bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 02:36:34 PM |
|
Blade Eruptor
Is there anything special I need to do with the mining_proxy programming??? I can't seem to get my blade above 73% efficiency. mostly it sits at 63% efficiency It doesnt seem to want to go over 6100mh/s grrr... plenty of power and fans. the fins are not hot.
I just got my first blade fired up a few minutes ago. I'm running this blade right off the power supply of the same PC running my USB block erupters. It pretty much shot right up to 10.9Gh/s and its rolling at 100% efficiency...give or take a percent or two. My first guess for you would probably be power related. The proxy was probably the easiest part of getting my blade running. What watts is the power supply? I am questioning the proxy because the first one I setup it was struggling to keep up so I set it up on 2 other pc's. I see it seems to change servers it uses for the proxy for whatever reason. I would assume because it is loses connection. but they are all in the same network. as I just typed that it changed proxy servers...
|
|
|
|
mdopro1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 03:42:51 PM |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
|
New Bitcoin fund doubling platform has launched! Receive Automated Payment Every 2 Hours Appealing alternative with Sophisticated algorithms. https://Btc-Funds.com
|
|
|
nite423
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 05:46:44 PM |
|
What watts is the power supply? I am questioning the proxy because the first one I setup it was struggling to keep up so I set it up on 2 other pc's. I see it seems to change servers it uses for the proxy for whatever reason. I would assume because it is loses connection. but they are all in the same network. as I just typed that it changed proxy servers...
I use PC Power and Cooling power supplies in all the PC's that I build. I've never had one go bad during the lifetime of any PC. This particular PC is running a 500 watt PC Power and Cooling unit. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817703035When I setup my proxy, I started it on my mining PC and entered the IP address of that PC twice in the blade config. I also entered the same Slush worker login and password twice. The proxy program looks like its having a near stroke keeping up with everything flashing past in the command window but it doesn't seem to have any problem keeping up.
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 06:10:06 PM |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
It's a blade how would running bfgminer help anything?
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 06:18:52 PM Last edit: October 27, 2013, 06:29:29 PM by bspurloc |
|
What watts is the power supply? I am questioning the proxy because the first one I setup it was struggling to keep up so I set it up on 2 other pc's. I see it seems to change servers it uses for the proxy for whatever reason. I would assume because it is loses connection. but they are all in the same network. as I just typed that it changed proxy servers...
I use PC Power and Cooling power supplies in all the PC's that I build. I've never had one go bad during the lifetime of any PC. This particular PC is running a 500 watt PC Power and Cooling unit. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817703035When I setup my proxy, I started it on my mining PC and entered the IP address of that PC twice in the blade config. I also entered the same Slush worker login and password twice. The proxy program looks like its having a near stroke keeping up with everything flashing past in the command window but it doesn't seem to have any problem keeping up. There has to be something wrong with these proxy's. I put both ip's pointing to the same one and it gets like 76units and cant get anymore work from the proxy. I point both at the other and the same crap. does this efficiency score tell me how effificent the chips are running or how efficient its communication between slush and its chips are? this is constantly flipping between proxy's cuz one is not answering anymore. would be nice if I could manually change the DIFF so I could limit the amount of traffic but slush is forced to make it auto to stop dumb dumbs from flooding him. would be nice if he at least let u set your min default. I am hitting refresh every 3rd refresh it is not receiving anymore work i hit switch servers it gets more work for 3 more refreshes then I have to switch again. OH never ind that is because its still working on what it got. Total MHS: 06379 Received: 0000000463 Accepted: 0000000326 Per Minute: 087.71 Efficiency: 070.41% Up Time: 0d,00h,03m,43s
|
|
|
|
nite423
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 06:50:30 PM |
|
There has to be something wrong with these proxy's. I put both ip's pointing to the same one and it gets like 76units and cant get anymore work from the proxy. I point both at the other and the same crap. does this efficiency score tell me how effificent the chips are running or how efficient its communication between slush and its chips are? this is constantly flipping between proxy's cuz one is not answering anymore. would be nice if I could manually change the DIFF so I could limit the amount of traffic but slush is forced to make it auto to stop dumb dumbs from flooding him. would be nice if he at least let u set your min default.
I am hitting refresh every 3rd refresh it is not receiving anymore work i hit switch servers it gets more work for 3 more refreshes then I have to switch again. OH never ind that is because its still working on what it got.
