Bitcoin Forum
October 22, 2017, 08:41:59 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 133 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance | HP14 released!  (Read 392609 times)
bcp19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
July 29, 2013, 08:07:57 PM
 #1441

My best profit from 1 month = 0 XPM  Grin
Damn dude!  My Timex Sinclair TS1000 has found 3 blocks already!  You really suck!

I do not suffer fools gladly... "Captain!  We're surrounded!"
I embrace my inner Kool-Aid.
1508661719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508661719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508661719
Reply with quote  #2

1508661719
Report to moderator
1508661719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508661719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508661719
Reply with quote  #2

1508661719
Report to moderator
1508661719
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508661719

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508661719
Reply with quote  #2

1508661719
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
gatra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 580


CTO @ Flixxo, Riecoin dev


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2013, 12:10:46 AM
 #1442

you could also try this optimization: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=257623.msg2829191#msg2829191
the else could be optimized too
in your case, if nBiTwinSeq is odd, you could do
Code:
nSolvedMultiplier = nPrime - nFixedInverse;
instead of
Code:
nSolvedMultiplier = (uint64)nFixedInverse * (nPrime - nDelta) % nPrime;


           ▄▄▄██████████▄▄▄
       ▄▄██
██████████████████▄▄
     ▄█
█████▀████████████▀██████▄
   ▄█
█████████████████████████████▄
  ▄█
█████████▄█▀▀██████████████████▄
 ▄█
███████████▀██████▄▄█████▄███████▄
▄█
██████████▀██▄▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀▀███████████▄
█████████████▀▀██▀████████▀▀████████
█████████████▄█▀████████████████████
████████▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀██████████████████
▀█
██████▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀███████████████████▀
 ▀█
███████▄████▄▄███████████████████▀
  ▀█
███████████████████████████████▀
   ▀█
█████████████████████████████▀
     ▀█
█████▄████████████▄██████▀
       ▀▀██
██████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀
riecoin       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄██▀▀         ▀▀██▄
  ▄██▀              ▀██▄
 ▄██     ██▄▄          ██▄
▄██      █████▄▄        ██▄
██       ████████▄▄      ██
██       ███████████▄    ██
██       ██████████▀     ██
▀██      ███████▀       ██▀
 ▀██     ████▀         ██▀
  ▀██▄   █▀          ▄██▀
    ▀██▄▄         ▄▄██▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
.flixxo   
glongsword
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 01:10:08 AM
 #1443

you could also try this optimization: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=257623.msg2829191#msg2829191
the else could be optimized too
in your case, if nBiTwinSeq is odd, you could do
Code:
nSolvedMultiplier = nPrime - nFixedInverse;
instead of
Code:
nSolvedMultiplier = (uint64)nFixedInverse * (nPrime - nDelta) % nPrime;


I tried your modification, but something went hilariously wrong.

debug.log:
Quote
2013-07-30 01:04:36 primemeter    698677 prime/h 1652756148 test/h         0 5-chains/h
2013-07-30 01:05:36 primemeter    706548 prime/h 1676006847 test/h         0 5-chains/h
2013-07-30 01:06:36 primemeter    702817 prime/h 1658045572 test/h         0 5-chains/h
2013-07-30 01:07:36 primemeter    700188 prime/h 1669475775 test/h         0 5-chains/h
2013-07-30 01:08:36 primemeter    710988 prime/h 1668002920 test/h         0 5-chains/h

Here's my fork:

https://bitbucket.org/geoffreyn/primecoin-hp-1

I'm not a programmer so I hope I just implemented your suggestion incorrectly.
gatra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 580


CTO @ Flixxo, Riecoin dev


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2013, 04:34:22 AM
 #1444

I'm not a programmer so I hope I just implemented your suggestion incorrectly.
You did not...
try this:

Code:
unsigned int nSolvedMultiplier;
if (nBiTwinSeq % 2 == 0)
{
  nSolvedMultiplier = nFixedInverse;
}
else
{
  nSolvedMultiplier = nPrime - nFixedInverse;
  nFixedInverse = (nFixedInverse * nTwoInverse) % nPrime;
}


