Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 07:18:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 [570] 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381852 times)
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 03, 2013, 10:57:44 AM
 #11381

I do not think it is very difficult. The value of each share you submit is calculated with the following formula:

scoreshare = exp(t/C)

where t is round duration in seconds, and C is a constant, currently 200. This means the value of each share is exponentially growing, so old share have significantly lower value compared to recent shares. So if you stop mining while others don't, your part of total pool score for that round will decrease exponentially. You can read the original post about this reward calculation method here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg50002#msg50002.

Additionally, based on measurement I have found that each hour, t is reset to zero and your score is divided by exp(3600/C). This is probably to prevent an arithmetic overflow (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_overflow).

Hope this helps,
   T
(emphasis by me)

(Also the whole pool's score is reduced by the same factor, not only yours.)  :-)
[edit] (In fact, it's the pool's score that is the candidate for arithmetic overflow, not the your one...) [/edit]

Thank you very much for posting the constants that resulted from your research, Tibor!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713856730
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713856730

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713856730
Reply with quote  #2

1713856730
Report to moderator
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 03, 2013, 11:19:12 AM
 #11382

mining.bitcoin.cz

Website is under the maintenance, but mining works without an interruption. You can follow updates on Facebook page.


I'm not on fb and won't be.
I'd prefer another place for such announcements, some "normal" pages like here on bitcointalk e.g.

(BTW, I can't see any (public) announcement on this event on the ffb.)
gravitate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 03, 2013, 11:23:59 AM
 #11383

ps i am a noob. Do my stats look normal?

Name   ID   Temp   MH/s   Accept   Reject   Error   Utility   Last Share Time
AMU   0   0   335.66   258   0   35   0.29   21:03:55
AMU   1   0   335.72   269   1   54   0.3   21:11:22
AMU   2   0   335.57   266   1   32   0.3   21:10:29
AMU   3   0   335.98   281   2   34   0.31   21:10:37
AMU   4   0   335.71   245   0   39   0.27   21:07:18
AMU   5   0   335.93   269   0   45   0.3   21:11:54
AMU   6   0   335.95   269   1   45   0.3   21:11:50
AMU   7   0   335.72   256   1   42   0.28   21:10:09
AMU   8   0   335.77   252   0   40   0.28   21:07:05
AMU   9   0   348.97   22   2   1922   0.02   21:06:55
AMU   10   0   335.97   261   0   42   0.29   21:12:26
AMU   11   0   335.57   248   1   46   0.28   21:12:40
Totals   12      4042.52   2896   9   2376   3.22   

I take it you have USB Eruptors? what kind of hub are you using? Port 9 is way off...if the power supply is right and cooling I only see less than 1% error on mine. So all yours seem to have a high error rate and like I said port 9 is way off.

I also hope #19421 gets fixed.


Hi thanks I am using 3 hubs and one of them is plugged into the raspberri pi itself I am guessing this one is the problem. I have a fan on all of them.. I will be buying a better hub however. I have wasted a lot of money on hubs so far

To peel or not to peel.
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 03, 2013, 11:56:56 AM
 #11384



Hi thanks I am using 3 hubs and one of them is plugged into the raspberri pi itself I am guessing this one is the problem. I have a fan on all of them.. I will be buying a better hub however. I have wasted a lot of money on hubs so far

So which hubs are you using? Running 4 on each? What is the volts and amp on the power adaptors?
willinliv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
August 03, 2013, 12:57:08 PM
 #11385

Anybody thinking this block is a little light?


19421   2013-08-03 01:52:48   7:09:54   160946644     22010   0.00193569      249905   25.17464593    92 confirmations left

I think I lucked out with that one - highest earnings on a single round so far for me! Thank you for your donations:

19423   2013-08-03 06:15:47   2:28:32   54379598   4192   0.00211264   249940   25.44683309    86 confirmations left
19422   2013-08-03 03:47:15   1:54:27   42104601   3140   0.00178380   249923   25.05371000    69 confirmations left
19421   2013-08-03 01:52:48   7:09:54   160946644   11999   0.00971988   249905   25.17464593    51 confirmations left
19420   2013-08-02 18:42:54   0:02:03   759065   68   0.00217892   249855   25.08682056    1 confirmations left
at least someone benefits from our losses.... Grin

Easy come easy go:

19423   2013-08-03 06:15:47   2:28:32   54379598   4192   0.00211264   249940   25.44683309    38 confirmations left
19422   2013-08-03 03:47:15   1:54:27   42104601   3140   0.00178380   249923   25.05371000    21 confirmations left
19421   2013-08-03 01:52:48   7:09:54   160946644   none   none   249905   25.17464593    3 confirmations left
19420   2013-08-02 18:42:54   0:02:03   759065   68   0.00217892   249855   25.08682056    confirmed
angryrob
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 287
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 03, 2013, 01:08:15 PM
 #11386

I just checked mine and with 2 confirms left, block 19421 is now showing a normal reward.
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 03, 2013, 01:10:05 PM
 #11387

I just checked mine and with 2 confirms left, block 19421 is now showing a normal reward.
yep. fixed now.

drewage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 03, 2013, 01:34:06 PM
 #11388

I just checked mine and with 2 confirms left, block 19421 is now showing a normal reward.
yep. fixed now.

