cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
May 21, 2014, 11:15:17 AM |
|
clever
just not clear on why people would hold curecoin
for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell
buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)
please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
Not sure i follow your reasoning. why would people hold any coin? imagine curecoin is just another coin.... even if it were i see no less reason to hold it than any of the others. altruistic folders? if they were purely altruistic would they be folding for cure coin? why not just fold and not bother collecting the coins? buying curecoin DOES support protein folding of course, creates buying pressure, pushes up prices, returns more funds to pay for electricity and folding? This coin is a great idea. However, a big mistake to give the ipo out all at one time at the start, these will sell suppressing price and therefore putting off non altruistic folders for quite a while. Look at the tiny buys and 500k coins just got released. People who thought it was a good idea to give 10k for 1 btc at the start were crazy Also virtually zero marketing so far. The 80% or whatever huge premine is not really being taken seriously either, that is probably making some nervous of getting in. I mean the holding address was published on some page in the thread but really no effort to look legit has been made on the OP. Anyone reading it will probably consider it could be dumped out at any time in the future. No information about the company set up on the OP. Basically you come to the thread notice the coins are all premined and given out on the pool but after all the scams on this board there is not enough accountability here to give total confidence. Get burned by a few scams and you will be sure to give cast iron proof on the OP to convince people the premine is more than safe. Who even holds it, what happens if they get hit by a bus? dump and run? I have a few rigs folding, but not buying any yet until the entire set up seems a lot more legit. Folding is at least doing some good if it turns out bad. Should be the biggest coin on the board by far, but i see new shit clones that provide nothing getting way more attention. Something is holding people off of this.
|
|
|
|
yzhi
|
|
May 21, 2014, 11:16:45 AM |
|
it is either in the CPU/GPU stage?
|
|
|
|
Arnault59
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
|
|
May 21, 2014, 11:31:52 AM |
|
Hi guys. I have a small problem : I have two rigs which are the same : three 280 TRI X on each rig. On the first, I earn each day more than 400 000 points. With the other, since today, only 80 000. I restarted computer without success. Any idea ?
Thanks for futures answers.
|
|
|
|
Croak
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
May 21, 2014, 12:05:24 PM |
|
Now both my machines are sticking on downloading WU's. Even a restart of the client will not fix them. Anyone else having this problem? kqpahv mentioned this error on the previous page but restarting the client did reset his. You're welcome Now only thing I am checking is GPU utilization and if thats 95+% I dont care about the numbers that the client is showing anymore. I'v got a different problem myself now: Some GPU's get stuck downloading new WU's Stays on "downloading" forever with no getwork server address available. Restarting the client solves this but is really uncomfortable if you have many rigs to keep an eye on.... This started yesterday, anyone experiencing the same thing ? Check the log and see if you are getting the same error message he got. So far I have not run into this error but I am watching for it. I am getting "05:32:12:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit". 2 out of 4 card on one machine, and 2 out of 3 on the other. Rebooting them didn't even fix it. It's happening to a lot of people (myself included, on three different rigs and eight different folding slots) so it's not just you. Did we use up all the Work Units? I highly doubt it - I haven't had this problem occur but I will look into it. I have the same problem. 2 out of my 5 cards not picking up new WUs. Re-boot didnt work ..... seems more widespread my log details 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:2:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY gpu:0:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:09:ERROR:WU02:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit 06:19:09:ERROR:WU01:FS01:Exception: Server did not assign work unit Now 3 out of 5 are stuck not picking up wu. will be down to 1 card in 20 mins by the looks of it Have tried deleting the GPUs from the config and reinstating. No joy still stuck on download There are command line options that F@H has that I have not researched. I would check to see if there is an option to override / change the work server. If there is an option to do it you can try using 171.64.65.79. One of my machines just received work from that server. I had a look https://fah-web.stanford.edu/projects/FAHClient/wiki/ClientDifferencesV6ToV7 sadly cant see anything that enables me to force the IP address. Complete uninstall including data and re-instal has forced a new IP address assignment and it's picked up new WUs ..... I would have hoped the client would try new IP address', but hey, whatever works. OK for the likes of me with just 1 Rig but will be a mare for those with multiple rigs Uninstall WITHOUT removing Data worked for me as well, across 5 rigs. Try that first, save yourself the hassle of setting up passkeys and remote connection configs again, if that doesn't work, THEN nuke Data.
