FiniteMatter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 03:10:03 AM |
|
What happened to 275087 ? blockchain.info says it's ours, but it doesn't appear in Slush's stats... Series numbers go from 21171 to 21173, skipping 21172 - which should be for block 275087. I've only been mining with Slush for 2 weeks now, and I have no reason to assume that the block won't show up eventually, but hoping some of the more seasoned miners in the pool can let us know if they've seen this happen before and what we might expect. After what happened with block 21027 I'm admittedly a little nervous though.
|
|
|
|
J_Dubbs
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 03:55:57 AM |
|
# Block gefunden Dauer Gesamtanzahl Shares Your shares Deine BTC-Vergütung Block # Block value Gültigkeit 21175 2013-12-16 02:06:46 3:24:59 Verarbeitung... 275130 25.02341864 95 Bestätigungen ausstehend <-- ?? 21174 2013-12-15 22:41:47 2:56:37 Verarbeitung... 275112 25.06858378 77 Bestätigungen ausstehend <-- ?? 21173 2013-12-15 19:45:10 0:21:53 Verarbeitung... 275090 25.07373889 55 Bestätigungen ausstehend <- ?? still waiting.... ditto +1 (usa...) First time I've seen this happen... # Block found at Duration Total shares Your shares Your BTC reward Block # Block value Validity 21176 2013-12-16 03:41:38 1:34:52 Processing... 275144 25.08904206 99 confirmations left 21175 2013-12-16 02:06:46 3:24:59 Processing... 275130 25.02341864 85 confirmations left 21174 2013-12-15 22:41:47 2:56:37 Processing... 275112 25.06858378 67 confirmations left 21173 2013-12-15 19:45:10 0:21:53 Processing... 275090 25.07373889 45 confirmations left I'd love to know when these will show up, added new equipment recently and so far this is real a buzzkill.
|
|
|
|
Sel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/exclamation.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 04:12:10 AM |
|
Has Slush's Pool finally crapped out ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
Sel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/smiley.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 04:18:52 AM |
|
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ..... or are we all gonna get a 1 BTC reward for Xmas .... wishful thinking..... LoL ....... ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
cenicsoft
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 04:46:29 AM |
|
Looks like everything was mostly fixed with those last few blocks. However, Round #21172 shows no block transaction fees for block #275087. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 05:09:39 AM Last edit: December 16, 2013, 09:42:13 AM by gourmet |
|
already opened ticket on site guess that they working now on this issue
275090 was already paid and back to processing aprox before 20 minutes
and 275087 not appears .
I wonder whether 275090 has been recalculated with proportional algorithm. I'm getting much less for it now than I was before recalculation. (But I was getting more than average before recalculation. Could it be an error, or just a variation (that could be compensating for a worse luck in an another block)? In the latter case, I'd've lost something due to the recalc.) TLDR: Can somebody tell whether the 275090 recalc was propo or normal exponential?
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 05:15:28 AM Last edit: December 16, 2013, 07:16:35 AM by gourmet |
|
Is there the target share rate value for Slush's pool VarDiff publicly available?
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 05:27:46 AM |
|
The daily reward graphs at https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/graphs/are one day delayed. The latest data point is for Nov 28, which is the day before yesterday (pool time, i.e. UTC). It continues for several days already, but it can't last for too long. I've seen the last data being OK some days ago AFAICR. Some longer time ago, all displayed data were shifted one day in the graph. In fact, the data points were OK (all data displayed), but their X-coordinates (date) were shifted one day. It is not the case now, today the data from the last (complete) day are missing. Looks like it has been fixed last night. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 05:31:49 AM |
|
Looks like everything was mostly fixed with those last few blocks. However, Round #21172 shows no block transaction fees for block #275087. Oh well.
Now it does. But I can't tell whether the rewards have changed also.
|
|
|
|
cor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 08:00:36 AM |
|
the block has been mined during a minor maintenance, so the reward has to be calculated retrospectively. our guys are working on it and the reward will be paid out within few hours.
DONE, all blocks have been successfully calculated.
|
|
|
|
ZephramC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 08:06:22 AM |
|
Wednesday's pool network share shall be interesting.
|
|
|
|
AlexeyK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 08:13:39 AM |
|
thanks Fixed
|
if you think that i deserve it 185h9KXxW2Efx6ynFM61ydUKsRNaVWUobs or GLC - GQjVzfk3k8gb3Cy65mBUf4ADkNNTRHgsx8
|
|
|
bobsmoke
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 10:11:04 AM |
|
FYI: "In order to celebrate the 3rd birthday of Slush's Pool, all rewards mined on 18th December 2013 (UTC time) will be paid out with a 0% fee to the miners. Good luck!"
|
|
|
|
cor
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 11:09:03 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
tom99
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 12:55:05 PM |
|
Is there the target share rate value for Slush's pool VarDiff publicly available?
diff is auto.
|
|
|
|
Sir Alan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 01:20:47 PM |
|
Is there the target share rate value for Slush's pool VarDiff publicly available? From the FAQ: "...each miner is led to send results of its work to the server around 20 times per minute. That's the goal. If the miner is too fast, Vardiff increases the difficulty for its work and when too slow, the difficulty decreases." So, no share rate target - that depends on the speed of your miners - but a target for the number of connections to the server, preventing overloading and incidentally protecting your own bandwidth.
|
1Eeyore17YeHrbJW5Q3pSdV8sXujkdrrFc
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 01:22:22 PM |
|
Is there the target share rate value for Slush's pool VarDiff publicly available?
diff is auto. Sure it's auto. That's why it's called VarDiff. :-))) The question is, what's the target value of the rate of hashes submitted by each worker? The "auto" diff is automatically set to a certain value to accomodate the rate of shares submitted by each worker to another certain value, the "target value of the share rate". I'm asking whether somebody can tell this value and whether it is publicly available at all.
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 01:30:24 PM |
|
Is there the target share rate value for Slush's pool VarDiff publicly available? From the FAQ: "...each miner is led to send results of its work to the server around 20 times per minute. That's the goal. If the miner is too fast, Vardiff increases the difficulty for its work and when too slow, the difficulty decreases." So, no share rate target - that depends on the speed of your miners - but a target for the number of connections to the server, preventing overloading and incidentally protecting your own bandwidth. Thank you for the number. It sure is the share rate target. Sending results of one's work is the same as sending shares. :-) Share rate would depend on the speed of my miners only if there were no VarDiff. The purpose of VarDiff is to set a reasonable share rate for each worker, preventing overloading and incidentally protecting bandwidth, yes. :-) Shares have different values for different target settings, but they're still shares...
|
|
|
|
caminilegroup
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 03:02:14 PM |
|
Congrats on the 0% fee's on the 18th ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Happy 3rd Year BDay ? According to home page there is a 2% fee ?
|
|
|
|
KNK
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 16, 2013, 03:21:34 PM |
|
Congrats on the 0% fee's on the 18th ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Happy 3rd Year BDay ? According to home page there is a 2% fee ? Do you read what you are quoting? 18th is after tomorrow not today
|
|
|
|
|