I understand that you can not ask for your passport to be appostiled, but can it be legally verified by the notary? On your last... banter with their CM on their ann thread, they indicated that they didn't strictly requiring an apostilled verification, a simple "can be verified officially" is enough. Maybe you misunderstood what they asked on CG, although I'll have to say that I think you're not the only one misunderstood their statement, given what's said is,



But yeah, common mistake, simple misunderstanding, their CM love to twist words, or whatever, so let's move on. Is it possible to get a *.asice file from a notary for your passport? Maybe this method is easier than the one mentioned above. It's all they asked now to verify your identity,

By tagging users, I assume you're referring to mentioning their name in sense that you told the readers that your reply is addressed to the user, and strictly for that. There's another "mention" in a sense that the person you "tagged" will get a notification through email or tg, but it's a rather different topic, easy to understand and very helpful, but out of context on this current discussion, so we will not talk about it right now.

For your case, you can simply catch your reader's attention and made them understand that certain user is being talked about, or "mentioned", simply by adding "@" in front of their username, or put the username on bold. For example, @holydarkness or holydarkness, or you can even simply mention them without any additional format, holydarkness, most readers would understand you're talking about them or mentioning them.

As for merging all messages, it's actually not as hard as you thought.

Upon composing a reply, if you scrolled down to another post, you'll see an "insert quote button",



Pressing them will --as the name suggested-- insert that quote into the draft you currently typed. So, you can, for example, replied to my post, click two enters to give some line space or put a separating line --"[ hr ]"-- to indicate that your reply to the said person is over, click the "insert quote" button to indicate the next paragraph will be to address the person you quoted above that paragraph, and so on.

Also, note that by doing this, most people would understand that you're talking to the person you quoted, so you don't really need to mention them again.

The guide is here, Scam Report Format (Use it to make scam reports properly). The button to create a new thread can be found on the top right corner of each board,



If you want to raise a scam accusation, then you're already on the right sub-board.

You can upload image of your proofs (screenshot, etc.) from imgur, imgbb, prnt, and the likes. The forum requires a newbie to buy a copper member to be able to show image, or you'll at least need to be a jr. member. But that's not really necessary, most likely than not, a highet rank member will quote your post to show the images

Archiving the spreadsheet in case the said BM edited the content and/or locked it for private access only.

---

I can't see anywhere on yahoo's post that sounded like he saw nothing wrong with what the BM did. He even made himself and the purpose of his post clear on the last part of it.

To loosely quote someone explained value betting once to me, "yes, value bets are not illegal as in you'll be jailed for it, but it's heavily frowned upon by sportbetting platforms". I think it's one of the common knowledge amongst sportbettors.

Was asking the same to OP on his scam accusation thread. I even went a bit further asking if OP used his friend's referral code when signed up, given he said his friend was the one recommended it to them. That'll create a possibility where megapari could make a connection that both accounts know each other to a certain degree.

But OP said that he didn't use the ref code, closing any possible trace that megapari could use to zero in to his friend, who live hundreds of miles away, down to the full name, amongst possibly hundreds of people from his country using the platform.

If megapari did a lucky guess, I'll say it's a helluva new level of lucky.

Then I find myself in a position so hard to understand how MegaPari could have guessed and/or make a connection between you and Lopez Marcos. I asked if you use his referral code or not in hope to get a better understanding for the case, how the findings made by megapari was initially founded and on what basis. Well, in a way, it does; it just didn't lean towards your favor.

Initially we've established that he's a friend of yours, who live in another city, hundreds of miles away, have different IP for sure, different device to access the site, different preferred deposit method --one prefers crypto and one prefers fiat. I would assume you both has different preferences of games too. We also learned that he recommended megapari to you, but you've never use his referral code.

So basically there's no ties between you and him, as you stated yourself above. Wouldn't you agree that it's a hell of a lucky guess that Megapari could connect the dots between the two of you down to the first, middle, and last name? I can't fathom how low is the probability of guessing correctly that you and Mr. Marcos are "acquainted", given all of the points above.

Imagine how many people in your country played on their site, few good hundreds are even probably played from the same city with you, maybe even your own neighbor played on megapari too, and for unfathomable reason megapari could have guessed that you and someone else hundreds of miles away from you are --at the very least-- friends? With no prior things that could connect your dot to his?

We understand you were recommended the site by that friend, Lopez Marcos? And you both preferred different methods for depositing funds; you by crypto and Marcos by fiat? May I assume you sign-up with his referral code? Or were you signing up without any ref. code at all?

Yes, I am well aware we are in 2023, as aware as that my question left unanswered. Allow me to change the question into something more specific, to better fit your narration: "is there a good, harmless, non-detrimental, benevolent --you name it-- reason behind the threads offering to buy for sportsbet account(s) all while your main account is being banned for multi-acc?"

