[Tycho]
|
|
October 30, 2011, 11:51:02 PM |
|
Deepbit uses a rolling 15min IIRC for speed calculation so just because it showed 2200 a day ago and now doesn't mean it was constantly 2200 over last 24 hours. Averaging window is user-adjustable, it can be longer or shorter than 15 min. Wait 1,666,814 shares in 24 hours? Sure about that? That is like 80GH/s. This number shown on stats page is average pool's shares per block during last 24 hours, not total shares (it's explained there). So i checked my end for miner down's or failing clocks, or stales, Nothings changed. But yet im being under calculated by 400mh/sec Now i know the way that deebit measures how fast miners are going isnt entirely accurate, But a 400mh/s miscalculation lastin for a day now? Thats just Messed Up. This measurement includes your personal luck, some part of pool's luck and a little bit of global network luck. It should not be used for precise calculations. If you want it to be closer to reality, increase your averaging window to 40 or 60 minutes.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks ! ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures ( NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
|
|
|
Fiyasko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
November 01, 2011, 01:15:36 PM |
|
Deepbit uses a rolling 15min IIRC for speed calculation so just because it showed 2200 a day ago and now doesn't mean it was constantly 2200 over last 24 hours. Averaging window is user-adjustable, it can be longer or shorter than 15 min. Wait 1,666,814 shares in 24 hours? Sure about that? That is like 80GH/s. This number shown on stats page is average pool's shares per block during last 24 hours, not total shares (it's explained there). So i checked my end for miner down's or failing clocks, or stales, Nothings changed. But yet im being under calculated by 400mh/sec Now i know the way that deebit measures how fast miners are going isnt entirely accurate, But a 400mh/s miscalculation lastin for a day now? Thats just Messed Up. This measurement includes your personal luck, some part of pool's luck and a little bit of global network luck. It should not be used for precise calculations. If you want it to be closer to reality, increase your averaging window to 40 or 60 minutes. Totally fixed by slapping the "measuring device" to average at 60mins. Thanks tycho! (lol @00m blocks where i get .4 from them)
|
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 02:20:31 PM |
|
I'm experiencing > 50% packet loss to pit.deepbit.net from only one of my servers. Other servers are OK, any clue ?
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
Fiyasko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
November 01, 2011, 03:08:43 PM |
|
I'm experiencing > 50% packet loss to pit.deepbit.net from only one of my servers. Other servers are OK, any clue ?
Holy fuck. Im doing just fine, I've got GUIminer set to Deepbit. So it kinda auto picks
|
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 03:35:02 PM |
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service. These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics --- 32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:08:17 PM |
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service. These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics --- 32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
I would be curious to see your Yahoo pings on Box2. I assume they'd also be lower. I would suspect there is something wrong locally. I.e., network adapter, cable length to router, etc, etc.
|
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system. - GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:15:51 PM |
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service. These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics --- 32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
I would be curious to see your Yahoo pings on Box2. I assume they'd also be lower. I would suspect there is something wrong locally. I.e., network adapter, cable length to router, etc, etc. The issue is that failing box is only failing with pit.deepbit.net I suspect a filtering problem on their side.
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:19:10 PM |
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service. These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics --- 32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
I would be curious to see your Yahoo pings on Box2. I assume they'd also be lower. I would suspect there is something wrong locally. I.e., network adapter, cable length to router, etc, etc. The issue is that failing box is only failing with pit.deepbit.net I suspect a filtering problem on their side. Hmm, I don't see how it could be a filtering problem on their side. Deepbit is going to see all of your traffic coming from your router as the one public IP. It is up to your router to route the traffic back to the correct box. I would think it is a filtering problem on your firewall/router. Unless, of course, each of your mining box's have a public IP, which would be undesirable. Then it could still be a firewall rule on that box. Just rambling thoughts, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:26:07 PM |
|
Yes, very weird, maybe they have problems with their filtering service. These is complete stats :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 38 packets transmitted, 14 received, 63% packet loss, time 37165ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 243.573/272.675/400.994/50.707 ms
while from same box :
--- yahoo.com ping statistics --- 32 packets transmitted, 32 received, 0% packet loss, time 31007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.581/234.843/307.661/24.113 ms
and from a different box :
--- pit.deepbit.net ping statistics --- 30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29003ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 127.558/127.979/128.352/0.459 ms
Any clues ?
