chancefx
Member
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 10
In Decentralization We Trust
|
|
October 23, 2017, 05:35:17 PM |
|
works fine for me, the growth about 5,6% more than ewbf.. I've tested on two identical rigs on suprnova with two different accounts 48 hours.. the growth in earned coins..
thx dstm, gj
|
|
|
|
DevonMiner
|
|
October 23, 2017, 06:22:27 PM |
|
Well I'm sold on this miner, 3 days and very stable once I got my 'clocks adjusted and right. Would love to see this as an available miner on SimpleMining OS
|
|
|
|
^BuTcH^
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 671
Merit: 103
Moni
|
|
October 23, 2017, 06:38:54 PM |
|
Well I'm sold on this miner, 3 days and very stable once I got my 'clocks adjusted and right. Would love to see this as an available miner on SimpleMining OS Can you share your core - mem settings? Thanks
|
|
|
|
W.T.R.
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 07:19:16 PM |
|
Hi there, is there a way to turn off 1 card when miner is working, or some cmd option to run only specific cards?
Tnx.
|
|
|
|
tf2addict
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:09:48 PM |
|
Giving this a try. Even 5 or 6% improvement helps.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:27:57 PM |
|
Hi there, is there a way to turn off 1 card when miner is working, or some cmd option to run only specific cards?
Tnx.
Yes, you can use the "--list-devices" option the get available devices and the '--dev' option to select them. To get help just lauch zm.exe without any parameters.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:29:44 PM |
|
Is it possible for next version get more from 1080ti?
Did you check that you are not cpu bound? Also try using an 1080Ti on a 16x pcie-bus.
|
|
|
|
Vispilio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1657
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:29:55 PM |
|
so has this become the Best and most stable miner for 1080 ti as well or just some for earlier versions ?..
|
|
|
|
UrsaUrsa
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 11
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:40:58 PM |
|
so has this become the Best and most stable miner for 1080 ti as well or just some for earlier versions ?..
It's good, probably better than EWBF besides stability because that's something that comes and goes at this stage. But dstm is working on it which is good.
|
|
|
|
alnash
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
October 23, 2017, 08:49:14 PM |
|
The latest version on Lin: $ ./zcash-zm.sh ./zm: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm) ./zm: /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm) Could not resolve hostname eu1.zcash-flypool.org
There is no dns entry for 'eu1.zcash-flypool.org' Try 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' I'm dumb... It works now. Compared to EWFB, your Linux version outputs about 10 sols more on my single 1060 3Gb. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Pustul
|
|
October 23, 2017, 09:55:41 PM |
|
I have problems when i try miner with HUSH on pool.miningspeed.com with my 1070 rigs. When i start the miner it says [20, "invalid solution XX"] as XX is number between 28-32.
Funny thing is that it works great on suprnova when i try it there. Maybe its something with the pool config or its the miner, but i want to report it anyway.
Same problem here with ZEN on miningspeed.com
|
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 24, 2017, 11:43:11 AM |
|
Whats the speed on 1060?
|
|
|
|
Elange
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2017, 01:42:13 PM |
|
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
October 24, 2017, 02:13:15 PM |
|
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Thx for reporting, this is a know bug, NameTaken had similar issues. It will be fixed in the next release - this path is unlikely to hit, zm 0.5.2 should reconnect properly in almost all cases.
|
|
|
|
laineux
|
|
October 24, 2017, 02:29:22 PM |
|
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Hi, I got the same problem with suprnova pool. I am using 0.5.2 on windows. Infinite loop. I just looked if I can had a list of pools but it seems impossible...
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
October 24, 2017, 02:39:52 PM |
|
Hi.
Tried out your miner. It is, in fact, about 10% faster than EWBF. However, it has a nasty bug that forced me to go back to EWBF.
I mine ZEC on nanopool, recently they've had some service disruptions. So, if pool drops connection, EWBF simply tries to reconnect and succeeds finally, while dstm's ZM miner goes into "0 connection closed by server - reconnecting..." infinite loop, scrolling text very fast and never actually resumes mining.
Using Linux version under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
Thanks!
Hi, I got the same problem with suprnova pool. I am using 0.5.2 on windows. Infinite loop. I just looked if I can had a list of pools but it seems impossible... Could you pls post the suprnava server and port you're using, I'll test the current dev branch against it.
|
|
|
|
chancefx
Member
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 10
In Decentralization We Trust
|
|
October 24, 2017, 03:46:16 PM Last edit: October 24, 2017, 03:59:57 PM by chancefx |
|
is there any --log command? don't find on first page
|
|
|
|
SpecialX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
October 24, 2017, 03:56:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
chancefx
Member
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 10
In Decentralization We Trust
|
|
October 24, 2017, 03:59:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|