[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[fernando]

maybe the volume will shift to bitfinex due to that walls

I'd love to see the volume on bitfinex at least as high on cryptsy. Bitfinex is more advanced and is rly fast in deposit withdraws and trades.
Lets put there more focus.

I'd like to see some volume go into cex.io too although I find their fees a little high for my liking.   Their interface is excellent though.

Except they always have so many tiny orders that it is really difficult to see the order book. At least it was like that when I used in the past.

Anyway, yeah, it would be nice to spread the love to the other good ones that are not Cryptsy.

[1714509009]

1714509009

[1714509009]

1714509009

[1714509009]

1714509009

[stonehedge]

maybe the volume will shift to bitfinex due to that walls

I'd love to see the volume on bitfinex at least as high on cryptsy. Bitfinex is more advanced and is rly fast in deposit withdraws and trades.
Lets put there more focus.

I'd like to see some volume go into cex.io too although I find their fees a little high for my liking.   Their interface is excellent though.

Except they always have so many tiny orders that it is really difficult to see the order book. At least it was like that when I used in the past.

Anyway, yeah, it would be nice to spread the love to the other good ones that are not Cryptsy.

I guess it is just difficult to attract volume.

I bought some DRK on Bittylicious at a very fair price last week.  They only had 88DRK in stock though.

[fernando]

maybe the volume will shift to bitfinex due to that walls

I'd love to see the volume on bitfinex at least as high on cryptsy. Bitfinex is more advanced and is rly fast in deposit withdraws and trades.
Lets put there more focus.

I'd like to see some volume go into cex.io too although I find their fees a little high for my liking.   Their interface is excellent though.

Except they always have so many tiny orders that it is really difficult to see the order book. At least it was like that when I used in the past.

Anyway, yeah, it would be nice to spread the love to the other good ones that are not Cryptsy.

I guess it is just difficult to attract volume.

I bought some DRK on Bittylicious at a very fair price last week.  They only had 88DRK in stock though.

We're a bunch of hodlers  Also, the price of DRK usually moves less than other coins, so it is less attractive for traders looking for violent swings.

[flipme]

The Mac Wallet just crashed on me multiple times.
Find a report here
http://pastebin.com/yNfMSQ6x

[DiCE1904]

The Mac Wallet just crashed on me multiple times.
Find a report here
http://pastebin.com/yNfMSQ6x

Same happens with me. Seem to wake up with a "would you like to re-open" last few mornings

[astrobitcoin]

I want to say I totally loved the Bitcoin Rush Darkcoin episode!! It looks really good prepared, the details and animations are lovely, interaction with them very funny. I am not a big Bitcoin Rush fan, but this episode was great! And I think people who did public criticism on that should stand ashamed in the corner This was a birthday special and should be honored as such

i finally had proper internet to watch it, was very curious about.

my review: i stopped it within 3 minutes, i couldn't stand the way the guy talks. i skipped to evans parts but the contrast of tone between the two is so sharp to make it unwatchable to me.. my 2 darkoshi

[eduffield]

The Mac Wallet just crashed on me multiple times.
Find a report here
http://pastebin.com/yNfMSQ6x

Looks like your blockchain is corrupt, we've seen a lot of this when upgrading from v10 to v11.

27  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010025cbae leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 108750
28  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010025b355 leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 102517
29  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010025e322 leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 114754
30  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010026098f leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 124591
31  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x0000000100261fa4 leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 130244
32  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010026de42 leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 179042
33  org.darkcoinfoundation.Darkcoin-Qt  0x000000010024350d leveldb_error::~leveldb_error() + 4653

Can you try syncing from scratch and see if that helps? It should just go away

[eduffield]

11.0.10 Core - All Users

Downloads: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/0-11-0-darkcoin-core-release.3601/page-12#post-37320

Darksend users please update and remix your coins to try this and improve your anonymity

Nearly perfect darksend (https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commit/bbd869589cb08945680627d60c5c091cbd2e8208).

- Found the collateral issue that's been causing users to get charged when they shouldn't be. Now collateral should be charged in about 1 in 40 sessions.
- Improvements to DS anonymity - no change will ever be returned to a user in a pool.
- DS Anonymity improvements for smaller wallets (will have a positive effect on all wallets though)
- DS should also be much faster at mixing
- EXACT DS anonymitizing amounts are now supported (UdjinM6)
- There's a known issue anonymizing small amounts of DRK, try larger amounts if you have any problem (UdjinM6 is working on this)

Performance improvements

- Found the top 5 reasons why performance is suffering for the Darkcoin client and fixed them. Now performance should be similiar to Darkcoil unless you're running Darksend mixing (DS is intensive on the CPU)

InstantX

- I'm officially moving onto finishing implementation of InstantX, expect more great things in the near future

[stonehedge]

11.0.10 Core - All Users

Downloads: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/0-11-0-darkcoin-core-release.3601/page-12#post-37320

Darksend users please update and remix your coins to try this and improve your anonymity

Nearly perfect darksend (https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commit/bbd869589cb08945680627d60c5c091cbd2e8208).

