Mistakes shouldn’t be overlooked and there’s no one mistake only that newbie should be aware of because all of them should be considered. Focusing on limiting yourself to prevent a single mistake will just just give a terrible result in the future because you are allowing other mistake to come at you.

In general, Being cautious by not trusting everyone here in crypto space is the best thing to do. Use a service as if they will scam you so that you will not be comfortable leaving your asset unsecured with them. As a newbie, They are the one that needs extra caution on what they are dealing in crypto but sadly most of the newbie are careless and just learning from mistakes after losing their funds.

Almost every single currency or asset that exists in the world is used somewhere in a criminal or bad activity, and that doesn't really make much of a difference as those using it are the ones who are bad and not the currency or asset that is being used. People used to think Bitcoin is a currency used only in criminal activities some years ago, but did that stop Bitcoin from becoming famous or proving everyone wrong? No.

So no matter how hard a certain group of people or authorities try to convey it so that it looks bad and people stay away from it, it will become more and more popular and people will start using it more. So we don't really need to worry about that thing.

Hmmm. Note that you don't have to be great at the start, in fact, it's normal to be that way. Take it one step at a time.

You may also feel like you have to teach others every time but that's incorrect as you could always ask people something you're curious about and start an engaging conversation which is what the forum is for, however do be careful of creating redundant threads.

The question of if or if not an old trading strategy can work again depends on if the strategy is outdated or not, not whether it is old.

If the strategy is outdated due to a better, more accurate strategy existing or because the strategy does not work for modern times, then obviously it is better to avoid it and go with something better. But again, in order to find that out you have to understand the fundamental workings of said strategy. Some of them are completely timeless while others have gone completely extinct since the age of the internet.

But this topic has gotten me thinking...I would love to go through some ancient trading strategies, perhaps I can find resurrect a hidden gem?

Basically, yes. Everything that is called investments is considered as risky by any means, so those who do that especially investing in bitcoin as its high volatility are called risk taker.
But technically speaking it depends on the amount of someone invest, tolerance and your objectives and it its subjective knowing there are degree for risks.

Before you go all in stop and think about it for a second. Many times I didn't take that second for thinking and I recklessly throw some money (small or big amount). I agree with OP, we usually try to make some quick profit, but all-in is a desperate move and will end up badly in most cases.


And we really have a very competitive market and very high volatility, and it is not easy for everyone to find a balance and be profitable... in the short or long run! It's risky, but if we don't dare to try and take some risks we can't know the outcome. I guess nobody has a 100% win rate, we all make mistakes and bad moves, and we need to learn from them and it is how we grow and get better in whatever we are doing.

In order to determine the method, it is necessary to practice in order to find a suitable method.
Any artist will not find their method with just one try. Including in trading, technical analysis, and fundamentals become the basic art of trading that must be known.
If you have mastered it, you are ready to enter the next step.

And as for the time it takes, it depends on how one learns and understands it.
If OP takes 3 years to succeed, then other people may be more or less than three years.

No knowledge is obtained instantly, it takes a process because the process is important.

It doesn't matter whether you are male or female because of the fact that Bitcoin was created for all people. Let's not separate this kind of thing and there's really no useful context. Anyone can own Bitcoin, women, men, young and old all have the same position in holding Bitcoin. If we classify Bitcoin ownership only from gender then indirectly Bitcoin is won by male groups. But is that the point? But I really admit that the contribution of women in helping to improve blockchain technology is extraordinary. The list above shows us that women have equal rights in participating in a part of crypto adoption.

We have seen how Manny Pacquiao live his life now and for sure that's the best example for all those fighters
who will have that same privilege. They need to make sure that before over spending the money they've got
something that will allow them to still have a comfortable life away from boxing.

The last time they played, I think the odds for the money line were almost even, or TNT was a slight favorite, if I recall correctly. So, there's no reason to change that, as TNT won their last meeting, making them likely the favorite in game 1. The odds will probably change after the game. Sometimes, it's difficult to predict how bookmakers set the odds. For example, if TNT is the slight favorite in game 1 and they win, do you think they will have the same spread in game 2? No, because Ginebra will likely be the favorite in game 2.

Kings will be very difficult to beat unless Sacramento will take a dive on this game, but I doubt that they will as they want to win as well to get that momentum entering the playoff because this is the first time that they will be in after many years. The Bulls is inconsistent, but in any night, Zach Lavine and DeRozan could be the most formidable duo in the league, and if that is the case, then it's going to be a problem for the Mavs. Spurs, is at the tail end of the standing, and this is the only game that I can think of that Mavs have a good chance to win, but it won't be enough for them.

Ginebra has the advantage inside the paint with the return of Aguilar, giving them an added boost. On the other hand, TNT needs to focus on their accurate 3-point shooting, as it will be their main weapon in winning the series.

In summary, just don't introduce it to anyone that you know that are not capable of controlling their emotions because you'll never know on up to what point they can control themselves.

Because the time might even come that you'll be the one to be blamed by those people whom you've introduced gambling. That's not a new story and there have been cases like that they were blamed and made it looked bad because they've just introduced those addicted gamblers to gambling.

Avoid being the trigger of others that may fall into gambling addiction if you don't want to get involved and be blamed for.

In fact, I did not finish reading all the words, many here are skeptical about links that may include downloading things, so it is better to quote part of the text here.

The advice is good, but without practical training, it will not benefit the user, as the user will link the advice to its importance after it occurs, such as not leaving your money in a central platform, he will not understand its importance unless he actually feels that his money in that platform is in danger, and therefore setting examples will help a lot.

I would say, Just don't trust altcoins unless you are ready for the stress.
What did people take away from the events that happened? For those who did not lose a lot, there was a good lesson not to trust the storage of their assets on the exchanges; perhaps this was a sign from above. But those who have suffered huge losses probably need psychological help, and maybe many will not return to this sphere, and the rest will be very careful. When investing your money in anything other than Bitcoin, wherever it is stored, you need to be on your guard early, and it is not recommended for the faint of heart to take risks.