I would be curious to see your Yahoo pings on Box2. I assume they'd also be lower. I would suspect there is something wrong locally. I.e., network adapter, cable length to router, etc, etc. The issue is that failing box is only failing with pit.deepbit.net I suspect a filtering problem on their side. Hmm, I don't see how it could be a filtering problem on their side. Deepbit is going to see all of your traffic coming from your router as the one public IP. It is up to your router to route the traffic back to the correct box. I would think it is a filtering problem on your firewall/router. Unless, of course, each of your mining box's have a public IP, which would be undesirable. Then it could still be a firewall rule on that box. Just rambling thoughts, Sam Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat. All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:30:46 PM |
|
Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat. All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
All are failing on pit.deepbit.net?? I thought your original message said that only one machine out of your farm was having problems and the rest were OK? Confused, Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:33:00 PM |
|
Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat. All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
All are failing on pit.deepbit.net?? I thought your original message said that only one machine out of your farm was having problems and the rest were OK? Confused, Sam yes, only pit.deepbit.net are failing from 30 different boxes with same public ip address no problem on other locations
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
November 01, 2011, 04:44:17 PM |
|
Thanks for your thoughts, there are more than 30 boxes behind than router, no special firewall rules, only nat. All of them failing only with pit.deepbit.net Maybe ddos filtering at deepbit does not like traffic from that specific public ip.
All are failing on pit.deepbit.net?? I thought your original message said that only one machine out of your farm was having problems and the rest were OK? Confused, Sam yes, only pit.deepbit.net are failing from 30 different boxes with same public ip address no problem on other locations Ah, that is different from my previous understanding. I guess I would Wireshark the connection between my router and ISP equipment and filter the traffic for the pit.deepbit.net IP to see what is happening, if your local to that installation. And/Or wait for Tycho to chime in. Sam
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
Peao
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 01, 2011, 06:56:36 PM |
|
yes, only pit.deepbit.net are failing from 30 different boxes with same public ip address no problem on other locations
gusti, i'm facing a similar problem here. some rigs behind a specific ISP are failing, but others from another room in the city (connected to another ISP), are ok...
|
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 07:05:47 PM |
|
yes, only pit.deepbit.net are failing from 30 different boxes with same public ip address no problem on other locations
gusti, i'm facing a similar problem here. some rigs behind a specific ISP are failing, but others from another room in the city (connected to another ISP), are ok... Good to hear that problem is not only mine. As a provisory solution, I connected to a secondary ISP, and it's working fine. So, the problem is for specific IP address from specific ISP, I still suspect a filtering problem on deepbit side. Tycho, are you coming to make any comment ?
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
[Tycho]
|
|
November 01, 2011, 10:09:12 PM |
|
Tycho, are you coming to make any comment ? Do you remember exactly when this problem started ? You can PM me your IP to check. Pool's total hashrate didn't changed noticeable, so it should be something specific.
|
Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks ! ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures ( NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 01, 2011, 10:33:15 PM |
|
Tycho, are you coming to make any comment ? Do you remember exactly when this problem started ? You can PM me your IP to check. Pool's total hashrate didn't changed noticeable, so it should be something specific. I believe that it started today, I just sent you a PM with IP address
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
Fiyasko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
|
|
November 06, 2011, 02:13:16 PM Last edit: November 07, 2011, 03:23:25 PM by JackRabiit |
|
Holy great luck run batman!
HOLY BAD LUCK RUN BATMAN!!!
|
|
|
|
Chopes
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
November 08, 2011, 05:32:24 PM |
|
Are payouts not working? Just tried to do an instant payout, reach the success page, but the btc is still in my account and no payout is recorded. Known issue being worked on?
|
|
|
|
Tomatocage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
|
|
November 08, 2011, 06:02:21 PM |
|
Why isn't the difficulty history updated anymore?
|
|
|
|
forsetifox
|
|
November 08, 2011, 06:58:18 PM |
|
Pay outs seem to be broken at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|