Bitcoin Forum
February 26, 2021, 04:27:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 [307] 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 ... 1121 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Obyte: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments  (Read 1224212 times)
mkn2030
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 01:54:08 PM
 #6121

You can not always be a wallet    ,

What should I do
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 02:17:55 PM
 #6122

Your veiled attempts now at being nice to Byteball by "scratching the surface, asking questions analyzing internals" is ridiculous, reminds me of Eric Cartman "just asking questions, bro". If youre such a good programmer, on such a high shiny horse, analyzing Byteball internals, developing IoT non-scam coin, you would see the answer to your questions faster than it took you to color the pictures.

You overestimate my power.
bspus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2158
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 21, 2017, 03:14:33 PM
 #6123


I don't know who is right (not enough technical knowledge about byteball to judge) but the thread is getting dominated by constant altercations between two forum members

If CFB is a troll, then Sato is feeding him and this does not help the thread. If he is not a troll, then this hostile behaviour is uncalled for.

In either case it's best to just step away from this toxic discussion. No one is convincing the other and I believe I speak for most when I say we are getting really tired of this.

SatoNatomato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 03:23:09 PM
 #6124

Your veiled attempts now at being nice to Byteball by "scratching the surface, asking questions analyzing internals" is ridiculous, reminds me of Eric Cartman "just asking questions, bro". If youre such a good programmer, on such a high shiny horse, analyzing Byteball internals, developing IoT non-scam coin, you would see the answer to your questions faster than it took you to color the pictures.

You overestimate my power.
Well that explains a lot.

If you dont want to justs be FUDing and trolling, and is actually "scratching the surface, analyzing", explain why the scenario in your picture would imply a limit in how many transactions/units can be handled. Cant just insinuate your pictures mean there is a limit while not explaining why. Ill wait...
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 03:39:32 PM
 #6125

Well that explains a lot.

If you dont want to justs be FUDing and trolling, and is actually "scratching the surface, analyzing", explain why the scenario in your picture would imply a limit in how many transactions/units can be handled. Cant just insinuate your pictures mean there is a limit while not explaining why. Ill wait...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_burden_of_proof:
Quote
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

The advantage is all the features listed on byteball.org and being a DAG it has no architectural limit on scaling, only implementation and hardware is limiting.

So, what are you waiting for?
SatoNatomato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 04:21:49 PM
 #6126

You overestimate my power.
So, what are you waiting for?
Someone with more knowledge and skills.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 04:29:04 PM
 #6127

You overestimate my power.
So, what are you waiting for?
Someone with more knowledge and skills.

I mean that it's you who is supposed to prove that DAGs can scale without a limit.
lordoliver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1019

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 05:18:54 PM
 #6128

its really getting boring guys.
I invite you both to a beer, if you discuss this in person...
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 05:32:35 PM
 #6129

its really getting boring guys.
I invite you both to a beer, if you discuss this in person...

Sorry, having superhuman patience (professional deformation of all low-level coders) I don't feel when it's the right moment to stop. I guess it's now.
davidoski
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 297
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 21, 2017, 06:09:15 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2017, 06:22:36 PM by davidoski
 #6130

They are both the same person. Didn't you notice that they are always here at the same time talking to each other? If they were different people than you would see some posts from one without an immediate answer from the other. You can see the same pattern nearly every day:


Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
kola-schaar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 260


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 07:54:56 PM
 #6131

For me difficult to imagine, but not impossible ..(I am probably too naive for this world)
That would be a bit perfidious. Or perhaps an obsession / egotism?
Who else should invest the time and why. To provoke tony? Or a mysterious way of advertising?

The world is full of mystery..
escapefrom3dom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 268



View Profile WWW
March 21, 2017, 07:58:37 PM
Last edit: March 21, 2017, 11:18:06 PM by escapefrom3dom
 #6132

For me difficult to imagine, but not impossible ..(I am probably too naive for this world)
That would be a bit perfidious. Or perhaps an obsession / egotism?
Who else should invest the time and why. To provoke tony? Or a mysterious way of advertising?

The world is full of mystery..


sybil in flesh and flood. ☺

ttookk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994
Merit: 513


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 08:51:30 PM
 #6133

As has been done in the Ubiq thread, it is possible to effectively ban users from posting in your thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1763606.1580

Just sayin'.

Seriously though, you guy(s?) should have chosen another means of discussion weeks ago. This is getting tedious.

SatoNatomato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 10:30:51 PM
 #6134

As has been done in the Ubiq thread, it is possible to effectively ban users from posting in your thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1763606.1580

Just sayin'.

Seriously though, you guy(s?) should have chosen another means of discussion weeks ago. This is getting tedious.
I am the brown monkey in the picture.

Scrotum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 11


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 11:29:40 PM
 #6135

its really getting boring guys.
I invite you both to a beer, if you discuss this in person...

