jonnybravo0311
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
 |
January 16, 2015, 07:58:20 PM |
|
Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks  See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:.........  I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while  LOL... I'm going to guess 9:37am server time!  So... massive increase in memory usage and increased GBT latency... yeah, sounds like pypy is the answer... /sarcasm |
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:10:24 PM |
|
Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:......... I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while LOL... I'm going to guess 9:37am server time! So... massive increase in memory usage and increased GBT latency... yeah, sounds like pypy is the answer... /sarcasm Lol, that's insane... I'd like to see P2Pool re-writen in C, would be much more efficient and multithreaded If anyone knows a C/Python/bitcoin master LMK |
|
|
|
|
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:13:16 PM |
|
Lol, that's insane... I'd like to see P2Pool re-writen in C, would be much more efficient and multithreaded If anyone knows a C/Python/bitcoin master LMK I'd like to see p2pool's flaws addressed as part of that rewrite . |
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
Chupacabras
Member
Offline
Activity: 166
Merit: 10
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:16:00 PM |
|
Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:......... I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while I dont see where??? LMAO |
|
|
|
|
|
PatMan
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:21:56 PM |
|
Lol, that's insane... I'd like to see P2Pool re-writen in C, would be much more efficient and multithreaded If anyone knows a C/Python/bitcoin master LMK I'd like to see p2pool's flaws addressed as part of that rewrite . Wouldn't we all.......about 2 years ago |
|
|
|
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:51:12 PM |
|
Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:......... I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while Told you... the p2pool WOW! signal.... |
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
|
January 16, 2015, 08:54:51 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
|
|
|
|
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
|
|
January 16, 2015, 09:27:28 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
Nice! Ok.. we need to post more in this thread.. hashrate is up to 3PH now |
|
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
January 16, 2015, 11:03:18 PM |
|
... I'm now mining straight to Trezor. I check with Trezor before I switched and they say generated tx is fine as long as you setup another account for generated tx. I think they're coming up with a fix to fix it but so far so good. Already got a few generated tx in Spoke with Slush today, this has been fixed in the new firmware upgrade (the one that includes multi-sig). You can now mine to your main TREZOR account if you desire. When spending P2Pool payouts with less then 120 confirmations will not be included. |
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 17, 2015, 12:52:12 AM |
|
... I'm now mining straight to Trezor. I check with Trezor before I switched and they say generated tx is fine as long as you setup another account for generated tx. I think they're coming up with a fix to fix it but so far so good. Already got a few generated tx in Spoke with Slush today, this has been fixed in the new firmware upgrade (the one that includes multi-sig). You can now mine to your main TREZOR account if you desire. When spending P2Pool payouts with less then 120 confirmations will not be included. 0.9 bitcoin is set to 100 (101 counting the block as '1') |
|
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
January 17, 2015, 02:08:26 AM |
|
What is Your Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency? Has You p2pool node external IP to see stats? |
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
January 17, 2015, 11:16:15 AM |
|
may i humbly ask for a updated step by step noob proof guide on pypy ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
idonothave
|
|
January 17, 2015, 12:29:05 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
what version of bitcoin core are You running? |
|
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
|
January 17, 2015, 02:28:48 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
what version of bitcoin core are You running? The latest: 0.9.4 My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy  |
|
|
|
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
|
|
January 17, 2015, 02:33:52 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
what version of bitcoin core are You running? The latest: 0.9.4 My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy Are you merge mining? My DOA sky rockets when merge mining. Plus, doesn't seem to be worth the effort as it's basically soloing, might as well gamble more and solo for BTC. |
|
|
|
|
IYFTech
|
|
January 17, 2015, 02:43:08 PM |
|
In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.
It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........
what version of bitcoin core are You running? The latest: 0.9.4 My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy Are you merge mining? My DOA sky rockets when merge mining. Plus, doesn't seem to be worth the effort as it's basically soloing, might as well gamble more and solo for BTC. Yeah, merge mining 7 coins in total. Your BTC DOA rate shouldn't change when you're merge mining - sounds like it's not setup right. |
|
|
|
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
|
|
January 17, 2015, 02:45:28 PM |
|
Yeah, merge mining 7 coins in total. Your BTC DOA rate shouldn't change when you're merge mining - sounds like it's not setup right.
It's the damn S4. They really hate restarts.. and with merge mining, more restarts...... But thanks to CK's quick fix, works much better. |
|
|
|
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Are we there yet?
|
|
January 17, 2015, 03:44:56 PM |
|
Super low share diff. Good time to get some shares NOW!
|
|
|
|
|
