Martin Armstrong Discussion

[DanB1]

What a pathetic fool

Yep. A pathetic fool. But so far with a great call, which I am enyoing:)

Well Hello Marty ........How is Florida this time of year?

Haha, this is great. So anybody that dares to say anything else here and all the dwarfs come out and troll. 

[1715584088]

1715584088

[1715584088]

1715584088

[1715584088]

1715584088

[1715584088]

1715584088

[CaymanJack]

What a pathetic fool

Yep. A pathetic fool. But so far with a great call, which I am enyoing:)

Well Hello Marty ........How is Florida this time of year?

Haha, this is great. So anybody that dares to say anything else here and all the dwarfs come out and troll. 

So if I would have listened to MAs prior calls, I would have sold waiting for lower lows that never came only to see the market rebound making higher highs that he said we wouldn't see. Now he says the market will either move higher or lower during this turning and this is magic to you?

Good grief you are truly blinded.

[DanB1]

What a pathetic fool

Yep. A pathetic fool. But so far with a great call, which I am enyoing:)

Well Hello Marty ........How is Florida this time of year?

Haha, this is great. So anybody that dares to say anything else here and all the dwarfs come out and troll.  

So if I would have listened to MAs prior calls, I would have sold waiting for lower lows that never came only to see the market rebound making higher highs that he said we wouldn't see. Now he says the market will either move higher or lower during this turning and this is magic to you?

Good grief you are truly blinded.

So months before it happens MA makes the call that the 18th of January 2020 will be a turning point. The market goes down hard from that moment. All the dwarfs here were caught with their hair on fire, and I am blinded because I am saying it?
I repeat, MA has been wrong many times but this call was awesome.
I know that when you are losing a lot of money, you don't want to hear it but it is what it is.

[CarnagexD]

And the ECM 2020 turning point should be a low.

Not sure if he said that, but what does it even mean? 
That also can't even be wrong because one man's low is another man's high.

By the looks of his predictions one may get carried away and be astounded about it. But at the core of his statements you can clearly see that he's playing safe with his words. Same manner a fortune teller speaks, cladded only by ambiguity. I wouldn't trust this person. But his past seems interesting. i might look into him and research the best that I can find in order to come up with a conclusion whether he's credible or just another broad.

[dibley8899]

What a pathetic fool

Yep. A pathetic fool. But so far with a great call, which I am enyoing:)

Well Hello Marty ........How is Florida this time of year?

Haha, this is great. So anybody that dares to say anything else here and all the dwarfs come out and troll.  

So if I would have listened to MAs prior calls, I would have sold waiting for lower lows that never came only to see the market rebound making higher highs that he said we wouldn't see. Now he says the market will either move higher or lower during this turning and this is magic to you?

Good grief you are truly blinded.

So months before it happens MA makes the call that the 18th of January 2020 will be a turning point. The market goes down hard from that moment. All the dwarfs here were caught with their hair on fire, and I am blinded because I am saying it?
I repeat, MA has been wrong many times but this call was awesome.
I know that when you are losing a lot of money, you don't want to hear it but it is what it is.

Yup Ecm predicts everything.....UK leaves after 47 years the EU thats 8.6 years X 5.465,  you see if you turn your laptop upside down 5.465 looks a bit like pi.       absolutely bang on the button, well done marty!

[CaymanJack]

What a pathetic fool

Yep. A pathetic fool. But so far with a great call, which I am enyoing:)

Well Hello Marty ........How is Florida this time of year?

Haha, this is great. So anybody that dares to say anything else here and all the dwarfs come out and troll.  

So if I would have listened to MAs prior calls, I would have sold waiting for lower lows that never came only to see the market rebound making higher highs that he said we wouldn't see. Now he says the market will either move higher or lower during this turning and this is magic to you?

Good grief you are truly blinded.

So months before it happens MA makes the call that the 18th of January 2020 will be a turning point. The market goes down hard from that moment. All the dwarfs here were caught with their hair on fire, and I am blinded because I am saying it?
I repeat, MA has been wrong many times but this call was awesome.
I know that when you are losing a lot of money, you don't want to hear it but it is what it is.

So if I throw darts and randomly hit a bulls eye, am I awesome?