           ▄▄▄██████████▄▄▄
       ▄▄██
██████████████████▄▄
     ▄█
█████▀████████████▀██████▄
   ▄█
█████████████████████████████▄
  ▄█
█████████▄█▀▀██████████████████▄
 ▄█
███████████▀██████▄▄█████▄███████▄
▄█
██████████▀██▄▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀▀███████████▄
█████████████▀▀██▀████████▀▀████████
█████████████▄█▀████████████████████
████████▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀██████████████████
▀█
██████▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀███████████████████▀
 ▀█
███████▄████▄▄███████████████████▀
  ▀█
███████████████████████████████▀
   ▀█
█████████████████████████████▀
     ▀█
█████▄████████████▄██████▀
       ▀▀██
██████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀
riecoin       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄██▀▀         ▀▀██▄
  ▄██▀              ▀██▄
 ▄██     ██▄▄          ██▄
▄██      █████▄▄        ██▄
██       ████████▄▄      ██
██       ███████████▄    ██
██       ██████████▀     ██
▀██      ███████▀       ██▀
 ▀██     ████▀         ██▀
  ▀██▄   █▀          ▄██▀
    ▀██▄▄         ▄▄██▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
.flixxo   
mikaelh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 301


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 07:54:38 AM
 #1445

I'm not a programmer so I hope I just implemented your suggestion incorrectly.
You did not...
try this:

Code:
unsigned int nSolvedMultiplier;
if (nBiTwinSeq % 2 == 0)
{
  nSolvedMultiplier = nFixedInverse;
}
else
{
  nSolvedMultiplier = nPrime - nFixedInverse;
  nFixedInverse = (nFixedInverse * nTwoInverse) % nPrime;
}

Nice one, thanks.
nabworth
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 08:33:04 PM
 #1446

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

btc   : 15BiqAD34pbDu6hpZyEqdddgttK96rpHh7
xpm : APPree11U9vHjf9sapU58VvaVfyT6E6rr5
noble: 9p9Rah24E21139b25XtqTBCr7Y3F8gphQH
Tuck Fheman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2013, 11:50:39 PM
 #1447

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

azwccc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243


View Profile
July 30, 2013, 11:52:23 PM
 #1448

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

Bitrated user: azwccc.
bcp19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 12:15:57 AM
 #1449

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think
in 25.5 hours I went from 5.28 to 13.66 XPM on ypool.  4 systems running mumus' 3.0 miner.  With the pool miner I had a total of 11.5k PPS, mumus says I'm getting almost 90, but I think the calculation is off.  I compared Cabin's miner to mumus' and the SPH are very similar.  Haven't tried the pool miner for shares, but I see they have .35 out.

I do not suffer fools gladly... "Captain!  We're surrounded!"
I embrace my inner Kool-Aid.
Beaflag VonRathburg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 472



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 03:20:22 AM
 #1450

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

in 25.5 hours I went from 5.28 to 13.66 XPM on ypool.  4 systems running mumus' 3.0 miner.  With the pool miner I had a total of 11.5k PPS, mumus says I'm getting almost 90, but I think the calculation is off.  I compared Cabin's miner to mumus' and the SPH are very similar.  Haven't tried the pool miner for shares, but I see they have .35 out.

You had a SUPER lucky streak then. You're the only one reporting these large gains. I am using Mumus' miner over 5 machines with slightly less PPS and in 25.3 hours made 0.933045 XPM. Hitting high share values has a lot to do with it. I wouldn't expect that your trend to continue.

xTachibana
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 09:37:29 AM
 #1451

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

in 25.5 hours I went from 5.28 to 13.66 XPM on ypool.  4 systems running mumus' 3.0 miner.  With the pool miner I had a total of 11.5k PPS, mumus says I'm getting almost 90, but I think the calculation is off.  I compared Cabin's miner to mumus' and the SPH are very similar.  Haven't tried the pool miner for shares, but I see they have .35 out.

