Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 05:03:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 [423] 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381860 times)
DrHaribo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034


Needs more jiggawatts


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2013, 08:51:56 PM
 #8441

I've been checking luck on other pools - most of the ones I look at are running with low luck and is not incomparable to ours. One exception stands out strongly - you'll never guess - BTCGuild - they are flying with luck atm. Bitminter's luck is even worse than ours... It'll change (I hope) - that's what luck does.

BitMinter had less bad luck than Slush the week that just ended. Looks like BTCguild had very bad luck 6 weeks in a row - not what I call flying with luck. But yes, it seems to be finally turning around for them today. The pool that stands out is actually Itzod with some crazy good luck recently.

More fun statistics: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/

▶▶▶ bitminter.com 2011-2020 ▶▶▶ pool.xbtodigital.io 2023-
1714496637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714496637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714496637
Reply with quote  #2

1714496637
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714496637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714496637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714496637
Reply with quote  #2

1714496637
Report to moderator
1714496637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714496637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714496637
Reply with quote  #2

1714496637
Report to moderator
1714496637
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714496637

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714496637
Reply with quote  #2

1714496637
Report to moderator
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 12:02:59 AM
 #8442

Well hire is another one...

18100   2013-05-19 08:25:54   0:06:07   770695   236893   25.06852200    invalid
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 501



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 12:25:04 AM
 #8443

Well hire is another one...

18100   2013-05-19 08:25:54   0:06:07   770695   236893   25.06852200    invalid

I can't help but wonder if this is a symptom of the increase in hashing speed. I wonder if once the difficulty compensates for the increased speed if these occurances will decrease as well.
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 12:45:30 AM
Last edit: May 20, 2013, 12:56:38 AM by Lucko
 #8444

Well hire is another one...

18100   2013-05-19 08:25:54   0:06:07   770695   236893   25.06852200    invalid

I can't help but wonder if this is a symptom of the increase in hashing speed. I wonder if once the difficulty compensates for the increased speed if these occurances will decrease as well.
I can't figure out how. The block generation is still same. If the block generation speed would increase then yes but it doesn't since difficulty increases. And the next difficulty change estimation is only 8% so the block generation is just a bit faster no a lot...

EDIT: We had much bigger changes in the past and this didn't happened.
vs3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 622
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
May 20, 2013, 01:45:31 AM
 #8445

I've been checking luck on other pools - most of the ones I look at are running with low luck and is not incomparable to ours. One exception stands out strongly - you'll never guess - BTCGuild - they are flying with luck atm. Bitminter's luck is even worse than ours... It'll change (I hope) - that's what luck does.

BitMinter had less bad luck than Slush the week that just ended. Looks like BTCguild had very bad luck 6 weeks in a row - not what I call flying with luck. But yes, it seems to be finally turning around for them today. The pool that stands out is actually Itzod with some crazy good luck recently.

More fun statistics: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/


Not quite - for the last few days we've consistently discovered more blocks than Bitminter. Looking earlier today - for 18th they had 10 and we had 14 (if I remember correctly - 12 are still visible on the stats page), then again - for 19th they had 16, we had 18.
And it's not just the last two days - on multiple occasions over the last few weeks when I checked - we always had same or more blocks per day.

Considering that they have 20-20% more hashpower than us - that says their luck is considerably worse than ours. So - no complaints from me about the luck. Smiley

organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
May 20, 2013, 01:50:36 AM
 #8446

I've been checking luck on other pools - most of the ones I look at are running with low luck and is not incomparable to ours. One exception stands out strongly - you'll never guess - BTCGuild - they are flying with luck atm. Bitminter's luck is even worse than ours... It'll change (I hope) - that's what luck does.

BitMinter had less bad luck than Slush the week that just ended. Looks like BTCguild had very bad luck 6 weeks in a row - not what I call flying with luck. But yes, it seems to be finally turning around for them today. The pool that stands out is actually Itzod with some crazy good luck recently.

More fun statistics: http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/


Not quite - for the last few days we've consistently discovered more blocks than Bitminter. Looking earlier today - for 18th they had 10 and we had 14 (if I remember correctly - 12 are still visible on the stats page), then again - for 19th they had 16, we had 18.
And it's not just the last two days - on multiple occasions over the last few weeks when I checked - we always had same or more blocks per day.

Considering that they have 20-20% more hashpower than us - that says their luck is considerably worse than ours. So - no complaints from me about the luck. Smiley

That's pretty much what DrH said, except in more detail.

