Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 03:55:06 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 [474] 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 ... 1412 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 6589902 times)
Maticul
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 04:07:09 PM
 #9461

how is the mhs for the RX 480 when overclocked and modded the bios?

That will be around 30MH/s.
marvykkio
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 04:39:32 PM
 #9462

Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:33:56:034   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:33:59:425   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:00:065   1ac0   ETH: checking pool connection...
18:34:00:065   1ac0   send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}

18:34:00:159   1ac0   got 243 bytes
18:34:00:159   1ac0   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0x2ac4c09721561e2cacd89f8992fd69d20be99744b9a1342b93ab4319e93987ba","0x3bdc9df6827f9db2a52b71fe21b847066a233755fd6b15bdb62a9c5e0aeb1d14","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}

18:34:00:175   1ac0   parse packet: 242
18:34:00:190   1ac0   ETH: job is the same
18:34:00:190   1ac0   new buf size: 0
18:34:02:815   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:06:190   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:07:816   1ac0   got 243 bytes
18:34:07:816   1ac0   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xbf702a346332ae819a51c82c837a8fd43bb02e35ce878bd15e6663d7a6e0bd9f","0x3bdc9df6827f9db2a52b71fe21b847066a233755fd6b15bdb62a9c5e0aeb1d14","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}

18:34:07:831   1ac0   parse packet: 242
18:34:07:847   1ac0   ETH: job changed
18:34:07:847   1ac0   new buf size: 0
18:34:07:862   1ac0   ETH: 04/19/17-18:34:07 - New job from etc-eu2.nanopool.org:19999
18:34:07:862   1ac0   target: 0x00000000dbe6fece (diff: 5000MH), epoch #119
18:34:07:862   1ac0   ETH - Total Speed: 141.234 Mh/s, Total Shares: 6, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:03
18:34:07:878   1ac0   ETH: GPU0 28.225 Mh/s, GPU1 28.263 Mh/s, GPU2 28.251 Mh/s, GPU3 28.244 Mh/s, GPU4 28.251 Mh/s, GPU5 0.000 Mh/s
18:34:09:581   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:09:675   1ac0   send: {"id":6,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x86d30d0", "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001e42ded"]}

18:34:10:097   1ac0   ETH: checking pool connection...
18:34:10:097   1ac0   send: {"worker": "", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": [], "id": 3, "method": "eth_getWork"}

18:34:10:191   1ac0   got 243 bytes
18:34:10:191   1ac0   buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"result":["0xbf702a346332ae819a51c82c837a8fd43bb02e35ce878bd15e6663d7a6e0bd9f","0x3bdc9df6827f9db2a52b71fe21b847066a233755fd6b15bdb62a9c5e0aeb1d14","0x00000000dbe6fecebdedd5beb573440e5a884d1b2fbf06fcce912adcb8d8422e"]}

18:34:10:206   1ac0   parse packet: 242
18:34:10:222   1ac0   ETH: job is the same
18:34:10:222   1ac0   new buf size: 0
18:34:12:956   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:13:034   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:13:066   1504   GPU0 t=48C fan=82%, GPU1 t=0C fan=0%, GPU2 t=45C fan=81%, GPU3 t=50C fan=81%, GPU4 t=52C fan=81%, GPU5 t=52C fan=84%
18:34:13:066   1504   em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 0,
18:34:13:066   1504   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 78
18:34:13:066   1504   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 219
18:34:13:066   1504   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 234
18:34:13:081   1504   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 78
18:34:13:081   1504   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 47
18:34:13:081   1504   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 188
18:34:13:081   1504   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 156
18:34:13:081   1504   watchdog - thread 7, hb time 16
18:34:13:097   1504   watchdog - thread 8, hb time 16
18:34:13:097   1504   watchdog - thread 9, hb time 156
18:34:13:097   1504   watchdog - thread 10, hb time 74578
18:34:13:097   1504   WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
18:34:13:097   1504   watchdog - thread 11, hb time 74422
18:34:13:113   1504   WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
18:34:13:159   1504   Got incorrect temperature 511, ignore
18:34:14:314   1504   Restarting OK, exit...