You had a SUPER lucky streak then. You're the only one reporting these large gains. I am using Mumus' miner over 5 machines with slightly less PPS and in 25.3 hours made 0.933045 XPM. Hitting high share values has a lot to do with it. I wouldn't expect that your trend to continue.

i have 1 cpu, a 3570k, i average 1-4 coins per day and i have been mining for  5 days so its not luck for the most part, you just fucked up your settings somehow
bcp19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 11:38:24 AM
 #1452

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

in 25.5 hours I went from 5.28 to 13.66 XPM on ypool.  4 systems running mumus' 3.0 miner.  With the pool miner I had a total of 11.5k PPS, mumus says I'm getting almost 90, but I think the calculation is off.  I compared Cabin's miner to mumus' and the SPH are very similar.  Haven't tried the pool miner for shares, but I see they have .35 out.

You had a SUPER lucky streak then. You're the only one reporting these large gains. I am using Mumus' miner over 5 machines with slightly less PPS and in 25.3 hours made 0.933045 XPM. Hitting high share values has a lot to do with it. I wouldn't expect that your trend to continue.
I may have had a little luck, current amount is 16.67...(~3 in the last 12 hours?) PPS seems to be a BS stat to go on now, but here are total running avgs across my machines: 380 SPH, 19.2 VPH, 1549 5ch/h, 104 6ch/h, 8.1 7ch/h, PPS 81k.
Since 19.2/380=.05052, which is 4x the 5ch value and .4 times the 6ch value, I have not had 'super luck'.

I think too many people are trying to pump up their PPS values at the cost of either shares or share values.  It's obvious we need a new metric to look at, PPS is not it.  I think a lot of people have used something -s 100000 to maximize PPS at a loss of VPH.

11.5kPPS = 4.3 VPS on a C2Quad, 15kPPS = 5.4 VPS on an i7, 27kPPS = 9.2 VPH on i5 2400, 28.2k = 9.7VPH on i5 2500k.

From these numbers, it appears the C2Quad is doing best on VPH/PPS with stock settings, maybe the others need some tweaks.  I have a second C2Quad running YAC, maybe it's time to switch it over and do some testing since I have a baseline to compare against.

I do not suffer fools gladly... "Captain!  We're surrounded!"
I embrace my inner Kool-Aid.
bcp19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 09:55:28 PM
 #1453

Got home from work and did some preliminary testing (Data is very rough due to short testing time, though both CPUs are Q6600's with 8GB ram):

Baseline C2Q(40 hours):
11.5kPPS, 60SPH, 4.3VPH, 235-5ch/h, 17-6ch/h, 1.5-7ch/h
-s 200000 C2Q(1 hour):
15.9kpps, 44SPH, 2.3VPH, 140-5ch/h, 14.6-6ch/h, 0-7ch/h
-s 400000 C2Q(1 hour):
14.3kPPS, 65SPH, 2.9VPH, 270-5ch/h, 17.5 6ch/h, 0-7ch/h
-s 600000 C2Q(1 hour):
13.1kPPS, 49SPH, 2.6VPH, 232-5ch/h, 6.33-6ch/h, 1.27-7ch/h

I was about to start -s 800000 when I noticed mumus put out V4.

WOW! what a change.  The 4 systems went from 90k to 105k PPS, but I still dislike using that as a guide (test 1 above proves more PPS doesn't = more SPH or VPH)

So, combined SPH went from 380 to 460.  VPS went from 19.2 to 42.3 (only 90 min into run, so these may be artifically high due to luck), 5ch/h went from 1549 to 2810, 6ch/h was 104, now 246, 7ch/h from 8.1 to 19.

Looks like I will have to restart testing tomorrow after a good burn-in of V4, but I'm still making XPM.  Currently up to 20.38, if I am reading forum time right, that's not quite 7 XPM in the last 21 hours.

All I can say at this point: THANKS mumus!

