xgtele
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 06:40:53 PM |
|
Sweet and congrats guys on 2 blocks today!
Now 3 blocks! Yes!!! ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
|
Searinox
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Do you like fire? I'm full of it.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 07:28:55 PM |
|
This is so slow. With hashrate down payout increased by a percent but block find rate dropped by that same percentage... now the payout's very rough. It's either everything or nothing at all. It isn't smooth and steady at all. Now that the difficulty's shot up it takes 36 hours to find a block...
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 07:29:52 PM |
|
yeah i got .045 btc with just 575MH mining for less than 24 hours, feel so good
default settings are the best, 130 efficiency 0 orphaned and only 1% doa
so you have 100 shares and 1 doa and 0 orphans? at 575mh in less than 24hrs?
|
|
|
|
xgtele
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 07:30:40 PM |
|
This is so slow. With hashrate down payout increased by a percent but block find rate dropped by that same percentage... now the payout's very rough. It's either everything or nothing at all. It isn't smooth and steady at all. Now that the difficulty's shot up it takes 36 hours to find a block...
Solo mining is also isn't smooth and steady at all.
|
|
|
|
GrapeApe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 07:51:39 PM |
|
yeah i got .045 btc with just 575MH mining for less than 24 hours, feel so good
default settings are the best, 130 efficiency 0 orphaned and only 1% doa
so you have 100 shares and 1 doa and 0 orphans? at 575mh in less than 24hrs? I think he's missing a zero in there... I was wondering if anyone has seen this? Today I finally received my units from Feb. 2 order. One unit was almost clean, while other one is moderate dusty. After checking all connections and desoldering F1 fuse, I started to configure units. First unit has been tuned to ozco.in and that is not surprise, cos same config was on my unit from batch one. Second unit has more interesting config: http://puu.sh/3hrak.pngAs you can see, first pool is eligius.st and most important is address: https://blockchain.info/address/1AYdAw8CcrQ2wx55LTbFHRn5bxgNZhaRLW?offset=0&filter=0716.40851602 BTC was mined from April 22 by various units. And only gods know, how much was mined on ozco.in. So, regardles what said Yifu, the answer is: YES, Team Avalon is mining with customer units.PS: I'm don't have any problems with fact, that Avalon is mining with my units, if this is burn test and not introducing shipment delays.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 08:31:26 PM |
|
no just 5, but they are worth 0.0145 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg801.imageshack.us%2Fimg801%2F7974%2F7t3r.png&t=665&c=UbMmvYOIEV1UnA)
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:01:41 PM |
|
no just 5, but they are worth 0.0145
how can you come to the conclusion that you have 0% orphans and 1% DOA and that 'default settings are best' on such a small sample i guarantee you will get plenty of orphans with 6 outgoing connections and 0 incoming
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:08:04 PM |
|
i'm only saying, that for now i have those result, and they are good, if i change to the one proposed by the guy with the guide, my latency goes up to 0.250s+. anyway i can't mine for more than 16h
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:36:48 PM |
|
How do you guys keep your latency so low? My "Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency" hovers around ~200ms even though my google ping is a pretty steady ~22ms. My machine is running nothing other than p2pool/bitcoind. My efficiency right now looks OK, but in past times orphans have jumped up a bunch. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F0mCQ10j.png&t=665&c=iQxJYl8NpA9KAQ)
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:40:54 PM |
|
Upgrade your Bitcoin, Google ping has nothing to do with it.
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:48:51 PM |
|
Upgrade your Bitcoin, Google ping has nothing to do with it.
Latency has something to do with it. I am already running 0.8.2.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:52:18 PM |
|
Now why would an internet ping have something to do with it?
|
|
|
|
freshzive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:55:26 PM |
|
Now why would an internet ping have something to do with it?
Latency (ping) to the other nodes? Or is that merely latency to the local bitcoind? Sorry.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:56:16 PM |
|
Just to Bitcoin locally
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 09:56:45 PM |
|
How do you guys keep your latency so low? My "Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency" hovers around ~200ms even though my google ping is a pretty steady ~22ms. My machine is running nothing other than p2pool/bitcoind. My efficiency right now looks OK, but in past times orphans have jumped up a bunch. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F0mCQ10j.png&t=665&c=iQxJYl8NpA9KAQ) GetBlockTemplate all takes place on your machine... no network involved. If I had to guess, I'd say old bitcoind (as bitpop suggested), slow disks, or not enough memory. If you are all up to date and don't want to upgrade your hardware, feel free to give my p2pool pool a try. It is a new type of mining pool backed by a p2pool instance that is currently running at 115% efficiency (with a sample of 595 shares). Basically, it pools shares from multiple users and submits them to p2pool under the same address. It tracks the original address tied to each share and then I pay out proportionally whenever p2pool finds a share. This allows for lower variance for smaller miners and will hopefully bring more hashpower to p2pool. I don't have publicly available stats yet, but I'm working on it. See this thread for more details: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=234841.0There are of course other public p2pool instances if you have enough hashpower and prefer the more direct route. My software is very new, and while it has been stable so far I can't make any guarantees. Anyone willing to help test would be very much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 10:03:57 PM |
|
Yes I have a public direct one, you can look at my latency
|
|
|
|
gyverlb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 17, 2013, 11:31:54 PM |
|
zvs posted an interesting try with 1MB blockmaxsize on his setup. forrestv, could you read it and my following comment? We may have found why we disagreed on blockmaxsize settings: it seems that P2Pool takes some time generating work with high number of transactions which is made worse on public nodes where the work must be generated for several payout addresses. On private nodes like mine (only allowing miners sharing the same payout address) this isn't really noticeable (probably <100ms even with maxed out blocks) but on public nodes like his the delays between each work generation add up and the last one can be seriously lagging (by several hundreds of ms and probably in some extreme cases several seconds). Here's the post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=153232.msg2499751#msg2499751Could you at least confirm that we understood what happens in zvs' log correctly?
|
|
|
|
daemondazz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2013, 01:02:40 AM |
|
I'm really trying to resist posting in case I jinx it, but has something changed or have we just had really good luck - 5 blocks in the last 27 hours?
|
Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2013, 01:04:40 AM |
|
No luck, just getting paid for last week. It's an average.
But yippee! And good because I just left to slush because of stupid jalapeno.
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 18, 2013, 01:30:03 AM |
|
No luck, just getting paid for last week. It's an average.
But yippee! And good because I just left to slush because of stupid jalapeno.
How long would our share time need to be extended to in order to make p2pool work well with BFL hardware?
|
|
|
|
|