No, it was your and others f$ck you response to me. Like you community have done before
You mean "f$ck responses" like this, which I gave you on telegram (others can confirm)?
mixmaster, [21.05.15 08:39]
Jadedjack, you think it's good if somebody runs 100 nodes and gets reward for all of them?
mixmaster, [21.05.15 18:43]
Some of us (some of the core marketing team) wanted to prepare for launch by having loads of nodes. We talked about this and you contributed ideas and solutions. The core devs then said we don't need that many nodes, so we didn't buy them. "Need" is not easy to define here as we don't know if we will need them at some time in the future (attacks or upcoming features and more users which leads to higher load on the network). My personal opinion doesn't matter by the way, because no single person alone decides about how we spend NEM funds, which is a good thing I think.
Now the way you describe it, it seems we made fun of you. This is soo wrong and I'm sure you know it, too. Having that script [comment: jadedjack built a script to automatically download, install and run a NEM node on linux servers] is very good and might be very useful in the future and I think (hope) you got reward for that. The fact that you fired up 14 nodes was your decision, you cannot expect to be paid afterwards if there was no agreement on that. That would be unfair to all other people.
Also I don't know anybody who shut down nodes because NEM price is low...
mixmaster, [22.05.15 10:05]
and about rewarding people who run multiple nodes, my opinion is this:
if we (core team, community, whoever -> common sense) think that we have not enough nodes and somebody is helping is by running multiple nodes (e.g. 14) then we should reward that person individually. but making the program interesting for people running multiple nodes will harm our decentralization. its not that hard to understand I think.
And by the way: We are discussing a way to enable people to run maybe 10 nodes (number should be discussed) without needing 10 times the full deposit amount. Just see this thread:
https://forum.ournem.com/general-discussion/nem-node-reward-discussion/msg17314/#msg17314It is pretty scummy of you to take my work and repost it after you know I want it removed.
You should consider publishing any of your work under certain licenses if you want to have control over the usage after you published anything.
If you think we will just watch how you harm the project and the whole community, you are wrong.
Don't confuse the "core team" with the developers. They are not the same people.
There is no such group like "core team". We have a core dev team and a core marketing team. It's all on here:
http://blog.nem.io/overview/And the NEM Funds are in multisig accounts with mixed people from core dev and core marketing team as cosigners. Stay with the facts