I do not suffer fools gladly... "Captain!  We're surrounded!"
I embrace my inner Kool-Aid.
Tuck Fheman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2013, 11:01:23 PM
 #1454

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

I'm averaging 2+XPM/day with mumu's latest miner. It's well worth a shot if you're not hitting blocks solo. They now have a system that runs like PPLNS. His new one uses mikaelh's updates as well.

ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 11:05:09 PM
 #1455

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

I'm averaging 2+XPM/day with mumu's latest miner. It's well worth a shot if you're not hitting blocks solo. They now have a system that runs like PPLNS. His new one uses mikaelh's updates as well.

It uses gmp?
hasle2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 02:18:07 AM
 #1456

a dual core i7 laptop and two weeks of non-stop mining, and i got a block ! woot. now i just have to wait for the price to rise again. Smiley

ypool might get you 2+XPM/day.

no more than 0.2/day I think

I'm averaging 2+XPM/day with mumu's latest miner. It's well worth a shot if you're not hitting blocks solo. They now have a system that runs like PPLNS. His new one uses mikaelh's updates as well.

It uses gmp?

Yep, they added it a week ago:

https://github.com/jh000/jhPrimeminer/commits/master
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638


GUNBOT Licenses -10% with ref. code 'GrumpyKitty'


View Profile WWW
August 01, 2013, 10:56:11 AM
 #1457

My best profit from 1 month = 0 XPM  Grin

Being retard is not something you should be proud of
Made me lol, good one  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
.
|
.
|
          ▄█████▄
        ▄█████████▄
      ▄████▀   ▀████▄
    ▄████▀   ▄ ▄█▀████▄
  ▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▀████▄
▄████▀   ▄███▀   ▄   ▀████▄
█████   ███▀   ▄███   █████
▀████▄   ▀██▄▄███▀   ▄████▀
  ▀████▄   ▀███▀   ▄████▀
    ▀████▄       ▄████▀
      ▀████▄   ▄████▀
        ▀███  ████▀
          ▀█▄███▀
unthy
paulthetafy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 805


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 03:54:15 PM
 #1458

Okay I'm looking at the 5-chains/m and chain/d stats in debug.log.  I can tweak my settings to either get higher 5-chains values OR higher chain/d values.  So which should I be looking at, i.e. which is it better to have higher?


mikaelh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 301


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 04:26:51 PM
 #1459

Okay I'm looking at the 5-chains/m and chain/d stats in debug.log.  I can tweak my settings to either get higher 5-chains values OR higher chain/d values.  So which should I be looking at, i.e. which is it better to have higher?

The chains/day estimate is an upcoming feature added by Sunny King. It's a probabilistic model that is supposed to give a more realistic measure of the actual chain finding performance. Right now it's not producing fully accurate estimates. On testnet the estimate was at least 12% higher than observed rate. Assuming that the model is correct, you can still use for comparative purposes including tuning the parameters. There were a few issues with the model earlier but I've been working with Sunny to fix them.

In short, chains/day should be the best performance metric so far.
paulthetafy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 805


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 04:33:27 PM
 #1460

Okay I'm looking at the 5-chains/m and chain/d stats in debug.log.  I can tweak my settings to either get higher 5-chains values OR higher chain/d values.  So which should I be looking at, i.e. which is it better to have higher?

The chains/day estimate is an upcoming feature added by Sunny King. It's a probabilistic model that is supposed to give a more realistic measure of the actual chain finding performance. Right now it's not producing fully accurate estimates. On testnet the estimate was at least 12% higher than observed rate. Assuming that the model is correct, you can still use for comparative purposes including tuning the parameters. There were a few issues with the model earlier but I've been working with Sunny to fix them.

In short, chains/day should be the best performance metric so far.
That's very interesting.  As I said, tweaking the sievesize/percent/roundpercent I have settings that result in higher 5-chains values but lower chains/d and vice versa, so something doesn't seem quite right there - you would expect them to both rise / fall wouldn't you? 
Also why is it a decimal value (my values are in the 0.5-2.0 range)?

Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 133 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!