Bitcoin Forum
March 24, 2019, 06:07:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 172 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 221690 times)
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 09:59:53 AM
 #1441

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.
1553407668
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553407668

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553407668
Reply with quote  #2

1553407668
Report to moderator
1553407668
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553407668

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553407668
Reply with quote  #2

1553407668
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1553407668
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553407668

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1553407668
Reply with quote  #2

1553407668
Report to moderator
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 10:02:38 AM
 #1442

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job Smiley

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------


Quote
  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 518.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 525.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 7.76   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 516.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 7.46   1.00 47  ++
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
>  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 503.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 520.7  I/s: 269.7  Sh: 7.67   1.00 46  +++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.4  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 521.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.71   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 531.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.97   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 526.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.8  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 6.57   1.00 39  ++++
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 523.7  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.9  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.24   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.72   1.00 63
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.74   1.00 70  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.76   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.2  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.77   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.41   1.00 47
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.44   1.00 55  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 529.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.64   1.00 57  +++
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.6  Sh: 5.34   1.00 57
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.26   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 519.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.5  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.02   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 4.93   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.9  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 282.1  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  ++++

Thx for the report.                                                                                                           
Are you thinking about a unix daemon? This isn't available on windows, I don't want to diverge the versions without a good reason, I'll do ofc if there is one. If you're mainly interested in disabling the output you can redirect it to /dev/null or/and start it in your init system (e.g. using systemd).

What colors and where would improve readability?
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 10:06:34 AM
 #1443

I'm having issues with memory errors after 6 hours, is there a restart script i can use in my .bat ?

This might be helpful
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2021765.msg25337530#msg25337530
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 10:10:38 AM
 #1444

Dear envelopment team dstm ZM
Could you help me fix error follow this picture,
I cant mine ZM

............
Sever set difficulty to : .....

Any my PC lagging, need to be restart
Provide more information about your hardware and software
Launch config?

I take a pict faile when mining via ZM "I'm using Mikrotik router board".
It is ok when i used another modem "not mikrotik"
Can you help me fix this problem

Thanks - Pila

https://uphinhnhanh.com/images/2017/11/29/dstmfailse.png

There something wrong with the router, it sometimes even fails to resolve the dns name, sry can't help - you have to check what's going wrong on the router side.
akuci
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 10:29:32 AM
 #1445

You need to add some space betwen 2 groups of readings, like 2 line space in between after the total hash, and the first gpu stats in the next readout. I really have trouble to read the information from the miner quickly.
Also some colors will be nice. Temps green, yellow and red like in EWBF.

Some things to add also: fan precentage readout, power readout in W (in miner window, not in telemetry).
k3rt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 04:12:32 PM
 #1446

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?
shibob
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 153


Native Vietnamese, Professional Translator


View Profile WWW
November 29, 2017, 04:20:00 PM
 #1447

I am currently reading through all 73 pages of this thread. Does ZM have some tools for overclocking or do you all use some other tools (xorg.conf)?

Wow, you are so eager for learning. I dont think ZM integrates any overclocking function or tool.
So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.

k3rt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 04:26:03 PM
 #1448

So I think for most of us, we use MSI Afterburner or EVGA Precision XOC.
What if I have a plain Ubuntu without the GUI? Just a terminal Cheesy

Since I want to control everything via SSH, without any GUI.
crazydane
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 155



View Profile
November 29, 2017, 04:46:27 PM
 #1449

Hi. Thx for the miner.

Small suggestion about API: can you please add GPU model to JSON-RPC responce? Thx!

This was requested already. It seems like this information isn't available on linux. It's on my notes, I'll take a closer look at it later.