- Found the collateral issue that's been causing users to get charged when they shouldn't be. Now collateral should be charged in about 1 in 40 sessions.
- Improvements to DS anonymity - no change will ever be returned to a user in a pool.
- DS Anonymity improvements for smaller wallets (will have a positive effect on all wallets though)
- DS should also be much faster at mixing
- EXACT DS anonymitizing amounts are now supported (UdjinM6)
- There's a known issue anonymizing small amounts of DRK, try larger amounts if you have any problem (UdjinM6 is working on this)

Performance improvements

- Found the top 5 reasons why performance is suffering for the Darkcoin client and fixed them. Now performance should be similiar to Darkcoil unless you're running Darksend mixing (DS is intensive on the CPU)

InstantX

- I'm officially moving onto finishing implementation of InstantX, expect more great things in the near future

Thank you Ed!

[stonehedge]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

[stonehedge]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

Hmm look like a double spend !?

Definitely not a double spend on my part!  Just a normal TX that says it is conflicted.  

I guess we're all conflicted in one way or another.  I think i'll give it some space to find itself (let the network work out what to do).  It hasn't arrived at its destination yet but has been deducted from my balance.

EDIT:  Just to say that I've tried a -rescan with no luck.  Maybe a Zapwallettx next?

[fernando]

the windows-zip download size is 86mb !? My last downloads were 15mb

It has been around that since we updated to v.0.11.

[GhostPlayer]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

Hmm look like a double spend !?

Definitely not a double spend on my part!  Just a normal TX that says it is conflicted. 

I guess we're all conflicted in one way or another.  I think i'll give it some space to find itself (let the network work out what to do).  It hasn't arrived at its destination yet but has been deducted from my balance.

hahaha  +100 for humor! I'm sure it will be sorted. How many confirms? Have you tried zapping the wallet?

[stonehedge]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

Hmm look like a double spend !?

Definitely not a double spend on my part!  Just a normal TX that says it is conflicted. 

I guess we're all conflicted in one way or another.  I think i'll give it some space to find itself (let the network work out what to do).  It hasn't arrived at its destination yet but has been deducted from my balance.

hahaha  +100 for humor! I'm sure it will be sorted. How many confirms? Have you tried zapping the wallet?

Just tried a zap and its still just sitting there feeling conflicted.

Transaction ID isn't showing up in the explorer...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/search.dws?q=658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407

[qwizzie]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

Hmm look like a double spend !?

Definitely not a double spend on my part!  Just a normal TX that says it is conflicted.  

I guess we're all conflicted in one way or another.  I think i'll give it some space to find itself (let the network work out what to do).  It hasn't arrived at its destination yet but has been deducted from my balance.

hahaha  +100 for humor! I'm sure it will be sorted. How many confirms? Have you tried zapping the wallet?

Just tried a zap and its still just sitting there feeling conflicted.

Transaction ID isn't showing up in the explorer...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/search.dws?q=658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407

and if you check total balance of yr wallet with the block chain explorer, has the 100 been withdrawn from your total balance there too ? if not then maybe a -reindex or -rescan on yr wallet is necessary ?

[UdjinM6]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

We are working on this too.
I had the same issue too.

Just tried a zap and its still just sitting there feeling conflicted.

Transaction ID isn't showing up in the explorer...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/search.dws?q=658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407

make sure you spell it right -zapwallettxes

[stonehedge]

Anybody know what this means?

Status: conflicted
Date: 20/01/2015 18:21
To: Xnsj1QcsvxPVUsBjPvYVNFEmTk3MPzqTnw
Debit: -100.00 DRK
Net amount: -100.00 DRK
Transaction ID: 658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407-000

We are working on this too.
I had the same issue too.

Just tried a zap and its still just sitting there feeling conflicted.

Transaction ID isn't showing up in the explorer...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/search.dws?q=658fdb31afa56cb818b45617ba03bf785c2918a5a5a60ab00e999b1111b41407

make sure you spell it right -zapwallettxes

Thanks mate.

I had this with a transaction yesterday but after it was broadcast and it resolved itself after a few minutes.  This one hasn't made it onto the network.

Just doing a reindex.  I tried rescan and zap (but not sure I spelled it right).  We'll see.

[oblox]

the windows-zip download size is 86mb !? My last downloads were 15mb

There's a bunch of builds (both 32 and 64-bit) in the Core releases.

[stonehedge]

I'm sure I'm being paranoid here but the conflicted transaction has gone, isn't on the blockchain and it seems like my balance is lower than it should be by about 100DRK.

Must check my facts though...the receiving address doesn't have it

I hope I'm just confused 

[LucD88]

the windows-zip download size is 86mb !? My last downloads were 15mb

That's because for whatever reason they included (in the ZIP version): darkcoin-0.11.0-win64-setup.exe, darkcoin-0.11.0-win32-setup.exe, test_darkcoin.exe, and test_darkcoin-qt.exe.. Don't know why actually.