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
Vasilis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 08:52:51 AM
 #8447

http://i.piccy.info/i7/f781d4600ea36f1440d2aeefaf4108f0/4-59-135/12553408/1234_1234_240.jpghttp://i.piccy.info/a3/2013-05-20-08-52/i7-4596970/240x150-r/i.gif
http://piccy.info/view3/4596970/2e86cc6caff56ff888e000399c8d0e53/orig/
Smerks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:03:52 PM
 #8448

Im a bit new to all this and have one question, with all this uncertainty in the last few days with invalids and improperly calculated blocks that fix themselves in time is it normal for Slush to not respond or is this out of the ordinary?
GuiltySpark343
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:33:16 PM
 #8449

... is it normal for Slush to not respond or is this out of the ordinary?

Everyone can say what they want about the weird blocks, bad luck, late/missing payments, etc. But the one thing that worries me is the noticeable absence of Slush. Not only personally (seriously I do hope he's ok), but also for the pool's well-being.

I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Ƀ:17wbDetEw2aESM5oWXbm5ih9NSdDruyWNT
minerapia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:49:41 PM
 #8450

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC
                   ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
Uliss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 252



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 03:52:28 PM
 #8451

Server can keep up with the work?


Works fine




Found 1 block




Found 1 + 1 block 

nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 04:05:49 PM
 #8452

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...

donations not accepted
autonomous42
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 04:15:57 PM
 #8453

Plus it's coming up on a month since Slush has posted anything. He logs in occasionally to this forum so he must know what's going on. Also his Trezor project recently released a new video and redesigned its website. Remember these issues only came up after the move to Amazon's EC2. The uptime is good but the latency is what's losing shares and mining invalid blocks. Perhaps he's also in legal talks with OVH about their inside job. I'd say that's pretty important. Maybe someone in the Czech republic can give him a call if they're that worried.
Smerks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 04:36:25 PM
 #8454

I had a payout from Slush over an hour ago and still not one confirmation on it

http://i41.tinypic.com/35krg2b.jpg
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 04:46:40 PM
 #8455

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...
Good morning  Wink
Lucko
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 04:49:48 PM
 #8456

Plus it's coming up on a month since Slush has posted anything. He logs in occasionally to this forum so he must know what's going on. Also his Trezor project recently released a new video and redesigned its website. Remember these issues only came up after the move to Amazon's EC2. The uptime is good but the latency is what's losing shares and mining invalid blocks. Perhaps he's also in legal talks with OVH about their inside job. I'd say that's pretty important. Maybe someone in the Czech republic can give him a call if they're that worried.
Only one thing is sure from that. Someone open a browser on his computer. This doesn't mean that it was Slush... Posting would mean that.
Lanidarc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 05:02:45 PM
 #8457

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...

Make that 10 - two in a row today now - 18120 and 18121
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 05:28:06 PM
 #8458

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...
Good morning  Wink

Lucko, just because I think there may be a latency issue with bitcoind - doesn't mean I agree anything you say - and doesn't mean I still don't think you are a bit of an idiot. I'll stay mining here come what may and will not be slagging off the pool every five minutes.


donations not accepted
Smerks
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 20, 2013, 05:36:22 PM
 #8459

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...
Good morning  Wink

Lucko, just because I think there may be a latency issue with bitcoind - doesn't mean I agree anything you say - and doesn't mean I still don't think you are a bit of an idiot. I'll stay mining here come what may and will not be slagging off the pool every five minutes.



But doesnt the fact that Slush hasnt even poked his head up to say hes aware make you somewhat concerned?
nottm28
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 20, 2013, 05:43:08 PM
 #8460

Rate of invalid blocks is getting ridiculous,
18120    2013-05-20 15:38:18    0:04:08    Processing...    237069    25.16931001    99 confirmations left
Is not even found in blockchain.info

Hmm, Bitminter have had 2 invalids in last 12 days - we have had 9... I think there is something wrong now...
Good morning  Wink

Lucko, just because I think there may be a latency issue with bitcoind - doesn't mean I agree anything you say - and doesn't mean I still don't think you are a bit of an idiot. I'll stay mining here come what may and will not be slagging off the pool every five minutes.



But doesnt the fact that Slush hasnt even poked his head up to say hes aware make you somewhat concerned?

Like I said before - the bitching levels after his hack went to new highs - I don't blame him for not coming on here to deal with the constant moaning from people who constantly fail to read even the very post before them sometimes. The pattern usually goes like this:

Hey whats up with block xxx - I mined for 6 hours and it's saying nil points...
And then
Ah's it seems to have corrected itself...
And then
Yeah but there's still something wrong...
And then
Where is Slush
And then
BFL get slagged or something like that, then - what's up with block xxx

It's a pain because true issues are being buried in the barrage of posters like Lucko - you can't see the wood for the trees.


donations not accepted
Pages: « 1 ... 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 [423] 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!