Total MHS: 06379 Received: 0000000463 Accepted: 0000000326 Per Minute: 087.71 Efficiency: 070.41% Up Time: 0d,00h,03m,43s
From my blade: Total MHS: 10906 Received: 0000130741 Accepted: 0000129847 Per Minute: 149.19 Efficiency: 099.31% Up Time: 0d,14h,30m,18s Have you let it run for awhile and then checked it or are you just starting it and then constantly restarting it when it looks like its not working? I think some shares take longer to process then others so it may look like its just sitting there but its really still working. Mine didn't just jump straight up to full speed right off the bat, it took about half an hour to get settled. Some of that was probably Slush's Varidiff setup, so if you starting it as a new worker (as I did) it started with a diff of 1 and it could just be waiting on more work. *edit* The efficiency score is your accepted shares divided by the total shares received. Some shares maybe bad for other reasons (stale, ect) but my guess is that your blade is still working on some of them.
|
|
|
|
mdopro1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 07:17:21 PM |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
It's a blade how would running bfgminer help anything? Latest BFGMiner can control blades and work like a proxy, so in that case you can get rid of the slush proxy altogether.
|
New Bitcoin fund doubling platform has launched! Receive Automated Payment Every 2 Hours Appealing alternative with Sophisticated algorithms. https://Btc-Funds.com
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 07:30:51 PM |
|
There has to be something wrong with these proxy's. I put both ip's pointing to the same one and it gets like 76units and cant get anymore work from the proxy. I point both at the other and the same crap. does this efficiency score tell me how effificent the chips are running or how efficient its communication between slush and its chips are? this is constantly flipping between proxy's cuz one is not answering anymore. would be nice if I could manually change the DIFF so I could limit the amount of traffic but slush is forced to make it auto to stop dumb dumbs from flooding him. would be nice if he at least let u set your min default.
I am hitting refresh every 3rd refresh it is not receiving anymore work i hit switch servers it gets more work for 3 more refreshes then I have to switch again. OH never ind that is because its still working on what it got.
Total MHS: 06379 Received: 0000000463 Accepted: 0000000326 Per Minute: 087.71 Efficiency: 070.41% Up Time: 0d,00h,03m,43s
From my blade: Total MHS: 10906 Received: 0000130741 Accepted: 0000129847 Per Minute: 149.19 Efficiency: 099.31% Up Time: 0d,14h,30m,18s Have you let it run for awhile and then checked it or are you just starting it and then constantly restarting it when it looks like its not working? I think some shares take longer to process then others so it may look like its just sitting there but its really still working. Mine didn't just jump straight up to full speed right off the bat, it took about half an hour to get settled. Some of that was probably Slush's Varidiff setup, so if you starting it as a new worker (as I did) it started with a diff of 1 and it could just be waiting on more work. *edit* The efficiency score is your accepted shares divided by the total shares received. Some shares maybe bad for other reasons (stale, ect) but my guess is that your blade is still working on some of them. I have let run for hours and it settles to 5xxx mh/s which is total garbage.
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 07:32:01 PM |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
It's a blade how would running bfgminer help anything? Latest BFGMiner can control blades and work like a proxy, so in that case you can get rid of the slush proxy altogether. I thought I have the latest bfgminer. any clue how to set that up?
|
|
|
|
Mudbankkeith
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 08:22:32 PM |
|
Take a look at MultiMiner Its a front end for BFGminer CGminer etc It also handles proxy for BFG
|
BTc donations welcome:- 13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
|
|
|
EzCheese
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 09:48:39 PM |
|
Ugh, slushy you need a freaking "withdraw now" button...
|
|
|
|
mdopro1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 10:56:59 PM |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
It's a blade how would running bfgminer help anything? Latest BFGMiner can control blades and work like a proxy, so in that case you can get rid of the slush proxy altogether. I thought I have the latest bfgminer. any clue how to set that up? Here's an example; Create a new instance BFGMiner and use something like following; C:\asics\bfgminer.exe -o http://btcguild.bitmonsters.com:3333 -u user_blade5 -p xxxxx -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u user.blade5 -p xxxxxx -G --http-port 8015 In your blade config use the following; Ports: 8015,8332 Server addresses: 192.168.1.21,192.168.1.113 8015 matters, you need it matched with BFGMiner config. 8332 doesn't matter because it will be pointed to a fake non-existent BFGMiner instance. Change first server address to your actual new instance of BFGMiner. Point second IP address to something fake, non-existent. Restart blade while new copy of BFGMiner is running. Change the obvious settings like pool address, username and passwords. The "-G" will exclude any GPUs and "--http-port 8015" is where BFGMiner will look for a blade. Try this setting and if your blades hardware is ok I don't think you will have any problems. I've been running the above setup for quite some time. Here's my uptime for today. Total MHS: 10470 Received: 0000164204 Accepted: 0000159413 Per Minute: 143.06 Efficiency: 097.08% Up Time: 0d,18h,34m,15s Ugh, slushy you need a freaking "withdraw now" button...
Change your threshold to 0.01 and you'll get withdraw now effect.
|
New Bitcoin fund doubling platform has launched! Receive Automated Payment Every 2 Hours Appealing alternative with Sophisticated algorithms. https://Btc-Funds.com
|
|
|
RayJay
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 27, 2013, 10:57:12 PM |
|
Why cant the luck stay around 100% for a while. Why from 192% straight down to 40% ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Almost like the Texas weather, from one extreme to the other in a day.
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:00:31 AM Last edit: October 28, 2013, 12:30:39 AM by bspurloc |
|
So there is no overclocking in gen2, that rules OC out.
Take note, are blades switching servers every hour or so?