Quoting to give further --although unnecessary, as I'll still do it regardless-- relevance:



I'm notifying Steve about this thread, he'll usually come to give SB's side of the story once he's online.

Meanwhile, just curious, OP,  what's the reason behind the request to buy an unverified account? Disregarding that the said account is not the one being questioned right now, I don't think buying an account is allowed by them, or at the very least, it's heavily frowned upon.

I think a little bit more context will be helpful here. The article you pointed out was talking about these paragraph, translated by google:


So basically you're pointing out that your govt didn't allow a legalization of derivatives --not sure I understand this part-- and translation for your passport? Wasn't the passport, the document we want to be legalized here, is the original, non-translated one?

I gave the legalization process document a read, the procedure for said verification is quite... not simple, at least not as simple as directly verifying the validity of the document by directly video conferencing with TD's representative. OP has to get an appointment online with a nominated notary selected by the govt based on their region, prepare a device and/or install an app that enable them to sign a message online, and pay some fee. But I have to agree that it's probably the best way to make sure that the passport verification is as legal and neutral as possible, given it's checked and validated by an appointed notary.

My question to OP is quite the same: will you do it? If I may be honest, I would really love to see what's the end of this case tell us as it's quite an interesting story.

You've created an accusation thread against them and their representative is attentive on that thread. Please divert all of your arguments, answers, proofs, complaints, and defense there. It's quite troublesome for anyone overseeing the case on the scam accusation board if they have to simultaneously read both threads.

---

Team_MegaPari, completely unrelated to the case, this is the first time I looked at your thread and see your preferred method to answer queries to people. If I may give you an advise, you might want to reply them in one post, put the separating line --[ hr ], without space-- if you want to make distinct separation between each reply. Consecutive post will usually be merged by mods.

I think it would be best to re-upload the image with OP's email address censored, just to be safe and sure you're still giving your best to protect their privacy. I understand that you also asked for Mr. Marcos' KYC and thus know that the same ID are shared on both account?

I haven't read your whitepaper yet, as it's 65 pages and definitely not what I'd like to call a light reading before bed, but meanwhile, as your project is an ERC-based token, it'll be more fitting if you move the topic to token sub-board. There should be a button to "move topic" at the bottom left of the page.

That doesn't exactly answered what I asked, ir even remotely close to covering the point. The question is: if anyone want to test your feature, they have to create account and/or login through firebase, where you possibility has access to see their data such as email and profile picture?

For a comparison so you get what's your competitors offered, craiyon didn't require you to create an account just because you're curious about their ai-image-generator.



And umm... where are we on the team details? I thought it'll be released "very soon" last week?

I don't think I understand correctly, were you saying that OP tried to cheat with multiple accounts and pooled the winnings into one account --not familiar with your platform, but I'll guess you allows user-to-user fund transfer-- and tried to withdraw them? If I understood you correctly, then OP is dumb, but can you provide a screenshot of multiple accounts transferring their winnings into the main account, to help backing up your claim?

You understand the message wrongly, OP tried to extort 1xbit --which, ironically, is the lesser of two evils on this case-- by asking for 1btc in exchange of OP deleting his post and give full access of his account to 1xbit, not offering.

The ulterior motive has also been nicely explained by OP on his second message, namely gathering customer's login details and funds confiscated,



Not sure how that'll scare 1xbit, given the best OP can do with the details he got is compiling a list of the victims and the total sum scammed, which would just further paint 1xbit one or two shades darker on their already vantablack reputation, where it's also quite established here that they couldn't care less about.

I see that your whitepaper is in Cyrillic, is there or will there be an English version available so I can read them and understand your project better? Kinda weird, at least to me, that you're ready to go global but your project details are lacking the supporting features to help achieving this goal. And do I understand correctly you're based in UEA?

If I have to be honest, prior to posting this thread and take a quick google search after it, I was divided between thinking if this is a serious offer of malicious software or is this an attempt to scam a scammer-wannabe, i.e.: offering a dud software. Sure, I've stumbled upon several people sharing their story of being hacked or warning about the possible hack through telegram, but this is the first time I finally "introduced" to the software and how it works; drain-ware, is what developers and cyber-security-analysts named them.


I think this software is not exclusively threatening newbies, inexperienced --or even experienced-- BM and those who dealt with contract-approval of web3 frequently are also at risk, in a sense that they might led into the trap in guise of escrow or NFT welcome bonus. Reading this article and from what can be inferred from the scammer's suggestion, one of the MO seems to be duplicating an existing platform, so even when people researching the said platform before they connect their wallet, they'll led to believe that the phishing site is legit as they shared the same name.