Bitcoin Forum
October 01, 2016, 07:01:52 AM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3152 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3916

Pages: « 1 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [668] 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3859423 times)
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 01:12:54 PM
 #13341

Hi, any one received any payment on the last 24h? I'm over 300% my threshold... and nothing.
My threshold is set to 0.1 and I received a payment this morning at 01h47 GMT - a few hours and two or three extra rounds Grin after the threshold was crossed.

I wonder - is your threshold still set below what appears to be the new minimum of 0.05?  If so, perhaps it is being treated as zero and ignored.

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
1475305312
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475305312

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475305312
Reply with quote  #2

1475305312
Report to moderator
1475305312
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475305312

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475305312
Reply with quote  #2

1475305312
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1475305312
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475305312

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475305312
Reply with quote  #2

1475305312
Report to moderator
1475305312
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1475305312

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1475305312
Reply with quote  #2

1475305312
Report to moderator
Matumaru
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 02:42:55 PM
 #13342

OOOOOOOPPPPSSSSSS

Sorry, totally wrong and maybe it helps to other people. I was looking to TOTAL REWARD, instead of CONFIRMED REWARDS.

Total Rewards are overpassing but the confirmed are still under.
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 02:52:56 PM
 #13343

Total Rewards are overpassing but the confirmed are still under.
Yup, that would do it.

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
Current C
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 04:58:49 PM
 #13344

Can someone explain this to me. This is copy pasted from https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/.

20957   2013-11-26 15:52:43   0:02:35   12301112   1191   0.00238445   271627   25.10929891    confirmed
20956   2013-11-26 15:50:08   2:06:37   621115370   48184   0.00216099   271626   25.31762960    confirmed
20955   2013-11-26 13:43:31   4:16:28   1269260019   37362   0.00000000   271612   25.06672930    confirmed
20954   2013-11-26 09:27:03   6:10:40   1798179211   177845   0.00265711   271587   25.35120125    confirmed

In line 20955, block number 271612 I have a zero payout, but I also obviously mined the block before for over 6 hours, that one for over 4 hours, and the one thereafter for 2 hours.

Why is this block paid at zero? I emailed info@bitcoin.cz already 2 days ago. Ive had no response.

This concerns me because I'm  providing shares to the pool and someone somehow is getting a payout for this block, I checked it on block chain, it was certainly mined by slushes pool.

What am I missing here?
pkobse
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148


View Profile
November 28, 2013, 05:39:38 PM
 #13345

Can someone explain this to me. This is copy pasted from https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/.

20957   2013-11-26 15:52:43   0:02:35   12301112   1191   0.00238445   271627   25.10929891    confirmed
20956   2013-11-26 15:50:08   2:06:37   621115370   48184   0.00216099   271626   25.31762960    confirmed
20955   2013-11-26 13:43:31   4:16:28   1269260019   37362   0.00000000   271612   25.06672930    confirmed
20954   2013-11-26 09:27:03   6:10:40   1798179211   177845   0.00265711   271587   25.35120125    confirmed

In line 20955, block number 271612 I have a zero payout, but I also obviously mined the block before for over 6 hours, that one for over 4 hours, and the one thereafter for 2 hours.

Why is this block paid at zero? I emailed info@bitcoin.cz already 2 days ago. Ive had no response.

This concerns me because I'm  providing shares to the pool and someone somehow is getting a payout for this block, I checked it on block chain, it was certainly mined by slushes pool.

What am I missing here?

As it is possible to see by amount of your shares in that round, which is lower as your total for 2 hour round, your miner was not submitting, and as the reward is zero, and by the amount of submitted shares, I will say that it was not working on that round from the 1 and half hour after the start to the finish. It was explained in this forum to people x times before.

BTC 1C9FGy8kUTF1R21bhLyzXQHDjm87xoRenn,
LTC LXZ7xhLYJU4K8zdtdYc89o81NgwXbSwEbC
or DOGE DKJDnR8deKGRRbFWCnsSDz15ha5t43B75B. :-)
laughingbear
Deflationary champion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 631


www.cryptobetfair.com


View Profile WWW
November 28, 2013, 09:41:23 PM
 #13346

im waiting on a payout as well, never had this problem before
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 12:48:19 PM
 #13347

same here, threshold crossed some hours ago, but the payout is still not happening.... Cry
Hideto
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 05:00:11 PM
 #13348

Hello i have a problem to sing in slush pool in my account and in stadistics i cant enter to those pages, the browser goes stuck.
Roobotics
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21

In Bitcoin we trust.


