Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2016, 08:46:31 AM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 [583] 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 ... 744 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2029822 times)
Chupacabras
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2015, 08:16:00 PM
 #11641

What's the command for running p2pool with pypy?  Tongue

screen -d -m -S p2pool pypy ~/p2pool/run_p2pool.py blah blah blah blah

check this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg10135870#msg10135870
then only replace python with pypy in your script
my is: screen -d -m -S p2pool-bitcoin pypy -O -E run_p2pool.py ...

Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks  Smiley

See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:.........



I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while  Wink
I dont see where???
LMAO

LXC: DFfLxDJfbqXyVNsTeWuARGPfQ2YKRE6y1a
BTC: 1N3misAgyCTW7b5BQojoLx7p9ok39e52UV
Life is like a box of chocolate. Famous Runner Forrest Gump
1480927591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480927591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480927591
Reply with quote  #2

1480927591
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
PatMan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


Watch out for the "Neg-Rep-Dogie-Police".....


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2015, 08:21:56 PM
 #11642


Lol, that's insane... I'd like to see P2Pool re-writen in C, would be much more efficient and multithreaded Smiley

If anyone knows a C/Python/bitcoin master LMK Smiley
I'd like to see p2pool's flaws addressed as part of that rewrite Smiley.

Wouldn't we all.......about 2 years ago  Tongue

"When one person is deluded it is called insanity - when many people are deluded it is called religion" - Robert M. Pirsig.  I don't want your coins, I want change.
Amazon UK BTC payment service - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301229.0 - with FREE delivery!
http://www.ae911truth.org/ - http://rethink911.org/ - http://rememberbuilding7.org/
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


Are we there yet?


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 08:51:12 PM
 #11643


Perfect, that's what I needed - thanks  Smiley

See if you can spot where I changed over to pypy:.........



I'm running 16GB Ram, so it's OK. I'll see how it fares like this for a while  Wink

Told you... the p2pool WOW! signal....

IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 08:54:51 PM
 #11644

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


Are we there yet?


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 09:27:28 PM
 #11645

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

Nice!

Ok.. we need to post more in this thread.. hashrate is up to 3PH now Smiley

corrow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97


View Profile
January 16, 2015, 10:46:32 PM
 #11646

Well when recoding p2pool, It would be Nice to solve the "payload too long" issue as well.

Does somebody know how to deal with this?  Huh  

Please check this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg10164796#msg10164796

 Roll Eyes
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2015, 11:03:18 PM
 #11647

...
I'm now mining straight to Trezor. I check with Trezor before I switched and they say generated tx is fine as long as you setup another account for generated tx. I think they're coming up with a fix to fix it but so far so good. Already got a few generated tx in Smiley

Spoke with Slush today, this has been fixed in the new firmware upgrade (the one that includes multi-sig). You can now mine to your main TREZOR account if you desire. When spending P2Pool payouts with less then 120 confirmations will not be included.

kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1918


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 12:52:12 AM
 #11648

...
I'm now mining straight to Trezor. I check with Trezor before I switched and they say generated tx is fine as long as you setup another account for generated tx. I think they're coming up with a fix to fix it but so far so good. Already got a few generated tx in Smiley

Spoke with Slush today, this has been fixed in the new firmware upgrade (the one that includes multi-sig). You can now mine to your main TREZOR account if you desire. When spending P2Pool payouts with less then 120 confirmations will not be included.
0.9 bitcoin is set to 100 (101 counting the block as '1')

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
idonothave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:08:26 AM
 #11649

Well when recoding p2pool, It would be Nice to solve the "payload too long" issue as well.

Does somebody know how to deal with this?  Huh  

Please check this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg10164796#msg10164796

 Roll Eyes

What is Your Bitcoind GetBlockTemplate Latency? Has You p2pool node external IP to see stats?
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 11:16:15 AM
 #11650

may i humbly ask for a updated step by step noob proof guide on pypy ?
idonothave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 12:24:01 PM
 #11651

may i humbly ask for a updated step by step noob proof guide on pypy ?

this should work for user using 64 bit linux: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg10135870#msg10135870
idonothave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 12:29:05 PM
 #11652

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

what version of bitcoin core are You running?
IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:28:48 PM
 #11653

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

what version of bitcoin core are You running?

The latest: 0.9.4

My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy  Grin

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


Are we there yet?


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:33:52 PM
 #11654

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

what version of bitcoin core are You running?

The latest: 0.9.4

My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy  Grin

Are you merge mining? My DOA sky rockets when merge mining. Plus, doesn't seem to be worth the effort as it's basically soloing, might as well gamble more and solo for BTC.

IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:43:08 PM
 #11655

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

what version of bitcoin core are You running?

The latest: 0.9.4

My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy  Grin

Are you merge mining? My DOA sky rockets when merge mining. Plus, doesn't seem to be worth the effort as it's basically soloing, might as well gamble more and solo for BTC.

Yeah, merge mining 7 coins in total. Your BTC DOA rate shouldn't change when you're merge mining - sounds like it's not setup right.

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


Are we there yet?


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 02:45:28 PM
 #11656

Yeah, merge mining 7 coins in total. Your BTC DOA rate shouldn't change when you're merge mining - sounds like it's not setup right.

It's the damn S4. They really hate restarts.. and with merge mining, more restarts......

But thanks to CK's quick fix, works much better.

sEpuLchEr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252


Are we there yet?


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 03:44:56 PM
 #11657

Super low share diff. Good time to get some shares NOW!

idonothave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 03:46:02 PM
 #11658

In all fairness, the huge memory use is not an issue for me and is a price worth paying for increased performance - which so far is the case. My DOA rate is lower so far, my latency is also lowering gradually & my recorded hash rate is slightly higher. So far so good.

It also shows how truly terrible & slow the standard python is for p2pool........

what version of bitcoin core are You running?

The latest: 0.9.4

My DOA rate has halved using pypy since I installed it - it was ~3-5%, but is now ~0.5-2.5% so I'm a happy hippy  Grin

Are you merge mining? My DOA sky rockets when merge mining. Plus, doesn't seem to be worth the effort as it's basically soloing, might as well gamble more and solo for BTC.

Yeah, merge mining 7 coins in total. Your BTC DOA rate shouldn't change when you're merge mining - sounds like it's not setup right.

7 coins? it interests me, can You tell me which coins?
IYFTech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


WANTED: Active dev to fix & re-write p2pool in C


View Profile
January 17, 2015, 03:53:28 PM
 #11659

Sure: Bitcoin, Namecoin, I0coin, Devcoin, Huntercoin, Groupcoin & Fusioncoin. I was also mining ixcoin until it got all mined out  Sad

-- Smiley  Thank you for smoking  Smiley --  If you paid VAT to dogie for items you should read this thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018906.0
jonnybravo0311
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
January 17, 2015, 03:59:12 PM
 #11660

Sure: Bitcoin, Namecoin, I0coin, Devcoin, Huntercoin, Groupcoin & Fusioncoin. I was also mining ixcoin until it got all mined out  Sad
You're still mining all of those coins?  Wow... I stopped everything except for NMC.  Sure, I've got a boatload of some of those coins, but nowhere to do anything with them.  Like FSC... I've got a few million of the things, but the coin's completely dead in the water and no exchanges trade it.

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
Pages: « 1 ... 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 [583] 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 ... 744 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!