selected solver: 1 Upd. Bug appears in all solvers 0-3, no messages in dmesg with Nvidia errors,etc. With overclock, or without Thanks for information. |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:04:43 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please  can you tell us what solver is which, and also what was the solver used in previous EWBF ? Well seems a reboot helped, solver 0 now work. weird... |
|
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:07:30 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please Ok i will add custom file name |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:11:02 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please Ok i will add custom file name Nice thanks  This version still struggle with threads, have to start 3 instances of the miner to maximize output as before. Performance of solver 0 and 1 are really close, but i see more stability, and a bit more sol on solver 1, also seems to get a bit of rejected shares on solver 0 when i don't have any in solver 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:13:22 PM |
|
Solver 0 seems to be very unstable for nvidia 1070 on my test rig, solver 1 work stable. Also yeah need logfile name pretty please can you tell us what solver is which, and also what was the solver used in previous EWBF ? Well seems a reboot helped, solver 0 now work. weird... All solvers is a variations of my old solver for example solver 3 is solver from version 0.6.0b for old cards. 0 is solver from version 0.1.0b but with optimizations in code. Solver 2 is most stable and 1 is a hybrid between 0 and 2. |
|
|
|
|
spoon_net
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:18:18 PM |
|
the release not good.
whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150
whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:25:09 PM |
|
the release not good.
whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150
whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
Try another solvers. Because on my rig i get 450 per one 1070 with new version and 440 with 0.1.0b |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:26:50 PM
Last edit: January 17, 2017, 08:38:46 PM by m1n1ngP4d4w4n |
|
the release not good.
whit 0.1.0b 5x1070=2150
whit 0.2.0b 5x1070=2120 ??!?
Try another solvers. Because on my rig i get 450 per one 1070 with new version and 440 with 0.1.0b Seems the optimization bring for me the same symptoms i got on nicehash 0.5c, unstability at higher overclock, i'm playing with settings right now. Thanks for the infos about solvers. Trying to find again the sweet spot. EDIT : got the same speed 2590s/sols (6x1070 rig) i was getting before with 0.0.1b, but with lower overclock (120/500 down from 150/600) and one instance, room to improve this result for sure |
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:34:56 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1]
INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1]
GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s
Total speed: 531 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0]
INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0]
INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0]
INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1]
INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0]
INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0]
INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d
INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1]
INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0]
INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0]
GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s
Total speed: 534 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1]
INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0]
INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0]
INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
|
EWBF_ (OP)
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:43:18 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1]
INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1]
GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s
Total speed: 531 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0]
INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0]
INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0]
INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1]
INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0]
INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0]
INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d
INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1]
INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0]
INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0]
GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s
Total speed: 534 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1]
INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0]
INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0]
INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
This actually not a problem. It happened by many reasons: first low precise of timers, load of pool, and this is not a ping it a time in milliseconds from finding a solution to receive a pool answer. |
|
|
|
|
skaf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:50:01 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wll1rah
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:50:25 PM |
|
Does anyone know how to use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?
|
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 08:52:21 PM |
|
Does anyone know how to use -eexit so it will restart my batch file?
Like this @echo off
timeout 30
SETX GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
SETX GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
SETX GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
SETX GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
SETX GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
LOG=%~n0.log
:RESTART
miner --server zec-eu.suprnova.cc --user xxxx --pass x --port 2142 --eexit 3 --log 2 --solver 0
goto :RESTART each time miner exit, it will restart itself. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:02:16 PM |
|
i have the strange issue that the yubmit time sometimes multiply by 10*
NFO 21:33:10: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:257, R:1]
INFO 21:33:15: GPU1 Accepted share 58ms [A:258, R:1]
GPU0: 260 Sol/s GPU1: 271 Sol/s
Total speed: 531 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:19: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:247, R:0]
INFO 21:33:20: GPU0 Accepted share 480ms [A:248, R:0]
INFO 21:33:21: GPU1 Accepted share 36ms [A:259, R:1]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 1639ms [A:249, R:0]
INFO 21:33:27: GPU0 Accepted share 644ms [A:250, R:0]
INFO 21:33:31: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:251, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU0 Accepted share 43ms [A:252, R:0]
INFO 21:33:35: GPU1 Accepted share 39ms [A:260, R:1]
INFO 21:33:37: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:253, R:0]
INFO 21:33:42: GPU0 Accepted share 46ms [A:254, R:0]
INFO: Detected new work: c6b888b78228421bcb4d
INFO 21:33:43: GPU1 Accepted share 33ms [A:261, R:1]
INFO 21:33:45: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:255, R:0]
INFO 21:33:46: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:256, R:0]
GPU0: 266 Sol/s GPU1: 268 Sol/s
Total speed: 534 Sol/s
INFO 21:33:51: GPU0 Accepted share 38ms [A:257, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU0 Accepted share 106ms [A:258, R:0]
INFO 21:34:01: GPU1 Accepted share 88ms [A:262, R:1]
INFO 21:34:03: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:259, R:0]
INFO 21:34:06: GPU0 Accepted share 700ms [A:260, R:0]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU1 Accepted share 3309ms [A:263, R:1]
INFO 21:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 723ms [A:261, R:0]
INFO 21:34:11: GPU0 Accepted share 40ms [A:262, R:0]
This actually not a problem. It happened by many reasons: first low precise of timers, load of pool, and this is not a ping it a time in milliseconds from finding a solution to receive a pool answer. 0.1.0b dont have this behaviour. it just happens with the new. |
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³
Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:02:56 PM |
|
good job  With what solver u get those numbers? can u post an example of ur bat file |
|
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:05:07 PM |
|
It selects different solvers for different cards even if the cards are the same? I have on one rig all EVGA 1070 and some cards use solver 0 and some solver 1. This is weird? I dont see the speed difference, it is probably marginal and thanks for the miner! Yes it is normal for modern gpu, solvers 0 and 1 fastest and difference between this solvers very small. But i know about cases when solver 1 will be much faster. It depends on hardware and software os, drivers etc. Yes, but each time i restart the miner it chooses different solver for the same card even , also i seem to be getting always better results on solver 0. |
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:09:50 PM |
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance. so about 2/2.5% gain from 0.0.1b
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:12:07 PM |
|
Final result
6x1070 rig, 2650sols/s 145/590 @60% tdp, had to reduce OC a bit to be stable. solver 0 forced, the best so far. Multiple instance of the miner seems to make it unstable now, with 3 it's totally unstable, with 2, it's pretty stable, but don't get more sols than with 1 instance.
I am glad that we can confirm the same results. Solver 0 forced is giving the best results and also two instances do not bring more sols |
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
January 17, 2017, 09:17:58 PM |
|
Tested 6*1070 Palit SJS rig , ver. 010 giving me more hash than 020.
I've tried all the solvers , only 1 is working to my cards...
|
|
|
|
|
|