|
|
|
|
TaffThomas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2014, 12:07:13 PM |
|
Now both my machines are sticking on downloading WU's. Even a restart of the client will not fix them. Anyone else having this problem? kqpahv mentioned this error on the previous page but restarting the client did reset his. You're welcome Now only thing I am checking is GPU utilization and if thats 95+% I dont care about the numbers that the client is showing anymore. I'v got a different problem myself now: Some GPU's get stuck downloading new WU's Stays on "downloading" forever with no getwork server address available. Restarting the client solves this but is really uncomfortable if you have many rigs to keep an eye on.... This started yesterday, anyone experiencing the same thing ? Check the log and see if you are getting the same error message he got. So far I have not run into this error but I am watching for it. I am getting "05:32:12:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit". 2 out of 4 card on one machine, and 2 out of 3 on the other. Rebooting them didn't even fix it. It's happening to a lot of people (myself included, on three different rigs and eight different folding slots) so it's not just you. Did we use up all the Work Units? I highly doubt it - I haven't had this problem occur but I will look into it. I have the same problem. 2 out of my 5 cards not picking up new WUs. Re-boot didnt work ..... seems more widespread my log details 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:2:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY gpu:0:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:09:ERROR:WU02:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit 06:19:09:ERROR:WU01:FS01:Exception: Server did not assign work unit Now 3 out of 5 are stuck not picking up wu. will be down to 1 card in 20 mins by the looks of it Have tried deleting the GPUs from the config and reinstating. No joy still stuck on download There are command line options that F@H has that I have not researched. I would check to see if there is an option to override / change the work server. If there is an option to do it you can try using 171.64.65.79. One of my machines just received work from that server. I had a look https://fah-web.stanford.edu/projects/FAHClient/wiki/ClientDifferencesV6ToV7 sadly cant see anything that enables me to force the IP address. Complete uninstall including data and re-instal has forced a new IP address assignment and it's picked up new WUs ..... I would have hoped the client would try new IP address', but hey, whatever works. OK for the likes of me with just 1 Rig but will be a mare for those with multiple rigs Uninstall WITHOUT removing Data worked for me as well, across 5 rigs. Try that first, save yourself the hassle of setting up passkeys and remote connection configs again, if that doesn't work, THEN nuke Data. Good call (I've deleted my original mail so not to confuse others)
|
|
|
|
matt608
|
|
May 21, 2014, 12:46:24 PM |
|
CureCoin added to coinmarketcap.com
I don't see it.
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:01:11 PM |
|
10000 coins each day have to be bought to keep value stable thats not a small task
and need lot or marketing/promotion
and most important give curecoin a meaning beside supporting health sience
services that can be bought via curecoin would be such a important step or/and payout for work done in curecoins (which include the side who pay out have to buys curecoins first to be able pay out in curecoins)
such a behavior isnt only a multipool which payout in cure
it could be also some health sience bounties which are paid in curecoins
guess what a promotion it would be if the winner of nobel price dont win euro (or swedisch krones) but instead a amount of curecoins....
im just brainstorming im full involved in diamond but i like curecoin too so i just share some ideas with u
|
|
|
|
neza777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:16:36 PM |
|
Now both my machines are sticking on downloading WU's. Even a restart of the client will not fix them. Anyone else having this problem? kqpahv mentioned this error on the previous page but restarting the client did reset his. You're welcome Now only thing I am checking is GPU utilization and if thats 95+% I dont care about the numbers that the client is showing anymore. I'v got a different problem myself now: Some GPU's get stuck downloading new WU's Stays on "downloading" forever with no getwork server address available. Restarting the client solves this but is really uncomfortable if you have many rigs to keep an eye on.... This started yesterday, anyone experiencing the same thing ? Check the log and see if you are getting the same error message he got. So far I have not run into this error but I am watching for it. I am getting "05:32:12:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit". 2 out of 4 card on one machine, and 2 out of 3 on the other. Rebooting them didn't even fix it. It's happening to a lot of people (myself included, on three different rigs and eight different folding slots) so it's not just you. Did we use up all the Work Units? I highly doubt it - I haven't had this problem occur but I will look into it. I have the same problem. 