I can draw a plotted line too and say something may happen during that time. If it does will I be awesome?

As you said, he has been wrong many times and we gets its right, he is awesome?

[tmfp]

I repeat, MA has been wrong many times but this call was awesome. 

Stopped Clock.

[AnonymousCoder]

...

So if I throw darts and randomly hit a bulls eye, am I awesome?

I can draw a plotted line too and say something may happen during that time. If it does will I be awesome?

As you said, he has been wrong many times and we gets its right, he is awesome?

Let's call a spade a spade:

DanB1's type of reasoning is what an ordinary person would call "corrupt".


With the added twist of course that what CaymanJack says about the randomness of it is absolutely true, plus that the market movement we see is too small to be outside of the margin of noise. It is not even a small correction. We are less than 3% from the high. So now let's see whether we can decline another 30% from here. So far it's a joke.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

[s29]

An Armstrong proponent here said that we would make a high before turning down last week, because of last week's panic cycle. It was an inside session and did not exceed the high or low.

Armstrong's calls are ambiguous. If you consistently follow his calls, your account will trend- or in most cases, drop- towards zero. He makes a call and different people have different interpretations, as shown multiple times on this forum. So you can't even say he was right. No one ever proved that Armstrong was consistently correct, whether it be by calls beforehand, screenshot evidence of a trade account, or whatever. I find it ironic that Armstrong calls people out for things that he is the greatest hypocrite of. Being a 'real' trader, going against the baddies, his takes and escapades. He lives in his head.

How dare you to criticize the ultimate forecasting prophet Martin Armstrong?

First he said the stock market would go down in to the Economic Confidence Model low of 2020.
Then he said it could be the high (after missing a 30% rally), and that the stock market would correct 20% into Q1 of 2021.
Then the Dow elected a weekly bullish reversal the week before the ECM 2020 turning point, and that we first would test the 30k level on the Dow, which didn't happen.
Then he said it could be the ECM 2020 turning point wasn't really about the stock market, but about a government change in Russia, Syria, Climate Change, Libya, the Coronavirus outbreak, etc.
Then he said last week in Greg Hunter's interview that it's just a small correction, and new highs thereafter.
Now today he touts on his blog that his ECM 2020 date correctly picked the Dow's high and that it's a major high, despite the ECM 2020 turning point being a low on the graphical ECM chart.

I absolutely object all the critisism that majesty Marty's amazing calls are ambiguous!  

And besides, he said at the ECM turning point 2015 that the new wave into 2020 would be about interest rates going higher, which wasn't the case at all.

[CaymanJack]

An Armstrong proponent here said that we would make a high before turning down last week, because of last week's panic cycle. It was an inside session and did not exceed the high or low.

Armstrong's calls are ambiguous. If you consistently follow his calls, your account will trend- or in most cases, drop- towards zero. He makes a call and different people have different interpretations, as shown multiple times on this forum. So you can't even say he was right. No one ever proved that Armstrong was consistently correct, whether it be by calls beforehand, screenshot evidence of a trade account, or whatever. I find it ironic that Armstrong calls people out for things that he is the greatest hypocrite of. Being a 'real' trader, going against the baddies, his takes and escapades. He lives in his head.

How dare you to criticize the ultimate forecasting prophet Martin Armstrong?

First he said the stock market would go down in to the Economic Confidence Model low of 2020.
Then he said it could be the high (after missing a 30% rally), and that the stock market would correct 20% into Q1 of 2021.
Then the Dow elected a weekly bullish reversal the week before the ECM 2020 turning point, and that we first would test the 30k level on the Dow, which didn't happen.
Then he said it could be the ECM 2020 turning point wasn't really about the stock market, but about a government change in Russia, Syria, Climate Change, Libya, the Coronavirus outbreak, etc.
Then he said last week in Greg Hunter's interview that it's just a small correction, and new highs thereafter.
Now today he touts on his blog that his ECM 2020 date correctly picked the Dow's high and that it's a major high, despite the ECM 2020 turning point being a low on the graphical ECM chart.

I absolutely object all the critisism that majesty Marty's amazing calls are ambiguous!  

And besides, he said at the ECM turning point 2015 that the new wave into 2020 would be about interest rates going higher, which wasn't the case at all.