Sorry, having superhuman patience (professional deformation of all low-level coders) I don't feel when it's the right moment to stop. I guess it's now.

Debate is healthy, competition is healthy, why stop? Only problem is cfb was moderating iota thread, which looks like dble standard.

Arguments is way better than mindless speculation of price and moon talk.
tonych
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 920
Merit: 877


View Profile WWW
March 21, 2017, 11:35:52 PM
 #6136

Unless you put all 12 witnesses on a single machine you have to deal with the following situation:

Blue balls are picked by 4 witnesses as the main chain, green balls are picked by other 4 witnesses and there is another version picked by the remaining witnesses (it's not shown to emphasize that noone can have a complete view of the DAG). Under high load every witness will pick its own main chain because none of them will see the whole DAG. The chance of that is high because
Quote
In normal use, people mostly link their new units to slightly less recent units, meaning that the DAG grows only in one direction.
is not true in high load, the DAG becomes very wide.

Adding to the bolded part above, every node will pick its own main chain (witnesses are no special).  You are demonstrating the simple fact that under high throughput and wide DAG, different nodes have different views of the world, hence build different MCs, and that the trailing part of the MC is constantly rebuilt as new units arrive.  However, the algorithm that they use to build the MC guarantees that the portion of the MC that is older than certain point (stability point) is never rebuilt, it is stable.  It is normal that there is no consensus (yet) about the unstable trailing part.


Sorry, didn't bother to read the actual article. Try https://www.infoq.com/articles/cap-twelve-years-later-how-the-rules-have-changed:
Quote
In its classic interpretation, the CAP theorem ignores latency, although in practice, latency and partitions are deeply related. Operationally, the essence of CAP takes place during a timeout, a period when the program must make a fundamental decision-the partition decision:

cancel the operation and thus decrease availability, or

proceed with the operation and thus risk inconsistency.

Quoting from the whitepaper:
Quote
15.   Partitioning risk
The network of Byteball nodes can never be partitioned into two parts that would both continue operating without noticing.  Even in the event of a global network disruption such as a sub-Atlantic rat cutting the cable that connects Europe and America, at least one of the sides of the split will notice that it has lost the majority of witnesses, meaning that it can’t advance the stability point, and nobody can spend outputs stuck in the unstable part of the MC.  Even if someone tries to send a double-spend, it will remain unstable (and therefore unrecognized) until the connection is restored.  The other part of the split where the majority of witnesses happens to be, will continue as normal.

In other words, in the minority partition, confirmations will just stop before the connection is restored.




Simplicity is beauty
lordoliver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1019

expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()


View Profile
March 21, 2017, 11:56:29 PM
 #6137

its really getting boring guys.
I invite you both to a beer, if you discuss this in person...

Sorry, having superhuman patience (professional deformation of all low-level coders) I don't feel when it's the right moment to stop. I guess it's now.

Debate is healthy, competition is healthy, why stop? Only problem is cfb was moderating iota thread, which looks like dble standard.

Arguments is way better than mindless speculation of price and moon talk.

discussion is healthy if its about technology, but not if the topic is only argumentless good and bad discussion which can also be called trolling ...
Scrotum
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 11


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 12:19:56 AM
 #6138

its really getting boring guys.
I invite you both to a beer, if you discuss this in person...

Sorry, having superhuman patience (professional deformation of all low-level coders) I don't feel when it's the right moment to stop. I guess it's now.

Debate is healthy, competition is healthy, why stop? Only problem is cfb was moderating iota thread, which looks like dble standard.

Arguments is way better than mindless speculation of price and moon talk.

discussion is healthy if its about technology, but not if the topic is only argumentless good and bad discussion which can also be called trolling ...

Agreed, discussion needs to be about the tech, and not personal. If both sides are trying to find weaknesses in the others project (even if just to win in their ego war) it serves a good purpose. These two guys are mostly using tech discussion in their battle, and it doesn't matter to iota and BB investors what their motivations for wanting to destroy the other guys position, just that weaknesses are discovered, and tech gets better and more robust.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 08:47:30 AM
 #6139

It is normal that there is no consensus (yet) about the unstable trailing part.

If we denote the interval of time between a transaction issuance and the transaction finalization (by witnesses) as confirmation time, does an average confirmation time increase monotonically if the global TPS rate increases monotonically?

PS: "Yes" would mean that SatoNatomato was wrong that DAG has no limits on scaling even if we have superpowerful hardware (but the latency still persists).
BTCspace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 22, 2017, 09:25:56 AM
 #6140

They are both the same person. Didn't you notice that they are always here at the same time talking to each other? If they were different people than you would see some posts from one without an immediate answer from the other. You can see the same pattern nearly every day:



i agree with you.

i have the same feeling.

running farm worldwide
Pages: « 1 ... 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 [307] 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 ... 1121 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!