England is missing world class play maker from middle of the field. If they had De Bruyne or Modrić I am sure they would have had much more success in big competitions. Maybe Jude Bellingham can be that player in the future. He played a very good tournament and could develop even more since he is still very young.
Perhaps my comment will make England fans disappointed and angry but there is another example, Andrea Pirlo from Italy when they won against England in Euro 2012. Pirlo destroyed England midfielders in that match and they hoped to have their own Pirlo. Years ago, England had a talented midfielder, Jack Wilshere but his career was destroyed by too much pressure on his early career and too many injuries. After Jack Wilshere, I did not see any midfielder from England has such potential to control match intensity well enough. You can't expect great things with midfield like Henderson, Rice, Philips which was Southgate special. That midfield can only play defense and hope that your opponent will be stupid enough or weak enough that your wings have enough space to score a couple of goals.
Correct, they are midfielders who simply rely on their body strength to fight but they lack of capability to control match with their techniques. |
|
|
|
Whitelist works like you flag this withdrawal address as safe so no need for some verifications every time you withdraw to that address.
This feature on an exchange is useful because it will become convenient every time you withdraw because no need for some verifications needed, it's 1 press only.
I mentioned it and believed it is the case for OP - Whitelisting an address
- Turning on the one-step withdrawal for whitelisted addresses
Not sure he actually checked his account on this.
Hmmm now I'm curious 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Would you mind confirming that you did not do these two steps above, please. I remember that Trust wallet now have a straight payment feature in the wallet from binance direct to the wallet instead of copying your wallet address and inserting into binance exchange, could this be the case? Because i am using this features.
How to transfer crypto from Binance to Trust wallet. The guide has a step for Whitelisting too. Some more |
|
|
|
Likely those Bitcoin Testnet Faucet are still working but of course you should check them by your own. The amount of t BTC you can claim from faucets is not too big. I thought you knew about scam method with t BTC but I share my topic here for other newbies too |
|
|
|
1. Do you think their involvement is helpful?
It is both helpful and harmful. - Helpful because VCs will expose cryptocurrency to more people. They already have their own networks and are able to expand their networks quickly with resources they have. More exposure, more cryptocurrency enthusiasts and more capital will pour into this market.
- Harmful because VCs can be scam groups too. With this side effect, they will make people feeling more negatively about this market.
2. Can crypto still survive without them?
It will do. Before 2020 bull run, importance of VCs was smaller dramatically and we had this market since 2009 without VCs or with less VCs.
Similarly for the cryptocurrency market without China, USA. it will still exist but short term effects should be very big. The market and its investors will be shocked and panic. |
|
|
|
As expected, England fell at the first difficult hurdle they faced (the same thing happens every single major tournament). The only reason they got to the previous World Cup semi final is because they didn’t play a top team. As soon as they met Croatia - OUT.
Same thing in the Euros, an easy path to the final vs Italy - OUT.
They are weak mentally and are not flexible, adaptive with tactics. So when they had troubles and let opponents scored first, they mostly were not able to equalize and failed. People talked too much about England that they have a most exciting and biggest or best national league (Premier League) but they forget the important contributions of foreigner players for Premier League. Domestic players were over valued by media and on transfer market. Big tournaments are places we can assess British players better. We have some exciting semi finals coming up. Argentina vs Croatia & France vs Morocco. Logic says the final will be Argentina vs France but this World Cup has been very unpredictable. We could easily see Croatia vs Morocco. I think the latter final would be great to see, even though most neutrals would like to see Messi finally win footballs greatest prize.
It looks to be perfect if a final match is between Argentina and France but I'd not say a final match between Croatia and Morocco is too bad. In 2004, we had a final match in Champions League between Monaco and Morocco so will we have another surprising match between Croatia and Morocco which were both under valued since beginning of World Cup 2022? We have a team that had some World Cup finals but never won it, Netherlands. Will Croatia have a second final match and win it? |
|
|
|
Some days ago I decided to make some withdrawal from Binance exchange and I noticed that the withdrawal went through without any form of verifications e.g Authentication code, Email code and phone number code.
- Did you whitelist that address for your withdrawal?
- Did you turn on One-step Withdrawal for your Binance account?
One-step Withdrawal
When this function is turned on, you can withdraw small amount crypto to whitelisted addresses without passing 2FA verification
You can check its on/ off status at https://www.binance.com/en/my/security |
|
|
|
It's surprising you've never encountered that before, because it's a very common issue among all casinos, sometimes at one casino you will be able to access one game from your location, while at another casino you won't be able to open the same game, and one other casino won't even allow you to access it (it won't display it).
In summary, for each game you can be geo blocked by the provider and/or by the casino but sometimes one provider will accept you (and people from your location) if you play through one casino but will block you if you play from another one.