LJLT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 05:40:27 PM
 #9463

Is this normal? the fluctuantions?


http://imgur.com/a/4eaf0
jackbox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1024



View Profile
April 19, 2017, 05:44:18 PM
 #9464

Is this normal? the fluctuantions?




Similar to my results. It is because effective hash rate is based on how many shares per hour you send. Shares are luck based. Sometimes you find more and your effective hash rate will be higher than actual hash rate, and sometimes you will find less and your effective hash rate will show slower than your actual hash rate. Perfectly normal. All you really need to care about is that average hash rate on pool approximates your reported hash rate over the long term.

Buy a Trezor and Protect your BTC, BCH, BTG, DASH, LTC, DGB, ZEC, ETH and ETC from hackers.
If I was helpful please buy me a coffee BTC: 1DWK7vBaxcTC5Wd2nQwLGEoy8xdFVzGKLK  BTG: AWvN1iBqCUqG2tEh3XoVvRbdcGrAzfBBpW
If I was helpful please buy me a burger DGB: DLASV6CUQpGtGSyaVz5FYuu5YxZ17MoGQz
LJLT
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 06:13:02 PM
 #9465

@jackbox my problem is that i feel im loosing a complete GPU with those numbers, Claymore reports me 170 MHs but the pool 147 MHs,, as i say i feel im loosing one of my 6 GPUs
Kaller
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 501


View Profile
April 19, 2017, 06:37:18 PM
 #9466

@jackbox my problem is that i feel im loosing a complete GPU with those numbers, Claymore reports me 170 MHs but the pool 147 MHs,, as i say i feel im loosing one of my 6 GPUs

For my pool, I also just get about 151/162 = 93% of the hash rate reported by the pool.
AriesIV10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006


Mine for a Bit


View Profile WWW
April 19, 2017, 07:33:43 PM
 #9467

I was waiting for this video to come out.  Great presentation on the new RX5xx Series GPUs.

PCB Breakdown: Sapphire RX 580 Nitro +
https://youtu.be/eaE_6eFaYjs

I am sticking with the RX 470 4GB.

BTC Address (Donations):  3LepZAju88ZRuNVD4cS6Xv5hKyKrjvirkB     Website:  www.MintMining.com
Email: Mining@MintMining.com      Power Supplies: https://bit.ly/2TtvdOR
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 1723


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 12:09:41 AM
 #9468

Looks like the EXP DEV fee pool was down or had issues and all my rigs stopped mining

Quote
17:52:11:400   9c4   DevFee: failed to mine for a long time, something is wrong, stop mining and reconnect.
17:52:11:400   9c4   Reconnect in 20 sec...
17:52:14:707   c8c   recv: 51
17:52:14:707   c8c   srv pck: 50
17:52:14:754   c8c   srv bs: 0
17:52:14:754   c8c   sent: 179
17:52:15:581   a68   checkread timeout
17:52:15:581   a68   DevFee: ETH: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...


It seemed to connect but not mine on the dev pool
Quote
17:52:35:595   a68   DevFee: ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'exp-eu.dwarfpool.com' <158.69.199.198> port 8018
17:52:35:642   a68   send: {"worker": "eth1.0", "jsonrpc": "2.0", "params": ["0xe8b6818cf0d24Bd0E7ded854b3D368662a150dAb", "x"], "id": 2, "method": "eth_submitLogin"}

17:52:35:642   a68   DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Connected (exp-eu.dwarfpool.com:8018)

Had no choice but to use -nofee 1





Claymore,

I am still getting this issue. Can't mine with any 280X anymore because the dev EXP pool seems to have issues.

TechPark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 03:49:08 AM
 #9469

@jackbox my problem is that i feel im loosing a complete GPU with those numbers, Claymore reports me 170 MHs but the pool 147 MHs,, as i say i feel im loosing one of my 6 GPUs

For my pool, I also just get about 151/162 = 93% of the hash rate reported by the pool.

Claymore fee 2%, Pool fee 1% makes a total of 3% lost right away. 170-3%=164

1. What is average ping response to your pool? ping poolipaddress -t
2. What is your internet connection bandwidth?
3. How many times per day your miner restarts?