View Profile
November 29, 2013, 08:08:57 PM
 #13349

Can someone explain this to me. This is copy pasted from https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/.

20957   2013-11-26 15:52:43   0:02:35   12301112   1191   0.00238445   271627   25.10929891    confirmed
20956   2013-11-26 15:50:08   2:06:37   621115370   48184   0.00216099   271626   25.31762960    confirmed
20955   2013-11-26 13:43:31   4:16:28   1269260019   37362   0.00000000   271612   25.06672930    confirmed
20954   2013-11-26 09:27:03   6:10:40   1798179211   177845   0.00265711   271587   25.35120125    confirmed

In line 20955, block number 271612 I have a zero payout, but I also obviously mined the block before for over 6 hours, that one for over 4 hours, and the one thereafter for 2 hours.

Why is this block paid at zero? I emailed info@bitcoin.cz already 2 days ago. Ive had no response.

This concerns me because I'm  providing shares to the pool and someone somehow is getting a payout for this block, I checked it on block chain, it was certainly mined by slushes pool.

What am I missing here?
On the 20955 round you provided significantly less shares than the other rounds, It it likely this happened all towards the end of the round because later shares are weighted more, this prevents pool-hopping. You actually missed out on the beginning of the 20956 round as well. Your ratios as far as (submitted shares/all shares) are as follows:
Round#:   Ratio:
20957   96.8e-6
20956   77.5e-6
20955   29.4e-6
20954   98.9e-6

But basically you missed so many submissions towards the end you were rounded down to zero by the pool hopping mechanic. The only way to earn shares in Slushes is to be there when the round completes by a fair margin.

If you'd like to donate:
BTC:1FKe3ee3uN84jk4ooM4x9SzRDR9czRM6yo
LTC:LXSJG2dtT1XQKuRojagPgt1DtBwF4oCeib
Doge:D5jig3QPneFDqg88Foybgo61h7LfW8P4Q2
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 01:53:25 AM
 #13350

New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 02:30:59 AM
 #13351

The daily reward graphs at
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/graphs/
are one day delayed. The latest data point is for Nov 28, which is the day before yesterday (pool time, i.e. UTC).

It continues for several days already, but it can't last for too long. I've seen the last data being OK some days ago AFAICR.

Some longer time ago, all displayed data were shifted one day in the graph. In fact, the data points were OK (all data displayed), but their X-coordinates (date) were shifted one day. It is not the case now, today the data from the last (complete) day are missing.
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 02:44:57 AM
 #13352

Can someone explain this to me. This is copy pasted from https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/.

20957   2013-11-26 15:52:43   0:02:35   12301112   1191   0.00238445   271627   25.10929891    confirmed
20956   2013-11-26 15:50:08   2:06:37   621115370   48184   0.00216099   271626   25.31762960    confirmed
20955   2013-11-26 13:43:31   4:16:28   1269260019   37362   0.00000000   271612   25.06672930    confirmed
20954   2013-11-26 09:27:03   6:10:40   1798179211   177845   0.00265711   271587   25.35120125    confirmed

In line 20955, block number 271612 I have a zero payout, but I also obviously mined the block before for over 6 hours, that one for over 4 hours, and the one thereafter for 2 hours.

Why is this block paid at zero? I emailed info@bitcoin.cz already 2 days ago. Ive had no response.

This concerns me because I'm  providing shares to the pool and someone somehow is getting a payout for this block, I checked it on block chain, it was certainly mined by slushes pool.

What am I missing here?
On the 20955 round you provided significantly less shares than the other rounds, It it likely this happened all towards the end of the round because later shares are weighted more, this prevents pool-hopping. You actually missed out on the beginning of the 20956 round as well. Your ratios as far as (submitted shares/all shares) are as follows:
Round#:   Ratio:
20957   96.8e-6
20956   77.5e-6
20955   29.4e-6
20954   98.9e-6

But basically you missed so many submissions towards the end you were rounded down to zero by the pool hopping mechanic. The only way to earn shares in Slushes is to be there when the round completes by a fair margin.