Restrictions can come from a casino and a game provider and their licenses. If a game provider does not restrict it in one nation, different casinos which partner with the game provider can restrict or allow that game and it depends on casinos' licenses. I can not remember to share names of game providers, specific games and specific casinos as examples here but it actually happens and it is very logic. |
|
|
|
The Morocco team was taken lightly by the Portugal coach. And he paid the price for this mistake in Portugal's defeat. Against Switzerland, without Ronaldo, Portugal's attack played very well and scored 6 goals. The Portugal coach thought the same strategy would work against Morocco. So he did not give place to Ronaldo in the starting XI. And so Portugal's gameplay was quite slow in the first half.
I don't say the Portugal coach, Mr. Santos was wrong by choosing Goncalo Ramos in last two matches of Portugal because of two biggest reasons. - Cristiano Ronaldo lost his good performance in past few months, not only in World Cup 2022
- Goncalo Ramos is a promising young player and this World Cup can be a start for his journey with Portugal in later big tournaments.
Even I support this choice of Santos, I did know a young player like Ramos can not play well in all big matches. He need to have more experience to improve his skills and ability to face with pressure. In match with Morocco, Ramos had one chance to make a good finish with his head but failed to complete it well. If Ronaldo is a player in that position, with his jump power, he would be able to complete it better. The match with Morocco shows that Ramos must learn a lot of more things for his career. And on this occasion, the Moroccan players made some good attacks and managed to score a goal as well.
To be frankly, in that goal, it is not a too much dangerous attack but Diogo Costa made a mistake and awarded Morocco that goal. A biggest mistake belongs to Costa, no doubt about it. |
|
|
|
What an amazing match! So much awesome defense in the first 90, two incredible goals in OT, and to finish it off on penalty kicks against Allison Becker! Hats off to Croatia, I had Brazil going all the way at the start, but I suspected that Croatia for anyone they faced.
Neymar again did not have any World Cup final, not mention about its trophy. Brazil was closely to a win but Croatia did not give up and they use all energy left to find a goal. They successfully got it with a support from Marquinhos. I know, it is unfair to blame it on Marquinhos in the 1 - 1 goal but he is actually a most mentioned Brazilian player in this match. At the end, he missed a penalty and in general he contributed to Brazil defeat. Livakovic, a goalkeeper of Croatia can be considered as a best goalkeeper in this World Cup. I don't think we must wait for the World Cup ending, he deserves it even now, just at quarter round.
At the end, I pay attention on quick talk between Modric, Casemiro and Rodrygo. It's very emotional moment between Real Madrid players (Casemiro, Modric) and ex-Real Madrid player (Casemiro). No meeting for Messi and Neymar in semi-final but will Messi play in semi-final? Netherlands can send Argentina and Messi to home too, I really think so. |
|
|
|
Another goal by Croatia the match score now 1-1 goal
They have an equalizer goal and the match is only 3 to 5 minutes including extra minutes left. Will Croatia have another match with penalty shoot out in World Cup? In the goal, if Marquinhos did not try to stop that shot, Allison Becker should save it. Anyway, Croatia proved that they can attack well too even attacking against Brazil. They did make that counter attack very quickly and with three passes, they had a goal. Things work like a clock for Croatia in that counter attack. Modric will not be sent out in this match because Croatia need to attack to find a goal. After Brazil scored a first goal, camera heads toward Modric and his disappointment. Now he can smile. Update: Finally, 120 minutes ended with 1 - 1 as a final result. |
|
|
|
I agree with you. The Brazil squad has plenty of players capable of producing surprises and breaking down Croatia's defense.
Rodrygo brought more positive effects for Brazil attacking than Vinicius so did Anthony at the opposite swing. However, Anthony looks only have his speed and his shots are not too good in power. Croatia's attack is very weak compared to Brazil's.
Croatia attack is not too weak actually. Give them chance and their attacking players will score goals. They did not have too many opportunities in a match with Japan but Perisic did an excellent head finish and scored an equalizer for them. Croatia defense have been able to keep Brazil away from scoring a goal so far. The first half was just a deadlock waiting to be broken by Brazil. In the second half, Brazil have started to be more effective. They were nearly wininng a penalty but Croatia were really lucky that there was an offside before that. They got an absolute goal chance with Neymar a few minutes ago but Neymar couldn't finish it up with a goal. Livakovic has been really successful with his saves so far. Gvardiol's effort in defense is just great.