Let us assume:
1. <100ms=you are fine. 100>x<300=1% lost.   300>x - can loose a lot
2. 20Mbs<x=you are fine. 20>x>10=1% lost.    10Mbs>x - can loose a lot
3. 3 times=1% lost

Could be 5%+ lost easily just on your side.
Also Claymore miner may not calculate hash rate accurately,  pool could have issues on their side...
noviceminer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 03:56:27 AM
 #9470

@jackbox my problem is that i feel im loosing a complete GPU with those numbers, Claymore reports me 170 MHs but the pool 147 MHs,, as i say i feel im loosing one of my 6 GPUs

For my pool, I also just get about 151/162 = 93% of the hash rate reported by the pool.

Claymore fee 2%, Pool fee 1% makes a total of 3% lost right away. 170-3%=164

1. What is average ping response to your pool? ping poolipaddress -t
2. What is your internet connection bandwidth?
3. How many times per day your miner restarts?

Let us assume:
1. <100ms=you are fine. 100>x<300=1% lost.   300>x - can loose a lot
2. 20Mbs<x=you are fine. 20>x>10=1% lost.    10Mbs>x - can loose a lot
3. 3 times=1% lost

Could be 5%+ lost easily just on your side.
Also Claymore miner may not calculate hash rate accurately,  pool could have issues on their side...


I just wanted to quote you since there is no option to give a THUMBS UP for a sensible technical post helping fellow miner understand the reason behind his issue. Kudos. Keep up the good work Smiley
xanx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 04:13:10 AM
 #9471

I have 5x rx480's and cant seem to get past 27ish on 4 of them and one is locked at 24. The 4 that are at 27 have 2175  memory clock w/ core clock at 1100 and the 5 is 1100/1750 ... so the question is- how can I modify them? Every time i try they revert back and dont want to budge.
philip7134
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 05:02:00 AM
 #9472

Hi. I am having problems with some of my cards crashing when I try to overclock their memory. They sometimes go for a few minutes but then usually a card crashes and and the miner restarts as in the picture. I am using several different types of Polaris cards. 4 rx 480 and 2 rx 470. I am using crimson 16.9.1. Does anyone know how to fix this?
Pic of issue. http://imgur.com/a/5Vjy4
cryptominer420
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 255


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 05:08:03 AM
 #9473

Lower the memory overclock on GPU 4 you can find it by pressing 4 ing the miner to disable the GPU from mining then use msi to lower the mem by 50 MHz

   ╖   ╓╖╖                         ╖╖╖ ,
  ▒   ╢▒,@▒▒▒║ ╓╣╝║║*╢  ╢▒╣ ],`]░╢▒▒╖ ▒ ╥╢▒▒▒╢  @╝╢▒
  Ñ▒▒]▒▒` ]`╢║▒╣▒╢▒▒  ╢▒╝▒▒▒  ╢▒╜║▒▒▒╢▒╜  ╢╢║N
 ║╢   ▒▒╜ ║▒▒╢▒▒@@╢▒║  ╢▒╜ ▒ ╙▒▒,║░▒╣ ▒║ ╢▒▒╢▒▒▒»@╢@@╢╜



.















▬▬  A Miner Built Mining Platform  ▬▬[/url]
Powered by Our Mining Community













noviceminer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 72
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 05:35:51 AM
 #9474

Hi. I am having problems with some of my cards crashing when I try to overclock their memory. They sometimes go for a few minutes but then usually a card crashes and and the miner restarts as in the picture. I am using several different types of Polaris cards. 4 rx 480 and 2 rx 470. I am using crimson 16.9.1. Does anyone know how to fix this?
Pic of issue. http://imgur.com/a/5Vjy4


Connect display using port on GPU to overclock then switch to VGA mode if possible. When you get your display back, start the miner. Use HDMI or DP port only to overclock and connect display to VGA. I faced same issue Smiley
winiu
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 06:03:17 AM
 #9475

I have the same issue as Coyn on 2x RX480, since upgrading from 9.0 to 9.1: Siacoin mining speed doubles, but Ethereum mining speed is very unstable and often drops. The cards do not appear to be throttling, temperatur is normal and there is sufficient power.

