qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
October 26, 2013, 02:38:27 PM |
|
I still got no reward for the block 20598 with 38472 shares! I'm qqqq85 on the pool.
You can raise it with Live Support (see link on left side of the Slush web site), 'they' probably will not look here. I had this one confirmed at 'normal' reward rate. Did you mine steadily through the whole block? I ask there but no one is replyed... I'm not shure it was steadily or not because since that round i got problems with the pool, but 38472 shares just didn't counted ? If those shares were at the start of the round and you submitted nothing for the end of the block, it's definitely possible. Ok, thanks for the explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
|
October 26, 2013, 03:36:26 PM Last edit: October 26, 2013, 06:00:01 PM by EasyQuest |
|
181%, 119%, 100% I love Slush's pool for days like this. Edit === 192%, 120%, 100% Even Higher!! :O
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
|
October 26, 2013, 04:29:30 PM Last edit: October 26, 2013, 05:02:53 PM by gourmet |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum.
|
|
|
|
Sc@rF@c3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2013, 06:10:26 PM |
|
Things have sorted themselves out, now getting Accepted,Accepted,Accepted,
|
|
|
|
visdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1081
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 26, 2013, 07:01:27 PM |
|
181%, 119%, 100% I love Slush's pool for days like this. Edit === 192%, 120%, 100% Even Higher!! :O It's the highest 1-day % I've seen here.
|
|
|
|
Sc@rF@c3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 26, 2013, 10:07:15 PM |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum. Don't understand? I did not realize how close the forum time was to my time zone 09:33 Forum time is 10:33 or 22:33 my time GMT Not predicting time, I was quoting mt clock 22:30, which was when I started writing the post
|
|
|
|
Trongersoll
|
|
October 26, 2013, 11:30:49 PM |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum. Don't understand? I did not realize how close the forum time was to my time zone 09:33 Forum time is 10:33 or 22:33 my time GMT Not predicting time, I was quoting mt clock 22:30, which was when I started writing the post Forum time is what ever you choose it to be.
|
|
|
|
scooter
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:52:29 AM |
|
The luck in recent days pleases me.
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
October 27, 2013, 02:12:52 AM Last edit: October 27, 2013, 02:29:48 AM by bspurloc |
|
Blade Eruptor
Is there anything special I need to do with the mining_proxy programming??? I can't seem to get my blade above 73% efficiency. mostly it sits at 63% efficiency It doesnt seem to want to go over 6100mh/s grrr... plenty of power and fans. the fins are not hot.
|
|
|
|
mdopro1
|
|
October 27, 2013, 04:36:51 AM |
|
Blade Eruptor
Is there anything special I need to do with the mining_proxy programming??? I can't seem to get my blade above 73% efficiency. mostly it sits at 63% efficiency It doesnt seem to want to go over 6100mh/s grrr... plenty of power and fans. the fins are not hot.
I originally struggled with them not getting efficiency in 90+% and it did turn out to be lack of power. Are you using generation 1 or the new ones? The luck in recent days pleases me.
You had to say it? Going on to 6 hours.
|
New Bitcoin fund doubling platform has launched! Receive Automated Payment Every 2 Hours Appealing alternative with Sophisticated algorithms. https://Btc-Funds.com
|
|
|
BuhTuglia
|
|
October 27, 2013, 05:12:40 AM |
|
Damn. I thought we were going for 200% luck until this damn iceberg showed up. Shoot.
|
Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine! Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
|
|
|
nite423
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2013, 05:18:28 AM |
|
Blade Eruptor
Is there anything special I need to do with the mining_proxy programming??? I can't seem to get my blade above 73% efficiency. mostly it sits at 63% efficiency It doesnt seem to want to go over 6100mh/s grrr... plenty of power and fans. the fins are not hot.
I just got my first blade fired up a few minutes ago. I'm running this blade right off the power supply of the same PC running my USB block erupters. It pretty much shot right up to 10.9Gh/s and its rolling at 100% efficiency...give or take a percent or two. My first guess for you would probably be power related. The proxy was probably the easiest part of getting my blade running.
|
|
|
|
gourmet
|
|
October 27, 2013, 09:35:56 AM |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum. Don't understand? I did not realize how close the forum time was to my time zone 09:33 Forum time is 10:33 or 22:33 my time GMT Not predicting time, I was quoting mt clock 22:30, which was when I started writing the post I'm afraid the one who doesn't understand is not me. ;-) I can understand quite well. And I have to repeat: The time you've stated as GMT was not GMT. The forum time in the message header says 21:33, and that is UTC (for our purpose, equal to GMT). Your clock, the time you've written in your post text, 22:30 GMT, is not GMT. In fact, it's a timezone one hour ahead of GMT, GMT+1, e.g. British Summer Time, BST . In short: You can't say "My time GMT" when your timezone is not GMT. It's nonsense to do so. On the contrary, the forum time is UTC (GMT), at least unless you change its display in your personal settings.