In blade config, input one proxy server address to the proxy you want it to go and for second proxy give it a non-existent IP address on your network. I have had gen2 switching constantly and would lose hash rate because of that. I am now using a real proxy and 1 fake ip address like I explained above and my blades have been running for over a month no problem.
EDIT: Better yet, forget the proxy, run BFGMiner and it will be so much more reliable.
It's a blade how would running bfgminer help anything? Latest BFGMiner can control blades and work like a proxy, so in that case you can get rid of the slush proxy altogether. I thought I have the latest bfgminer. any clue how to set that up? Here's an example; Create a new instance BFGMiner and use something like following; C:\asics\bfgminer.exe -o http://btcguild.bitmonsters.com:3333 -u user_blade5 -p xxxxx -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u user.blade5 -p xxxxxx -G --http-port 8015 In your blade config use the following; Ports: 8015,8332 Server addresses: 192.168.1.21,192.168.1.113 8015 matters, you need it matched with BFGMiner config. 8332 doesn't matter because it will be pointed to a fake non-existent BFGMiner instance. Change first server address to your actual new instance of BFGMiner. Point second IP address to something fake, non-existent. Restart blade while new copy of BFGMiner is running. Change the obvious settings like pool address, username and passwords. The "-G" will exclude any GPUs and "--http-port 8015" is where BFGMiner will look for a blade. Try this setting and if your blades hardware is ok I don't think you will have any problems. I've been running the above setup for quite some time. Here's my uptime for today. Total MHS: 10470 Received: 0000164204 Accepted: 0000159413 Per Minute: 143.06 Efficiency: 097.08% Up Time: 0d,18h,34m,15s Ugh, slushy you need a freaking "withdraw now" button...
Change your threshold to 0.01 and you'll get withdraw now effect. bfgminer.exe -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u slushbits.worker1 -p 1 -G --http-port 8015 --http-port: unrecognized option do you mean --socks-proxy? (ignore error was cuz of socks porxy use)
|
|
|
|
Dreadmand
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:08:00 AM |
|
Why cant the luck stay around 100% for a while. Why from 192% straight down to 40% ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Almost like the Texas weather, from one extreme to the other in a day. I suspect something is wrong still with slush's pool from the problems we had on Friday. Only 5 blocks found today.. My backup pool which has a less combined hashing power than Slush found 17 blocks for the day so far!!! What is going on? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
mdopro1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:12:56 AM |
|
bfgminer.exe -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u slushbits.worker1 -p 1 -G --http-port 8015 --http-port: unrecognized option do you mean --socks-proxy? You likely don't have the latest version or you have the 64-bit version which I think has not implemented http-port yet. Can you tell me what version of BFG you are running?
|
New Bitcoin fund doubling platform has launched! Receive Automated Payment Every 2 Hours Appealing alternative with Sophisticated algorithms. https://Btc-Funds.com
|
|
|
eleuthria
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:13:06 AM |
|
Why cant the luck stay around 100% for a while. Why from 192% straight down to 40% ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Almost like the Texas weather, from one extreme to the other in a day. I suspect something is wrong still with slush's pool from the problems we had on Friday. Only 5 blocks found today.. My backup pool which has a less combined hashing power than Slush found 17 blocks for the day so far!!! What is going on? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Your stats must be wrong. What pool smaller than slush (which is already fairly small) has found seventeen blocks in the last 24 hours?
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:26:54 AM |
|
bfgminer.exe -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u slushbits.worker1 -p 1 -G --http-port 8015 --http-port: unrecognized option do you mean --socks-proxy? You likely don't have the latest version or you have the 64-bit version which I think has not implemented http-port yet. Can you tell me what version of BFG you are running? using newest 64bit one. I'll get the 32bit one that connection issue was because I tried the socksproxy thing which made it try to use a socks proxy... haha
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:42:46 AM |
|
bfgminer.exe -o http://stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 -u slushbits.worker1 -p 1 -G --http-port 8015 --http-port: unrecognized option do you mean --socks-proxy? You likely don't have the latest version or you have the 64-bit version which I think has not implemented http-port yet. Can you tell me what version of BFG you are running? using newest 64bit one. I'll get the 32bit one that connection issue was because I tried the socksproxy thing which made it try to use a socks proxy... haha Ok I have BFGminer working as the proxy but it isnt making anything better.... almost time to get bat and smash this thing. Total MHS: 00569 Received: 0000000040 Accepted: 0000000021 Per Minute: 007.68 Efficiency: 052.50% Up Time: 0d,00h,02m,44s It just stops asking for more work or something it WANTS to change servers so badly. gets to 40 and DEMANDS to switch servers... it will not request more. this is stupid
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 28, 2013, 12:54:18 AM |
|
Ok I had to set up a 2nd bfgminer cuz this thing will not work with a blank or invalid as it demands to switch to another server and will not use the same one. if I put the same server for the 2nd it will not get anything from it.
with 2 valid ones in there it will keep mining however its will even slower than with sluches proxy program its now at 39% 3000 mh/s
this is pathetic. it cant be this hard I am not someone who knows nothing about this stuff. I am either going to snap this thing over my leg or return it... haha...or both
|
|
|
|
|