You should be able to do something like this to at least get the vendor added:

Code:
#!/bin/bash

DEVICE_IDS=$(nvidia-smi --query-gpu=pci.sub_device_id --format=csv,noheader,nounits)
i=0

for ID in $DEVICE_IDS
do
   VENDOR_ID=${ID:6:5}
  
   # GPU Query, 3842=EVGA, 1462=MSI, 10DE=Nvidia, 19DA=Zotac, 807D=Asus, 1458=Gigabyte
   case $VENDOR_ID in
      3842) VENDOR_ID="EVGA";;
      1462) VENDOR_ID="MSI";;
      10DE) VENDOR_ID="NVIDIA";;
      19DA) VENDOR_ID="ZOTAC";;
      807D) VENDOR_ID="ASUS";;
      1458) VENDOR_ID="GIGABYTE";;
   esac
  
   MODEL=$(nvidia-smi -i $i --query-gpu=name --format=csv,noheader,nounits | tail -1)
  
   echo "$i,$VENDOR_ID,$MODEL"
  
   i=$(($i + 1))
done
abudfv2008
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 588
Merit: 105


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 05:12:18 PM
Last edit: November 29, 2017, 05:29:15 PM by abudfv2008
 #1450

I was observing that thread since 0.3x version and your miner looks interesting.

Today finally I tested it. Unfortunately I noticed that I've a bit lower hashrate than on EWBF. ~520-525 vs 530-550 Sol/s. I've GTX 1080.

Temperatures and power use is similar (68C and 165-170W). 85% TDP. Memory +200mhz.
I set vcore to +80mhz. On EWBF maximum was +60mhz (it crashed even on 65mhz after 24h). I'm not testing your miner long time but looks more stable. On EWBF +80mhz gets me fast crash.

I hope that you will be able to increase performance for GTX 1080 too because as opposed to gtx 1060 and 1080ti, currently EWBF looks more efficient for me.

Also to my mind you could use some colors to make it more transparent to read and ability to run on background (--quiet/--background?). Thanks for your job Smiley

PS. Sol/W is great option. I'll be able to better OC my card with it.

----------
edit:
crash after 3-4 hours. I'll try with +75mhz..
---------


Quote
  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 518.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 525.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 7.76   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 516.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 7.46   1.00 47  ++
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a0a...
>  GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 503.6  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 520.7  I/s: 269.7  Sh: 7.67   1.00 46  +++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.4  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 521.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.71   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 531.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.97   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 526.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.8  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 6.57   1.00 39  ++++
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 523.7  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 522.9  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 6.24   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  67C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.72   1.00 63
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.5  Sol/W: 3.14  Avg: 523.0  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.74   1.00 70  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.1  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.76   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.2  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.77   1.00 47  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.3  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.41   1.00 47
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 524.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.44   1.00 55  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 529.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 5.64   1.00 57  +++
>  GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.8  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.6  Sh: 5.34   1.00 57
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.7  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.6  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 525.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.7  I/s: 280.3  Sh: 5.26   1.00 46  ++
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 519.0  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.5  I/s: 280.4  Sh: 5.02   1.00 46
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 521.1  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 280.5  Sh: 4.93   1.00 63  +
   GPU0  68C  Sol/s: 523.9  Sol/W: 3.13  Avg: 523.4  I/s: 282.1  Sh: 5.23   1.00 47  ++++
Agree with some space for improvements with 1080. But for me dsmt is slighlty faster. (maybe because with the same settings GPU is running on higher frequency)



lolmining
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 07:09:41 PM
 #1451

Small, 2.6% improvement over EWBF.