You're right.

But the OP's question has been answered quite well only 4 (four) posts above your one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg3754997#msg3754997

And with the apt remark, that It was explained in this forum to people x times before.

I'm not sure whether it's really necessary to repeat the answer again and again. Yes, you have added some apt numbers to the answer, but anyway...
J_Dubbs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 03:48:31 AM
 #13353

New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)

So does a 16% increase in difficulty equal 16% less revenue? (assume no changes to equipment and no changes to participants within the pool, just talking about difficulty as an isolated thing).

"a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"
Learn something new?: 1hzpjSkWaxm7XaEMi5P2fL6hhxuj8gxyX
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
November 30, 2013, 03:54:19 AM
 #13354

New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)

So does a 16% increase in difficulty equal 16% less revenue? (assume no changes to equipment and no changes to participants within the pool, just talking about difficulty as an isolated thing).

~13.8% decrease in expected earnings from a 16% diff increase.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
picree
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 04:29:08 AM
 #13355

I too am having problems with my Slush account!  Contacted Slush via Facebook PM asking to check my account...no reply.  I had some "old" Confirmed Rewards and some new Confirmed Rewards generated in the last month or so.  After the servers were brought back online recently it seems like all the old coins disappeared! Cry  Not sure what else to do!  Anyone else notice a loss of coins?   Huh
J_Dubbs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 05:50:40 AM
 #13356

New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)

So does a 16% increase in difficulty equal 16% less revenue? (assume no changes to equipment and no changes to participants within the pool, just talking about difficulty as an isolated thing).

~13.8% decrease in expected earnings from a 16% diff increase.

So to maintain the same revenues through a 16% difficulty increase would you need to increase your hashing power by 13.8% or 16%?

"a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush"
Learn something new?: 1hzpjSkWaxm7XaEMi5P2fL6hhxuj8gxyX
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:14:17 AM
 #13357

New difficulty is 707M. The change occured yesterday evening (UTC), only several hours ago. Maybe it can be mentioned here..
The change to the difficulty has been "only" 16 %.
The tempo of difficulty increase is decreasing for several epochs already.
I wonder whether it's a permanent change or a temporary one only. :-)

So does a 16% increase in difficulty equal 16% less revenue? (assume no changes to equipment and no changes to participants within the pool, just talking about difficulty as an isolated thing).

~13.8% decrease in expected earnings from a 16% diff increase.

So to maintain the same revenues through a 16% difficulty increase would you need to increase your hashing power by 13.8% or 16%?

You can guess twice. :-)
(But B is right.)

[edit]
One illustrative example:
If the diff would rise by 100 % (i.e., the new one would be twice the old one), your earnings would drop to 50 % (or to one half), that is also by 50 %.
Then guess what you have to do for to maintain your earnings: increase your power by 50 % or by 100 %? Sure by 100 %, to twice the original value.
Sir Alan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:00:50 AM
 #13358

Then guess what you have to do for to maintain your earnings: increase your power by 50 % or by 100 %? Sure by 100 %, to twice the original value.
Which is what many people are doing, hence the rapid rise in hashing power (quite apart from new miners joining).  It's like the Cold War arms race all over again, with both sides going for bigger and better to out-do the other.  Ultimately neither will win, having spent a fortune trying, but there will be losers.

It's also known as the Red Queen hypothesis.

1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:10:27 AM
 #13359

My usual complaint.... payouts not happening again.... Cry
It's unclear if the 0.05 threshold is applied, my account settings are still on 0.01, but payouts have been happening in a random fashion, way above 0.01 and below 0.05.  This is frustrating and annoying.  I may 'spit the dummy' and explore elsewhere if this doesn't get sorted... Angry
EasyQuest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198


Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 01:20:15 PM
 #13360

Been having no issue with the payouts... they just take longer than normal, but every payment has been successful.
Pages: « 1 ... 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [668] 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!