Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 11:29:51 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 19163 19164 19165 19166 19167 19168 19169 19170 19171 19172 19173 19174 19175 19176 19177 19178 19179 19180 19181 19182 19183 19184 19185 19186 19187 19188 19189 19190 19191 19192 19193 19194 19195 19196 19197 19198 19199 19200 19201 19202 19203 19204 19205 19206 19207 19208 19209 19210 19211 19212 [19213] 19214 19215 19216 19217 19218 19219 19220 19221 19222 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 19262 19263 ... 33463 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26403634 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 09:39:40 AM

This is how you can tell cryptocucks are getting fleeced soon:

conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 09:42:06 AM

Either way there is rampant price manipulation.  There is a thread around here somewhere where the OP tells everyone in advance that the market is going to crash on  monday 15th.  Im sure his accuracy was just random hmm.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7pxg0d/2018_crypto_black_monday/

My theory is slightly different: wall street started loading up on btc once futures were a sure fact, and kept pumping until it established an upward avalanche-momentum when even moms and pops started panic-buying btc above 10K. While the noobs were buying above 10-15K the sharks loaded up on shorts (btc futures are still mostly short), and then, when their target was hit at 20K they pulled the trigger unloading their "physical" btc making out like bandits both because they sold at the top their btc and even more from their futures short bets placed at the top. A perfect controlled demolition, which they will repeat until it works imho, that's why they will let the price pump again after the next futures expiration.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:22:44 AM

Something is going on... Bullish signal ?

https://dedi.jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#2h

The spammer bitches gave up.



 I believe there’s a correlation between price movement and mem pool activity. In this cause the most recent final spike seems to follow the falling price which was looking rather ugly at that time.   The mem pool falls as price stagnates.  

Here we can compare 7 day google trends for bitcoin against mem pool activity. 


imagehost ru

The problem is I don’t think this information tells us anything we don’t already know. Unless we read something rather concerning into the mem pool being empty.

HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:30:20 AM

Either way there is rampant price manipulation.  There is a thread around here somewhere where the OP tells everyone in advance that the market is going to crash on  monday 15th.  Im sure his accuracy was just random hmm.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7pxg0d/2018_crypto_black_monday/

My theory is slightly different: wall street started loading up on btc once futures were a sure fact, and kept pumping until it established an upward avalanche-momentum when even moms and pops started panic-buying btc above 10K. While the noobs were buying above 10-15K the sharks loaded up on shorts (btc futures are still mostly short), and then, when their target was hit at 20K they pulled the trigger unloading their "physical" btc making out like bandits both because they sold at the top their btc and even more from their futures short bets placed at the top. A perfect controlled demolition, which they will repeat until it works imho, that's why they will let the price pump again after the next futures expiration.

Someone has to take the other side of the short.  How can they be “mostly” short?
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:35:07 AM

except there is no volume on the futures exchanges
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:35:30 AM

The problem is I don’t think this information tells us anything we don’t already know. Unless we read something rather concerning into the mem pool being empty.

You must be a BCHcoiner. Btc price falls 50% and mempool shrinks of a couple of order of magnitudes, and the explanation for you would be that btc is so less useful/interesting for speculation, trading, and anything else at current price? The spammers gave up, and you can too.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:41:02 AM

Someone has to take the other side of the short.  How can they be “mostly” short?

The dumb money, as always.


https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-21/bitcoin-futures-traders-add-shorts-short-squeeze-imminent
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:44:48 AM

Hash rate is also up significantly.  Could this alone bring down the mem pool?  Happy to have my theories challenged - that’s why I post them. 


unlimited image hosting
Lopumbo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 102


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:53:38 AM

Hash rate is also up significantly.  Could this alone bring down the mem pool?


unlimited image hosting

tx/block went down 30% and ~20% too fast mining over the last 7 days
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 3124



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 10:59:19 AM

I was hoping not to have to install special instrumentation like wireshark.

Well, wireshark is about as universal a network analysis tool as exists.

Quote
BTW, 8333 is for bitcoind. LN uses a different port (can't recall right now).

Exactly. Filter out all 8333 and what are you left with? Traffic not to/from your validating client - which I believe was what you were looking for in your query.
I'd be left with the rest of the traffic - which isn't LN alone. I'd better filter to select LN traffic only. But that's a minor detail.
flynn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 540



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:00:51 AM

Either way there is rampant price manipulation.  There is a thread around here somewhere where the OP tells everyone in advance that the market is going to crash on  monday 15th.  Im sure his accuracy was just random hmm.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7pxg0d/2018_crypto_black_monday/

My theory is slightly different: wall street started loading up on btc once futures were a sure fact, and kept pumping until it established an upward avalanche-momentum when even moms and pops started panic-buying btc above 10K. While the noobs were buying above 10-15K the sharks loaded up on shorts (btc futures are still mostly short), and then, when their target was hit at 20K they pulled the trigger unloading their "physical" btc making out like bandits both because they sold at the top their btc and even more from their futures short bets placed at the top. A perfect controlled demolition, which they will repeat until it works imho, that's why they will let the price pump again after the next futures expiration.

Someone has to take the other side of the short.  How can they be “mostly” short?

You know, it's a bubble, ... blah blah blah
Lopumbo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 102


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:03:18 AM

fabiorem
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 347


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:05:27 AM

My theory is slightly different: wall street started loading up on btc once futures were a sure fact, and kept pumping until it established an upward avalanche-momentum when even moms and pops started panic-buying btc above 10K. While the noobs were buying above 10-15K the sharks loaded up on shorts (btc futures are still mostly short), and then, when their target was hit at 20K they pulled the trigger unloading their "physical" btc making out like bandits both because they sold at the top their btc and even more from their futures short bets placed at the top. A perfect controlled demolition, which they will repeat until it works imho, that's why they will let the price pump again after the next futures expiration.