Adjusting dcri does not help, even with low numbers Ethereum mining speed is unstable. Currently I use -asm 0 to fix it, but of course that causes much lower Siacoin mining speed.
I have exacly the same problem on RX480 and RX470.
9.0 or -asm was much more stable.
nevermind41
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 09:36:30 AM
 #9476

Greetings,  Claymore.
There is a suggestion - can you add to the dual-miner function - delayed launch of the second coin's mining? Preferably with a range of 0 - 60 sec.
Sometimes there are bugs (the dumping of video cards, a reset on power) at the start, there is an idea that this can happen because the second coin begins to dig before the dag is formed and the ether mining will start ...
 Roll Eyes

Miner cannot mine second coin if DAG is not yet generated. Probably the reason is the power consumption in dual mode, check PSU and cables.
@Claymore
 Can you add to your miner releases recommended drivers for rx 4xx cards? 
MrJaekin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 275
Merit: 258


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 01:03:14 PM
 #9477

I have the same issue as Coyn on 2x RX480, since upgrading from 9.0 to 9.1: Siacoin mining speed doubles, but Ethereum mining speed is very unstable and often drops. The cards do not appear to be throttling, temperatur is normal and there is sufficient power.

Adjusting dcri does not help, even with low numbers Ethereum mining speed is unstable. Currently I use -asm 0 to fix it, but of course that causes much lower Siacoin mining speed.
I have exacly the same problem on RX480 and RX470.
9.0 or -asm was much more stable.

Same problem here.. I've got a rig with 6 RX480s in it and no matter what dcri or asm setting I use, I can't get a decent ETH speed while dual mining.  Stock BIOS.  Mining ETH alone, I get 30.5 to 31MHS.  If I dual mine with PASC, the highest I can get ETH is 25MHS.  Can someone that is successfully getting full speed from ETH and PASL post their bat/config file?
TechPark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 01:20:05 PM
 #9478

I have 5x rx480's and cant seem to get past 27ish on 4 of them and one is locked at 24. The 4 that are at 27 have 2175  memory clock w/ core clock at 1100 and the 5 is 1100/1750 ... so the question is- how can I modify them? Every time i try they revert back and dont want to budge.

Could you please explain step by step what you are doing so we can try to spot the error...
TechPark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 01:21:28 PM
 #9479

Hi. I am having problems with some of my cards crashing when I try to overclock their memory. They sometimes go for a few minutes but then usually a card crashes and and the miner restarts as in the picture. I am using several different types of Polaris cards. 4 rx 480 and 2 rx 470. I am using crimson 16.9.1. Does anyone know how to fix this?
Pic of issue. http://imgur.com/a/5Vjy4

Could you please explain step by step what you are doing so we can try to spot the error...
xanx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 20, 2017, 02:26:26 PM
 #9480

I have 5x rx480's and cant seem to get past 27ish on 4 of them and one is locked at 24. The 4 that are at 27 have 2175  memory clock w/ core clock at 1100 and the 5 is 1100/1750 ... so the question is- how can I modify them? Every time i try they revert back and dont want to budge.

Could you please explain step by step what you are doing so we can try to spot the error...

Solo mining ethereum using claymores v9.0 with: a b250f strix mobo and 1200w psu, 4gb RAM, 5 rx480's (I have 6 but apparently b250 chipset dosent allow 6 even though there are 6 pcie slots). In MSI, GPU's 0 through 3 are all synchronized at 1100 core/2176 memory and any I time I try to change theses values, even with small increments the GPU's stop and I have to restart PC. Same thing goes for GPU4 except, GPU4 is clocked at 1266/1750, any modifications results in the same thing and I have to restart only to come back to their reverted values. When I first had 2 GPU's I could get 29/30 no problem while over clocking in MSI but now GPU's 0-3 are stuck at 27ish and GPU 4 at 22-24ish mhz. My config is as follows:

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 0
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:14444 -ewal <address> -epsw x -r 34

The restart timer is just an arbitrary value I play around with. In BIOS all I changed was PCIEXx16_2 configuration from auto to x2 (before this only 3 GPUS would catch in device manager), System agent configuration to Above 4D Decoding [Enabled] and changing the primary Display to CPU graphics. I have the 17.4.2 drivers installed for AMD and the latest/most up to date BIOS.

Pages: « 1 ... 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 [474] 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 ... 1412 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!