Punxsutawney Phil has better forecast accuracy and his forecasts are not ambiguous.

[dibley8899]

Whopping post on the ecm there. But fails to point out it missed the 2000 highs which was a further 300% move in the naz and the record valuation lol

[trc4949]

oooops. markets are hitting new all time highs, but marty said we are in for 20% correction now....  the ecm date was a great call, but it may have only been a one week correction.... ooops

[AnonymousCoder]

Armstrong tinkering with his Wikipedia article

Let's look at the history and then click on the numeric IP address and then look up Geolocate then there is no surprise because it is in St. Petersburg Florida where he lives

 

He is doing exactly what so many people are saying: He changes the facts in hindsight to fit his narrative. In other words, he is a liar.




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

[unwashed]

BTFD  

Please send $15 for my next BTFD forecast, lol.  All joking aside, Big miss in my book for Marty. I believe it should of been temp high not peak, isn't there a difference?


 

[AnonymousCoder]

BTFD

Please send $15 for my next BTFD forecast, lol. All joking aside, Big miss in my book for Marty. I believe it should of been temp high not peak, isn't there a difference?


 

You were right. That was the perfect fit for the Self-fulfilling Financial Forecast


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

[SOC1]

See, this is exactly the problem with Armstrong. How in the world could anyone have traded off this 'forecast'?


"The ECM turning point was worked like a charm"

"The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM, which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible"

2nd Feb - "We did close the week below the 28,375 level, which implies we do have a correction in progress"   THE FOLLOWING 4 DAYS THE DOW WENT UP 1,200 POINTS IN A STRAIGHT LINE



These are the facts, I'm not sorry if you find them offensive.

[nstrdms]

See, this is exactly the problem with Armstrong. How in the world could anyone have traded off this 'forecast'?


A) "The ECM turning point was worked like a charm"

B) "The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM, which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible"

C) 2nd Feb - "We did close the week below the 28,375 level, which implies we do have a correction in progress"  THE FOLLOWING 4 DAYS THE DOW WENT UP 1,200 POINTS IN A STRAIGHT LINE



These are the facts, I'm not sorry if you find them offensive.

A) Yes, Armstrong is correct here. The ECM turning point (i.e., con) was worked like a charm. Never fails in its fraud..
B) Yes, Armstrong is also correct here. It often warns of a reasonable correction. It is YOUR fault for not subjectively interpreting his writings in such a way as to profit from it.
C) Yes, Armstrong again is also correct here. If you looked in the rear view mirror as Armstrong teaches, you would have clearly confirmed that a correction was in progress. Now if you look again in hindsight, you will clearly see the uptrend. What you need to do now is wait until the following week for the next installment of Armstrong correctly predicting the past.

[SOC1]

Today's blog from MA states that a "rare superposition even occurred on Fri 31st Jan marking the low".......

BUT on the 2nd Feb on his private blog:  "we did close the week below the 28,375 level, which implies we do have a correction in progress"


Honestly, you couldn't make this stuff up.....

[Snillegutt]

Its so clear when its not MA faking somebody writing him, when there is no appraisal at all, like in "Swedens Insane hunt..."

Martin, if youre gonna be better at lying, you need to make it less obvious when its you writing to yourself and when its actually someone commenting. Either stop the absurd appraisal of your "abilities" or make sure "they all" bow down to the great Martin Armstrong:-)

[s29]

Its so clear when its not MA faking somebody writing him, when there is no appraisal at all, like in "Swedens Insane hunt..."

Martin, if youre gonna be better at lying, you need to make it less obvious when its you writing to yourself and when its actually someone commenting. Either stop the absurd appraisal of your "abilities" or make sure "they all" bow down to the great Martin Armstrong:-)

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/forthcoming-books/

COMMENT: Marty; the books you handed out at the WEC are spectacular. One first edition just sold for $2,000 on eBay. The second edition is going for $300 on eBay but there aren’t many of those either. I just wanted to say thank you for your generous gift to the attendees. The book is worth the price of the ticket, lol. I hope you get the time to do the next one.

DF

 

I'm sorry, but how fucking difficult is it for a "institutional advisor" to let a publisher print enough books? It's just paper and ink.