Their defense is very strong and not only their defenders but their midfielders too. Their trio midfielders Modric, Kovaci and Brozovic run a lot to chase the ball and stop attacks of Brazil. Perisic contributed a lot for their defense too even Perisic swing is a most powerful one for Croatia attacking. Gvardiol is a big discovery in this World Cup. He took over the position of Vida and performed so impressive. If Croatia don't have Livakovic, Brazil should score at least one goal in the second half. I still think Brazil will find a way to win this match but it looks like there is a probability for watching extra time considering the current performances.
Again Croatia have another 120-minute match in World Cup. It's their fifth one since World Cup 2018, unbelievable. Brazil can score goal as Rodrygo and Anthony brought more momentum for their attacking but if they let 120-minutes end with a draw, Croatia will have advantage in penalty. |
|
|
|
I believe Croatia will play as they did it before, They will try to gamble on a Penalty kick. As we know how hard it when they get a win in 90' because the material player is not enough to create a score and face-to-face with Brazil players. I guess Croatia will play defensively in 90', so if they try to force and change the strategy, they will do the counter-attack strategy in extra time even if only 1 or 2 players are on the front because the rest is guard back to defense.
Penalty kicks are always risky for all teams, not only Croatia. I am sure that if possible, Croatia will try to win this match within 90 minutes (best) or 120 minutes but not want to go to another penalty kick. Their team are no longer young especially their key players like Luka Modric or Ivan Perisic. We saw in the match with Japan that both Modric and Perisic were replaced in the first extra half because they were no longer able to run well enough to compete with Japanese players. Croatia need them not only for attacking but also for proactive defense. Will their defence be able to cope with the pressure of attack that the Brazilian team will apply throughout the game? Croatia is an ageing team, their players are experienced but they are not capable of running around with maximum agility for 90 minutes against a team like Brazil therefore their strategy is limited.
Brazil have many players can make Croatia surprised but it is on the paper only. So far in this match, after a full first half, Brazil did not find a way to get closely to Croatia goalkeeper. Only a good combination between Richarlison and Vini Jr. That is a most considerable chance for them in the first half and it is not good enough to be called as a real chance. Croatia will mainly defend within the match and patiently wait for counter attacking. We saw they did tried some times in the first half and in the second half, very likely that Brazil will attack more seriously. That will bring more opportunities for Croatia but of course they must keep their defense strongly first. |
|
|
|
It seems that no KYC is required for this site. I believe KYC should be mandatory to ensure a secure transaction environment.
KYC is good for companies because they can know their customers better and somewhat reduce risk to be compromised for money laundering activities. It is good for gambling casinos but not for gamblers who don't trade on casinos and will not directly do on-chain transactions with other gamblers. It's different than on Peer-to-Peer trading platforms where money laundering activities are more popular, especially with newbie trade partners and not yet complete KYC. So don't prefer any site which doesn't have any KYC policy.
You are saying the opposite of what majority of the crowd, investors, traders, gamblers are looking for. They would like to have no-KYC policies. |
|
|
|
Now, I was extremely wrong about Germany, but I still think England can win the World Cup.
England have good improvement since World Cup 2018 (third position), Euro 2020 (runner up) and it would be a big milestone for them and Southgate if they can win World Cup, a first one since World Cup 1966 at their homeland. I'm going to say:
Semi finals - Brazil vs Argentina & England vs Portugal
Argentina vs England in the final.
You chose England so Mbappe will not like your choice, so does Neymar from Brazil.
I would feel great if the final is between Argentina and Portugal so it will be a final direct crash between Messi and Ronaldo. They made a nice photo before World Cup beginning and it would be very classic if they meet each other in World Cup final match. Ronaldo is in worst period of his career but with him, he can become a hero with only one shot. Even if Ronaldo won't score, if that final is between Argentina and Portugal and we have chance to see these two legendary players play against each other, it is an unique chance in our life. |
|
|
|
A well known crypto newbie contact me about two crypto project he his currently holding, Mina Protocol and Fuel, the problem is Alameda and FTX are big investors of these two projects, he is asking if he should sell his bag and replace with other altcoin?
The bear market is not over and it's not smart to buy altcoins in middle of bear market. Is this a good reason to sell off your coins and replace with another that Alameda and FTX aren't involved?
FTX and Alameda are not gods so it's funny to see people believed about those entities a lot in the past two years. Same goes to Venture Capitals VCs which got a lot of belief and capital from retail investors. Those people invested without research and they spent money by following VCs. What will you do in this case?
Bitcoin first Ethereum and BNB will be my next considerations but I will buy these altcoins after Bitcoin. Reason is Bitcoin is a market leader and it will start a new bull run first. Ethereum will follow Bitcoin and BNB should be next altcoin to follow Bitcoin and Ethereum. |
|
|
|
Control your emotion, believe me, emotion is your biggest number one enemy.