Code:
   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.2  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 767.5  I/s: 411.1  Sh: 5.37   1.00 104 ++
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 761.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.34   1.00 105 +
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 775.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 6.73   1.00 94  +
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.12   1.00 95  +++
>  GPU4  58C  Sol/s: 715.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 384.9  Sh: 7.15   1.00 82
   ========== Sol/s: 3788.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2029.5 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 754.5  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.36   1.00 93  +
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.36   1.00 99  +++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.6  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 6.72   1.00 109 +
   GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 759.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.8  I/s: 408.3  Sh: 7.13   1.00 103 +++
   GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 788.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.2  I/s: 424.2  Sh: 7.16   1.00 104 +++
   ========== Sol/s: 3844.9 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2065.7 Sh: 31.72  1.00 101
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.4  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 5.33   1.00 93
>  GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 767.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.36   1.00 94  ++
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 6.70   1.00 110 +
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 760.5  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 7.11   1.00 93  +
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 807.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.6  Sh: 7.14   1.00 94  +
   ========== Sol/s: 3876.8 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.9 I/s: 2069.6 Sh: 31.64  1.00 96
   GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 752.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 767.4  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 5.32   1.00 94  +
   GPU2  53C  Sol/s: 770.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.4  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.39   1.00 101 ++++
   GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 767.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.0  I/s: 411.2  Sh: 6.69   1.00 102 ++
>  GPU3  52C  Sol/s: 755.2  Sol/W: 3.23  Avg: 762.7  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 7.12   1.00 96  +++
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.3  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 7.19   1.00 90  ++++++
   ========== Sol/s: 3841.6 Sol/W: 3.20  Avg: 3863.8 I/s: 2069.3 Sh: 31.72  1.00 96

cTnko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 10:14:25 PM
 #1452

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?

lolmining
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 11:13:21 PM
 #1453

Code:
#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.9  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.21   0.99 110
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.91   1.00 94
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 765.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.41   1.00 125
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 761.7  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.65   1.00 109
#  GPU0  server set difficulty to: 000f0f0f0f00000000000000...
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 791.0  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 794.9  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.38   0.98 98
========== Sol/s: 3859.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.1 I/s: 2073.2 Sh: 26.56  0.99 107
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU1  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU2  server set difficulty to: 000787878780000000000000...
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.8  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.32   0.97 94
>  GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 772.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.5  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.89   1.00 94
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.45   1.00 99
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.0  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.62   1.00 110
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 805.8  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.39   0.98 101
========== Sol/s: 3886.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.6 Sh: 26.67  0.99 99
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 756.6  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.40   0.96 85
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 777.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 4.87   1.00 93
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.8  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.46   1.00 93
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 762.1  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.9  Sh: 5.62   1.00 101
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 802.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.9  Sh: 5.36   0.98 109
========== Sol/s: 3870.1 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2068.9 Sh: 26.70  0.99 96
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.40   0.96 94
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 771.7  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.84   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 776.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 771.9  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.47   1.00 109
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 755.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.0  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.63   1.00 109
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 797.6  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 425.5  Sh: 5.33   0.98 93
========== Sol/s: 3873.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.2 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.67  0.99 102
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.44   0.95 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 773.0  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.82   1.00 109
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 783.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 413.1  Sh: 5.57   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 774.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 78
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 796.3  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.31   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3898.4 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2073.0 Sh: 26.74  0.99 98
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 768.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.6  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.48   0.94 86
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 769.5  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 410.8  Sh: 4.81   1.00 94
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 771.3  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 5.60   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 767.8  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 408.6  Sh: 5.60   1.00 110
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 789.2  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.25   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3866.2 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.5 I/s: 2067.2 Sh: 26.74  0.98 97
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 776.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.58   0.92 109
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.4  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.82   1.00 101
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 777.9  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 412.8  Sh: 5.54   1.00 89
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.9  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 410.2  Sh: 5.57   1.00 94
>  GPU4  60C  Sol/s: 797.5  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 426.2  Sh: 5.23   0.98 110
========== Sol/s: 3892.5 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.7 I/s: 2074.0 Sh: 26.74  0.98 100
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 773.4  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 5.68   0.92 97
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 768.1  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.7  I/s: 411.8  Sh: 4.83   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 772.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.1  I/s: 413.0  Sh: 5.58   1.00 88
>  GPU3  51C  Sol/s: 765.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.58   1.00 86
>  GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 790.9  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.0  I/s: 425.8  Sh: 5.20   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3869.8 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2072.7 Sh: 26.87  0.98 85
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 769.1  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 412.4  Sh: 5.68   0.92 78
#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]
GPU1  54C  Sol/s: 774.9  Sol/W: 3.25  Avg: 769.8  I/s: 412.1  Sh: 4.78   1.00 78
GPU2  54C  Sol/s: 768.0  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 772.0  I/s: 412.7  Sh: 5.52   1.00 88
GPU3  50C  Sol/s: 763.2  Sol/W: 3.24  Avg: 765.1  I/s: 409.9  Sh: 5.55   1.00 94
GPU4  59C  Sol/s: 798.4  Sol/W: 3.01  Avg: 795.1  I/s: 424.6  Sh: 5.15   0.98 78
========== Sol/s: 3873.7 Sol/W: 3.21  Avg: 3872.6 I/s: 2071.7 Sh: 26.68  0.98 83
GPU0  58C  Sol/s: 764.8  Sol/W: 3.26  Avg: 770.7  I/s: 411.5  Sh: 5.65   0.91 94