2 out of my 5 cards not picking up new WUs. Re-boot didnt work ..... seems more widespread my log details 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Requesting new work unit for slot 00: READY gpu:2:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU02:FS00:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Requesting new work unit for slot 01: READY gpu:0:Hawaii [Radeon R9 200 Series] from 171.64.65.93 06:19:08:WU01:FS01:Connecting to 171.64.65.93:8080 06:19:09:ERROR:WU02:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit 06:19:09:ERROR:WU01:FS01:Exception: Server did not assign work unit Now 3 out of 5 are stuck not picking up wu. will be down to 1 card in 20 mins by the looks of it Have tried deleting the GPUs from the config and reinstating. No joy still stuck on download There are command line options that F@H has that I have not researched. I would check to see if there is an option to override / change the work server. If there is an option to do it you can try using 171.64.65.79. One of my machines just received work from that server. I had a look https://fah-web.stanford.edu/projects/FAHClient/wiki/ClientDifferencesV6ToV7 sadly cant see anything that enables me to force the IP address. Complete uninstall including data and re-instal has forced a new IP address assignment and it's picked up new WUs ..... I would have hoped the client would try new IP address', but hey, whatever works. OK for the likes of me with just 1 Rig but will be a mare for those with multiple rigs Uninstall WITHOUT removing Data worked for me as well, across 5 rigs. Try that first, save yourself the hassle of setting up passkeys and remote connection configs again, if that doesn't work, THEN nuke Data. Good call (I've deleted my original mail so not to confuse others) Just un-instal and re-instal still the same only my cpu can running all of my gpu stuck on download
|
|
|
|
TaffThomas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:16:52 PM |
|
10000 coins each day have to be bought to keep value stable thats not a small task
and need lot or marketing/promotion
and most important give curecoin a meaning beside supporting health sience
services that can be bought via curecoin would be such a important step or/and payout for work done in curecoins (which include the side who pay out have to buys curecoins first to be able pay out in curecoins)
such a behavior isnt only a multipool which payout in cure
it could be also some health sience bounties which are paid in curecoins
guess what a promotion it would be if the winner of nobel price dont win euro (or swedisch krones) but instead a amount of curecoins....
im just brainstorming im full involved in diamond but i like curecoin too so i just share some ideas with u
Seeing it used on the Stamford Campus as a means of buying or paying for some university services may well be a good start if they can convince the powers that be. Look at where Facebook came from in the early days
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:24:02 PM |
|
Does the PoS already work ? I haven't seen any staking so far (4 or 5 days..)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:39:24 PM |
|
Does the PoS already work ? I haven't seen any staking so far (4 or 5 days..)
if its based on PPC coins need 30 days coin-age to be able take part in POS
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:46:07 PM |
|
I think the fact that the folded coins are distributed from a central authority makes investors very uneasy about investing in Curecoin. There is quite simply too much in the hands of a few people. I will still support Curecoin with 1 of my rigs because I like contributing to science, but from an investor stand point there is too much risk! clever
just not clear on why people would hold curecoin
for the previously purely altruistic protein folders, there is only incentive to sell
buying curecoin doesn't support protein folding or scientific research except in a stretch of the imagination that a higher priced curecoin helps donations (more selling)
please explain why this won't be worth 2 satoshis in a month
Not sure i follow your reasoning. why would people hold any coin? imagine curecoin is just another coin.... even if it were i see no less reason to hold it than any of the others. altruistic folders? if they were purely altruistic would they be folding for cure coin? why not just fold and not bother collecting the coins? buying curecoin DOES support protein folding of course, creates buying pressure, pushes up prices, returns more funds to pay for electricity and folding? This coin is a great idea. However, a big mistake to give the ipo out all at one time at the start, these will sell suppressing price and therefore putting off non altruistic folders for quite a while. Look at the tiny buys and 500k coins just got released. People who thought it was a good idea to give 10k for 1 btc at the start were crazy Also virtually zero marketing so far. The 80% or whatever huge premine is not really being taken seriously either, that is probably making some nervous of getting in. I mean the holding address was published on some page in the thread but really no effort to look legit has been made on the OP. Anyone reading it will probably consider it could be dumped out at any time in the future. No information about the company set up on the OP. Basically you come to the thread notice the coins are all premined and given out on the pool but after all the scams on this board there is not enough accountability here to give total confidence. Get burned by a few scams and you will be sure to give cast iron proof on the OP to convince people the premine is more than safe. Who even holds it, what happens if they get hit by a bus? dump and run? I have a few rigs folding, but not buying any yet until the entire set up seems a lot more legit. Folding is at least doing some good if it turns out bad. Should be the biggest coin on the board by far, but i see new shit clones that provide nothing getting way more attention. Something is holding people off of this.