It is hard to control if you are trading too much. Over trading means emotional decisions which usually don't lead to happy endings. If you over trade, you will be rekted and will be angry with the market. Especially the fear and greed know how to stop loss and know how to take profit.
Let's practice - Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful
Stay away from btc If you are futures trader btc moving too slow.
Trading shit coins is bad Trading future with shit coins is worse Bitcoin is the best cryptocurrency for either holders or traders. |
|
|
|
Hey xtraelv, I have a question about the users which donated 50 BTC. I observed that on your list there are 41 users mentioned. However, when accessing this link - https://bitcointalk.org/donate.html - there are only 38. Do you have any idea why this discrepancy appeared? I can not know the difference of 3 VIP members. Excepting that, I thought that all users listed by you here were also supposed to have a VIP status. However, I found that two of them, which appear in the 50 BTC donators list, do not have the VIP status displayed at their profile -- any idea why? These are the two I'm talking about: but for these two members, I know. Stats on active & merit status of Donators & VIPs. In the past, when I checked, they are old scammers and their names are still in list of VIP donators. Likely their VIP badges were removed because of their scams activities. Details: +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| userid username badge status meritstatus lastactiveday period |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
17. | 35827 pirateat40 VIP abandoned none 23mar2013 2455 |
24. | 54967 BitAvenue VIP abandoned none 08dec2017 734 |
Other notes: +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| userid username newusername notes |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
5. | 35827 pirateat40 OldScammerTag |
11. | 54967 BitAvenue R- OldScammerTag |
History - Bitcoin Savings and Trust and Pirateat40 on Bitcointalk (PONZI)Some VIP members got the VIP badges without 50 BTC donation Maybe they didn't donate 50 BTC but were gifted the VIP status because of their contribution to Bitcoin and the forum.
Right. I posted about this somewhere when I did it. IIRC MagicalTux also got VIP without paying 50 BTC because he contributed significant resources in other ways. MagicalTux got "free" VIP status for hosting the forum for a long time, too. I think that him plus Hal are the only free donator statuses I gave out. You'd have to do something pretty extraordinary to convince me to give out another free one.
I don't see any point in donating 5 BTC now and then 5 BTC later. You won't get Donator status until you've donated a total of at least 10 BTC. It'd be better for you to earn interest on the 5 BTC somewhere until you're ready to pay 10 BTC. The forum isn't in need of money.
|
|
|
|
I am not really happy with Ronaldo’s behaviour because he once again stormed off at the end, and is proving to be a distraction for this Portugal team and the Portugal player’s have shown that they do not need him hence he should not be in the playing 11 again for their next match. Ronaldo does not care what others think about him, happy or unhappy, it is their problems, not his. With the very high ego, Ronaldo has yet accepted that his career is going to its ending. Neutrally I should say things have changed too fast with Ronaldo and all of us. It's just one season ago, he was still a best player of Manchester United and belonged to one of best goal scorers in Europe. After a few months in the summer, he lost it all and with him, it is very hard to accept this fact. However I very agree with you that Ronaldo behavior is unacceptable. It is bad for him and for any team he is playing for at the moment. He is very famous and his drama can affect his teams negatively with so much noise on media and on field too. In match with Morocco, when every players were singing national anthem, Cristiano Ronaldo got the spotlight |
|
|
|
Basically Spain is still playing that famous tiki-taka style where they just pass, and we all know that it worked amazingly for a while but the reality is that teams figured that out with deep defence already, if you can't pass through passes to make sure people can score, that's not going to work and you do not have a Messi to help you out there.
Tiki-taka of Spain is outdated and they need an upgrade version of it like what Manchester City and Pep Guardiola are using in their club. Unfortunately, Manchester City have better players than Spain have. City have better midfielders, better tactic and a top-notch striker Erling Haaland. It's important for Spain to have a top-notch striker who can create pressure on opponent's defenders like Haaland. Many years since retirement of David Villa and Fernando Torres, Spain have yet found a good striker to replace them. Manchester City versions with and without Haaland are very different and a version with Haaland brings lot of fear to their opponents. Spain needs to figure out it is not working anymore, even Pep is having hard time with a billion dollar team, got Haaland to make sure it would work.
They need to upgrade their tactics first and next, must have some necessary players for it. They need both to succeed in next big tournaments. All in all, I feel like it is the tactic that caused them to lose, Morocco played a much
Spain lost against Italy in Euro 2020 and Morocco in World Cup 2022 in a same way. They dominated these matches but failed to win within 120 minutes. At penalty spots, they failed to both opponents. Spain is like England with very bad records on penalty spots. |
|
|
|
There is no spreadsheets sir, I dont know admin accept or not Due to GDPR (read in OP), the management team don't share a spreadsheet. You should join the Telegram Bounty group, and ask any question there. Their management representative will answer your question. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