|
|
|
|
Mudbankkeith
|
|
October 27, 2013, 10:30:07 AM |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum. Don't understand? I did not realize how close the forum time was to my time zone 09:33 Forum time is 10:33 or 22:33 my time GMT Not predicting time, I was quoting mt clock 22:30, which was when I started writing the post I'm afraid the one who doesn't understand is not me. ;-) I can understand quite well. And I have to repeat: The time you've stated as GMT was not GMT. The forum time in the message header says 21:33, and that is UTC (for our purpose, equal to GMT). Your clock, the time you've written in your post text, 22:30 GMT, is not GMT. In fact, it's a timezone one hour ahead of GMT, GMT+1, e.g. British Summer Time, BST . In short: You can't say "My time GMT" when your timezone is not GMT. It's nonsense to do so. On the contrary, the forum time is UTC (GMT), at least unless you change its display in your personal settings. Today It would be correct
|
BTc donations welcome:- 13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
|
|
|
gourmet
|
|
October 27, 2013, 11:00:38 AM |
|
GMT 22:30 ^^^^^^ Has anyone else been getting many Rejected then the odd Accepted share I noticed this when the hashing rate dropped. Have 3 x BFL 60GH/s miners, so difficulty should not be a problem
I have switched pools for the time being, and I get no more rejected shares
Can you predict the future? At least an hour ahead? I believe more the message header (see the first (header) line) than your time indication in the text. Unfortunately I can`t emphasize the text in the header of the quoted message for comparison. The time in your text may be some DST, but UTC (GMT) is one hour less. This forum uses UTC, as it's a world-wide forum. Don't understand? I did not realize how close the forum time was to my time zone 09:33 Forum time is 10:33 or 22:33 my time GMT Not predicting time, I was quoting mt clock 22:30, which was when I started writing the post I'm afraid the one who doesn't understand is not me. ;-) I can understand quite well. And I have to repeat: The time you've stated as GMT was not GMT. The forum time in the message header says 21:33, and that is UTC (for our purpose, equal to GMT). Your clock, the time you've written in your post text, 22:30 GMT, is not GMT. In fact, it's a timezone one hour ahead of GMT, GMT+1, e.g. British Summer Time, BST . In short: You can't say "My time GMT" when your timezone is not GMT. It's nonsense to do so. On the contrary, the forum time is UTC (GMT), at least unless you change its display in your personal settings. Today It would be correct Yes. If his timezone was really BST, since this morning it would be GMT again. :-)
|
|
|
|
Dreadmand
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:21:35 PM |
|
Almost 7 hrs to find a coin! This is going to kill the great luck we have been having the last week. 20629 2013-10-27 05:37:03 6:45:51 1477630526 1561539 0.02717843 266303 25.18773243 50 confirmations left
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:30:25 PM |
|
Almost 7 hrs to find a coin! This is going to kill the great luck we have been having the last week. 20629 2013-10-27 05:37:03 6:45:51 1477630526 1561539 0.02717843 266303 25.18773243 50 confirmations left Block*
|
|
|
|
Mudbankkeith
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:57:42 PM |
|
Almost 7 hrs to find a coin! This is going to kill the great luck we have been having the last week. 20629 2013-10-27 05:37:03 6:45:51 1477630526 1561539 0.02717843 266303 25.18773243 50 confirmations left Block* You speakth of the Bitcoin Gods & They takth retribution!!!
|
BTc donations welcome:- 13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
|
|
|
KNK
|
|
October 27, 2013, 01:51:39 PM |
|
I have a suggestion to the pool developers about VarDiff implementation - allow the user to set the Diff and change it only if it's more than 1 or 2 away:
I saw some variance in my reward and collected some stats - the reason is that my Diff is jumping between 1 and 3 (for ~2Gh load-balanced between pools), so if it was possible to force it to 2 there would be less variance, but also less load on the server compared to when it set to 1, just because of less shares found for a while.
|
|
|
|
tineron
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2013, 02:20:48 PM |
|
Two-factor authentication seems very dangerous when I can't turn it off. Why can it never be turned off?
|
|
|
|
|