#  GPU0  rejected share: [1,"Share above target.",null]

whats that?
baga105
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 360
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 11:19:30 PM
 #1454

So is this better than Ewbf for Zec mining?

Ass, Gas or Grass! No one rides for free!
cTnko
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 29, 2017, 11:53:36 PM
 #1455

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?



Too much OC made your GPU hang, either reboot or reset drivers with nvidia inspector, it should unlock the GPU's and u'll be able to kill the ZM process. Dtsm work very differently of other Zcash miners, you need to take another approach of your PL/OC otherwise u'll never find your sweetspot or completly miss the mark.

Good luck.

Thank you, but i know pretty much all of that, i have been mining for quite some time now.
What i wanted to know was why the miner process didn't exit, pretty much all other miners i tried force closed them selves after a critical error like this one.
While i can write my self a script that can monitor the reported hashrate from json data and force close the process or reboot the machine when desired, if the miner could close it self like all the others it would make things much simpler for most miners out there, since most people use infinite while loop scripts that simply restarts the process after it exits.
lolmining
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 04:26:45 AM
 #1456

So is this better than Ewbf for Zec mining?

so far not quite. On 1080ti's I cant get better than 2.6%. power consumption is roughly the same. What bad is that miner is unstable and on nicehash pool creates a lot of rejected shares. I switched back to EWBF and 100% shares are good.
Makak4R
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 111



View Profile
November 30, 2017, 04:55:30 AM
 #1457

So is this better than Ewbf for Zec mining?

so far not quite. On 1080ti's I cant get better than 2.6%. power consumption is roughly the same. What bad is that miner is unstable and on nicehash pool creates a lot of rejected shares. I switched back to EWBF and 100% shares are good.

don't forget, that there is a dev fee integrated, while ewbf you can run without it
so that means - they are basically have same speed.
and if in your case nicehash have rejected some share from dstm - that's maybe some configuration errors?

DeepOnion    ▬▬  Anonymous and Untraceable  ▬▬    ENJOY YOUR PRIVACY  •  JOIN DEEPONION
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐   ANN  Whitepaper  Facebook  Twitter  Telegram  Discord    ▌▌▌▌▌▌▌▌
Get $ONION  (✔Cryptopia  ✔KuCoin)  |  VoteCentral  Register NOW!  |  Download DeepOnion
timbereagle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 30, 2017, 05:26:12 AM
 #1458

DEV please reduce fee to maximum %1.

You are doing good job but %2 very high fee when your miner is only %2-3 faster then competitor.

 
Herbalking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 07:04:29 AM
 #1459

on new version after few days to many time rec.. is this problem with my oc?
https://image.prntscr.com/image/cvAZuR5cR_eP4oooxBDYKQ.png
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 30, 2017, 09:10:08 AM
 #1460

@dstm Is there any reason why the process wouldn't exit on its own under such condition?


Thx for reporting. 0.5.6 has some changes how it handles GPU crashes - it contains some initial recover infrastructure. Previous versions exited immediately in this case - I'll look into it.
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 172 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!