 Grin

gyruss
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 03, 2013, 07:02:59 PM
 #11389

 Angry

I'm still seeing a reduced reward for 19421 (249905). I was actively watching it and about 1-2 hours before the block was solved, I saw my estimated reward drop from 0.003xxxx to 0. Then it slowly built up little by little, to  0.0015xxxx, bur never recovered. This really sucks because the round lasted over 7 hours.

Unfortunately, I've decided to stop mining there for the time being until the issue can be confirmed as fixed.

- G
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 03, 2013, 09:00:32 PM
 #11390

I see the pool is pushing close to 30,000 GH/s and the difficulty went up today to 37392766... I keep adding miners but just can not keep up ..
angryrob
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 287
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 12:33:39 AM
 #11391

19436, 19437, and 19438 all just over half reward for me... and that is half with regards to our new increase in hashing power.(another 3+ TH/s! nice!) Wondering if it's cause of the increase hashing power that blocks need to be recalc'd more often. or maybe i just don't notice it so much sometimes as I do right now.
drewage
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 01:02:02 AM
 #11392

19436, 19437, and 19438 all just over half reward for me... and that is half with regards to our new increase in hashing power.(another 3+ TH/s! nice!) Wondering if it's cause of the increase hashing power that blocks need to be recalc'd more often. or maybe i just don't notice it so much sometimes as I do right now.

I agree they do seem a bit off but the luck has been nice.

cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2013, 07:42:47 AM
 #11393

19436, 19437, and 19438 all just over half reward for me... and that is half with regards to our new increase in hashing power.(another 3+ TH/s! nice!) Wondering if it's cause of the increase hashing power that blocks need to be recalc'd more often. or maybe i just don't notice it so much sometimes as I do right now.

I agree they do seem a bit off but the luck has been nice.
For me the rewards are OK for those blocks. Yes, they are lower than usual, but are actually higher than 25*my_hashrate/total_pool_hashrate, so I'm happy.

The rewards are lower because pool hashrate increased so much tonight: 32 TH !!

bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 04, 2013, 08:50:58 AM
 #11394

I see the pool is pushing close to 30,000 GH/s and the difficulty went up today to 37392766... I keep adding miners but just can not keep up ..


yeah each diff negates 660mh/s!
but this -=> 31334.034 Ghash/s hurts too! hah
tronic1704
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 171
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 08:58:52 AM
 #11395

I think, the comlete last Reward-Calculations are not correctly.

normaly it was between 0,08 and 0,1 per block and now it´s only 0,05 and 0,06.

Think should be stop Mining at Slush.  At #19437 i got only 0.00000192 by 27750 shares.   Sad

trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 707
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 10:38:20 AM
 #11396

but this -=> 31334.034 Ghash/s hurts too! hah

I am glad i don't get hurt by stable payout curves at all.
d20_9999
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 04, 2013, 04:22:15 PM
 #11397

Rookie question:

I have 9 of the Block Erupter USB sticks hashing all on the same rig, which averages about 3 Gh/s.  Should I set the difficulty for the worker to 2, since the total hashing power is over 2 Gh/s, or should I keep it at one, since each stick only has 335 Mh/s of power?

Keep at 1, else endless discarded.

?
I've always believed that the rig should behave like one worker with combined power. Is there any reason for discarded shares other than bad configuration/setting?

Interesting note:  I have accounts on BTC Guild and Bitminter as well.  If I point my nine Erupters to either of their pools, with a worker set to a difficulty of 1, both pools auto adjust the difficulty up to 2.

I might have to do a little experimenting, and compare 24 hour totals.
bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 07:27:54 PM
 #11398

Nine hour block!!! Ughh!   Shocked Angry
jarhed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 254


View Profile
August 04, 2013, 07:48:41 PM
 #11399

Nine hour block!!! Ughh!   Shocked Angry

Yea WTF. Now I'm trapped.
MinermanNC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 04, 2013, 08:03:35 PM
 #11400

wow what a long block! glad im mining FTC for the moment with GPU's...actually making money again Smiley Asics are ordered and ill be back here....soon i hope!!!

*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
Pages: « 1 ... 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 [570] 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!