|
|
|
|
antonioserrano72
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 353
Merit: 250
Impossible
|
|
May 21, 2014, 01:51:07 PM |
|
CureCoin added to coinmarketcap.com
I don't see it. You have to press the all coins arrow
|
|
|
|
LasersHurt
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:02:54 PM |
|
The 80% or whatever huge premine is not really being taken seriously either, that is probably making some nervous of getting in. I mean the holding address was published on some page in the thread but really no effort to look legit has been made on the OP. Anyone reading it will probably consider it could be dumped out at any time in the future. No information about the company set up on the OP. Basically you come to the thread notice the coins are all premined and given out on the pool but after all the scams on this board there is not enough accountability here to give total confidence. Get burned by a few scams and you will be sure to give cast iron proof on the OP to convince people the premine is more than safe. Who even holds it, what happens if they get hit by a bus? dump and run?
A Public Ledger site is being created, which should ease some of your fears. There's a lot of information on the new website as well. It's being taken seriously, but there's nothing that can be done to help anyone's opinions until the ledger is out there. The devs could bend over backwards to assure people, but it wouldn't matter. They might as well keep their focus on finishing and publishing the ledger. And some people will never trust a central holding, even when it's in the hands of a 501c3 nonprofit. For them, there is no help.
|
|
|
|
matt608
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:05:35 PM |
|
Curecoin should be a top 10 crypto, it will get there in coming months I expect.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:14:46 PM |
|
how to stop this sticking at 99.99% ? it is happening on a few rigs now. Didn't happen before.
|
|
|
|
vujk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:16:36 PM |
|
how to stop this sticking at 99.99% ? it is happening on a few rigs now. Didn't happen before.
Try underclocking your core clock on your card a tad.
|
|
|
|
ptman
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:23:30 PM |
|
Is the last version of the source code the one that is on the official GitHub code repository?
I have two guys mining in my pool and the last thing I want is for them to be mining in an old fork of CureCoin.
Is there something special one has to do in order to mine CureCoin? I did set up the pool like it was any other Sha256 coin. Did I do it wrong?
I ask this because I have +1 TH/s of mining power in my pool for 2 days and the pool did not find any block!!!
|
|
|
|
matt608
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:30:38 PM |
|
Truly fantastic idea for a coin! I am so in!
Welcome aboard!
|
|
|
|
ifyoubuildit
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 2
|
|
May 21, 2014, 02:49:26 PM |
|
Also virtually zero marketing so far.
The 80% or whatever huge premine is not really being taken seriously either, that is probably making some nervous of getting in. I mean the holding address was published on some page in the thread but really no effort to look legit has been made on the OP. Anyone reading it will probably consider it could be dumped out at any time in the future. No information about the company set up on the OP. Basically you come to the thread notice the coins are all premined and given out on the pool but after all the scams on this board there is not enough accountability here to give total confidence. Get burned by a few scams and you will be sure to give cast iron proof on the OP to convince people the premine is more than safe. Who even holds it, what happens if they get hit by a bus? dump and run?
I think that the lack of marketing is the biggest issue so far. Imo, the coin was released prematurely - even before the website was done. Given the softness of the alt market right now, I don't know why the devs rushed to release. I think it would've made sense to raise a little additional money as well to make some explanatory videos, branded materials, and possibly even buy some ads. Right now, the devs and all supporters of the coin should be hustling to reach out to writers and media about the coin. The message needs to be clear that the project integrates with Stanford's Folding@Home project and transfers the millions of daily Kwh used for bitcoin mining towards a social purpose - doing disease research. I have personally sent a few emails without much response but could do a lot more. I also think within the altcoin community, the devs should host an open invite to a number of the big altcoin traders, possibly even flying them out to Michigan (I think?) to meet with the team and visit the data center to understand the legitimacy of the operation. Because of the centralized distribution (even if automated and more Peercoin like centralized checkpointing) there will be questions - but those can be assuaged if others were credibility offer support of the coin. I think it will be a journey, but that this is the most important redistribution of energy yet proposed in the bitcoin world. That said, the team needs to move quickly or others will release worse coins with better marketing, steal attention and market share and Curecoin will lose. I think the team is doing a strong job on the dev side, but a weak job on the marketing side. The can either look to add marketing talent to their team or depend on the community. If neither of those happen, the project won't succeed.
|
|
|
|
|