I have the same impression. Just compare October and November, you'll see that it spiked too much.

They dont need to have too much volume on the exchanges, just enough to trigger the noobs, to buy at first and then to sell.

So my guess is that after 26th, they will pump it again. But I doubt it will have the same effect this time. January always have crashes, they just intensified it.

d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 3124



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:08:17 AM
Last edit: January 24, 2018, 12:54:42 PM by d_eddie

Quote
For those playing along at home, you'll no doubt note that (should my understanding be correct), BW consumption scales at O(n^2).
I'm sure it will improve when the routing invention breakthrough occurs.
(snip)
(snip)

Honestly, I don't know which solution has eventually been adopted in this first version of the LN, but already in 2016 the proposed method was significantly better than the naive SAN technique you hint at.

Great. What does that have to do with the shipping implementation? Anything?

Let's summarize our path so far:
you: I'll try it out
me: cool - please let me know about your BW use. My understanding is it broadcasts all state to everyone
you: oh posh! how dare you assume the devs did not do better
me: well, that's what I'm led to believe - you have better info?
you: no, but here's a possibly relevant scrap of a possibly workable design that would do better

I mean, I don't mean to misrepresent anything here, but that's the way it looks from my vantage point.

Quote
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@emabfuri/bitfury-bitcoin-routing-lightning-network-solution

Here's a relevant excerpt.
Quote
Using a fog of war like design, the collected information by the routing algorithm “includes channels within a low hop-distance and paths to randomly selected nodes further away… As a result, a node will have a well-illuminated map of its local neighborhood within the network, with random patches of visibility further away enabled by the selection of beacon nodes.”

I often write with rhetorical metaphorical flourish as well. But not within a technical specification that I expect to be taken seriously. So in addition to questioning this excerpt's relevance to current code, I also question it's author's capability.

Quote
So, it's not an initially low TTL that gets conservatively increased as I had wildly imagined, but not so far off either: closer nodes are exhaustively enumerated, while a small set of distant nodes is selected pseudorandomly.

Which still leaves quite the bulk elided from view. In what way is this anonymous? How does it handle nodes dropping off the network? And the ensuing rejoins? 'Beacons'? Is that a euphemism for trusted intermediary?

It just sounds like we're being asked to buy a pig in a poke. Again, my assumptions could be wrong. But life has taught me well that SW projects are rarely underpromised and overdelivered.

That excerpt is from a nontechnical post. That's why it has language suitable for laypersons. I pasted it in to give you the gist of it. However, there are fewer "metaphorical flourishes" than you think.

"Beacon node", for example. In this context the term has a precise technical meaning.

I linked the full pdf with specs and more technical details, but the link got "elided from view" in your reply. It would be useful to read it before going on with this discussion.

http://bitfury.com/content/5-white-papers-research/whitepaper_flare_an_approach_to_routing_in_lightning_network_7_7_2016.pdf


NOTE: Emphatic bold while quoting jbreher is mine.
Icygreen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1135



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:16:32 AM

Isn't bitmain in the process of moving miners out of China? This could be related to the disappearing spam in the mempool.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 5070



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:20:09 AM

Someone has to take the other side of the short.  How can they be “mostly” short?

The dumb money, as always.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-21/bitcoin-futures-traders-add-shorts-short-squeeze-imminent

I love in that article how J.P. Morgan provided all the detailed aggregate charts for Bitcoin and other crypto. They sure have a lot of time on their hands to analyze a market that they supposedly can't stand.  Tongue
Icygreen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1135



View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:25:33 AM



Nice find! Bullish and the regulations need to be tightened on exchanges if we'll ever leave the wild west.
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 360


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:26:26 AM

I thought bitconnect was a one off. Nope - there are dozens of these stupid scams:

https://www.cryptolendingprograms.com/

 Huh
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 360


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:34:00 AM



This does not surprise me a all. I have been involved in on site IT audits of large cloud / hosting providers - standards are usually very very low and lots of stupid security holes like those listed above. It's scary when you think about what they have been trusted to manage.
mymenace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061


Smile


View Profile
January 24, 2018, 11:40:23 AM

The coming Crypto World WAR, the war to end all wars.


National Crypto currencies are coming
https://www.rt.com/business/416826-ntional-cryptocurrencies-challenge-bitcoin/

Global Crypto currency (IMF)
https://www.acchain.org/en/


Choose your Ally
Globalisation (One World Currency/SDR/ACCchain)

Nationalism (Centraliazed/Regulated)

Humanity (Decentralization/Unregulated)





Pages: « 1 ... 19163 19164 19165 19166 19167 19168 19169 19170 19171 19172 19173 19174 19175 19176 19177 19178 19179 19180 19181 19182 19183 19184 19185 19186 19187 19188 19189 19190 19191 19192 19193 19194 19195 19196 19197 19198 19199 19200 19201 19202 19203 19204 19205 19206 19207 19208 19209 19210 19211 19212 [19213] 19214 19215 19216 19217 19218 19219 19220 19221 19222 19223 19224 19225 19226 19227 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 19244 19245 19246 19247 19248 19249 19250 19251 19252 19253 19254 19255 19256 19257 19258 19259 19260 19261 19262 19263 ... 33463 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!